Functional & Integrative Genomics

, Volume 17, Issue 2–3, pp 279–292 | Cite as

Drought-inducible expression of Hv-miR827 enhances drought tolerance in transgenic barley

  • Jannatul Ferdous
  • Ryan Whitford
  • Martin Nguyen
  • Chris Brien
  • Peter Langridge
  • Penny J. TrickerEmail author
Original Article


Drought is one of the major abiotic stresses reducing crop yield. Since the discovery of plant microRNAs (miRNAs), considerable progress has been made in clarifying their role in plant responses to abiotic stresses, including drought. miR827 was previously reported to confer drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. We examined barley (Hordeum vulgare L. ‘Golden Promise’) plants over-expressing miR827 for plant performance under drought. Transgenic plants constitutively expressing CaMV-35S::Ath-miR827 and drought-inducible Zm-Rab17::Hv-miR827 were phenotyped by non-destructive imaging for growth and whole plant water use efficiency (WUEwp). We observed that the growth, WUEwp, time to anthesis and grain weight of transgenic barley plants expressing CaMV-35S::Ath-miR827 were negatively affected in both well-watered and drought-treated growing conditions compared with the wild-type plants. In contrast, transgenic plants over-expressing Zm-Rab17::Hv-miR827 showed improved WUEwp with no growth or reproductive timing change compared with the wild-type plants. The recovery of Zm-Rab17::Hv-miR827 over-expressing plants also improved following severe drought stress. Our results suggest that Hv-miR827 has the potential to improve the performance of barley under drought and that the choice of promoter to control the timing and specificity of miRNA expression is critical.


Ath-miR827 Hv-miR827 Non-destructive imaging Promoter 



This research was supported by a grant to the Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics, supported through research funding from DuPont/Pioneer (USA). Our grateful thanks to Patricia Warner and ACPFG Transformation Group for barley transformation; Margaret Pallotta and Suzanne Manning for their assistance with Southern blotting; and Dr. Sergiy Lopato, Dr. Ainur Ismagul and Dr. Nataliya Kovalchuk for generation and selection of the Zm-Rab17::GUS transgenic barley germplasm. We specially thank the team of The Plant Accelerator for technical support in running the experiment and conducting the image analysis. The Plant Accelerator, Australian Plant Phenomics Facility, is funded under the National Collaborative Infrastructure Strategy. We are thankful to Dr. Ursula Langridge, Alex Kovalchuk and Yuri Onyskiv for their assistance with growing plants at different phases of this experiment, and Yuan Li and Hui Zhou for performing the qRT-PCR assays. We also thank Dr. Bu-Jun Shi for his advice at the early stage of this experiment.

Supplementary material

10142_2016_526_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (21 kb)
ESM 1 (XLSX 20 kb)
10142_2016_526_MOESM2_ESM.docx (22.8 mb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 23365 kb)


  1. Aukerman M, Park W (2009) Drought tolerant plants and related constructs and methods involving genes encoding mir827, Patent application number: US20090165168Google Scholar
  2. Axtell MJ, Bartel DP (2005) Antiquity of microRNAs and their targets in land plants. Plant Cell 17:1658–1673CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bao Y, Wang C, Jiang C, Pan J, Zhang G, Liu H, Zhang H (2014) The tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF)-like family protein SEVEN IN ABSENTIA 2 (SINA2) promotes drought tolerance in an ABA-dependent manner in Arabidopsis. New Phytol 202(1):174–187Google Scholar
  4. Bartel DP (2009) MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 136:215–233CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Blum A (2011) Drought resistance—is it really a complex trait? Funct Plant Biol 38:753–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyer JS (1970) Leaf enlargement and metabolic rates in corn, soybean, and sunflower at various leaf water potentials. Plant Physiol 46:233–235CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyer JS, Westgate ME (2004) Grain yields with limited water. J Exp Bot 55:2385–2394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brien CJ (2011) dae: functions useful in the design and ANOVA of experiments. Version 2.1-7.
  9. Budak H, Kantar M, Bulut R, Akpinar BA (2015) Stress responsive miRNAs and isomiRs in cereals. Plant Sci 235:1–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Busk PK, Jensen AB, Pages M (1997) Regulatory elements in vivo in the promoter of the abscisic acid responsive gene rab17 from maize. Plant J 11:1285–1295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Butler D, Cullis BR, Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ (2010) Analysis of mixed models for S language environments: ASReml-R reference manual. DPI Publications, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  12. Centritto M, Lauteri M, Monteverdi MC, Serraj R (2009) Leaf gas exchange, carbon isotope discrimination, and grain yield in contrasting rice genotypes subjected to water deficits during the reproductive stage. J Exp Bot 60:2325–2339CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheah BH, Nadarajah K, Divate MD, Wickneswari R (2015) Identification of four functionally important microRNA families with contrasting differential expression profiles between drought-tolerant and susceptible rice leaf at vegetative stage. BMC Genomics 16:692–709CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen C, Ridzon DA, Broomer AJ, Zhou Z, Lee DH, Nguyen JT, Barbisin M, Xu NL, Mahuvakar VR, Andersen MR, Lao KQ, Livak KJ, Guegler KJ (2005) Real-time quantification of microRNAs by stem-loop RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 33:e179CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Coombes NE (2009) Digger design search tool in R.
  16. Curtis MD, Grossniklaus U (2003) A gateway cloning vector set for high-throughput functional analysis of genes in planta. Plant Physiol 133:462–469CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Edwards K, Johnstone C, Thompson C (1991) A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 19(6):1349–1349Google Scholar
  18. Ferdous J, Li Y, Reid N, Langridge P, Shi BJ, Tricker PJ (2015) Identification of reference genes for quantitative expression analysis of microRNAs and mRNAs in barley under various stress conditions. PLoS One 10:e0118503CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferdous J, Sanchez-Ferrero JC, Langridge P, Milne L, Chowdhury J, Brien C, Tricker PJ (2016) Differential expression of microRNAs and potential targets under drought stress in barley. Plant Cell Environ. doi: 10.1111/pce.12764 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Frazier TP, Sun G, Burklew CE, Zhang B (2011) Salt and drought stresses induce the aberrant expression of microRNA genes in tobacco. Mol Biotechnol 49:159–165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hackenberg M, Huang P-J, Huang C-Y, Shi B-J, Gustafson P, Langridge P (2013) A comprehensive expression profile of microRNAs and other classes of non-coding small RNAs in barley under phosphorus-deficient and -sufficient consitions. DNA Res 20:109–125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hackenberg M, Gustafson P, Langridge P, Shi BJ (2015) Differential expression of microRNAs and other small RNAs in barley between water and drought conditions. Plant Biotechnol J 13:2–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Honsdorf N, March TJ, Berger B, Tester M, Pillen K (2014) High-throughput phenotyping to detect drought tolerance qtl in wild barley introgression lines. PLoS One 9:e97047CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Ismagul A, Mazonka I, Callegari C, Eliby S (2014) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). In: Fleury D, Whitford R (eds) Crop breeding methods and protocols, 1st edn. Springer, New York, pp 203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW (1987) GUS fusion: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J 6:3901–3907PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP, Bartel B (2006) MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57:19–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kantar M, Lucas SJ , Budak H, Kantar M, Lucas SJ, Budak H (2011) miRNA expression patterns of Triticum dicoccoides in response to shock drought stress. Planta 233(3):471–484Google Scholar
  28. Kasuga M, Liu Q, Miura S, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (1999) Improving plant drought, salt, and freezing tolerance by gene transfer of a single stress-inducible transcription factor. Nat Biotechnol 17:287–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Katiyar A, Smita S, Muthusamy SK, Chinnusamy V, Pandey DM, Bansal KC (2015) Identification of novel drought-responsive microRNAs and trans-acting siRNAs from Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench by high-throughput sequencing analysis. Front Plant Sci 6:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kulcheski FR, de Oliveira LFV, Molina LG, Almerão MP, Rodrigues FA, Marcolino J, Barbosa JF, Stolf-Moreira R, Nepomuceno AL, Marcelino-Guimarães FC, Abdelnoor RV, Nascimento LC, Carazzolle MF, Pereira GAG, Margis R (2011) Identification of novel soybean microRNAs involved in abiotic and biotic stresses. BMC Genomics 12:307–323CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Lawlor DW (2013) Genetic engineering to improve plant performance under drought: physiological evaluation of achievements, limitations, and possibilities. J Exp Bot 64:83–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Li WX, Oono Y, Zhu J, He XJ, Wu JM, Iida K, Lu XY, Cui X, Jin H, Zhu JK (2008) The Arabidopsis NFYA5 transcription factor is regulated transcriptionally and posttranscriptionally to promote drought resistance. Plant Cell 20:2238–2251CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Lin SI, Santi C, Jobet E, Lacut E, El Kholti N, Karlowski WM, Verdeil JL, Breitler JC, Périn C, Ko SS, Guiderdoni E, Chiou TJ, Echeverria M (2010) Complex regulation of two target genes encoding SPX-MFS proteins by rice miR827 in response to phosphate starvation. Plant Cell Physiol 51:2119–2131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu HH, Tian X, Li YJ, Wu CA, Zheng CC (2008) Microarray-based analysis of stress-regulated microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. RNA 14:836–843CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu Q, Wang F, Axtell MJ (2014) Analysis of complementarity requirements for plant microRNA targeting using a Nicotiana benthamiana quantitative transient assay. Plant Cell 26:741–753CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu H, Searle IR, Watson-Haigh NS, Baumann U, Mather DE, Able AJ, Able JA (2015) Genome-wide identification of microRNAs in leaves and the developing head of four durum genotypes during water deficit stress. PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142799 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu H, Able AJ, Able JA (2016a) Water-deficit responsive microRNAs and their targets in four durum wheat genotypes. Funct Integr Genomics. doi: 10.1007/s10142-016-0515-y Google Scholar
  38. Liu H, Able AJ, Able JA (2016b) SMARTER de-stressed cereal breeding. Trends Plant Sci. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.07.006 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lu XY, Huang XL (2008) Plant miRNAs and abiotic stress responses. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 368:458–462CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Morran S, Eini O, Pyvovarenko T, Parent B, Singh R, Ismagul A, Eliby S, Shirley N, Langridge P, Lopato S (2011) Improvement of stress tolerance of wheat and barley by modulation of expression of DREB/CBF factors. Plant Biotechnol J 9:230–249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Nakashima K, Ito Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2009) Transcriptional regulatory networks in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis and grasses. Plant Physiol 149:88–95CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Nevo E, Chen G (2010) Drought and salt tolerances in wild relatives for wheat and barley improvement. Plant Cell Environ 33:670–685CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Oh SJ, Kwon CW, Choi DW, Song SI, Kim JK (2007) Expression of barley HvCBF4 enhances tolerance to abiotic stress in transgenic rice. Plant Biotechnol J 5:646–656CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Parizotto EA, Dunoyer P, Rahm N, Himber C, Voinnet O (2004) In vivo investigation of the transcription, processing, endonucleolytic activity, and functional relevance of the spatial distribution of a plant miRNA. Genes Dev 18:2237–2242CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Qin Y, Duan Z, Xia X, Yin W (2011) Expression profiles of precursor and mature microRNAs under dehydration and high salinity shock in Populus euphratica. Plant Cell Rep 30:1893–1907CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. R Development Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Google Scholar
  47. R Development Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Google Scholar
  48. Schreiber AW, Shi B-J, Huang C-Y, Langridge P, Baumann U (2011) Discovery of barley miRNAs through deep sequencing of short reads. BMC Genomics 12:129CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Schwab R, Palatnik JF, Riester M, Schommer C, Schmid M, Weigel D (2005) Specific effects of microRNAs on the plant transcriptome. Dev Cell 8:517–527CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Shi BJ, Sutton T, Collins NC, Pallotta M, Langridge P (2010) Construction of a barley bacterial artificial chromosome library suitable for cloning genes for boron tolerance, sodium exclusion and high grain zinc content. Plant Breed 129:291–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2007) Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J Exp Bot 58:221–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Sunkar R, Zhu JK (2004) Novel and stress-regulated microRNAs and other small RNAs from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 16:2001–2019CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Sunkar R, Chinnusamy V, Zhu J, Zhu JK (2007) Small RNAs as big players in plant abiotic stress responses and nutrient deprivation. Trends Plant Sci 12:301–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Sunkar R, Li YF, Jagadeeswaran G (2012) Functions of microRNAs in plant stress responses. Trends Plant Sci 17:196–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Trindade I, Capitao C, Dalmay T, Fevereiro MP, dos Santos DM (2010) miR398 and miR408 are up-regulated in response to water deficit in Medicago truncatula. Planta 231:705–716CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Varkonyi-Gasic E, Wu R, Wood M, Walton EF, Hellens RP (2007) Protocol: a highly sensitive RT-PCR method for detection and quantification of microRNAs. Plant Methods 3:12–23CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Wei L, Zhang D, Xiang F, Zhang Z (2009) Differentially expressed miRNAs potentially involved in the regulation of defense mechanism to drought stress in maize seedlings. Int J Plant Sci 170:979–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Xu Z, Dooner HK (2006) The maize aberrant pollen transmission 1 gene is a SABRE/KIP homolog required for pollen tube growth. Genetics 172:1251–1261CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Xu Z, Zhou G, Shimizu H (2010) Plant responses to drought and rewatering. Plant Signaling Behav 5:649–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang JZ, Creelman RA, Zhu JK (2004) From laboratory to field: using information from Arabidopsis to engineer salt, cold, and drought tolerance in crops. Plant Physiol 135:615–621CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhang B, Pan X, Cannon CH, Cobb GP, Anderson TA (2006) Conservation and divergence of plant microRNA genes. Plant J 46:243–259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jannatul Ferdous
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ryan Whitford
    • 1
    • 2
  • Martin Nguyen
    • 3
  • Chris Brien
    • 3
  • Peter Langridge
    • 2
  • Penny J. Tricker
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Australian Centre for Plant Functional GenomicsAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.School of Agriculture, Food and WineThe University of Adelaide, PMB1Glen OsmondAustralia
  3. 3.Phenomics and Bioinformatics Research Centre, School of Information Technology and Mathematical SciencesUniversity of South AustraliaMawson LakesAustralia

Personalised recommendations