Neurosurgical Review

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 53–66 | Cite as

Posterior petrous bone meningiomas: surgical experience in 53 patients and literature review

  • Matthieu Peyre
  • Alexis Bozorg-Grayeli
  • Alain Rey
  • Olivier Sterkers
  • Michel KalamaridesEmail author
Original Article


Meningiomas of the posterior fossa represent a heterogeneous group of tumors regarding difficulty of resection and functional outcome. The aim of this review was to focus on tumors located mainly on the posterior surface of the petrous bone and threatening hearing and facial functions. An anatomical classification was used to evaluate surgical outcome depending on the relationship of the tumor to the internal auditory meatus. The authors performed a retrospective chart review of 53 consecutive patients operated on for a posterior petrous bone meningioma in a tertiary referral center and a literature review. Tumors were classified in four groups according to the modified Desgeorges and Sterkers classification: posterior petrous (P; 17 tumors), meatus and internal auditory canal (M; 12 tumors), petrous apex without invasion of the internal auditory canal (A; 9 tumors), and cerebellopontine angle with invasion of the internal auditory canal (AMP; 15 tumors). The facial function was preserved in 100% of P and A tumors, 75% of group M tumors, and 53% of AMP tumors. Hearing preservation was attempted only in P, A, and M groups where rates of serviceable hearing preservation were 82%, 80%, and 66%, respectively. The cumulative rate of hearing preservation for AMP tumors was 45% in our literature review. The increased facial morbidity associated with AMP tumors compared with other groups was also confirmed by the review of the literature. In conclusion, this study shows that among posterior petrous bone meningiomas, tumors invading the internal auditory canal present with increased postoperative functional morbidity in spite of a tailored approach regarding dural insertion.


Meningioma Skull base Internal auditory canal Petroclival Cerebellopontine angle Petrous bone 



  1. 1.
    Ausman JI (2006) A revolution in skull base surgery: the quality of life matters! Surg Neurol 65(6):635–636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bacciu A, Piazza P, Di Lella F, Sanna M (2007) Intracanalicular meningioma: clinical features, radiologic findings, and surgical management. Otol Neurotol 28(3):391–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bassiouni H, Hunold A, Asgari S, Stolke D (2004) Meningiomas of the posterior petrous bone: functional outcome after microsurgery. J Neurosurg 100(6):1014–1024PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Batra PS, Dutra JC, Wiet RJ (2002) Auditory and facial nerve function following surgery for cerebellopontine angle meningiomas. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128(4):369–374PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Breuer T, Gjuric M, Wigand ME (2000) Extended middle fossa surgery for meningiomas within or at the internal auditory canal. Am J Otol 21(5):729–734PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bricolo AP, Turazzi S, Talacchi A, Cristofori L (1992) Microsurgical removal of petroclival meningiomas: a report of 33 patients. Neurosurgery 31(5):813–828, discussion 828PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Castellano F, Ruggiero G (1953) Meningiomas of the posterior fossa. Acta Radiol 104:3–157Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anonymous (1995) Committee on hearing and equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113:179–180Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Couldwell WT, Fukushima T, Giannotta SL, Weiss MH (1996) Petroclival meningiomas: surgical experience in 109 cases. J Neurosurg 84(1):20–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Darrouzet V, Guerin J, Aouad N, Dutkiewicz J, Blayney AW, Bebear JP (1997) The widened retrolabyrinthe approach: a new concept in acoustic neuroma surgery. J Neurosurg 86(5):812–821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Desgeorges M, Sterkers O (1994) Anatomo-radiological classification of meningioma of the posterior skull base. Neurochirurgie 40(5):273–295PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Desgeorges M, Sterkers O, Poncet JL, Rey A, Sterkers JM (1995) Surgery for meningioma of the posterior skull base. 135 cases. Choice of approach and results. Neurochirurgie 41(4):265–290, discussion 290–264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Devèze A, Franco-Vidal V, Liguoro D, Guerin J, Darrouzet V (2007) Transpetrosal approaches for meningiomas of the posterior aspect of the petrous bone Results in 43 consecutive patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 109(7):578–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    House JW (1983) Facial nerve grading systems. Laryngoscope 93(8):1056–1069PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ichinose T, Goto T, Ishibashi K, Takami T, Ohata K (2010) The role of radical microsurgical resection in multimodal treatment for skull base meningioma. J Neurosurg 113(5):1072–1078PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kano T, Kawase T, Horiguchi T, Yoshida K (2010) Meningiomas of the ventral foramen magnum and lower clivus: factors influencing surgical morbidity, the extent of tumour resection, and tumour recurrence. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152(1):79–86, discussion 86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kawase T, Shiobara R, Ohira T, Toya S (1996) Developmental patterns and characteristic symptoms of petroclival meningiomas. Neurol Med Chir Tokyo 36(1):1–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kawase T, Shiobara R, Toya S (1991) Anterior transpetrosal-transtentorial approach for sphenopetroclival meningiomas: surgical method and results in 10 patients. Neurosurgery 28(6):869–875, discussion 875–866PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lang DA, Neil-Dwyer G, Garfield J (1999) Outcome after complex neurosurgery: the caregiver’s burden is forgotten. J Neurosurg 91(3):359–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lecuire J, Dechaume JP, Buffard P, Bochu M (1971) Meningiomas of the posterior cranial fossa. Neurochirurgie 17:1–146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu JK, Gottfried ON, Couldwell WT (2003) Surgical management of posterior petrous meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus 14(6):e7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nakamura M, Roser F, Dormiani M, Matthies C, Vorkapic P, Samii M (2005) Facial and cochlear nerve function after surgery of cerebellopontine angle meningiomas. Neurosurgery 57(1):77–90, discussion 77–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nakamura M, Roser F, Mirzai S, Matthies C, Vorkapic P, Samii M (2004) Meningiomas of the internal auditory canal. Neurosurgery 55(1):119–127, discussion 127–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Natarajan SK, Sekhar LN, Schessel D, Morita A (2007) Petroclival meningiomas: multimodality treatment and outcomes at long-term follow-up. Neurosurgery 60(6):965–979, discussion 979–981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Qu FJ, Zhou XD, Wang XL, Li F, Lu XD, Liu YG, Zhong YH, Yang HA, Ni SL (2009) The classification of posterior petrous meningiomas and its clinical significance. J Int Med Res 37(3):949–957PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Raj Wijetunga LH, Fagan PA, Sheehy JP (1998) Petrous apex meningiomas: an alternative surgical approach. J Clin Neurosci 5(3):310–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Roberti F, Sekhar LN, Kalavakonda C, Wright DC (2001) Posterior fossa meningiomas: surgical experience in 161 cases. Surg Neurol 56(1):8–20, discussion 20–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rosenorn J (1989) The risk of ischaemic brain damage during the use of self-retaining brain retractors. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 120:1–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rosenorn J, Diemer NH (1982) Reduction of regional cerebral blood flow during brain retraction pressure in the rat. J Neurosurg 56(6):826–829PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Roser F, Nakamura M, Dormiani M, Matthies C, Vorkapic P, Samii M (2005) Meningiomas of the cerebellopontine angle with extension into the internal auditory canal. J Neurosurg 102(1):17–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Samii M, Tatagiba M (1992) Experience with 36 surgical cases of petroclival meningiomas. Acta Neurochir Wien 118(1–2):27–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sanna M, Bacciu A, Pasanisi E, Taibah A, Piazza P (2007) Posterior petrous face meningiomas: an algorithm for surgical management. Otol Neurotol 28(7):942–950PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schaller B, Merlo A, Gratzl O, Probst R (1999) Premeatal and retromeatal cerebellopontine angle meningioma. Two distinct clinical entities. Acta Neurochir Wien 141(5):465–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Seifert V (2010) Clinical management of petroclival meningiomas and the eternal quest for preservation of quality of life: personal experiences over a period of 20years. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152(7):1099–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sekhar LN, Jannetta PJ (1984) Cerebellopontine angle meningiomas. Microsurgical excision and follow-up results. J Neurosurg 60(3):500–505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sekhar LN, Jannetta PJ, Burkhart LE, Janosky JE (1990) Meningiomas involving the clivus: a six-year experience with 41 patients. Neurosurgery 27(5):764–781, discussion 781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Selesnick SH, Nguyen TD, Gutin PH, Lavyne MH (2001) Posterior petrous face meningiomas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124(4):408–413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sughrue ME, Kane AJ, Shangari G, Rutkowski MJ, McDermott MW, Berger MS, Parsa AT (2010) The relevance of Simpson Grade I and II resection in modern neurosurgical treatment of World Health Organization Grade I meningiomas. J Neurosurg 113(5):1029–1035PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    von Eckardstein KL, Driscoll CLW, Link MJ (2010) Outcome after microsurgery for meningiomas involving the internal auditory canal. Neurosurgery 67(5):1236–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Voss NF, Vrionis FD, Heilman CB, Robertson JH (2000) Meningiomas of the cerebellopontine angle. Surg Neurol 53(5):439–446, discussion 446–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wu ZB, Yu CJ, Guan SS (2005) Posterior petrous meningiomas: 82 cases. J Neurosurg 102(2):284–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yasargil M, Mortara R, Curcic M (1980) Meningiomas of basal posterior cranial fossa. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 7:3–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthieu Peyre
    • 1
    • 3
  • Alexis Bozorg-Grayeli
    • 2
    • 3
  • Alain Rey
    • 1
    • 3
  • Olivier Sterkers
    • 2
    • 3
  • Michel Kalamarides
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryHopital BeaujonClichyFrance
  2. 2.Department of Otology and ENT surgeryHopital BeaujonClichyFrance
  3. 3.Université Paris DiderotParis 7France

Personalised recommendations