Skip to main content
Log in

The diagnostic utility of rib series in assessing rib fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rib series rarely add information to the posteroanterior (PA) film for the diagnosis of rib fractures. In this investigation, we evaluated the utility of rib X-rays using turnaround time (TAT), radiation exposure, and cost-efficiency as the key parameters. This investigation was conducted from January 2008 to December 2012. We included patients who had rib series performed for suspected rib fractures. TAT for patients was calculated from the time exam was ordered by the emergency department (ED) physician/staff to time the report was finalized by the attending radiologist. Effective radiation dose for rib series was calculated as a summation of radiation dose from the standard rib series images for each patient. Cost-efficiency was determined based on the number of interventions that took place as a result of a complicated study. Our investigation consisted of 422 patients, 208 females aged (57 ± 20.8) and 214 males aged (48 ± 17.3). A total of 74(17.5 %) abnormal findings were noted, out of which only 1(0.23 %) underwent management change. The mean turnaround time for patients undergoing rib series had a value of 133.5 (±129.8) min as opposed to a single chest PA of 61.8(± 64) min. Average effective radiation dose for a rib series was 0.105 (±0.04) mSv, whereas average effective radiation dose of a single chest PA was 0.02 mSv. Dedicated rib series has a low-yield diagnostic value as it pertains to management change. The overall impact on patient care based on our findings is small when compared to the risks associated with prolonged TAT, repeated exposure to radiation, and extensive medical costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (2010) Emergency Department Summary. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/ervisits.htm. Accessed 9 Sept 2013

  2. Recinos G, Inaba K, Dubose J, Barmparas G, Teixeira PG, Talving P et al (2009) Epidemiology of sternal fractures. Am Surg 75:401–404

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Southall AC, Harris VV (1999) Patient ED turnaround times: a comparative review. Am J Emerg Med 17:151–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Griffith JF, Rainer TH, Ching AS, Law KL, Cocks RA, Metreweli C (1999) Sonography compared with radiography in revealing acute rib fracture. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:1603–1609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sears BW, Luchette FA, Esposito TJ, Dickson EL, Grant M, Santaniello JM et al (2005) Old fashion clinical judgment in the era of protocols: is mandatory chest X-ray necessary in injured patients? J Trauma 59:324–330, discussion 330–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bansidhar BJ, Lagares-Garcia JA, Miller SL (2002) Clinical rib fractures: are follow-up chest X-rays a waste of resources? Am Surg 68:449–453

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. American College of Radiology ACR appropriateness criteria. http://www.guideline.gov/annotated-bibliographies/index.aspx

  8. Berrington de González A, Darby S (2004) Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 363:345–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kleinerman RA (2006) Cancer risks following diagnostic and therapeutic radiation exposure in children. Pediatr Radiol 36(Suppl 2):121–125

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson TV, Master VA (2012) Sensitive biomarkers of cancer recurrence and metastasis: inexpensive tools to cut costs and reduce radiation exposure among cancer patients. Mol Diagn Ther 16:13–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kattan KR (1978) Trauma of the bony thorax. Semin Roentgenol 13:69–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ruger JP, Richter CJ, Spitznagel EL, Lewis LM (2004) Analysis of costs, length of stay, and utilization of emergency department services by frequent users: implications for health policy. Acad Emerg Med 11:1311–1317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shah KH, Slovis BH, Runde D, Godbout B, Newman DH, Lee J (2013) Radiation exposure among patients with the highest CT scan utilization in the emergency department. Emerg Radiol. doi:10.1007/s10140-013-1142-8

  14. Anand P, Kunnumakkara AB, Kunnumakara AB, Sundaram C, Harikumar KB, Tharakan ST et al (2008) Cancer is a preventable disease that requires major lifestyle changes. Pharm Res 25:2097–2116

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

There was no commercial funding for the study. The authors have full control over all the data. The paper will not be published elsewhere in any language without the consent of the copyright owners.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faisal Khosa.

Additional information

Faisal Khosa is the American Roentgen Ray Society scholar (2013–2015)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shuaib, W., Vijayasarathi, A., Tiwana, M.H. et al. The diagnostic utility of rib series in assessing rib fractures. Emerg Radiol 21, 159–164 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-013-1177-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-013-1177-x

Keywords

Navigation