Skip to main content
Log in

The implications of ISAT and ISUIA for the management of cerebral aneurysms during pregnancy

  • Review
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Both the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) and the International Study on Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA) have been widely extrapolated to influence the management of actual or anticipated aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). However, it remains possible that sub-groups exist for which such extrapolation might subsequently prove premature. In this review, we discuss the implications that such extrapolation may potentially have for one such SAH sub-group: the clinically rare scenario of SAH in pregnancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ausman JI (2002) Why the international study of unruptured intracranial aneurysms has lost credibility with neuroscientists. Surg Neurol 58:287–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ausman JI (2003) ISAT study: is coiling better than clipping? Surg Neurol 59:162–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barno A, Freeman DW (1976) Maternal deaths due to spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 125:384–392

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barrett JM, Van Hooydonk JE, Boem FH (1982) Pregnancy-related rupture of arterial aneurysms. Obstet Gynecol Surv 37:557–566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cannell DE, Botterell EH (1956) Subarachnoid haemorrhage and pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 72:844–855

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Copeland EL, Mabon RF (1967) Spontaneous intracranial bleeding in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 20:373–378

    Google Scholar 

  7. Danne TA, Tandy RW (1960) Rupture of congenital intracranial aneurysms during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 15:305–314

    Google Scholar 

  8. de la Monty SM, Moore GW, Monk MA et al (1985) Risk factors for the development and rupture of intracranial berry aneurysms. Am J Med 78:957–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D’Haese J, Christiaens F, D’Haens J, Camu F (1997) Combined caesarean section and clipping of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm: a case report. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 9:341–345

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dias MS, Sekhar LN (1990) Intracranial haemorrhage from aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations during pregnancy and the puerperium. Neurosurgery 27:855–866

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Edwards FM risks of medical imaging. In: Putman CE, Ravin CE (eds) Textbook of diagnostic imaging. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 83–98

  12. Ferguson GG, Peerless SJ, Drake CG (1981) Natural history of intracranial aneurysms. N Engl J Med 305:99, Letter

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Feygelman VM, Huda W, Peters KR (1992) Effective dose equivalents to patients undergoing cerebral angiography. AJNR 13:845–849

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fleigner JRH, Hooper RS, Kloss M (1969) Subarachnoid hemorrhage and pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commomw 76:912–917

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fox JL (1983) Intracranial aneurysms. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hunt H, Schifrin B, Suzuki K (1974) Ruptured berry aneurysms and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 43:827–836

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kittner SJ, Stern BJ, Feeser BR et al (1996) Pregnancy and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med 335:768–774

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kizilkilic O, Albayram S, Adaletli I, Kantarci F, Uzma O, Islak C, Kocer N (2003) Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms during pregnancy: report of three cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 268:325–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Koivisto T, Vanninen R, Hurskainen H, Saari T, Hernerniemi J, Vapalahti M (2000) Outcomes of early endovascular versus surgcial treatment of ruptured cerebral aneuryms: a prospective randomised study. Stroke 31(10):2369–2377

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Le TT, Hasakal ZJ, Holland GA, Townsend R (1995) Endovascular stent placement and magnetic resonance angiography for management of hypertension and renal artery occlusion during pregnancy. Obstet & Gynecol 85(5:2):822–825

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Locksley HB (1966) Report on the cooperative study of intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoid haemorrhage. Section V, part II. Natural history of subarachnoid haemorrhage, intracranial aneurysms and arterio-venous malformations based on 6,368 cases in the co-operative study. J Neurosurg 25:321–368

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Marshall NW, Noble J, Faulkner K (1995) Patient and staff dosimetry in neuroradiological procedures. Br J Radiol 68:495–501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Marshman LAG, Aspoas AR, Rai MS (2005) Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms during pregnancy: Letter. Arch Gynecol Obstet 272:93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mas JL, Lamy C (1998) Stroke in pregnancy and the puerperium. J Neurol 245:305–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Meyers PM, Halbach VV, Malek AM, Phatouros CC, Doed CF, Lawton MT, Lempert TE, Higashida RT (2000) Endovascular treatment of cerebral artery aneurysms during pregnancy: Report of three cases. Am J Neuroradiol 21:1306–1311

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Miller HJ, Hinkley CM (1970) Berry aneurysms in pregnancy: a 10-year report. South Med J 63:279–285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Minielly R, Yuzpe AA, Drake CG (1979) Subarachnoid haemorrhage secondary to reported cerebral aneurysm in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 53:64–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Molyneux A (2002) International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 360:1267–1274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. National Radiological Protection Board (1993) Board statement on diagnostic medical exposures to ionizing radiation during pregnancy. Documents of the NRPB 4(4). London, HMSO

  30. National Radiological Protection Board (1998) Advice on exposure to ionizing radiation during pregnancy. ISBN 0 85951 420X

  31. Piotin M, Filho CBA, Kothimbakam R, Moret J (2001) Endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysm in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1261–1262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Robinson JL, Hall CJ, Sedzimir CB (1972) Subarachnoid haemorrhage in pregnancy. J Neurosurg 36:27–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sanchez-Ramos L, Chami YG, Bass TA, DelValle GO, Adair CD (1994) Myocardial infarction during pregnancy: management with transluminal coronary angioplasty and metallic intracoronary stents . Am J Obstet Gynecol 171(5):1392–1393

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Selo-Ojeme DO, Marshman LAG, Ikomi A, Ojutiku D, Apsoas AR, Chawda SJ, Bawa GPS, Rai MS (2005) Review: aneurysmal sub-arachnoid haemorrhage in pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol 116:131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shahabi S, Tecco L, Jani J, Pirotte B, Rodesch G, Baurain M, Simon P, Masters L, Rodesch F (2001) Management of a ruptured basilar artery aneurysm during pregnancy. Acta Chir Belg 101:193–195

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Siwolke GA, Cox SM, Cunningham GG (1991) Cerebrovascular accidents complicating pregnancy and the puerperium. Obstet Gynecol 78:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stehbens WE (1981) Aetiology of cerebral aneurysms. Lancet 2:524–525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Stoodley MA, Macdonald RL, Weir BK (1998) Pregnancy and intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurg Clin N Am 9:549–556

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Weir BK, Drake CG (1991) Rapid growth of residual aneurysmal neck during pregnancy: a case report. J Neurosurg 75:780–782

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Weir BK (2002) Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a review. J Neurosurg 96(1):3–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wiebers DO, Wishnat JP (1985) The incidence of stroke among pregnant women in Rochester, Minn 1955 through 1979. JAMA 254:3055–3057

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Sundt TM et al (1987) The significance of unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms. J Neurosurg 66:23–29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Wiebers DO (1998) Unruptured intracranial aneurysms-risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. The international study of unruptured intracranial aneurysms investigators. NEJM 339(24):1725–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wiebers DO (2003) Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 362:103–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurence A. G. Marshman.

Additional information

Comments

Michael T. Lawton, San Francisco, CA

The management of a pregnant mother with an intracranial aneurysm is controversial. Should an unruptured aneurysm be treated or observed? Should a ruptured aneurysym be endovascularly coiled or microsurgically clipped? From their review of the literature, Marshman and colleagues suggest that pregnancy increases the risk of aneurysm rupture and that the management of unruptured aneuysms in pregnant women should be more aggressive than in non-pregnant women. Furthermore, the authors suggest that coil embolization presents unique problems for pregnant women, with danger to the fetus associated with prolonged radiation exposure and danger to the mother associated with systemic anticoagulation during labor and delivery. The International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) and the International Study on Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA) might appear to address some of the controversy over these issues, but the authors caution against extrapolating data from these studies because neither one addressed aneurysm management during pregnancy. Unfortunately, there is no randomized, controlled trial that examines these special circumstances, and it is difficult to imagine that such a study could be conducted. Therefore, as with all unresolved clinical controversies, management decisions must be made by the patient after being informed of the options of observation, microsurgical clipping and endovascular coiling. Ultimately, her decision will be based on her gut reaction more than the hard science.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marshman, L.A.G., Aspoas, A.R., Rai, M.S. et al. The implications of ISAT and ISUIA for the management of cerebral aneurysms during pregnancy. Neurosurg Rev 30, 177–180 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-007-0074-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-007-0074-8

Keywords

Navigation