Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical and radiological outcome of craniocervical osteo-dural decompression for Chiari I-associated syringomyelia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of craniocervical decompression for patients affected by Chiari I-related syringomyelia. We performed a retrospective analysis of a group of patients affected by Chiari I-associated syringomyelia treated by craniocervical decompression (CCD). Surgical and technical aspects and preoperative factors predicting outcome were discussed. A total of 36 patients were reviewed. There were 17 men and 19 women (female/male ratio 1.11), and the mean age was 40.4 (range 18–68). The most important preoperative symptoms were related to myelopathy (pain, weakness, atrophy, spasticity, sensory loss, and dysesthesias). Most syrinxes were in the cervico-thoracic region (61.1%), and the majority of patients had tonsillar descent between the foramen magnum and C1. All patients underwent a craniectomy less than 3 cm in diameter followed by a duroplasty with dura substitute. No arachnoid manipulation was necessary. Three patients (8.1%) experienced cerebrospinal fluid leaks that resolved without complications. At a mean follow up of 40 months (range 16–72) 80.5% of patients exhibited improvement over their preoperative neurological examination while 11.1% stabilized. The syrinx shrank in 80.5% of patients. Chi-square test showed that preoperative syrinx extension and degree of tonsillar descent did not correlate with clinical and neuroradiological postoperative evolution. Treating syringomyelia associated in Chiari I malformation with CCD leads to a large percentage of patients with satisfying results and no irreversible complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aschoff A, St K (1993) 100 years syrinx surgery: a review. Acta neurochir (Wien) 123:157–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aboulker J (1979) Syringomyelia and intra-rachidian fluids. X. Rachidian fluid stasis (in French). Neurochirurgie 25(suppl 1):98–107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gardner WJ (1977) Syringomyelia. Surg Neurol 7:370

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gardner WJ, McMurray FG (1976) “Non-communicating syringomyelia: a non-existent entity. Surg Neurol 6:251–256

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakamura N, Iwasaki Y, Hida K, Abe H, Fujioka Y, Nagashima K (2000) Dural band pathology in syringomyelia with Chiari type I malformation. Neuropathology 20(1):38–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oldfield EH (2001) Syringomyelia. J Neurosurg 95(Suppl 1):153–155

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aghakhani N, Parker F, David P, Morar S, Lacroix C, Benoudiba F, Tadie M (2009) Long-term follow-up of Chiari-related syringomyelia in adults: analysis of 157 surgically treated cases. Neurosurgery 64(2):308–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Badie B, Mendoza D, Batzdorf U (1995) Posterior fossa volume and response to suboccipital decompression in patients with Chiari I malformation. Neurosurgery 37:214–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Feldstein NA, Choudhri TF (1999) Management of the Chiari I malformations with holocord syringohydromyelia. Pediatr Neurosurg 31:143–149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fischer EG (1995) Posterior fossa decompression for Chiari I deformity, including resection of the cerebellar tonsils. Childs Nerv Syst 11:625–629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Klekamp J, Batzdorf U, Samii M, Bothe HW (1996) The surgical treatment of Chiari I malformation. Acta Neurochir 138:788–801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Blagodatsky MD, Larionov SN, Alexandrov YA, Velm AI (1999) Surgical treatment of Chiari I malformation with and without syringomyelia. Acta Neurochir 141:963–968

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Guyotat J, Bret P, Jouanneau E, Ricci AC, Lapras C (1998) Syringomyelia associated with type I Chiari malformation. A 21-year retrospective study on 75 cases treated by foramen magnum decompression with special emphasis on the value of tonsil resection. Acta Neurochir 140:745–754

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Iwasaki Y, Hida K, Koyanagi I et al (2000) Reevaluation of syringosubarachnoid shunt for syringomyelia with Chiari malformation. Neurosurgery 46(2):407–412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Attal N, Parker F, Tadié M, Aghakani N, Bouhassira D (2004) Effects of surgery on the sensory deficits of syringomyelia and predictors of outcome: a long-term prospective study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:1025–1030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Munshi I, Frim D, Stine-Reyes R et al (2000) Effects of posterior fossa decompression with and without duraplasty on Chiari malformation-associated hydromyelia. Neurosurgery 46:1384–1390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Perrini P, Benedetto N, Tenenbaum R, Di Lorenzo R (2007) Extra-arachnoidal cranio-cervical decompression for syringomyelia associated with Chiari I malformation in adults: technique assessment. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 149:1015–1023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tubbs RS, Wellons JC III, Oakes WJ et al (2003) Reformation of the posterior atlanto-occipital membrane following posterior fossa decompression with subsequent constriction at the craniocervical junction. Pediatr Neurosurg 38:219–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tognetti F, Calbucci F (1993) Syringomyelia: syringo-subarachnoid shunt versus posterior fossa decompression. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 123(3–4):196–197

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang ZQ, Chen YQ, Chen YA, Wu X, Wang YB, Li XG (2008) Chiari I malformation associated with syringomyelia: a retrospective study of 316 surgically treated patients. Spinal Cord 46:358–363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hida K, Iwasaki Y, Koyanagi I, Sawamura Y, Abe H (2000) Surgical indication and results of foramen magnum decompression versus syringosubarachnoid shunting for syringomyelia associated with Chiari I malformation. Neurosurgery 46:407–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hida K, Iwasaki Y (2001) Syringosubarachnoid shunt for syringomyelia associated with Chiari I malformation. Neurosurg Focus 11 (1):Article 7

    Google Scholar 

  23. Versari PP, D'Aliberti G, Talamonti G, Collice M (1993) Foraminal syringomyelia: suggestion for a grading system. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 125(1–4):97–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoffman CE, Souweidane MM (2008) Cerebrospinal fluid-related complications with autologous duraplasty and arachnoid sparing in type I Chiari malformation. Neurosurgery 62(3 Suppl 1):156–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wetjen NM, Heiss JD, Oldfield EH (2008) Time course of syringomyelia resolution following decompression of Chiari malformation Type I. J Neurosurg Pediatr 1(2):118–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Alzate JC, Kothbauer KF, Jallo GI, Epstein FJ (2001) Treatment of Chiari I malformation in patients with and without syringomyelia: a consecutive series of 66 cases. Neurosurg Focus 11:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hayhurst C, Richards O, Zaki H, Findlay G, Pigott TJ (2008) Hindbrain decompression for Chiari-syringomyelia complex: an outcome analysis comparing surgical techniques. Br J Neurosurg 22(1):86–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Milhorat TH, Johnson RW, Milhorat RH, Capocelli AL Jr, Pevsner PH (1995) Clinicopathological correlations in syringomyelia using axial magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 37:206–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Milhorat TH, Kotzen RM, Anzil AP (1994) Stenosis of central canal of spinal cord in man: incidence and pathological findings in 232 autopsy cases. J Neurosurg 80:716–722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Oldfield EH, Muraszko K, Shawker TH, Patronas NJ (1994) Pathophysiology of syringomyelia associated with Chiari I malformation of the cerebellar tonsils. Implications for diagnosis and treatment. J Neurosurg 80:3–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Padovani R, Cavallo M, Gaist G (1989) Surgical treatment of syringomyelia: favorable results with syringosubarachnoid shunting. Surg Neurol 32:173–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sindou M, Chávez-Machuca J, Hashish H (2002) Cranio-cervical decompression for Chiari type I-malformation, adding extreme lateral foramen magnum opening and expansile duroplasty with arachnoid preservation. Technique and long-term functional results in 44 consecutive adult cases—comparison with literature data. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144(10):1005–1019

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giannantonio Spena.

Additional information

Comments

Ralf Alfons Kockro, Zurich, Switzerland

This is an interesting retrospective analysis of 36 consecutive cases summarizing the clinical and radiological outcome of decompression surgery for Chiari I associated syringomyelia. The results show first of all that straight forward posterior fossa decompression with duroplasty and without arachnoid opening results in a high percentage of clinical improvement and a low complication rate. Equally important, the radiological analysis shows that the pre-operative size of syrinx and position of tonsils do not correlate with the postoperative clinical or radiological course. In view of these results, I agree with the authors that early cranio-cervical decompression is the most appropriate first line surgical strategy. However, it would be interesting to further investigate the pre- and postoperative imaging features of those patients which did not benefit from decompression surgery in a larger series in order to define the cases in which extended surgical methods could be considered to further improve clinical outcome.

Jörg Klekamp, Quakenbrück, Germany

The authors present a series of 36 patients with Chiari I malformation and an average follow-up of 40 months. Surgical treatment involved a small decompression of the foramen magnum with a duraplasty but without arachnoid opening. The major argument for leaving the arachnoid or even the inner dura layer intact during this operation is avoidance of complications, i.e., cerebrospinal fluid (csf) fistulas in particular. In this paper, the authors claim no complications related to the surgical technique and yet they mention six accidental tears of the arachnoid (16.6%) and 3 csf fistulas (8.3%) that required either a lumbar drain or a surgical revision. In my understanding, these are complications related to the surgical technique. As with other similar papers on this subject, the technique of leaving the arachnoid intact does not automatically avoid csf fistulas. I always open the arachnoid during this operation. With appropriate closure of the wound, i.e., insertion of the duraplasty with running sutures and meticulous soft tissue closure, the rate of csf fistulas in my personal series of 194 patients is 3.1%.

The second argument is that clinical and radiological results are as good with this method as with potentially more dangerous techniques involving arachnoid dissection. This is probably a correct statement as far as short-term results are concerned. However, we have to remember, that we are dealing with a chronic disease. If we want to find out how to best treat our patients, we have to analyze long-term results applying survival statistics such as the Kaplan-Meier method and determine the rates of progression-free survival for each surgical technique. To my knowledge, none of the papers in the literature as well as this one provide such data. In this paper, the authors only mention two surgical revisions 2 and 7 years after the initial operation, i.e., a rate of 5.6%. Looking again at my series, four of 194 patients (2.1%) required surgical revisions 4–75 months after the initial operation. This low revision rate suggests that 97.9% were more or less satisfied. But that is not correct. With Kaplan-Meier statistics, the rate of patients free of progression was 82.9% for 15 years. As long as we do not have such data 5, 10, or 15 years after surgery for the different techniques advocated in the literature, this controversial discussion will continue.

Lotfi Hacein-Bey, Sacramento, USA

Although there is a wide consensus that symptomatic syringomyelia (with or without Chiari I malformation) should be generally treated with craniocervical decompression, there is some variety in the techniques advocated. The authors present a well-documented retrospective analysis of 36 patients with syringomyelia and Chiari I malformation treated during an 11-year period with a consistent surgical technique of duraplasty performed through a relatively small bone opening, and without arachnoid opening. Clinical presentation was posterior fossa overcrowding, long tract impairment or brainstem compression. Clinical and imaging follow-up are of reasonable duration and quality. Postoperative syrinx decrease rate was 80.5% and clinical improvement was observed in 92% of the patients in this series.

Although better outcomes have been reported in the literature, the main merit of this article is to show that reasonable outcomes may be obtained in patients with syringomyelia who are treated with the consistent use of a relatively minimal surgical technique.

As our understanding of the physiology of syringomyelia increases, and as newer surgical techniques become available, continued improvements in clinical outcomes can be expected.

Richard G. Fessler, Chicago, USA

Dr. Spena et al., report the retrospective results of their decompression/dura-plasty technique for the treatment of Chiari I malformation in a group of 36 patients. They state that 80.5% of their patients experienced improvement of their neurologic symptoms over their preoperative neurological examination with a mean follow-up of 40 months (range 16–72). Their conclusion, based on these results, is that treating Syringomyelia associated in Chiari I malformation leads to a large percentage of patients with satisfying results with no irreversible complications. These results are not inconsistent with previous short-term results reported for a variety of techniques of treating Chiari malformation. Important observations noted by the authors include their observation that there appeared to be no correlation between the presence of syringomyelia and clinical outcome, and that the amount of pre-operative cerebellar descent and symptoms did not correlate with post-operative clinical result.

However, several technical details do make validity of these conclusions suspect. First, of course, the data was collected retrospectively. Second, the data was collected by the operating surgeons, thus introducing potential bias. Third, it is not discernable from the text, exactly what “improved, unchanged, or worsened” actually means, given the multiple symptoms followed by the authors. Finally, although the authors report that their follow-up averages 40 months, the “patients and methods” section reports that clinical evaluation was done at “one, three, and six months and at one year.” It is difficult to know how to reconcile this difference.

It is well-known that certain aspects of Chiari syndrome, such as muscle weakness and atrophy, ataxia, dorsal column dysfunction, hypesthetic pain, and cranial neuropathies are notoriously difficult to treat. Thus, having more detail on exactly what got better, what remained unchanged, what worsened, and how these impacted the patient’s quality of life are critical to interpreting outcome. Moreover, late failures and progression of symptoms are also common following treatment of Chiari malformation. Thus, assuming that the author’s data do reflect a true, unbiased improvement in their patient’s symptoms, a more accurate conclusion could only claim short term benefit. Long-term success rate needs to be determined after at least several more years of clinical follow-up.

Ricardo Botelho, São Paulo, Brazil

Magnetic resonance imaging brought clarity to the diagnosis of Chiari malformation and has revolutionized the treatment evaluation of this disease. The adequacy of neural decompression and return of cerebrospinal fluid flow at craniocervical junction may be, now, verified. The new factor recently suggested to evaluate the adequacy of surgery is the maintenance and expansion of the cisterna magna. The presence of this cisterna has been considered important in the prevention of post-operative cerebellar ptosis, functioning as a cushion buffer for structures of cranial posterior fossa. The arachnoid preservation technique in surgery for Chiari malformation has the potential to avoid adhesions between the dura and the neural structures that would occur with arachnoid opening and neural dissection techniques, recreating the Cisterna magna.

Because of the relative rarity of Chiari malformation, several samples of patients in different series have been necessary to demonstrate efficacy of the described technique. The work of Spena and Cols. provides additional evidence of such intervention in Chiari malformation. The authors have obtained more than 80% reduction in syringomyelia cavities, high clinical improvement and low complication rates. Technique of arachnoid preservation must be considered an important option in surgery for Chiari malformation, as demonstrated by these authors, among others.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spena, G., Bernucci, C., Garbossa, D. et al. Clinical and radiological outcome of craniocervical osteo-dural decompression for Chiari I-associated syringomyelia. Neurosurg Rev 33, 297–304 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-010-0260-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-010-0260-y

Keywords

Navigation