Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cervical spine metastases: techniques for anterior reconstruction and stabilization

  • Review
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The surgical management of cervical spine metastases continues to evolve and improve. The authors provide an overview of the various techniques for anterior reconstruction and stabilization of the subaxial cervical spine after corpectomy for spinal metastases. Vertebral body reconstruction can be accomplished using a variety of materials such as bone autograft/allograft, polymethylmethacrylate, interbody spacers, and/or cages with or without supplemental anterior cervical plating. In some instances, posterior instrumentation is needed for additional stabilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fornasier VL, Horne JG (1975) Metastases to the vertebral column. Cancer 36:590–594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobs WB, Perrin RG (2001) Evaluation and treatment of spinal metastases: an overview. Neurosurg Focus 11(6):e10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Black P (1979) Spinal metastasis: current status and recommended guidelines for management. Neurosurgery 5:726–746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Perrin RG, McBroom RJ (1988) Spinal fixation after anterior decompression for symptomatic spinal metastasis. Neurosurgery 22:324–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jenis LG, Dunn EJ, An HS (1999) Metastatic disease of the cervical spine. A review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 359:89–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Steinmetz MP, Mekhail A, Benzel EC (2001) Management of metastatic tumors of the spine: strategies and operative indications. Neurosurg Focus 11(6):e2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jonsson B, Jonsson H Jr, Karlstrom G, Sjostrom L (1994) Surgery of cervical spine metastases: a retrospective study. Eur Spine J 3:76–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eleraky M, Setzer M, Vrionis FD (2010) Posterior transpedicular corpectomy for malignant cervical spine tumors. Eur Spine J 19:257–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu JK, Apfelbaum RI, Chiles BW 3rd, Schmidt MH (2003) Cervical spinal metastasis: anterior reconstruction and stabilization techniques after tumor resection. Neurosurg Focus 15(5):E2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chuang HC, Wei ST, Lee HC, Chen CC, Lee WY, Cho DY (2008) Preliminary experience of titanium mesh cages for pathological fracture of middle and lower cervical vertebrae. J Clin Neurosci 15:1210–1215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fehlings MG, David KS, Vialle L, Vialle E, Setzer M, Vrionis FD (2009) Decision making in the surgical treatment of cervical spine metastases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:S108–S117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hammerberg KW (1992) Surgical treatment of metastatic spine disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:1148–1153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Katagiri H, Takahashi M, Inagaki J, Kobayashi H, Sugiura H, Yamamura S et al (1998) Clinical results of nonsurgical treatment for spinal metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 42:1127–1132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. DeWald RL, Bridwell KH, Prodromas C, Rodts MF (1985) Reconstructive spinal surgery as palliation for metastatic malignancies of the spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 10:21–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Oda I, Abumi K, Ito M, Kotani Y, Oya T, Hasegawa K et al (2006) Palliative spinal reconstruction using cervical pedicle screws for metastatic lesions of the spine: a retrospective analysis of 32 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:1439–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Klimo P Jr, Schmidt MH (2004) Surgical management of spinal metastases. Oncologist 9:188–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu JK, Apfelbaum RI, Schmidt MH (2004) Surgical management of cervical spinal metastasis: anterior reconstruction and stabilization techniques. Neurosurg Clin N Am 15:413–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sundaresan N, Steinberger AA, Moore F, Sachdev VP, Krol G, Hough L et al (1996) Indications and results of combined anterior–posterior approaches for spine tumor surgery. J Neurosurg 85:438–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fourney DR, Gokaslan ZL (2003) Spinal instability and deformity due to neoplastic conditions. Neurosurg Focus 14(1):e8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller DJ, Lang FF, Walsh GL, Abi-Said D, Wildrick DM, Gokaslan ZL (2000) Coaxial double-lumen methylmethacrylate reconstruction in the anterior cervical and upper thoracic spine after tumor resection. J Neurosurg 92:181–190

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Scoville WB, Palmer AH, Samra K, Chong G (1967) The use of acrylic plastic for vertebral replacement or fixation in metastatic disease of the spine. Technical note. J Neurosurg 27:274–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McAfee PC, Bohlman HH, Ducker T, Eismont FJ (1986) Failure of stabilization of the spine with methylmethacrylate. A retrospective analysis of twenty-four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:1145–1157

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dunn EJ (1977) The role of methyl methacrylate in the stabilization and replacement of tumors of the cervical spine: a project of the Cervical Spine Research Society. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sundaresan N, Galicich JH, Lane JM, Bains MS, McCormack P (1985) Treatment of neoplastic epidural cord compression by vertebral body resection and stabilization. J Neurosurg 63:676–684

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Harrington KD (1984) Anterior cord decompression and spinal stabilization for patients with metastatic lesions of the spine. J Neurosurg 61:107–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ono K, Yonenobu K, Ebara S, Fujiwara K, Yamashita K, Fuji T et al (1988) Prosthetic replacement surgery for cervical spine metastasis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13:817–822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Caspar W (1980) Die ventrale interkorporale stabilisierung mit der HWS-trapez-osteosyntheseplatte. indikationen, technik, ergebnisse. Orthop Prax 12:981–988

    Google Scholar 

  28. Arts MP, Peul WC (2008) Vertebral body replacement systems with expandable cages in the treatment of various spinal pathologies: a prospectively followed case series of 60 patients. Neurosurgery 63:537–544, discussion 544–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Auguste KI, Chin C, Acosta FL, Ames CP (2006) Expandable cylindrical cages in the cervical spine: a review of 22 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 4:285–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Clausen JD, Ryken TC, Traynelis VC, Sawin PD, Dexter F, Goel VK (1996) Biomechanical evaluation of caspar and cervical spine locking plate systems in a cadaveric model. J Neurosurg 84:1039–1045

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Caspar W, Pitzen T, Papavero L, Geisler FH, Johnson TA (1999) Anterior cervical plating for the treatment of neoplasms in the cervical vertebrae. J Neurosurg 90:27–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cooper PR, Errico TJ, Martin R, Crawford B, DiBartolo T (1993) A systematic approach to spinal reconstruction after anterior decompression for neoplastic disease of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Neurosurgery 32:1–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Harrington KD (1988) Anterior decompression and stabilization of the spine as a treatment for vertebral collapse and spinal cord compression from metastatic malignancy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 233:177–197

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Das K, Couldwell WT, Sava G, Taddonio RF (2001) Use of cylindrical titanium mesh and locking plates in anterior cervical fusion. Technical note. J Neurosurg 94:174–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Majd ME, Vadhva M, Holt RT (1999) Anterior cervical reconstruction using titanium cages with anterior plating. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1604–1610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu JK, Rosenberg WS, Schmidt MH (2005) Titanium cage-assisted polymethylmethacrylate reconstruction for cervical spinal metastasis: technical note. Neurosurgery 56:E207

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sung S, Jeon B, Suk H, Kim Y, Park Y (2007) Anterior cervical stabilization for cervical spinal metastases. Kor J Spine 4:24–30

    Google Scholar 

  38. Thongtrangan I, Balabhadra RS, Le H, Park J, Kim DH (2003) Vertebral body replacement with an expandable cage for reconstruction after spinal tumor resection. Neurosurg Focus 15(5):E8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Riaz S, Fox R, Lavoie M, Mahood J (2006) Vertebral body reconstruction for thoracolumbar spinal metastasis—a review of techniques. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 18:70–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Coumans JV, Marchek CP, Henderson FC (2002) Use of the telescopic plate spacer in treatment of cervical and cervicothoracic spine tumors. Neurosurgery 51:417–424; discussion 424–426

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schenke H, Eif M Reconstruction of the cervicale spine in cervical myelopathy using an anterior distraction device. 13th World Congress of Neurological Surgery, Marrakesh, Morocco, pp 159–162

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Kristin Kraus, M.Sc., for editorial assistance in preparing this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erica F. Bisson.

Additional information

Comments

George A. Alexiou, Ioannina, Greece

The spine is the most common site of bone metastasis. The treatment of spinal metastasis is mainly palliative in nature. Although chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and radiotherapy are the mainstay treatment, surgery remains an option in selected cases. Surgical therapy has evolved over the last years from simple decompressive approaches to direct anterior reconstructive approaches. Anterior reconstruction and stabilization has been performed using several different techniques. Anterior reconstruction has the advantages of resection of tumor burden, direct neural decompression and correction of the unstable spine. Occasionally, it becomes necessary to supplement the anterior construct with posterior instrumentations. The current study presents a comprehensive review of the techniques described in literature for anterior reconstruction after cervical corpectomy. In general, these techniques can achieve good clinical and radiographic outcomes. The authors provide a nice and thorough description of the available materials and in my opinion they give a nice systematic presentation of the surgical options. Given the available modalities for reconstruction following anterior cervical corpectomy, further comparative studies are needed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sayama, C.M., Schmidt, M.H. & Bisson, E.F. Cervical spine metastases: techniques for anterior reconstruction and stabilization. Neurosurg Rev 35, 463–475 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-012-0388-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-012-0388-z

Keywords

Navigation