Skip to main content
Log in

Teflon granuloma after microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: a case report and literature review

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teflon has been commonly used as a surgical material. In particular, Teflon has been considered suitable for microvascular decompression of cranial nerves, as it is a stable, inert substance that does not resorb or migrate. Giant cell foreign body reactions after microvascular decompression (MVD) have been reported, but this rare complication has not been well recognized. Here, we report one case of Teflon granuloma that occurred 4 years after MVD for hemifacial spasm. We discuss the cause, histopathological analysis, particular MVD surgical methods, and management of Teflon granuloma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baker FG II, Janetta PJ, Bissonette DJ, Larkins MV, Jho HD (1996) The long-term outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. N Engl J Med 334:1077–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bederson JB, Wilson CB (1989) Evaluation of microvascular decompression and partial rhizotomy in 252 cases of trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 71:359–367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bejjani GK, Shekhar LN (1997) Repositioning of the vertebral artery as treatment for neurovascular compression syndromes: technical note. J Neurosurg 86:728–732

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Capelle HH, Brandis A, Tschan CA, Krauss JK (2010) Treatment of recurrent trigeminal neuralgia due to Teflon granuloma. J Headache Pain 11:339–344

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen J, Lee S, Lui T, Yen Y, Chen T, Tzaan W (2000) Teflon granuloma after microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Surg Neurol 53:281–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chung R, Piper MA, Boland TJ (1993) Recurrent giant cell reaction to residual Proplast in the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 76:9–16

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dedo HH, Carlsoo B (1982) Histologic evaluation of Teflon granulomas of human vocal codes: a light and electron microscopic study. Acta Otolaryngol 93:475–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Deep NL, Graffeo CS, Copeland WR III, Link MJ, Atkinson JL, Neff BA et al (2016) Teflon granuloma mimicking cerebellopontine angle tumors following microvascular decompression. Laryngoscope 126:E310–E313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Engh JA, Horowitz M, Burkhart L, Chang YF, Kassam A (2005) Repeat microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:1574–1580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Fukushima T (1984) Results of posterior fossa microvascular decompression in the treatment of hemifacial spasm. Facial N Res Jpn 4:9–14 Japanese

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goya T, Wakisaka S, Kinoshita K (1990) Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia with special reference to delayed recurrence. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 30:462–467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jagannath PM, Venkataramana NK, Bansal A, Ravichandra M (2012) Outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia using autologous muscle draft: a five-year prospective study. Asian J Neurosurg 7:125–130

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Janetta PJ, Tew PJ Jr (1979) Treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 4:93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsushima T, Yamaguchi T, Inoue TK, Matsukado K, Fukui M (2000) Recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression using an interposing technique. Teflon belt adhesion and the sling retraction technique. Acta Neurochir 142:557–561

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Megerian CA, Busaba NY, McKenna MJ, Ojemann RG (1995) Teflon granuloma presenting as an enlarging, gadolinium enhancing posterior fossa mass with progressive hearing loss following microvascular decompression. Am J Otol 16:783–786

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Park YS, Chang JH, Cho J, Park YG, Chung SS, Chung JW (2006) Reoperation for persistent or recurrent hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression. Neurosurgery 58:1162–1167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Premsagar IC, Moss T, Cakham HB (1997) Teflon-induced granuloma following treatment of trigeminal neuralgia by microvascular decompression: report of two cases. J Neurosurg 87:454–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Skinner HA (1931) Some histologic features of the cranial nerves. Arch Neuro Psychiatry 25:356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tanaka Y, Uchida M, Onodera H, Hiromoto J, Yoshida Y (2014) Simple transposition technique for microvascular decompression using an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene “belt”: technical note. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 54:483–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Toth G, Rubeiz H, Macdonald RL (2007) Polytetrafluoroethlene-induced granuloma and brainstem cyst after microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: case report. Neurosurgery 61:875–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Hiroyuki Enomoto M.D. for useful discussions. I am grateful for assistance with the numerical simulations and carefully proofreading this manuscript from him.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazunori Oda.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from 61-year-old male with recurrent left-sided facial paralysis, progressive hearing loss and fever as the case presented.

Electronic supplementary material

(MP4 181,917 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oda, K., Higuchi, T., Murai, Y. et al. Teflon granuloma after microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: a case report and literature review. Neurosurg Rev 40, 513–516 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-017-0865-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-017-0865-5

Keywords

Navigation