Skip to main content
Log in

Paradigms for single-patient multimodality treatment for cerebral aneurysms: single-center eleven-year experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Endovascular and surgical techniques are conventional options for treating intracranial aneurysms, but criteria for selecting an optimal approach for individual patients remain variable across practitioners and institutions. While endovascular and surgical approaches are generally used alone, both modalities combined in single patients can produce efficacious outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of combined, concomitant endovascular and surgical modalities in the treatment of multiple and/or complex aneurysms in single patients. Indications, sequencing rationale, and categorization for multimodality treatments are reviewed. All intracranial aneurysms treated at our institution from 2004 to 2014 were reviewed. Single patients who had undergone concomitant endovascular and surgical treatments were eligible for participation in our study. Demographic data and clinical presentation parameters, including location, size, and morphological features of lesions, treatment sequencing, and outcomes were recorded. Our cohort consisted of 27 patients with 57 aneurysms who received concomitant endovascular and surgical treatment of their aneurysm(s). One patient arrived to us after he had an aneurysm clipped at an outside institution and then required treatment for a contralateral ruptured aneurysm. 66.7% of patients were diagnosed with subarachnoid hemorrhage. These were subdivided according to therapeutic approach: clipping and coiling (CL+CO), clipping and stenting (CL+ST), bypass and endovascular parent vessel occlusion (PVO) (BY+PVO), attempted clipping then stenting, and bypass followed by stenting. Glasgow Outcome Scale was as follows: CL-CO-Multiple, 4.17 (five in unruptured patients, 3.75 in ruptured); CO-CL-Multiple, five (all patients had a ruptured aneurysm); CL-CO-Single, three (all patients had a ruptured aneurysm); CO-CL-Single, five (all patients had a ruptured aneurysm). No patients suffered a new neurological deficit as a result of treatment. A total of two mortalities were documented. Concomitant, mutimodality endovascular and surgical therapy may offer a safe and potentially more effective paradigm than single modality approaches for the management of multiple, complex, or “failed” aneurysm treatments in selected patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed O, Kalakoti P, Hefner M, Cuellar H, Guthikonda B (2015) Seven intracranial aneurysms in one patient: treatment and review of literature. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg 17:113–119

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnautovic KI, Al-Mefty O, Angtuaco E (1998) A combined microsurgical skull-base and endovascular approach to giant and large paraclinoid aneurysms. Surg Neurol 50:504–518 discussion 518-520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brisman JL, Roonprapunt C, Song JK, Niimi Y, Setton A, Berenstein A, Flamm ES (2004) Intentional partial coil occlusion followed by delayed clip application to wide-necked middle cerebral artery aneurysms in patients presenting with severe vasospasm. Report of two cases Journal of neurosurgery 101:154–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Choudhri O, Mukerji N, Steinberg GK (2013) Combined endovascular and microsurgical management of complex cerebral aneurysms. Front Neurol 4:108

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Civit T, Auque J, Marchal JC, Bracard S, Picard L, Hepner H (1996) Aneurysm clipping after endovascular treatment with coils: a report of eight patients. Neurosurgery 38:955–960 discussion 960-951

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cockroft KM, Marks MP, Steinberg GK (2000) Planned direct dual-modality treatment of complex broad-necked intracranial aneurysms: four technical case reports. Neurosurgery 46:226–230 discussion 230-221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cui L, Peng Q, Ha W, Zhou D, Xu Y (2009) Parent artery occlusion for intracranial aneurysms. Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences 15:309–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Darsaut TE, Jack AS, Kerr RS, Raymond J (2013) International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial—ISAT part II: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 14:156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hacein-Bey L, Connolly ES Jr, Mayer SA, Young WL, Pile-Spellman J, Solomon RA (1998) Complex intracranial aneurysms: combined operative and endovascular approaches. Neurosurgery 43:1304–1312 discussion 1312-1303

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanel RA, Spetzler RF (2008) Surgical treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 62:1289–1297 discussion 1297-1289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoh BL, Putman CM, Budzik RF, Carter BS, Ogilvy CS (2001) Combined surgical and endovascular techniques of flow alteration to treat fusiform and complex wide-necked intracranial aneurysms that are unsuitable for clipping or coil embolization. J Neurosurg 95:24–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lawton MT, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Sanai N, Malek JY, Dowd CF (2003) Combined microsurgical and endovascular management of complex intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 52:263–274 discussion 274-265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marks MP, Steinberg GK, Lane B (1995) Combined use of endovascular coils and surgical clipping for intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 16:15–18

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsumoto Y, Kondo R, Matsumori Y, Shimizu H, Takahashi A, Tominaga T (2012) Antiplatelet therapy for prevention of thromboembolic complications associated with coil embolization of unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Drugs R D 12:1–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Molyneux AJ, Birks J, Clarke A, Sneade M, Kerr RS (2015) The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Lancet 385:691–697

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, Clarke M, Sneade M, Yarnold JA, Sandercock P, International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial Collaborative G (2005) International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 366:809–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nieuwkamp DJ, Setz LE, Algra A, Linn FH, de Rooij NK, Rinkel GJ (2009) Changes in case fatality of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and region: a meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 8:635–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pandey P, Rayes M, Hong D, Guthikonda M, Xavier A (2011) Endovascular management of a giant aneurysm through saphenous vein graft after extracranial-intracranial bypass: case report and literature review. Journal of neurointerventional surgery 3:361–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosen DS, Macdonald RL (2005) Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care 2:110–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang YJ, Barrow DL, Cawley CM, Dion JE (2003) Neurosurgical management of intracranial aneurysms previously treated with endovascular therapy. Neurosurgery 52:283–293 discussion 293-285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Chalif.

Ethics declarations

Funding

There was no funding, institutional, or national grant associated with this project.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alobaid, A., Nossek, E., Wagner, K. et al. Paradigms for single-patient multimodality treatment for cerebral aneurysms: single-center eleven-year experience. Neurosurg Rev 40, 495–506 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-016-0810-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-016-0810-z

Keywords

Navigation