Abstract
The objectives of this study were to determine the rate of acute blunt cervical spine injury at an academic urban level 1 trauma center and to evaluate the utilization of cervical spine imaging based on the established American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria®. We retrospectively reviewed all radiography and CT imaging of the cervical spine performed over a year period in adult patients presenting with acute blunt cervical spine trauma. Exclusion criteria were children ≤17 years, non-acute trauma of ≥72 h, and penetrating trauma. Any fracture, dislocation, or ligamentous instability demonstrated by diagnostic imaging and requiring stabilization or specialized follow-up was defined as clinically significant cervical spine injury. A total of 1,325 cervical spine studies were reviewed in 1,245 patients; 32.7% (433/1,325) were cervical spine radiographs and 67.3% (892/1,325) were CT examinations. Approximately 1.5% (19/1,245) of the patients demonstrated clinically significant acute cervical spine injury. There were 6.4% (80/1,245) patients who received both cervical spine radiographs and CT as imaging evaluation. Based on the ACR Appropriateness Criteria®, all of the cervical spine radiographs performed (433) were determined to be “inappropriate” imaging in the setting of acute cervical spine injury.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
National Center for Health Statistics (1994) National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey 1992. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville
Reid DC, Henderson R, Saboe L, Miller JD (1987) Etiology and clinical course of missed spine fractures. J Trauma 27:980–986
Hoffman JR, Schriger DL, Mower WR et al (1992) Low-risk criteria for cervical spine radiography in blunt trauma: a prospective study. Ann Emerg Med 21:1288–1290
Korley FK, Pham JC, Kirsch TD (2010) Use of advanced radiology during visits to US emergency departments for injury-related conditions, 1998–2007. JAMA 304:1465–1471
Government Accountability Office (2008) Medicare part B imaging services: rapid spending growth and shift to physician offices indicate need for CMS to consider additional management practices (GAO-08-452). http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08452.pdf . Accessed 13 Aug 2011
Wiest PW, Locken JA, Heintz PH, Mettler FA Jr (2002) CT scanning: a major source of radiation exposure. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 23:402–410
Linton OW, Mettler FA Jr, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2003) National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients. Am J Roentgenol 181:321–329
Daffner RH, Wippold FJ II, Bennett DL et al (2009) ACR Appropriateness Criteria® suspected spine trauma. American College of Radiology (ACR). http://www.acr.org/ac. Accessed 13 Aug 2011
Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, Todd KH, Zucker MI (2000) Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiology Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med 343:94–99
Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL et al (2001) The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 286:1841–1848
Stiell IG, Lesiuk H, Vandemheen K et al (1999) Obtaining consensus for a definition of “clinically important cervical spine injury” in the CCC study. 1999 SAEM Annual Meeting Abstracts. Acad Emerg Med 6:435
Panacek EA, Mower WR, Holmes JF, National Emergency X-Radiology Utilization Study Group et al (2001) Test performance of the individual NEXUS low-risk clinical screening criteria for cervical spine injury. Ann Emerg Med 38:22–25
Stiell IG, Clement CM, McKnight RD et al (2003) The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med 349:2510–2518
Mower WR, Wolfson AB, Hoffman JR, Todd KH (2004) The Canadian C-spine rule. N Engl J Med 350:1467–1469
Stiell IG, Clement CM, Grimshaw J et al (2009) Implementation of the Canadian C-spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomized trial. BMJ 339:4146–4152
Daffner RH (2000) Cervical radiography for trauma patients: a time-effective technique? Am J Roentgenol 175:1309–1311
Daffner RH (2001) Helical CT of the cervical spine for trauma patients: a time study. Am J Roentgenol 177:677–679
Brohi K, Healy M, Fotheringham T et al (2005) Helical computed tomographic scanning for the evaluation of the cervical spine the unconscious, intubated trauma patient. J Trauma 58:897–901
Holmes JF, Akkinepalli R (2005) Computed tomography versus plain radiography to screen for cervical spine injury: a meta-analysis. J Trauma 58:902–905
Bailitz J, Starr F, Beecroft M et al (2009) CT should replace three-view radiographs as the initial screening test in patients at high, moderate, and low risk for blunt cervical spine injury: a prospective comparison. J Trauma 66:1605–1609
Como JJ, Diaz JJ Jr, Dunham CM et al (2009) Practice management guidelines for identification of cervical spine injuries following trauma—update from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Practice Management Guidelines Committee. EAST. http://www.east.org/Content/documents/practicemanagementguidelines/cspine2009.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug 2011
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) (2000) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, vol. 1: sources. United Nations Publishing, New York, Annex D: Medical radiation doses
Anglen J, Metzler M, Bunn P, Griffiths H (2002) Flexion and extension views are not cost-effective in a cervical spine clearance protocol for obtunded trauma patients. J Trauma 52:54–59
Freedman I, van Gelderen D, Cooper DJ et al (2005) Cervical spine assessment in the unconscious trauma patient: a major trauma service’s experience with passive flexion-extension radiography. J Trauma 58:1183–1188
Khan SN, Erickson G, Sena MJ, Gupta MC (2011) Use of flexion and extension radiographs of the cervical spine to rule out acute instability in patients with negative computed tomography scans. J Orthop Trauma 25:51–56
Blackmore CC, Mecklenberg RS, Kaplan GS (2011) Effectiveness of clinical decision support in controlling inappropriate imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 8:19–25
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This publication was made possible by Grant Number 5K23NS058387-02 from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NINDS or NIH.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sheikh, K., Belfi, L.M., Sharma, R. et al. Evaluation of acute cervical spine imaging based on ACR Appropriateness Criteria®. Emerg Radiol 19, 11–17 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-011-0994-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-011-0994-z