An assessment of repeat computed tomography utilization in the emergency department in the setting of blunt trauma
Computed tomography (CT) is a standard imaging modality utilized during the evaluation of trauma patients in the emergency department (ED). However, while it is common to utilize intravenous (IV) contrast as an adjunct, the use of multiple CT scans and how it impacts patient flow can lead to changes in patient management. Our objectives are to assess length of stay (LOS) and rates of acute kidney injury (AKI), when two CT scans of the abdomen/pelvis are performed compared to one CT scan.
Data of trauma hospital encounters were retrospectively collected during a 5-year period at a large, level 1 trauma center. Encounters were categorized into patients who received one or two CT scans of the abdomen/pelvis, as well as if they had received IV contrast or not. CT scan reads were extracted from chart records, and groups were compared.
Of 5787 patient encounters, 5335 (93.4%) received IV contrast and 75 (1.3%) received two CT scans. Lower rates of AKI were associated with IV contrast (2.5 vs 12.5%). Receiving two CT scans was associated with increased rates of AKI (20.0 vs 3.0%; p < 0.0001), ICU admissions (88.0 vs 25.1%; p < 0.0001), and hospital LOS (21.9 vs 1.4 days; p < 0.0001). Of the repeat CT scans, 59.4% demonstrated no significant difference and did not require blood products or the operating room.
Two CT scans performed during blunt trauma encounters demonstrated mixed benefit and were associated with an increased hospital LOS. Additionally, IV contrast was associated with lower rates of AKI.
KeywordsBlunt trauma Length of stay Emergency department Computed tomography Injury severity score
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was approved by our hospital’s institutional review board.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 6.Broder JS, Hamedani AG, Liu SW, Emerman CL (2013) Emergency department contrast practices for abdominal/pelvic computed tomography-a national survey and comparison with the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria(®). J Emerg Med 44(2):423–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.08.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Davenport MS, Khalatbari S, Cohan RH, Dillman JR, Myles JD, Ellis JH (2013) Contrast material-induced nephrotoxicity and intravenous low-osmolality iodinated contrast material: risk stratification by using estimated glomerular filtration rate. Radiology 268(3):719–728. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13122276 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Di Saverio S, Gambale G, Coccolini F, Catena F, Giorgini E, Ansaloni L, Amadori N, Coniglio C, Giugni A, Biscardi A, Magnone S, Filicori F, Cavallo P, Villani S, Cinquantini F, Annicchiarico M, Gordini G, Tugnoli G (2014) Changes in the outcomes of severe trauma patients from 15-year experience in a Western European trauma ICU of Emilia Romagna region (1996-2010). A population cross-sectional survey study. Langenbeck's Arch Surg 399(1):109–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-013-1143-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Colling KP, Irwin ED, Byrnes MC, Reicks P, Dellich WA, Reicks K, Gipson J, Beilman GJ (2014) Computed tomography scans with intravenous contrast: low incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in blunt trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 77(2):226–230. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000336 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Fuentes E, Shields JF, Chirumamilla N, Martinez M, Kaafarani H, Yeh DD, White B, Filbin M, DePesa C, Velmahos G, Lee J (2016) “One-way-street” streamlined admission of critically ill trauma patients reduces emergency department length of stay. Intern Emerg Med 12:1019–1024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-016-1511-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Sabzghabaei A, Shojaee M, Kariman H, Manouchehrifar M, Heydari K, Sohrabi S (2017) Pan vs. selective computed tomography scans in management of multiple trauma patients; a brief report. Emerg (Tehran) 5(1):e38Google Scholar
- 27.Sierink JC, Treskes K, Edwards MJ, Beuker BJ, den Hartog D, Hohmann J, Dijkgraaf MG, Luitse JS, Beenen LF, Hollmann MW, Goslings JC, group R-s (2016) Immediate total-body CT scanning versus conventional imaging and selective CT scanning in patients with severe trauma (REACT-2): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 388(10045):673–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30932-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Gupta M, Schriger DL, Hiatt JR, Cryer HG, Tillou A, Hoffman JR, Baraff LJ (2011) Selective use of computed tomography compared with routine whole body imaging in patients with blunt trauma. Ann Emerg Med 58(5):407–416.e415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.06.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar