Abstract
Paediatric stroke is a major cause of morbidity and death in children. There is often a delay in making the diagnosis because common differential diagnoses such as migraine and seizures need to be considered and quick access to imaging is difficult. Early recognition is increasingly important for early treatment and to improve outcomes. We present the case of a 4-year-old boy who presented to the Emergency Department with acute hemiparesis. To target the provisional diagnosis of an acute ischaemic stroke, we requested magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) limited to two sequences only: diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). We were able to confirm the diagnosis of acute ischaemic stroke within 90 min of presentation to hospital.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
deVeber G, The Canadian Pediatric Ischemic Stroke Study Group (2000) Canadian pediatric ischemic stroke registry: analysis of children with arterial ischemic stroke. Ann Neurol 48:526
Galvin J, Hewish S, Rice J, Mackay MT (2011) Functional outcome following paediatric stroke. Dev Neurorehabil 14(2):67–71
Ganesan V, Hogan A, Shack N, Gordon A, Isaacs E, Kirkham FJ (2000) Outcome after ischaemic stroke in childhood. Dev Med Child Neurol 42:455–461
Mullins ME, Schaefer PW, Sorensen AG, Halpern EF, Ay H, He J, Koroshetz WJ, Gonzalez RG (2002) CT and conventional and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in acute stroke: study in 691 patients at presentation to the emergency department. Radiology 224:353–369
Gasparotti R, Pinelli L, Liserre R (2001) New MR sequences in daily practice; susceptibility weighted imaging. A pictorial essay. Insights Imaging 2:335–347
Srinivasan J, Miller SP, Phan TG, Mackay MT (2009) Delayed recognition of initial stroke in children: need for increased awareness. Paediatrics 124:e227
Rafay M, Pontigon A, Chiang J, Adams M, Jarvis DA, Silver F, MacGregor D, deVeber G (2009) Delay to diagnosis in acute pediatric arterial ischaemic stroke. Stroke 40:58–64
Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z, Butler MW, Goergen SK, Byrnes GB, Giles GG, Wallace AB, Anderson PR, Guiver TA, McGlae P, Cain TM, Dowty JG, Bickerstaffe AC, Darby SC (2013) Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360
Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, Howe NL, Ronckers CM, Rajaraman P, Sir Craft AW, Parker L, Berrington de Gonzalez A (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380(9840):499–505
Saunders D, Thompson C, Gunny R, Jones R, Cox T, Chong WK (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging protocols for paediatric neuroradiology. Pediatr Radiol 37:789–797
Sharma A (2014) A case for changing the way we utilize MR imaging: a societal perspective. J Am Coll Radiol 11(10):931–932
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the parents of our patient who consented to this publication. The authors have no financial ties to disclose.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(GIF 171 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miteff, C.I., Subramanian, G., Brown, J.E. et al. Acute ‘limited’ magnetic resonance imaging in childhood stroke—an illustrative case. Emerg Radiol 22, 453–455 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-015-1310-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-015-1310-0