Advertisement

Emergency Radiology

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 81–86 | Cite as

Imaging of flank pain: readdressing state-of-the-art

  • Priyanka JhaEmail author
  • Brian Bentley
  • Spencer Behr
  • Judy Yee
  • Ronald Zagoria
Review Article

Abstract

Pain resulting from renal and ureteral stones is a common cause for patients presenting in the acute setting. Since the late 1990s, computed tomography (CT) has been the initial imaging method of choice to evaluate patients with suspected ureteral stones; however, concerns regarding both radiation dose and cost-effectiveness have prompted investigations into a different imaging algorithm. Studies utilizing ultrasound have provided evidence indicating that it may be a more appropriate first step, with selective use of CT in selected cases, in the diagnostic work-up. Techniques have evolved with low-dose CT, dual-energy CT, and magnetic resonance urography emerging as useful in imaging of renal colic patients. This manuscript reviews the current literature on state-of-the-art imaging for acute flank pain and proposes a new imaging algorithm in the evaluation of patients with acute flank pain and suspected ureteral stones.

Keywords

Renal stone Low-dose CT Ultrasound MRI Pregnancy Imaging protocol STONE score 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Pearle MS, Calhoun EA, Curhan GC, Urologic Diseases of America Project (2005) Urologic diseases in America project: urolithiasis. J Urol 173(3):848–857CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fwu CW, Eggers PW, Kimmel PL, Kusek JW, Kirkali Z (2013) Emergency department visits, use of imaging, and drugs for urolithiasis have increased in the United States. Kidney Int 83(3):479–486CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Foster G, Stocks C, Brorofsky MS (2012) Emergency Department visits and hospital admissions for kidney stone disease, 2009: statistical brief #139. In: Healthcase Cose and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Breids (Internet). Rockville (MD): Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (US); 2006 Feb-. 2009 [cited 2016 February 29th]; Available from: http://www.ncbi.nih.gov/books/NBK100827/
  4. 4.
    Moore CL, Bomann S, Daniels B et al (2014) Derivation and validation of a clinical prediction rule for uncomplicated ureteral stone—the STONE score: retrospective and prospective observational cohort studies. BMJ 348:g2191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang RC, Rodriguez RM, Moghadassi M et al (2016) External validation of the STONE score, a clinical prediction rule for ureteral stone: an observational multi-institutional study. Ann Emerg Med 67(4):423–432.e2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coursey CA, Casalino DD, Remer EM et al (2012) ACR Appropriateness Criteria® acute onset flank pain—suspicion of stone disease. Ultrasound Q 28(3):227–233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Teichman JM (2004) Clinical practice. Acute renal colic from ureteral calculus. N Engl J Med 350(7):684–693CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Niemann T, Kollmann T, Bongartz G (2008) Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(2):396–401CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moore CL, Daniels B, Singh D, Luty S, Molinaro A (2013) Prevalence and clinical importance of alternative causes of symptoms using a renal colic computed tomography protocol in patients with flank or back pain and absence of pyuria. Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med 20(5):470–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ather MH, Faizullah K, Achakzai I, Siwani R, Irani F (2009) Alternate and incidental diagnoses on noncontrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography for acute flank pain. Urol J 6(1):14–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fulgham PF, Assimos DG, Pearle MS, Preminger GM (2013) Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment. J Urol 189(4):1203–1213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Katz DS, Scheer M, Lumerman JH, Mellinger BC, Stillman CA, Lane MJ (2000) Alternative or additional diagnoses on unenhanced helical computed tomography for suspected renal colic: experience with 1000 consecutive examinations. Urology 56(1):53–57CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schoenfeld EM, Poronsky KE, Elia TR, Budhram GR, Garb JL, Mader TJ (2015) Young patients with suspected uncomplicated renal colic are unlikely to have dangerous alternative diagnoses or need emergent intervention. West J Emerg Med 16(2):269–275CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Boll DT et al (2010) Dual-energy multidetector CT: how does it work, what can it tell us, and when can we use it in abdominopelvic imaging? Radiographics 30(4):1037–1055CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hidas G, Eliahou R, Duvdevani M et al (2010) Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy CT: in vivo analysis and comparison with x-ray diffraction. Radiology 257(2):394–401CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Manglaviti G, Tresoldi S, Guerrer CS et al (2011) In vivo evaluation of the chemical composition of urinary stones using dual-energy CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197(1):W76–W83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tiselius HG, Ackermann D, Alken P et al (2001) Guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur Urol 40(4):362–371CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wilhelm K, Schoenthaler M, Hein S et al (2015) Focused dual-energy CT maintains diagnostic and compositional accuracy for urolithiasis using ultralow-dose noncontrast CT. Urology 86(6):1097–1102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen CY, Hsu JS, Jaw TS et al (2015) Split-bolus portal venous phase dual-energy CT urography: protocol design, image quality, and dose reduction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205(5):W492–W501CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen CY, Tsai TH, Jaw TS et al (2016) Diagnostic performance of split-bolus portal venous phase dual-energy CT urography in patients with hematuria. AJR Am J Roentgenol 206(5):1013–1022CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lukasiewicz A, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Coombs L et al (2014) Radiation dose index of renal colic protocol CT studies in the United States: a report from the American College of Radiology National Radiology Data Registry. Radiology 271(2):445–451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hara AK, Wellnitz CV, Paden RG, Pavlicek W, Sahani DV (2013) Reducing body CT radiation dose: beyond just changing the numbers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201(1):33–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Poletti PA, Platon A, Rutschmann OT, Schmidlin FR, Iselin CE, Becker CD (2007) Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(4):927–933CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brenner DJ, Elliston CD (2004) Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. Radiology 232(3):735–738CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Westphalen AC, Hsia RY, Maselli JH, Wang R, Gonzales R (2011) Radiological imaging of patients with suspected urinary tract stones: national trends, diagnoses, and predictors. Acad Emerg Med Off J Soc Acad Emerg Med 18(7):699–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smith-Bindman R, Aubin C, Bailitz J et al (2014) Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis. N Engl J Med 371(12):1100–1110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Luyckx F (2015) Who wants to go further has to know the past: A comment upon: Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis-R. Smith-Bindman et al. N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 18;371(12):1100-1110. World J Urol 33(10):1371–1372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Song Y, Hernandez N, Gee MS, Noble VE, Eisner BH (2015) Can ureteral stones cause pain without causing hydronephrosis? World J UrolGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fowler KA, Locken JA, Duchesne JH, Williamson MR (2002) US for detecting renal calculi with nonenhanced CT as a reference standard. Radiology 222(1):109–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Patlas M, Farkas A, Fisher D, Zaghal I, Hadas-Halpern I (2001) Ultrasound vs CT for the detection of ureteric stones in patients with renal colic. Br J Radiol 74(886):901–904CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ripolles T, Errando J, Agramunt M, Martinez MJ (2004) Ureteral colic: US versus CT. Abdom Imaging 29(2):263–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sheafor DH, Hertzberg BS, Freed KS et al (2000) Nonenhanced helical CT and US in the emergency evaluation of patients with renal colic: prospective comparison. Radiology 217(3):792–797CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Coll DM, Varanelli MJ, Smith RC (2002) Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178(1):101–103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Johri N, Cooper B, Robertson W, Choong S, Rickards D, Unwin R (2010) An update and practical guide to renal stone management. Nephron Clin Pract 116(3):c159–c171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moore CL, Scoutt L (2012) Sonography first for acute flank pain? J Ultrasound Med Off J Am Inst Ultrasound Med 31(11):1703–1711Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    European Association of Urology. Guidelines on urolithiasis. http://uroweb.org/guideline/urolithiasis/. Accessed 8 Sept 2016
  37. 37.
    Dalziel PJ, Noble VE (2013) Bedside ultrasound and the assessment of renal colic: a review. Emerg Med J EMJ 30(1):3–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Manthey DE, Teichman J (2001) Nephrolithiasis. Emerg Med Clin North Am 19(3):633–654, viiiCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Masselli G, Weston M, Spencer J (2015) The role of imaging in the diagnosis and management of renal stone disease in pregnancy. Clin Radiol 70(12):1462–1471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wallace GW, Davis MA, Semelka RC, Fielding JR (2012) Imaging the pregnant patient with abdominal pain. Abdom Imaging 37(5):849–860CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Regan F, Kuszyk B, Bohlman ME, Jackman S (2005) Acute ureteric calculus obstruction: unenhanced spiral CT versus HASTE MR urography and abdominal radiograph. Br J Radiol 78(930):506–511CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lubarsky M, Kalb B, Sharma P, Keim SM, Martin DR (2013) MR imaging for acute nontraumatic abdominopelvic pain: rationale and practical considerations. Radiographics 33(2):313–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bannas P, Pickhardt PJ (2015) MR evaluation of the nontraumatic acute abdomen with CT correlation. Radiol Clin N Am 53(6):1327–1339CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Emergency Radiology 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Priyanka Jha
    • 1
    Email author
  • Brian Bentley
    • 1
  • Spencer Behr
    • 1
  • Judy Yee
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ronald Zagoria
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiology and Biomedical ImagingUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.San Francisco Veterans Administration Medical CenterSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations