Skip to main content
Log in

Proximal STA to proximal PCA bypass using a radial artery graft by posterior oblique transzygomatic subtemporal approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the use of a radial artery graft (RAG) for bypass of the proximal superficial temporal artery (STA) to proximal posterior cerebral artery (PCA) by posterior oblique transzygomatic subtemporal approach as an alternative to the external carotid artery (ECA) to PCA anastomosis. We conducted an anatomical and technical study at a university hospital. Five adult cadaveric specimens were dissected. A preauricular vertical skin incision was used. The trunk of STA was identified. A 30° oblique posterior zygomatic arch osteotomy and microcraniotomy was performed. The dura of the middle cranial fossa was then opened. The temporal lobe was retracted, the interpeduncular and ambient cisterns were opened, and the P2 segment of the PCA was exposed. The proximal side of the RAG was anastomosed with the proximal STA and the distal side was anastomosed with the P2 segment. The mean caliber of the proximal STA was 2.25 ± 0.35 mm. The mean diameter of the P2 was 2.2 ± 0.2 mm. The average length of the RAG was 56 ± 3.2 mm. The mean caliber of the proximal and the distal sides of the graft was 2.5 ± 0.25 mm and 2.3 ± 0.15 mm, respectively. Because the proximal STA to proximal PCA bypass uses a short RAG and their calibers are over 2 mm, this bypass technique can provide a sufficient blood flow and may be a reasonable alternative over ECA to PCA bypass using long grafts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albuquerque FC, Fiorella D, Han P, Spetzler RF, McDougall CG (2003) A reappraisal of angioplasty and stenting for the treatment of vertebral origin stenosis. Neurosurgery 53:607–616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ausman JI, Nicoloff DM, Chou SN (1978) Posterior fossa revascularization: anastomosis of vertebral artery to PICA with interposed radial artery graft. Surg Neurol 9:281–286

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ausman JI, Diaz FG, de los Reyes RA, Pak H, Patel S, Boulos R (1981) Superficial temporal to proximal superior cerebellar artery anastomosis for basilar artery stenosis. Neurosurgsery 9:56–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ausman JI, Diaz FG, de los Reyes RA, Pak H, Patel S, Boulos R (1981) Anastomosis of occipital artery to anterior inferior cerebellar artery for vertebrobasilar junction stenosis. Surg Neurol 16:99–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ausman JI, Diaz FG, de los Reyes RA, Pak H, Patel S, Mehta B, Boulos R (1982) Posterior circulation revascularisation. Superficial temporal artery to superior cerebellar artery anastomosis. J Neurosurg 56:766–776

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ausman JI, Diaz FG, Dujovny M (1986) Posterior circulation revascularization. Clin Neurosurg 33:331–343

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Budillon AM, Nicolini F, Agostinelli A, Beghi C, Pavesi G, Fragnito C, Busi M, Gherli T (2003) Complications after radial artery harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting: our experience. Surgery 133:283–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Diaz FG, Pearce JE, Ausman JI (1985) Complications of cerebral revascularization with autogenous vein grafts. Neurosurgery 17:271–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Greene MA, Malias MA (2001) Arm complications after radial artery procurement for coronary bypass operation. Ann Thorac Surg 72:126–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamada J, Todaka T, Yano S, Kai Y, Morioka M, Ushio Y (2002) Vertebral artery-posterior inferior cerebellar artery bypass with a superficial temporal artery graft to treat aneurysms involving the PICA. J Neurosurg 96:867–871

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hauth EA, Gissler HM, Drescher R, Jansen C, Jaeger HJ, Mathias KD (2004) Angioplasty or stenting of extra- and intracranial vertebral artery stenoses. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 27:51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heros RC, Ameri AM (1984) Rupture of a giant basilar aneurysm after saphenous vein interposition graft to the posterior cerebral artery: case report. J Neurosurg 61:387–390

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hopkins LN, Martin NA, Hadley MN, Spetzler RF, Budny J, Carter LP (1987) Vertebrobasilar insufficiency. Part 2. Microsurgical treatment of intracranial vertebrobasilar disease. J Neurosurg 66:662–674

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamiyama H, Abe H, Yamauchi T, Yamauchi T, Kohama Y, Houkin K, Mitsumori K (1992) Use of a radial artery graft in STA-MCA anastomosis and other recent improvements in reconstructive surgery. Jpn J Neurosurg 1:4–13

    Google Scholar 

  15. Khodadad G (1976) Occipital artery-posterior inferior cerebellar artery anastomosis. Surg Neurol 5:225–227

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kawashima M, Rhoton AL Jr, Tanriover N, Ulm AJ, Yasuda A, Fujii K (2005) Microsurgical anatomy of cerebral revascularization: Part II. Posterior circulation. Neurosurgery 102:132–147

    Google Scholar 

  17. Little JR, Furlan AJ, Bryerton B (1983) Short vein grafts of cerebral revascularization. J Neurosurg 59:384–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Malek AM, Higashida RT, Phatouros CC, Lempert TE, Meyers PM, Gress DR, Dowd CF, Halbach VV (1999) Treatment of posterior circulation ischemia with extracranial percutaneous balloon angioplasty and stent placement. Stroke 30:2073–2085

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mukherjee D, Pineda G (2007) Extracranial vertebral artery intervention. J Interv Cardiol 20:409–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sekhar LN, Schramm VL Jr, Jones NF, Yonas H, Horton J, Latchaw RE, Curtin H (1986) Operative exposure and management of the petrous and upper cervical internal carotid artery. Neurosurg 19:967–982

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sekhar LN, Wright DC, Olding M (1999) Brain revascularization by saphenous vein and radial artery bypass graft. In: Sekhar LN, Olivera ED (eds) Cranial microsurgery. Thieme, New York, pp 581–600

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sen C, Sekhar LN (1992) Direct vein graft reconstruction of the cavernous, petrous, and upper cervical internal carotid artery: lessons learned from 30 cases. Neurosurgery 30:732–743

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sundt TM Jr, Piepgras DG, Houser OW, Campbell JK (1982) Interposition saphenous vein grafts for advanced occlusive disease and large aneurysms in the posterior circulation. J Neurosurg 56:205–215

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sundt TM, Piepgras DG, Marsh WR (1987) Bypass vein grafts for giant aneurysms and severe intracranial occlusive disease in the anterior and posterior circulation. In: Sundt TM (ed) Occlusive cerebrovascular disease, diagnosis and surgical management. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 439–464

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cagatay Han Ulku.

Additional information

Comments

Ugur Türe, Istanbul, Turkey

The authors present a study of the proximal superficial temporal artery (STA) to proximal posterior cerebral artery (PCA) bypass using a radial artery graft in cadavers. They present this technique as another option to revascularize brain tissue. Because it uses a short radial artery graft (RAG), the authors suggest that their technique is superior to the proximal external carotid artery (ECA) to PCA bypass, which uses a long RAG.

Brain revascularization procedures have been done for more than 40 years since Yaşargil and Donaghy developed the extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass technique. This method was used with increasing frequency in the 1970s and early 1980s. After the results of the EC-IC bypass study, however, the popularity of this procedure declined. Currently, this technique is used to manage neurovascular disorders such as cerebrovascular ischemic disease, moyamoya disease, complex intracranial aneurysms, and some cranial base tumors that require carotid artery resection. However, studies concerning the indications and techniques for bypass surgery are still ongoing. Recently, due to the development of endovascular techniques, vascular neurosurgeons are faced with more problematic cases. Therefore, any study presenting new anastomosis techniques or materials, as well as new combinations of donor and recipient arteries, is more than welcome in the neurosurgical literature.

I would like to commend the authors for their efforts in studying the various approaches for EC-IC bypass techniques. This team has published many other articles about this topic, studying the feasibility of various procedures in cadavers. Now, however, is the time to test these techniques with clinical application. We look forward to seeing their experience with successful examples of their bypass techniques in patients.

Claudius Thomé, Mannheim, Germany

Using cadaveric dissection, Dr. Ulku et al. demonstrate the feasibility of a novel bypass technique in an attempt to revascularize the posterior cerebral circulation. The described procedure is suggested to be an advantageous alternative to available techniques, as it only requires a short radial artery graft between the proximal STA and the P2 segment of the PCA. Intracranial access is achieved via a transzygomatic subtemporal approach.

The anatomical measurements show an excellent agreement of the involved vessel diameters thus providing optimal conditions for successful bypass surgery. Therefore, the presented technique constitutes an alternative to an ECA to PCA bypass with a long graft and to a direct (distal) STA to PCA bypass, which would eliminate one suture site in patients with a prominent STA. Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that this is a cadaveric study and suturing an anastomosis to the P2 via a limited minicraniotomy is clinically a very difficult task in a narrow and deep surgical field. Additionally, even in specialized centers only a limited number of posterior revascularization procedures are performed, as the vast majority of patients with vertebrobasilar insufficiency are treated medically or in selected cases by interventional procedures. Thus, the surgical morbidity as well as the efficacy of revascularization needs to be determined before the technique’s clinical usefulness can be assessed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ulku, C.H., Cicekcibasi, A.E., Cengiz, S.L. et al. Proximal STA to proximal PCA bypass using a radial artery graft by posterior oblique transzygomatic subtemporal approach. Neurosurg Rev 32, 95–99 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-008-0157-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-008-0157-1

Keywords

Navigation