Skip to main content
Log in

Transnasal endoscopic odontoidectomy after occipito-cervical fusion during the same operative setting—technical note

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, a purely transnasal endoscopic approach (TNEA) for decompression of the anterior cranio-cervical junction has been described. At present, there is only a limited number of patients having been operated on in a few specialized centers. The possibilities, safety, and limits of this approach are still under investigation. The relationship between TNEA and occipito-cervical fusion, especially, which may typically be considered in this kind of pathologies, should be further elucidated. So far, the feasibility of TNEA after previous occipito-cervical fusion has only been reported for a single case. In that case, there was a posterior atlanto-axial subluxation and basilar invagination. In the present paper, another example of a surgical procedure of TNEA after previous posterior fusion during the same operative setting is given. It differs from the other case concerning the pathophysiology. In fact, here, there was anterior atlanto-axial subluxation and no basilar invagination. The possibilities and limits of this novel approach are thoroughly discussed. Special interest is given to the problem of CCJ instability and previous occipito-cervical fusion. Technical hints and pitfalls are described in detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alfieri A, Jho HD, Tschabitscher M (2002) Endoscopic endonasal approach to the ventral cranio-cervical junction: anatomical study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144:219–225, discussion 225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashraf J, Crockard HA, Ransford AO, Stevens JM (1991) Transoral decompression and posterior stabilisation in Morquio's disease. Arch Dis Child 66:1318–1321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cantarella G, Mazzola RF, Benincasa A (1998) A possible sequela of transoral approach to the upper cervical spine. Velopharyngeal incompetence. J Neurosurg Sci 42:51–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carpentier A, Polivka M, Blanquet A, Lot G, George B (2002) Suboccipital and cervical chordomas: the value of aggressive treatment at first presentation of the disease. J Neurosurg 97:1070–1077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cavallo LM, Messina A, Cappabianca P, Esposito F, de Divitiis E, Gardner P, Tschabitscher M (2005) Endoscopic endonasal surgery of the midline skull base: anatomical study and clinical considerations. Neurosurg Focus 19:E2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Crockard HA (1985) The transoral approach to the base of the brain and upper cervical cord. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 67:321–325

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Crockard HA, Essigman WK, Stevens JM, Pozo JL, Ransford AO, Kendall BE (1985) Surgical treatment of cervical cord compression in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 44:809–816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Crockard HA, Pozo JL, Ransford AO, Stevens JM, Kendall BE, Essigman WK (1986) Transoral decompression and posterior fusion for rheumatoid atlanto-axial subluxation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68:350–356

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Almeida JR, Zanation AM, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, Gardner PA, Kassam AB (2009) Defining the nasopalatine line: the limit for endonasal surgery of the spine. Laryngoscope 119:239–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Divitiis O, Conti A, Angileri FF, Cardali S, La Torre D, Tschabitscher M (2004) Endoscopic transoral-transclival approach to the brainstem and surrounding cisternal space: anatomic study. Neurosurgery 54:125–130, discussion 130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Di Lorenzo N (1992) Craniocervical junction malformation treated by transoral approach. A survey of 25 cases with emphasis on postoperative instability and outcome. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 118:112–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dickman CA, Locantro J, Fessler RG (1992) The influence of transoral odontoid resection on stability of the craniovertebral junction. J Neurosurg 77:525–530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Edwards RJ, David KM, Crockard HA (2000) Management of tuberculomas of the craniovertebral junction. Br J Neurosurg 14:19–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. George B, Archilli M, Cornelius JF (2006) Bone tumors at the cranio-cervical junction. Surgical management and results from a series of 41 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148:741–749, discussion 749

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Husain M, Rastogi M, Ojha BK, Chandra A, Jha DK (2006) Endoscopic transoral surgery for craniovertebral junction anomalies. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 5:367–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hwang SW, Heilman CB, Riesenburger RI, Kryzanski J (2008) C1–C2 arthrodesis after transoral odontoidectomy and suboccipital craniectomy for ventral brain stem compression in Chiari I patients. Eur Spine J

  17. Kassam AB, Snyderman C, Gardner P, Carrau R, Spiro R (2005) The expanded endonasal approach: a fully endoscopic transnasal approach and resection of the odontoid process: technical case report. Neurosurgery 57:E213, discussion E213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Laufer I, Greenfield JP, Anand VK, Hartl R, Schwartz TH (2008) Endonasal endoscopic resection of the odontoid process in a nonachondroplastic dwarf with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: feasibility of the approach and utility of the intraoperative Iso-C three-dimensional navigation. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine 8:376–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Leng LZ, Anand VK, Hartl R, Schwartz TH (2009) Endonasal endoscopic resection of an os odontoideum to decompress the cervicomedullary junction: a minimal access surgical technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:E139–E143

    Google Scholar 

  20. Menezes AH, VanGilder JC (1988) Transoral-transpharyngeal approach to the anterior craniocervical junction. Ten-year experience with 72 patients. J Neurosurg 69:895–903

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nayak JV, Gardner PA, Vescan AD, Carrau RL, Kassam AB, Snyderman CH (2007) Experience with the expanded endonasal approach for resection of the odontoid process in rheumatoid disease. Am J Rhinol 21:601–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Frédérick Cornelius.

Additional information

Comments

Enrico de Divitiis, Naples, Italy

With the publication of this manuscript, the authors reported their single case experience afforded the extension of the endoscopic endonasal approaches. Besides, it is interesting to notice how such area, because of its strategic “position”, often results with this approach when the several widespread neoplastic and/or inflammatory diseases are involved. Furthermore, the treatment of such lesions is still controversial, being debated among different specialists such as ENT surgeons, maxillo-facial surgeons, and/or neurosurgeons. In such a case, collaborative surgery has been performed by two tuned operators using four-hand technique through a binostril approach. The present study could be considered another contribution to demonstrate the feasibility of the endoscopic transnasal approach for many different lesions of the skull base, thus increasing the anatomical and surgical skills and experience of surgeons working in this deep and complex operative field.

Domenico Solari, Paolo Cappabianca, Naples, Italy

In this interesting clinical paper, Cornelius et al. report a single case experience of a pure transnasal endoscopic odontoidectomy, once again shedding light on the possibilities provided by this technique. Several anatomical studies and clinical reviews have demonstrated the feasibility of the endonasal route for different pathologies involving multiple areas of the skull base and, more recently, the CVJ area. This manuscript is another example of the work in progress to improve the knowledge and the refinement of such approaches. The Authors confirmed that this route could be considered in the management of midline CVJ disease as an alternative to the widely accepted microsurgical transoral approach, though it guarantees the respect of the surrounding structures, notwithstanding the narrowness of the field. Besides, the creation of a muscle-mucosal flap seems to be a good solution for the closure, even though the access to intradural lesions seems as yet unsafe.

Another important aspect they weigh in on is the relevance of team approach, which magnifies the efforts and the results provided, to reach the difficult goals of our discipline. As a matter of fact, endoscopic skull base surgery has been developed due to the cooperation among neurosurgeons on one side and ENT and cranio-maxillo-facial surgeons on the other.

Finally, we should be reminded of the relevant role played by image-guidance systems, i.e., the neuronavigator, in providing the surgeon with correct orientation to the targeted area.

Henry W. S. Schroeder, Greifswald, Germany

Cornelius et al. present a patient who underwent a transnasal endoscopic odontoidectomy after a posterior cervicocranial fusion had been performed because of C1/2 instability. The technique is described in detail and discussed. The authors achieved a very good outcome. Only few similar cases have been reported previously. This interesting case report demonstrates nicely an expanded indication for an endonasal endoscopic approach and shows the advantages of the endoscope when dealing with such lesions. Although the microscope provides a high-resolution stereoscopic view, there is a considerable loss of light at the entry point in narrow and deep surgical approaches. Furthermore, the neurosurgeon works within the light beam which further diminishes the light intensity in the surgical field. And last but not least, with the microscope, structures can only be visualized when they are located just in front of the lens. Using the endoscope, the surgeon brings the eye close to the surgical target with perfect illumination even in a very deep surgical field. The panoramic view of the endoscope shows more anatomical details, and therefore orientation is facilitated. Endoscopes with angled optics enable a look around a corner or behind neurovascular structures which is beneficial in many interventions.

Compared with the transoral approach to the odontoid, the endonasal approach is clearly preferable because it causes less postoperative discomfort for the patient. Oral feeding can be initiated early after surgery avoiding the need for gastric tubes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cornelius, J.F., Kania, R., Bostelmann, R. et al. Transnasal endoscopic odontoidectomy after occipito-cervical fusion during the same operative setting—technical note. Neurosurg Rev 34, 115–121 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-010-0295-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-010-0295-0

Keywords

Navigation