Skip to main content
Log in

Can lab data be used to reduce abdominal computed tomography (CT) usage in young adults presenting to the emergency department with nontraumatic abdominal pain?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We sought to determine whether laboratory parameters could be found, predictive of a negative abdominal CT scan in young adults with nontraumatic abdominal pain. Following institutional review board approval, we evaluated CT reports of 522 patients, aged 21–35 years old, who presented to the Emergency Department with nontraumatic abdominal pain. Bivariate analyses relating ten laboratory parameters to whether the CT detected a cause for abdominal pain were conducted. A multivariate logistic regression model was then derived, with all variables in the final model significant at p < 0.05. Variables were dichotomized to yield odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Of the 522 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 45% had a cause for pain demonstrated by CT. Predictors of a negative CT in men were normal hematocrit and negative urine blood (p = 0.045, p = 0.016, respectively), and in women normal hematocrit, granulocyte percent, and alkaline phosphatase (p = 0.023, p = 0.039, p < 0.0001, respectively). When standard normal values were used to calculate descriptive statistics, only granulocyte percent in women had a significant confidence interval (odds ratio 2.5, confidence interval 1.6–4.0). Among the 208 women with normal granulocyte percent, the final clinical diagnosis was appendicitis, cholecystitis, and diverticulitis, in three, three, and two cases, respectively (4% combined). In summary, no laboratory test was sufficient to offer reassurance that a CT is not necessary in a young adult patient with nontraumatic abdominal pain. Alternative strategies should be considered to decrease the use of CT, and its associated radiation exposure, in young adults with nontraumatic abdominal pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grant TH, Rosen MP, Fidler JL, et al (2008) ACR appropriateness criteria. http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/app_criteria/pdf/ExpertPanelonGastrointestinalImaging/AcuteAbdominalPainandFeverorSuspectedAbdominalAbscessDoc1.aspx. Accessed online 11 February 2010

  2. Gerhardt RT, Nelson BK, Keenan S, Kernan L, MacKersie A, Lane MS (2005) Derivation of a clinical guideline for the assessment of nonspecific abdominal pain: the Guideline for Abdominal Pain in the ED Setting (GAPEDS) Phase 1 Study. Am J Emerg Med 23:709–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gallagher EJ et al (2000) Clinical policy: critical issues for the initial evaluation and management of patients presenting with a chief complaint of nontraumatic acute abdominal pain. Ann Emerg Med 36:406–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Broder J, Warshauer DM (2006) Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000-2005. Emerg Radiol 13:25–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fleischer AC, James AE Jr, Millis JB, Julian C (1978) Differential diagnosis of pelvic masses by gray scale sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 131:469–476

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boone JM, Brunberg JA (2008) Computed tomography use in a tertiary care university hospital. J Am Coll Radiol 5:132–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee KH, Kim YH, Hahn S, Lee KW, Lee HJ, Kim TJ, Kang SB, Shin JH, Park BJ (2006) Added value of coronal reformations for duty radiologists and for referring physicians or surgeons in the CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Korean J Radiol 7:87–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Philipp MO, Kubin K, Hörmann M, Metz VM (2003) Radiological emergency room management with emphasis on multidetector-row CT. Eur J Radiol 48:2–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Miller LA, Shanmuganathan K (2005) Multidetector CT evaluation of abdominal trauma. Radiol Clin North Am 43:1079–1095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaewlai R, Avery LL, Asrani AV, Novelline RA (2008) Multidetector CT of blunt thoracic trauma. Radiographics 28:1555–1570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nagurney JT, Brown DF, Chang Y, Sane S, Wang AC, Weiner JB (2003) Use of diagnostic testing in the emergency department for patients presenting with non-traumatic abdominal pain. J Emerg Med 25:363–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosen MP, Sands DZ, Longmaid HE 3rd, Reynolds KF, Wagner M, Raptopoulos V (2000) Impact of abdominal CT on the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1391–1396

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mezrich R (2008) Are CT scans carcinogenic? J Am Coll Radiol 5:691–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hadley JL, Agola J, Wong P (2006) Potential impact of the American College of radiology appropriateness criteria on CT for trauma. Am J Roentgenol 186:937–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Amis ES Jr, Butler PF, Applegate KE, Birnbaum SB, Brateman LF, Hevezi JM, Mettler FA, Morin RL, Pentecost MJ, Smith GG, Strauss KJ, Zeman RK (2007) American College of Radiology. American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 4:272–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Parker JS, Vukov LF, Wollan PC (1996) Abdominal pain in the elderly: use of temperature and laboratory testing to screen for surgical disease. Fam Med 28:193–197

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lewis LM, Klippel AP, Bavolek RA, Ross LM, Scherer TM, Banet GA (2007) Quantifying the usefulness of CT in evaluating seniors with abdominal pain. Eur J Radiol 61:290–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J, Butler PF, Callahan MJ, Coley BD, Farley S, Frush DP, Hernanz-Schulman M, Jaramillo D, Johnson ND, Kaste SC, Morrison G, Strauss KJ, Tuggle N (2008) The image gently campaign: working together to change practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:273–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hall EJ (2002) Introduction to session I: helical CT and cancer risk. Pediatr Radiol 32:225–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brenner DJ (2002) Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatr Radiol 32:223–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Safran DB, Pilati D, Folz E, Oller D (2001) Is appendiceal CT scan overused for evaluating patients with right lower quadrant pain? Am J Emerg Med 19:199–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Musunuru S, Chen H, Rikkers LF, Weber SM (2007) Computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: definitive or detrimental? J Gastrointest Surg 11:1417–1421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Modahl L, Digumarthy SR, Rhea JT, Conn AK, Saini S, Lee SI (2006) Emergency department abdominal computed tomography for nontraumatic abdominal pain: optimizing utilization. J Am Coll Radiol 3:860–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Roth C, Tello R, Sutherland K, Ptak T (2002) Prediction rule for etiology of vague abdominal pain in the emergency room: utility for imaging triage. Invest Radiol 37:552–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ahn SH, Mayo-Smith WW, Murphy BL, Reinert SE, Cronan JJ (2002) Acute nontraumatic abdominal pain in adult patients: abdominal radiography compared with CT evaluation. Radiology 225:159–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vandermeer FQ, Wong-You-Cheong JJ (2009) Imaging of acute pelvic pain. Clin Obstet Gynecol 52:2–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Karcaaltincaba M, Haliloglu M, Akpinar E, Akata D, Ozmen M, Ariyurek M, Akhan O (2007) Multidetector CT and MRI findings in periportal space pathologies. Eur J Radiol 61:3–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Furlan A, Federle MP, Yealy DM, Averch TD, Pealer K (2008) Nonobstructing renal stones on unenhanced CT: a real cause for renal colic? AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:W125–W127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Coury TA, Sonda LP, Lingeman JE, Kahnoski RJ (1988) Treatment of painful caliceal stones. Urology 32:119–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Scott JH 3rd, Amin M, Harty JI (1983) Abnormal urinalysis in appendicitis. J Urol 129:1015

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Brensilver HL, Kaplan MM (1975) Significance of elevated liver alkaline phosphatase in serum. Gastroenterology 68:1556–1562

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shwayder JM (2008) Pelvic pain, adnexal masses, and ultrasound. Semin Reprod Med 26:252–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Larson DB, Rader SB, Forman HP, Fenton LZ (2007) Informing parents about CT radiation exposure in children: it's OK to tell them. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:271–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Graff LG 4th, Robinson D (2001) Abdominal pain and emergency department evaluation. Emerg Med Clin North Am 19:123–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Onur OE, Guneysel O, Unluer EE, Akoglu H, Cingi A, Onur E, Denizbasi A (2008) Outpatient follow-up'' or ''Active clinical observation'' in patients with nonspecific abdominal pain in the Emergency Department. A randomized clinical trial. Minerva Chir 63:9–15

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Linda B. Haramati M.D. M.S. for insightful discussions relating to data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meir H. Scheinfeld.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheinfeld, M.H., Mahadevia, S., Stein, E.G. et al. Can lab data be used to reduce abdominal computed tomography (CT) usage in young adults presenting to the emergency department with nontraumatic abdominal pain?. Emerg Radiol 17, 353–360 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-010-0866-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-010-0866-y

Keywords

Navigation