Skip to main content
Log in

Accessory ossicles of the foot—an imaging conundrum

  • Pictorial Essay
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various anatomical variations can be found in the foot and ankle, including sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles. These are usually incidental findings and remain asymptomatic; however, they may cause complications resulting in painful syndromes or degenerative changes secondary to overuse or trauma. They can also lead to fractures or simulate fractures. These complications are challenging to diagnose on radiographs. Advanced imaging with US, CT, MRI, or Tc-99m bone scan is useful for definitive diagnosis. This study aims to illustrate how imaging modalities can be used to diagnose complications of common sesamoids and accessory ossicles of the ankle and foot (hallux sesamoids, os trigonum, accessory navicular, os supranaviculare, os peroneum, os intermetatarseum, and os calcaneus secundarius) and demonstrate the imaging differences between fractures and their mimics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mellado JM, Ramos A, Salvado E et al (2003) Accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones of the ankle and foot: imaging findings, clinical significance and differential diagnosis. Eur Radiol 13(Suppl. 6):L164–L177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sarin VK, Erickson GM, Giori NJ, Bergman AG, Carter DR (1999) Coincident development of sesamoid bones and clues to their evolution. Anat Rec 257(5):174–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nwawka OK, Hayashi D, Diaz LE, Goud AR, Arndt WF, Roemer FW, Malguria N, Guermazi A (2013) Sesamoids and accessory ossicles of the foot: anatomical variability and related pathology. Insights Imaging 4(5):581–593

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller TT (2002) Painful accessory bones of the foot. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 6(2):153–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong GNL, Tan TJ (2016) MR imaging as a problem solving tool in posterior ankle pain: a review. Eur J Radiol 85(12):2238–2256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Abourazzak FE, Shimi M, Azzouzi H, Mansouri S, El Mrini A, Harzy T (2015) An unusual cause of medial foot pain: the cornuate navicular. Eur J Rheumatol 2(1):33–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yalawar RS, Bhuyan D, Desai RS, Goswami G (2014) A rare case of symptomatic os supranaviculare in a sportsman. IOSR J Appl Phys 6(4):15–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oh SJ, Kim YH, Kim SK, Kim M-W (2012) Painful os peroneum syndrome presenting as lateral plantar foot pain. Ann Rehabil Med 36(1):163–166

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chagas-Neto FA, de Souza BNC, Nogueira-Barbosa MH (2016) Painful os peroneum syndrome: underdiagnosed condition in the lateral midfoot pain. Case Rep Radiol 2016:8739362

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Henderson RS (1963) Os intermetatarseum and a possible relationship to hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 45B(1):117–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lawson JP (1994) International skeletal society lecture in honor of Howard D. Dorfman. Clinically significant radiologic anatomic variants of the skeleton. Am J Roentgenol 163(2):249–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Krapf D, Krapf S, Wyss C (2015) Calcaneus secundarius – a relevant differential diagnosis in ankle pain: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep 9:127

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yan YY, Mehta KV, Tan TJ (2016) Fracture of the os trigonum: a report of two cases and review of the literature. Foot Ankle Surg 22(4):e21–e24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Karadaglis D, Grace D (2003) Morphology of the hallux sesamoids. Foot Ankle Surg 9(3):165–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Biedert R, Hintermann B (2003) Stress fractures of the medial great toe sesamoids in athletes. Foot Ankle Int 24(2):137–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Boike A, Schnirring-Judge M, McMillin S (2001) Sesamoid disorders of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 28(2):269–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kose O, Okan AN, Durakbasa MO, Emrem K, Islam NC (2006) Fracture of the os trigonum: a case report. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 14(3):354–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Escobedo EM, MacDonald TL, Hunter JC (2006) Acute fracture of the os trigonum. Emerg Radiol 13(3):139–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Karasick D, Schweitzer ME (1996) The os trigonum syndrome: imaging features. Am J Roentgenol 166(1):125–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pesquer L, Guillo S, Meyer P, Hauger O (2014) US in ankle impingement syndrome. J Ultrasound 17(2):89–97 PMC. Web. 22 Oct. 2018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller TT, Staron RB, Feldman F, Parisien M, Glucksman WJ, Gandolfo LH (1995) The symptomatic accessory tarsal navicular bone: assessment with MR imaging. Radiology 195(3):849–853

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mosel LD, Kat E, Voyvodic F (2004) Imaging of the symptomatic type II accessory navicular bone. Australas Radiol 48(2):267–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chuang Y-W, Tsai W-S, Chen K-H, Hsu H-C (2012) Clinical use of high-resolution ultrasonography for the diagnosis of type II accessory navicular bone. Am J Phys Med Rehab 91(2):177–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ingalls J, Wissman R (2011) The os supranaviculare and navicular stress fractures. Skelet Radiol 40(7):937–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bianchi S, Bortolotto C, Draghi F (2017) Os peroneum imaging: normal appearance and pathological findings. Insights Imaging 8(1):59–68

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. McLenna MK, Margolis M (1991) Radiology rounds. Can Fam Physician 37:1372–1375

    Google Scholar 

  27. Strayer SM, Reece SG, Petrizzi MJ (1999) Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Am Fam Physician 59(9):2516–2522

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hodge JC (1999) Anterior process fracture or calcaneus secundarius: a case report. J Emerg Med 17(2):305–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ersen O, Akyıldız F, Ozyurek S, Sivrioglu AK (2013) Os calcaneus secundarius mimicking fracture. BMJ Case Rep 2013:bcr2013009954

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and final approval of the version to be submitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuyi Guo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, S., Yan, Y.Y., Lee, S.S.Y. et al. Accessory ossicles of the foot—an imaging conundrum. Emerg Radiol 26, 465–478 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-019-01688-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-019-01688-x

Keywords

Navigation