Skip to main content
Log in

Abscisic acid, sucrose, and auxin coordinately regulate berry ripening process of the Fujiminori grape

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Functional & Integrative Genomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of abscisic acid (ABA), sucrose, and auxin on grape fruit development and to assess the mechanism of these three factors on the grape fruit ripening process. Different concentrations of ABA, sucrose, and auxin were used to treat the grape fruit, and the ripening-related indices, such as physiological and molecular level parameters, were analyzed. The activity of BG protein activity was analyzed during the fruit development. Sucrose, ABA, and auxin influenced the grape fruit sugar accumulation in different ways, as well as the volatile compounds, anthocyanin content, and fruit firmness. ABA and sucrose induced, but auxin blocked, the ripening-related gene expression levels, such as softening genes PE, PG, PL, and CELL, anthocyanin genes DFR, CHI, F3H, GST, CHS, and UFGT, and aroma genes Ecar, QR, and EGS. ABA, sucrose, and glucose induced the fruit dry weight accumulation, and auxin mainly enhanced fruit dry weight through seed weight accumulation. In the early development of grape, starch was the main energy storage; in the later, it was glucose and fructose. Sucrose metabolism pathway-related gene expression levels were significant for glucose and fructose accumulation. BG protein activity was important in the regulation of grape ABA content levels. ABA plays a core role in the grape fruit development; sucrose functions in fruit development through two pathways: one was ABA dependent, the other ABA independent. Auxin blocked ABA accumulation to regulate the fruit development process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ABA:

Abscisic acid

IAA:

Indole-3-acetic acid

NDGA:

Nordihydroguaiaretic acid

NPA:

1-N-Naphthylphthalamic acid

Reference

  • Ai TN, Naing AH, Arun M, Lim SH, Kim CK (2016) Sucrose-induced anthocyanin accumulation in vegetative tissue of Petunia plants requires anthocyanin regulatory transcription factors. Plant Sci 252:144–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander L, Grierson D (2002) Ethylene biosynthesis and action in tomato: a model for climacteric fruit ripening. J Exp Bot 53:2039–2055

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JV, Doğramacı M, Horvath DP, Foley ME, Chao WS, Suttle JC, Thimmapuram J, Hernandez AG, Ali S, Mikel MA (2012) Auxin and ABA act as central regulators of developmental networks associated with paradormancy in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Functional Integrative Genomics 12(3):515–531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews PK, Li S (1995) Cell wall hydrolytic enzyme activity during development of nonclimacteric sweet cherry (Pruns avium L.) fruit. J. Hortic Sci 70:561–567

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baker RF, Leach KA, Boyer NR, Swyers MJ, Benitez-Alfonso Y, Skopelitis T, Luo A, Sylvester A, Jackson D, Braun DM (2016) Sucrose transporter ZmSut1 expression and localization uncover new insights into sucrose phloem loading. Plant Physiology pp.00884.

  • Basson CE, Groenewald JH, Kossmann J et al (2010) Sugar and acid-related quality attributes and enzyme activities in strawberry fruits: invertase is the main sucrose hydrolysing enzyme. Food Chem 121(4):1156–1162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cakir B, Agasse A, Gaillard C, Saumonneau A, Delrot S, Atanassova R (2003) A grape ASR protein involved in sugar and abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 15:2165–2180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Coombe BG (1992) Research on development and ripening of the grape berry. Am J Enol Vitic 43:101–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Corso M, Vannozzi A, Ziliotto F, Zouine M, Maza E, Nicolato T, Vitulo N, Meggio F, Valle G, Bouzayen M, Müller M, Munné-Bosch S, Lucchin M, Bonghi C (2016) Grapevine rootstocks differentially affect the rate of ripening and modulate auxin-related genes in cabernet sauvignon berries. Front Plant Sci 7(382)

  • Dong J, Zhang YT, Tang XW, Jin WM, Han ZH (2013) Differences in volatile ester composition between Fragaria×ananassa and F. vesca and implications for strawberry aroma patterns. Sci Horti (Amsterdam) 150:47–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engelen FAV, Molthoff JW, Conner AJ, Nap JP, Pereira A, Stiekema WJ (1995) pBINPLUS: an improved plant transformation vector based on pBIN19. Transgen Res 4:288–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernie AR, Roessner U, Geigenberger P (2001) The sucrose analog palatinose leads to a stimulation of sucrose degradation and starch synthesis when supplied to discs of growing potato tubers. Plant Physiol 125:1967–1977

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fu FQ, Mao WH, Shi K, Zhou YH, Asami T et al (2008) A role of brassinosteroids in early fruit development in cucumber. J Exp Bot 59:2299–2308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson SI (2005) Control of plant development and gene expression by sugar signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8:93–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giovannoni JJ (2001) Molecular biology of fruit maturation and ripening. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 52:725–749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giovannoni JJ (2004) Genetic regulation of fruit development and ripening. Plant Cell 16:170–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han Y, Dang RH, Li JX, Jiang J, Zhang N, Jia MR, Wei LZ, Li ZQ, Li BB, Jia WS (2015) SUCROSE NONFERMENTING1-RELATED PROTEIN KINASE2.6, an ortholog of OPEN STOMATA1, is a negative regulator of strawberry fruit development and ripening. Plant Physiol 167(3):915–930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hardie WJ, O'brien TP, Jaudzems VG (1996) Morphology, anatomy and development of the pericarp after anthesis in grape, Vitis vinifera L. Aust J Grape Wine Res 2(2):97–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy J (1967) Sucrose breakdown and synthesis in the ripening grape berry. Aust J Biol Sci 20:465–470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang H, Xie S, Xiao Q, Wei B, Zheng L, Wang Y, Cao Y, Zhang X, Long T, Li Y, Hu Y, Yu G, Liu H, Liu Y, Huang Z, Zhang J, Huang Y (2016) Sucrose and ABA regulate starch biosynthesis in maize through a novel transcription factor, ZmEREB156. Sci Rep 6:27590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jia HF, Chai YM, Li CL, Lu D, Luo JJ, Qin L, Shen YY (2011) Abscisic acid plays an important role in the regulation of strawberry fruit ripening. Plant Physiol 157:188–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jia HF, Zhang C, Pervaiz T, Zhao PC, Liu ZJ, Wang BJ, Wang C, Zhang L, Fang JG, Qian JP (2015) Jasmonic acid involves in grape fruit ripening and resistant against botrytis cinerea. Functional Integrative Genomics 16(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan F, Guy CL (2005) RNA interference of Arabidopsis beta-amylase8 prevents maltose accumulation upon cold shock and increases sensitivity of PSII photochemical efficiency to freezing stress. Plant J 44(5):730–743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koyama K, Sadamatsu K, Goto-Yamamoto N (2010) Abscisic acid stimulated ripening and gene expression in berry skins of the Cabernet Sauvignon grape. Functional Integrative Genomics 10(3):367–381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KH, Piao HL, Kim HY, Choi SM, Jiang F, Hartung W, Hwang I, Kwak JM, Lee IJ, Hwang I (2006) Activation of glucosidase via stress-induced polymerization rapidly increases active pools of abscisic acid. Cell 126:1109–1120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Chung EJ, Joung YH, Choi D (2010) Non-climacteric fruit ripening in pepper: increased transcription of EIL-like genes normally regulated by ethylene. Functional Integrative Genomics 10:135–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Li P, Sun L, Wang Y, Ji K, Sun Y, Dai S, Chen P, Duan C, Leng P (2012) Expression analysis of β-glucosidase genes that regulate abscisic acid homeostasis during watermelon(Citrullus lanatus) development and under stress conditions. Journal Plant Physiology 169(1):78–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nambara E, Marion-poll A (2005) Abscisic acid biosynthesis and catabolism. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56:165–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nardozza S, Boldingh HL, Osorio S et al (2013) Metabolic analysis of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) berries from extreme genotypes reveals hallmarks for fruit starch metabolism. J Exp Bot 64(16):5049–5063

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Neta-Sharir I, Shoseyov O, Weiss D (2000) Sugars enhance the expression of gibberellin-induced genes in developing petunia flowers. Physiol Plant 109(2):196–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Price J, Laxmi A, St Martin SK, Jang JC (2004) Global transcription profiling reveals multiple sugar signal transduction mechanisms in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 16:2128–2150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Qin G, Zhu Z, Wang W, Cai J, Chen Y, Li L, Tian S (2016) A tomato vacuolar invertase inhibitor mediates sucrose metabolism and influences fruit ripening. Plant Physiology pp.01269.

  • Robinson NL, Hewitt JD, Bennett AB (1988) Sink metabolism in tomato fruit I. Developmental changes in carbohydrate metabolizing enzymes Plant Physiology 87(3):727–730

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour GB, Østergaard L, Chapman NH, Knapp S, Martin C (2013) Fruit development and ripening. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64:219–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Solfanclli C, Poggi A, Loreti E (2006) Sucrose-specific induction of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 140:637–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su L, Diretto G, Purgatto E, Danoun S, Zouine M, Li Z, Roustan JP, Bouzayen M, Giuliano G, Chervin C (2015) Carotenoid accumulation during tomato fruit ripening is modulated by the auxin-ethylene balance. BMC Plant Biol 15:114

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sun C, Palmqvist S, Olsson H (2003) A novel WRKY transcription factor, SUSIBA2, participates in sugar signaling in barley by binding to the sugar-responsive elements of the iso1 promoter. Plant Cell 15:2076–2092

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Symons G, Davies C, Shavrukov Y, Dry I, Reid J et al (2006) Grapes on steroids. Brassinosteroids are involved in grape berry ripening Plant Physiol 140:150–158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tadiello A, Ziosi V, Negri AS, Noferini M, Fiori G, Busatto N, Espen L, Costa G12, Trainotti L (2016) On the role of ethylene, auxin and a GOLVEN-like peptide hormone in the regulation of peach ripening. BMC Plant Biol 16:44

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Trainotti L, Tadiello A, Casadoro G (2007) The involvement of auxin in the ripening of climacteric fruits comes of age: the hormone plays a role of its own and has an intense interplay with ethylene in ripening peaches. J Exp Bot 58:3299–3308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Villalobos-González L, Peña-Neira A, Ibáñez F, Pastenes C (2016) Long-term effects of abscisic acid (ABA) on the grape berry phenylpropanoid pathway: gene expression andmetabolite content. Plant Physiol Biochem 105:213–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang N, Duhita N, Ariizumi T, Ezura H (2016) Involvement of vacuolar processing enzyme slvpe5 in post-transcriptional process of invertase in sucrose accumulation in tomato. Plant Physiology Biochemistry 108:71–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wegrzyn TF, MacRae EA (1992) Pectinesterase, polygalacturonase, and β-galactosidase during softening of ethylene-treated kiwifruit. Hortscience 27:900–902

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xing L, Zhao Y, Gao J, Xiang C, Zhu JK (2016) The ABA receptor PYL9 together with PYL8 plays an important role in regulating lateral root growth. Sci Rep 6:27177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan RC, Carbaugh DH (2007) Effects of NAA, AVG, and 1-MCP on ethylene biosynthesis, preharvest fruit drop, fruit maturity, and quality of ‘Golden supreme’ and ‘Golden delicious’ apples. Hortscience 42:101–105

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Leng P, Zhang GL, Li XX (2009) Cloning and functional analysis of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (NCED) genes encoding a key enzyme during abscisic acid biosynthesis from peach and grape fruits. J Plant Physiol 166:1241–1252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences for providing the grape material. This work was supported by the Jiangsu Natural Science Fund (BK20140707), Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture (ZW2014009), China National Natural Science Fund (31401847), China National Natural State Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture (NYB-201508-1) Science Fund (31361140358), and State Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture (NYB-201508-1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Haifeng Jia or Jinggui Fang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary table S1

(DOCX 15 kb)

Fig. S1

(DOCX 301 kb)

Fig. S2

(DOCX 516 kb)

Fig. S3

(DOCX 138 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jia, H., Xie, Z., Wang, C. et al. Abscisic acid, sucrose, and auxin coordinately regulate berry ripening process of the Fujiminori grape. Funct Integr Genomics 17, 441–457 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-017-0546-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-017-0546-z

Keywords

Navigation