Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diffusion MRI of acute pancreatitis and comparison with normal individuals using ADC values

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to retrospectively measure and compare pancreatic apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) with aged matched controls who underwent diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). The institutional review board approved this retrospective Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant study with a waiver for informed consent. Pancreatic ADC values from 27 patients with a clinical diagnosis of AP and 38 normal age-matched controls evaluated with DWI (b = 0 and 800 mm2/s) were retrospectively and independently measured by two radiologists. The ADCs were compared between the groups and between each of the pancreatic segments in the normal group. Inter-observer reliability was calculated and receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of DW imaging in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The ICC for inter-observer reliability was 0.98 in the control and 0.97 in the AP group. The mean pancreatic ADC in the AP group (1.32 × 10−3 mm2/s ± 0.13) was significantly lower than in the normal group (1.77 × 10−3 mm2/s ± 0.32). There was no significant difference in mean ADCs between each of the pancreatic segments in the controls. A threshold ADC value of 1.62 × 10–3 mm2/s yielded a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 87% for detecting acute pancreatitis for b values of 0 and 800 s/mm2. Pancreatic ADCs are significantly lower in patients with AP than normal controls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morgan DE, Baron TH, Smith JK, Robbin ML, Kenney PJ (1997) Pancreatic fluid collections prior to intervention: evaluation with MR imaging compared with CT and US. Radiology 203(3):773–778

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hirota M, Kimura Y, Ishiko T, Beppu T, Yamashita Y, Ogawa M (2002) Visualization of the heterogeneous internal structure of so-called “pancreatic necrosis” by magnetic resonance imaging in acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Pancreas 25(1):63–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stimac D, Miletic D, Radic M, Krznaric I, Mazur-Grbac M, Perkovic D, Milic S, Golubovic V (2007) The role of nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the early assessment of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 102(5):997–1004. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01164.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saifuddin A, Ward J, Ridgway J, Chalmers AG (1993) Comparison of MR and CT scanning in severe acute pancreatitis: initial experiences. Clin Radiol 48(2):111–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lecesne R, Taourel P, Bret PM, Atri M, Reinhold C (1999) Acute pancreatitis: interobserver agreement and correlation of CT and MR cholangiopancreatography with outcome. Radiology 211(3):727–735

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ward J, Chalmers AG, Guthrie AJ, Larvin M, Robinson PJ (1997) T2-weighted and dynamic enhanced MRI in acute pancreatitis: comparison with contrast enhanced CT. Clin Radiol 52(2):109–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim YK, Ko SW, Kim CS, Hwang SB (2006) Effectiveness of MR imaging for diagnosing the mild forms of acute pancreatitis: comparison with MDCT. J Magn Reson Imaging 24(6):1342–1349. doi:10.1002/jmri.20801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gallix BP, Bret PM, Atri M, Lecesne R, Reinhold C (2005) Comparison of qualitative and quantitative measurements on unenhanced T1-weighted fat saturation MR images in predicting pancreatic pathology. J Magn Reson Imaging 21(5):583–589. doi:10.1002/jmri.20310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sica GT, Miller FH, Rodriguez G, McTavish J, Banks PA (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with pancreatitis: evaluation of signal intensity and enhancement changes. J Magn Reson Imaging 15(3):275–284. doi:10.1002/jmri.10066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Akisik MF, Aisen AM, Sandrasegaran K, Jennings SG, Lin C, Sherman S, Lin JA, Rydberg M (2009) Assessment of chronic pancreatitis: utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with secretin enhancement. Radiology 250(1):103–109. doi:10.1148/radiol.2493080160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Taniguchi T, Kobayashi H, Nishikawa K, Iida E, Michigami Y, Morimoto E, Yamashita R, Miyagi K, Okamoto M (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in autoimmune pancreatitis. Jpn J Radiol 27(3):138–142. doi:10.1007/s11604-008-0311-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shinya S, Sasaki T, Nakagawa Y, Guiquing Z, Yamamoto F, Yamashita Y (2009) The efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging for the detection and evaluation of acute pancreatitis. Hepatogastroenterology 56(94–95):1407–1410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Burdette JH, Elster AD, Ricci PE (1999) Acute cerebral infarction: quantification of spin-density and T2 shine-through phenomena on diffusion-weighted MR images. Radiology 212(2):333–339

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Koh DM, Collins DJ (2007) Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(6):1622–1635. doi:10.2214/AJR.06.1403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Parikh T, Drew SJ, Lee VS, Wong S, Hecht EM, Babb JS, Taouli B (2008) Focal liver lesion detection and characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging. Radiology 246(3):812–822. doi:10.1148/radiol.2463070432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Naganawa S, Sato C, Kumada H, Ishigaki T, Miura S, Takizawa O (2005) Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer of the uterus: comparison with the normal uterine cervix. Eur Radiol 15(1):71–78. doi:10.1007/s00330-004-2529-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Kuroki S, Murakami K, Nawano S, Moriyama N (2004) Diffusion-weighted single shot echo planar imaging of colorectal cancer using a sensitivity-encoding technique. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34(10):620–626. doi:10.1093/jjco/hyh108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ichikawa T, Erturk SM, Motosugi U, Sou H, Iino H, Araki T, Fujii H (2007) High-b value diffusion-weighted MRI for detecting pancreatic adenocarcinoma: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(2):409–414. doi:10.2214/AJR.05.1918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Akisik MF, Sandrasegaran K, Jennings SG, Aisen AM, Lin C, Sherman S, Rydberg MP (2009) Diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis by using apparent diffusion coefficient measurements at 3.0-T MR following secretin stimulation. Radiology 252(2):418–425. doi:10.1148/radiol.2522081656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shinya S, Sasaki T, Nakagawa Y, Guiquing Z, Yamamoto F, Yamashita Y (2008) Acute pancreatitis successfully diagnosed by diffusion-weighted imaging: a case report. World J Gastroenterol 14(35):5478–5480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, Ikushima I, Shigematu Y, Hirai T, Okuda T, Liang L, Ge Y, Komohara Y, Ushio Y, Takahashi M (1999) Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 9(1):53–60. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199901)9:1<53::AID-JMRI7>3.0.CO;2-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Taouli B, Tolia AJ, Losada M, Babb JS, Chan ES, Bannan MA, Tobias H (2007) Diffusion-weighted MRI for quantification of liver fibrosis: preliminary experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(4):799–806. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.2086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Oto A, Zhu F, Kulkarni K, Karczmar GS, Turner JR, Rubin D (2009) Evaluation of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for detection of bowel inflammation in patients with Crohn’s disease. Acad Radiol 16(5):597–603. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2008.11.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Verswijvel G, Vandecaveye V, Gelin G, Vandevenne J, Grieten M, Horvath M, Oyen R, Palmers Y (2002) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the evaluation of renal infection: preliminary results. JBR-BTR 85(2):100–103

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bockman DE, Buchler M, Beger HG (1986) Ultrastructure of human acute pancreatitis. Int J Pancreatol 1(2):141–153. doi:10.1007/BF02788446

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lankisch PG, Burchard-Reckert S, Lehnick D (1999) Underestimation of acute pancreatitis: patients with only a small increase in amylase/lipase levels can also have or develop severe acute pancreatitis. Gut 44(4):542–544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 2026, Chicago, IL, 60637-1470, USA

    Stephen Thomas, Arda Kayhan, Hatice Lakadamyali & Aytekin Oto

Authors
  1. Stephen Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arda Kayhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hatice Lakadamyali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aytekin Oto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aytekin Oto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, S., Kayhan, A., Lakadamyali, H. et al. Diffusion MRI of acute pancreatitis and comparison with normal individuals using ADC values. Emerg Radiol 19, 5–9 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-011-0983-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-011-0983-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation