The spectrum of lung parenchymal changes in COVID-19 demonstrates a fairly typical pattern. Pan et al. described a temporal relationship of CT chest findings, characterized by 4 stages of progression [8]. The initial findings include predominantly lower lobe subpleural ground glass change (stage 1); bilateral multilobar ground glass change and consolidation (stage 2); dense consolidation, crazy paving pattern, and parenchymal bands (stage 3); and final stage of resolution with the absorption of consolidation and lack of visualization of the crazy paving pattern (stage 4) [8]. We can propose that patients 1 and 2 were in stage 2 of the disease while patient 3 was in stage 3 of the disease.
DECT works on the principle of utilizing two different x-ray energy spectra (high- and low-kilovoltage series) during image acquisitions. By using various post processing techniques, different sequences such as virtual non-contrast, iodine images and lung perfusion maps can be generated. Hence, DECT with added post-processing allows the radiologist to assess for perfusion abnormalities in addition to the lung parenchyma.
The cases above, although negative for pulmonary embolism, demonstrated a spectrum of lung perfusion changes ranging from hypoperfusion to hyperperfusion. We noted dilatation of blood vessels in the subpleural region and within the affected lungs in all three patients, in keeping with previously published findings. Caruso et al. describe finding enlarged subpleural blood vessels (> 3 mm) in 89% of their patients [9]. This is corroborated by the study by Lang et al. who found dilated pulmonary vasculature in 85% of cases and dilated distal blood vessels extending to the pleura and fissures [4]. Alberello et al. described two cases in which there was a progressive increase in pulmonary artery caliber and pulmonary vessel hypertrophy in areas of increased ground glass opacification, suggesting that it could be an early radiological sign to predict lung deterioration [5]. The proposed mechanisms to explain this underlying change include abnormal vasoregulation, intrapulmonary shunting, or microvascular thrombosis. Ackermann et al. described severe endothelial damage within the lungs in a small group of seven patients with COVID-19 and a process of angiogenesis accounting for new vessel growth, much more evident in COVID-19 patients than in influenza, which may account for the vessel dilatation noted on CT [10]. Recent literature has also shed light on the seemingly “happy” hypoxic patient who, though fairly hypoxemic based on physiological parameters, might not initially experience significant symptomatic dyspnea due to preserve lung compliance but subsequently experiences rapid deterioration [11].
The reporting time for COVID-19 swab results is variable, dependent on local policy and resource availability. There have been multiple cases in which the initial COVID-19 RT-PCR result has been false negative with concurrent CT demonstrating positive lung parenchymal changes [12]. The CT findings of ground glass opacities and peripheral consolidation are not specific and may be seen in a variety of diseases. DECT could strengthen diagnostic confidence over conventional CT in circumstances where the initial COVID swab is negative or pending, thereby aiding clinical management.
The limitations of the study are that these are preliminary results in a small number of cases from a single institution. Further analysis on a larger cohort of cases with varying severity of lung parenchymal involvement would be of value. It remains a work in progress to determine if early identification of areas of perfusion anomalies on DECT in the “happy” hypoxic patient who is compensating well could be a useful prognostic indicator for predicting deterioration. If validated, the routine use of DECT (if available) may be helpful in assessing for perfusion anomalies, a feature which could even be incorporated as part of a COVID-19 pneumonia CT severity scoring system.