Skip to main content

Is flow diversion the death of cerebral bypass and coiling/stent-assisted coiling for giant cavernous aneurysms? A critical review on comparative outcomes and ongoing clinical trials

Neurosurgical Review volume 36, pages 505–512 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

The classic surgical treatment for symptomatic giant aneurysms originating from the cavernous segment of the carotid artery has been either microsurgical direct clip-reconstruction or carotid occlusion followed by additional cerebral bypass for those patients who fail in a balloon test occlusion. Nevertheless the emergence of new endovascular techniques, especially flow-diverting devices, has promised to revolutionize the treatment of giant cavernous aneurysms, possibly avoiding major microsurgical operations. In this review the authors summarize the current “state-of-art” of treatment of giant cavernous aneurysms, comparing the overall outcomes, complications, morbidity and mortality rates of new flow-diverting devices in relation to traditional microsurgical series.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Balt International: Multicenter randomized trial on selective endovascular aneurysm occlusion with coils versus parent vessel reconstruction using the SILK flow diverter (MARCO POLO post-market clinical investigation) - http://174.129.253.118/clinical-trial/NCT01084681/. Accessed 5 June 2012

  2. Benitez RP, Silva MT, Klem J, Veznedaroglu E, Rosenwasser RH (2004) Endovascular occlusion of wide-necked aneurysms with a new intracranial microstent (Neuroform) and detachable coils. Neurosurgery 54:1359–1368

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biondi A, Janardhan V, Katz JM, Salvaggio K, Riina HA, Gobin YP (2007) Neuroform stent-assisted coil embolization of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: strategies in stent deployment and midterm follow-up. Neurosurgery 61:460–469

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brinjikji W, Cloft HJ, Fiorella D, Lanzino G, Kallmes DF (2013) Estimating the proportion of intracranial aneurysms likely to be amenable to treatment with the pipeline embolization device. J Neurointerv Surg 5(1):45–48

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Byrne JV, Beltechi R, Yarnold JA, Birks J, Kamran M (2010) Early experience in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PLoS One 5:e12492

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cantore G, Santoro A, Guidetti G, Delfinis CP, Colonnese C, Passacantilli E (2008) Surgical treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms: current viewpoint. Neurosurgery 63:279–289

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carter BS, Ogilvy CS, Putman C, Ojemann RG (2000) Selective use of extracranialintracranial bypass as an adjunct to therapeutic internal carotid artery occlusion. Clin Neurosurg 46:351–362

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung J, Kim BM, Lim YC (2012) Five overlapping enterprise stents in the internal carotid artery-to-middle cerebral artery to treat a ruptured blood blister-like aneurysm. Neurol Sci, Oct 31 [Epub ahead of print]

  9. Crobeddu E, Lanzino G, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ (2012) Marked decrease in coil and stent utilization following introduction of flow diversion technology. J Neurointerv Surg, Apr 27. [Epub ahead of print]

  10. Cruz JP, Chow M, O'Kelly C, Marotta B, Spears J, Montanera W, Fiorella D, Marotta T (2012) Delayed ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage following flow diversion for the treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms. J Neuroradiol 33:603–608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dobson G, Flewitt J, Tyberg JV, Moore R, Karamanoglu M (2006) Endografting of the descending thoracic aorta increases ascending aortic input impedance and attenuates pressure transmission in dogs. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 32:129–135

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dolenc VV (1999) Extradural approach to intracavernous ICA aneurysms. Acta Neurochir Suppl 72:99–106

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fargen KM, Hoh BL, Welch BG et al (2012) Long-term results of enterprise stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 71:239–244

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fiorella D, Woo H, Albuquerque FC, Nelson PK (2008) Definitive reconstruction of circumferential, fusiform intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 62:1115–1120

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fiorella D, Lylyk P, Szikora I, Kelly ME, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG, Nelson PK (2009) Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline embolization device: the emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 1:56–65

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fraser JF SM, Patsalides A, Riina HA, Gobin YP, Stieg PE (2011) Principles in case-based aneurysm treatment: approaching complex lesions excluded by International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) criteria. World Neurosurg 75:462–475

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kallmes DF, Ding YH, Dai D, Kadirvel R, Lewis DA, Cloft HJ (2007) A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 38:2346–2352

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leonardi MCL, Toni F, Dall'olio M, Princiotta C, Stafa A, Simonetti L, Agati R (2011) Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using flow-diverting silk stents (BALT): a single centre experience. Interv Neuroradiol 17:306–315

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lylyk P, Miranda C, Ceratto R, Ferrario A, Scrivano E, Luna HR, Berez AL, Tran Q, Nelson PK, Fiorella D (2009) Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 64:632–642

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gelber BR, Sund TM (1980) Treatment of intracavernous and giant carotid aneurysms by combined internal carotid ligation and extra- to intracranial bypass. J Neurosurg 52:1–10

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Grunwald IQ, Kamran M, Corkill RA, Kühn AL, Choi IS, Turnbull S, Dobson D, Fassbender K, Watson D, Gounis MJ (2012) Simple measurement of aneurysm residual after treatment: the SMART scale for evaluation of intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diverters. Acta Neurochir 154:21–26

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ionita CN, Natarajan SK, Wang W, Hopkins LN, Levy EI, Siddiqui AH, Bednarek DR, Rudin S (2011) Evaluation of a second-generation self-expanding variable-porosity flow diverter in a rabbit elastase aneurysm model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:1399–1407

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Izar B, Rai A, Raghuram K, Rotruck J, Carpenter J (2011) Comparison of devices used for stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms. PLoS One 6:e24875

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jafar JJ, Russel SM, Woo HH (2002) Treatment of giant intracranial aneurisms with saphenous vein extracranial-to-intracranial bypass grafting: indications, operative technique, and results in 29 patients. Neurosurgery 51:138–146

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lawton MT, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Sanai N, Malek JY, Dowd CF (2008) Combined microsurgical and endovascular management of complex intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 62:1503–1515

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liou TM, Li YC (2008) Effects of stent porosity on hemodynamics in a sidewall aneurysm model. J Biomech 41:1174–1183

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mattei TA (2012) Pathophysiology of normal perfusion pressure breakthrough: more than just abnormal capillaries. Br J Neurosurg 26:786–787

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mut F, Cebral JR (2012) Effects of flow-diverting device oversizing on hemodynamics alteration in cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012 [Epub ahead of print]

  29. Nelson PKLP, Szikora I, Wetzel SG, Wanke I, Fiorella D (2011) The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:34–40

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Parkinson RJ, Eddleman CS, Batjer HH, Bendok BR (2006) Giant intracranial aneurysms: endovascular challenges. Neurosurgery 59:S103–S112

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pierot F (2011) Flow diverter stents in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: where are we? J Neuroradiol 38:40–46

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pumar JM, Garcia-Dorrego R, Nieto A, Vazquez-Herrero F, Blanco-Ulla M, Vazquez-Martin A (2010) Vascular reconstruction of a fusiform basilar aneurysm with the Silk embolization system. J Neurointerv Surg 2:242–244

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ramanathan D, Temkin N, Kim LJ, Ghodke B, Sekhar LN (2012) Cerebral bypasses for complex aneurysms and tumors: long-term results and graft management strategies. Neurosurgery 70:1442–1457

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. al-Rodhan NR, Piepgras DG, Sundt TM Jr (1993) Transitional cavernous aneurysms of the internal carotid artery. Neurosurgery 33:993–996

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. van Rooij WJ (2012) Endovascular treatment of cavernous sinus aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:323–326

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schaller B (2008) Extracranial-intracranial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in intracranial aneurysms of the anterior cerebral circulation: a systematic review. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 17:287–298

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sindou MKY, Debrun G, Decq P, Dolenc V, Duquesnel J, Gaston A, Guegan YHJ, Marsault C (1984) Giant intracranial aneurysms. Therapeutic, approaches. Neurochirurgie 30:1–128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tremmel M, Xiang J, Natarajan SK, Hopkins N, Siddiqui AH, Levy EI, Meng H (2010) Alteration of intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics for flow diversion using enterprise and vision stents. World Neurosurg 74:306–315

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Turowski B, Macht S, Kulcsár Z, Hänggi D, Stummer W (2011) Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (SILK–Stent). Neuroradiology 53:37–41

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wong GK, Kwan MC, Ng RY, Yu SC, Poon WS (2011) Flow diverters for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: current status and ongoing clinical trials. J Clin Neurosci 18:737–740

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, 828 NE Glen Oak, #302, Peoria, IL, 61603, USA

    Tobias A. Mattei

  2. Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA

    Andrew S. Ferrell

  3. Department of Neurosurgery, Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA

    Gavin W. Britz

Authors
  1. Tobias A. Mattei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew S. Ferrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gavin W. Britz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias A. Mattei.

Additional information

Comments

Paulo Henrique Pires de Aguiar; Sao Paolo, Brazil

The paper is well written, with many considerations regarding all options of intracavernous sinus aneurysm treatment. They classified in partial cavernous sinus aneurysm and pure cavernous sinus aneurysm treatment and performed a very interesting comparison between endovascular techniques and surgical techniques for the treatment of such aneurysms. The main point was the discussion about the complications of the flow divert devices, specially the physiopathological possibilities. In my opinion the second hypothesis showing a similar physiopathology of breakthrough is controversial, but it is mentioned in the literature .The conclusion is very important for further questions regarding the future use of flow divert devices. I mean that the Cordis Enterprise(TM) Self-expanding Intracranial Stent and Enterprise Stent Aneurysm Treatment Study shall bring new horizons for this very important topic.

Shokei Yamada, Loma Linda, USA

According to the authors, this article is intended to provide general neurosurgeons with the new technology of intravascular intervention. The emphasis is placed on intracavernous aneurysms, especially those with extra sinus extension into the intradural space. To circumvent difficulties with obliterating these aneurysms by clipping and coiling, they introduce flow-diverting devices, Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) and SILK system.

First, the PED is a new endovascular stent designed to exclude aneurysms from the parent cerebrovasculature. The technology of this stand-alone device with self-expanding mesh tube was initially thought to be highly effective in anatomically reconstructing large segmental vascular defects, and secondarily occluding wide-necked, giant aneurysms or fusiform aneurysms. Yet, the statistical information for successes is still limited.

Second, the SILK stent utilizes a braided mesh cylinder with flared ends, designed to provide 35–55 % metal coverage. Although this technology was claimed to be a valuable tool in the endovascular treatment of cavernous sinus aneurysms, only unruptured aneurysms are the target of this treatment. No statistical analysis of large series to evaluate procedural outcomes of these devices is available. The authors’ concern is rather the morbidity associated with the application of these new devices. MARCOPOLO studies by British groups were mentioned without referring to statistics.

The discussion section includes valuable pathophysiological analysis of the benefit and complications involved in the new technology. Despite their enthusiastic selection of an important subject, "the treatment of intracavernous sinus aneurysms with extracavernous extension,” the authors have not reached any conclusion as to which procedure they would advise for readers to select between the traditional surgical treatment (i.e., the aneurysm clipping or EC-IC bypass procedure) and the new intravascular procedures.

While these devices potentially show promise, further studies with hopefully, prospective, randomized controlled trials to support their use will occur. Currently, the literature does not support the use of these devices and they would still fall under the category of "investigational.”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mattei, T.A., Ferrell, A.S. & Britz, G.W. Is flow diversion the death of cerebral bypass and coiling/stent-assisted coiling for giant cavernous aneurysms? A critical review on comparative outcomes and ongoing clinical trials. Neurosurg Rev 36, 505–512 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-013-0459-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-013-0459-9

Keywords

  • Flow-diverting devices
  • Giant intracranial aneurysms
  • Cavernous sinus aneurysms
  • Pipeline device
  • Silk stent
  • Clinical trials