Prognostic significance of hematoma thickness to midline shift ratio in patients with acute intracranial subdural hematoma: a retrospective study
- 119 Downloads
Acute intracranial subdural hematoma (ASDH) is commonly associated with a grave prognosis citing a high incidence of morbidity and mortality. The parameters to decide on surgical evacuation of the hematoma are sometimes controversial. In this study, we theorized that the ratio between maximal hematoma thickness and midline shift would be varied by associated intrinsic brain pathology emanating from the trauma and would thus objectively evaluates the prognosis in ASDH. The records of patients diagnosed with ASDH who were submitted to surgical evacuation through a craniotomy were revised. Data collected included basic demographic data, preoperative general and neurological examinations, and radiological findings. The maximal thickness of the hematoma (H) on the preoperative CT brain was divided by the midline shift at the same level (MS) formulating the H/MS ratio. Postoperative data obtained included Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), and follow-up period. Sixty-seven eligible patients were included in the study, of which 53 (79.1%) patients were males. Mean age was 34 years. The H/MS ratio ranged from 0.69 to 1.8 with a mean of 0.93. Age above 50 years (P = 0.0218), admission GCS of less than 6 (0.0482), and H/MS ratio of 0.79 or less (P = 0.00435) were negative prognostic factors and correlated with a low postoperative GCS and GOS. H/MS ratio is a useful prognostic tool in patients diagnosed with ASDH and can be added to the armamentarium of data to improve the management decision in this cohort of patients.
KeywordsAcute subdural hematoma (ASDH) Hematoma thickness/midline shift ratio (H/MS) Prognosis Glasgow Coma scale (GCS) Glasgow outcome scale (GOS)
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.
No funding was received for this research.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Amenta PS, Jallo J (2014) ICU care. Traumatic Brain Injury:87–114Google Scholar
- 4.Bullock MR, Chesnut R, Ghajar J, Gordon D, Hartl R, Newell DW, Servadei F, Walters BC, Wilberger JE (2006) Surgical Management of Acute Subdural Hematomas. Neurosurgery 58:S2-16–S2-24Google Scholar
- 10.Gerard C, Busl KM: (2014) Treatment of acute subdural hematoma. Curr Treat Options Neurol 16Google Scholar
- 12.Hlatky R, Valadka AB, Goodman JC, Robertson CS (2004) Evolution of brain tissue injury after evacuation of acute traumatic subdural hematomas. Neurosurgery:1318–1324Google Scholar
- 25.Pilitsis J, Atwater B, Warden D, Deck G, Carroll J, Smith J, Sing Chau Ng, Tseng J: (2013) Outcomes in octogenarians with subdural hematomas. Clin Neurol NeurosurgGoogle Scholar
- 31.Tjahjadi M, Arifin MZ, Gill AS, Faried A: (2013) Early mortality predictor of severe traumatic brain injury: a single center study of prognostic variables based on admission characteristics. Indian J NeurotraumaGoogle Scholar
- 32.Tsang KK, Whitfield PC: (2011) Traumatic brain injury: review of current management strategies. British J Oral Maxillofacial SurgGoogle Scholar
- 38.Zacko JC, Harris L, Bullock MB (2011) Surgical management of traumatic brain injury. Youmans Neurol Surg:3424–3452Google Scholar