Skip to main content
Log in

Accuracy of multidetector computed tomography in differentiating primary epiploic appendagitis from left acute colonic diverticulitis associated with secondary epiploic appendagitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to evaluate the prevalence of left acute colonic diverticulitis (LACD) associated with secondary epiploic appendagitis (SEA) detected by computed tomography (CT); to describe CT features that distinguish LACD associated with SEA from primary epiploic appendagitis (PEA); and to assess the accuracy of CT in diagnosing LACD associated with SEA versus PEA. Institutional review board approval was obtained. We retrospectively identified 46 consecutive patients with LACD between July 2004 and July 2005 and 26 patients with PEA between 2000 and 2005 investigated using multidetector CT. Two radiologists blinded to the final diagnosis reviewed the CT images for findings of LACD-associated SEA or PEA. Each reader classified each CT scan into one of four categories: PEA, LACD-associated SEA, LACD without SEA, and indeterminate. Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon test were performed to compare the groups. The prevalence of LACD-associated SEA was 71% (33/46) in the LACD group. The accuracy of CT was 100% for diagnosing LACD-associated SEA (33/33), 100% for diagnosing LACD without SEA (13/13), and 96% for diagnosing PEA (25/26). Colon wall thickening, "inflamed diverticulum", extraluminal gas, abscess or phlegmon, multiple paracolic fatty lesions, and a thin hyperattenuated rim were significantly associated with LACD-associated SEA. Neither the dot sign nor parietal peritoneal thickening showed good accuracy for differentiating PEA from LACD-associated SEA. CT is accurate for distinguishing LACD-associated SEA from PEA. The findings that perform best for diagnosing SEA are evidence of diverticulitis, multiple fatty lesions, and a thin hyperattenuated rim.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rioux M, Langis P (1994) Primary epiploic appendagitis: clinical, US, and CT findings in 14 cases. Radiology 191:523–526

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh AK, Gervais DA, Hahn PF, Sagar P, Mueller PR, Novelline RA (2005) Acute epiploic appendagitis and its mimics. Radiographics 25:1521–1534. doi:10.1148/rg.256055030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Molla E, Ripolles T, Martinez MJ, Morote V, Rosello-Sastre E (1998) Primary epiploic appendagitis: US and CT findings. Eur Radiol 8:435–438. doi:10.1007/s003300050408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Son HJ et al (2002) Clinical diagnosis of primary epiploic appendagitis: differentiation from acute diverticulitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 34:435–438. doi:10.1097/00004836-200204000-00010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dockerty MB, Lynn TE, Waugh JM (1956) A clinicopathologic study of the epiploic appendages. Surg Gynecol Obstet 103:423–433

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rao PM, Wittenberg J, Lawrason JN (1997) Primary epiploic appendagitis: evolutionary changes in CT appearance. Radiology 204:713–717

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh AK, Gervais DA, Hahn PF, Rhea J, Mueller PR (2004) CT appearance of acute appendagitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1303–1307

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Wittenberg J, Warshaw AL (1998) Misdiagnosis of primary epiploic appendagitis. Am J Surg 176:81–85. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00103-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Danse EM, Van Beers BE, Baudrez V, Pauls C, Baudrez Y et al (2001) Epiploic appendagitis: color Doppler sonographic findings. Eur Radiol 11:183–186. doi:10.1007/s003300000672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Breda Vriesman AC, Puylaert JB (2002) Epiploic appendagitis and omental infarction: pitfalls and look-alikes. Abdom Imaging 27:20–28. doi:10.1007/s00261-001-0056-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, Rettenbacher T, Gritzmann N (2002) Primary epiploic appendagitis: sonographic findings with CT correlation. J Clin Ultrasound 30:481–495. doi:10.1002/jcu.10102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McClure MJ, Khalili K, Sarrazin J, Hanbidge A (2001) Radiological features of epiploic appendagitis and segmental omental infarction. Clin Radiol 56:819–827. doi:10.1053/crad.2001.0848

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghahremani GG, White EM, Hoff FL, Gore RM, Miller JW, Christ ML (1992) Appendaces epiploicae of the colon: radiologic and pathologic features. Radiographics 12:59–77

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Legome EL, Belton AL, Murray RE, Rao PM, Novelline RA (2002) Epiploic appendagitis: the emergency department presentation. J Emerg Med 22:9–13. doi:10.1016/S0736-4679(01)00430-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rao PM, Rhea JT (1998) Colonic diverticulitis: evaluation of the arrowhead sign and the inflamed diverticulum for CT diagnosis. Radiology 209:775–779

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Osada H, Ohno H, Watanabe W, Nakada K, Okada T et al (2008) Multidetector computed tomography diagnosis of primary and secondary epiploic appendagitis. Radiat Med 26:582–586. doi:10.1007/s11604-008-0278-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Zins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jalaguier, A., Zins, M., Rodallec, M. et al. Accuracy of multidetector computed tomography in differentiating primary epiploic appendagitis from left acute colonic diverticulitis associated with secondary epiploic appendagitis. Emerg Radiol 17, 51–56 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-009-0822-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-009-0822-x

Keywords

Navigation