Skip to main content

Comparison of retrospectively ECG-gated and nongated MDCT of the chest in an emergency setting regarding workflow, image quality, and diagnostic certainty

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to assess the influence of ECG-gated acquisition on workflow and to compare image quality and diagnostic certainty for retrospectively ECG-gated and nongated multidetector computed tomography of the chest in the emergency suite.

Materials and methods

Thirty-two consecutive patients were referred for both an ECG-gated and a nongated CT to rule out traumatic thoracic injury (n=15) or acute aortic dissection (n=17). The time from the start of the transportation from the emergency suite to the CT room until the start of the CT scan was recorded. Using a scoring system, the image quality of axial images and multiplanar reformats, the presence of disease, and the subjective diagnostic certainty were assessed with regard to the vascular structures, the bone structures, and the lung parenchyma.

Results

The time needed for transportation and patient preparation was 12.1±1.7 min (8.1–14.5 min). The motion artifacts of the thoracic aorta and the supra-aortic vessels were significantly reduced in the ECG-gated data acquisition compared with the nongated technique (P<0.001). Subjective diagnostic certainty for assessment of the aorta was significantly better using ECG gating. The image quality of the lung parenchyma (P<0.005), the spine (P<0.005), and the ribs (P<0.002) was inferior in the ECG-gated data sets but did not compromise the detection rate of traumatic lesions and fractures.

Conclusion

Performing ECG gating in the emergency room did not slow down the diagnostic workup. ECG-gated acquisition performed better in the assessment of the aorta, but image quality for lung and bone structures was slightly reduced. Further studies are required to assess the influence of the imaging technique on the diagnostic outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Rieger M, Sparr H, Esterhammer R et al (2002) Modern CT diagnosis of acute thoracic and abdominal trauma. Radiologe 42:556–563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Feczko JD, Lynch L, Pless JE, Clark MA, McClain J, Hawley DA (1992) An autopsy case review of 142 nonpenetrating (blunt) injuries of the aorta. J Trauma 33:846–849

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wintermark M, Wicky S, Schnyder P (2002) Imaging of acute traumatic injuries of the thoracic aorta. Eur Radiol 12:431–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khan IA, Nair CK (2002) Clinical, diagnostic, and management perspectives of aortic dissection. Chest 122:311–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM et al (2000) The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA 283:897–903

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K, Miller BH, White CS, Turney SZ (1996) Traumatic aortic injury: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced thoracic CT—five-year experience at a major trauma center. Radiology 200:413–422

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gavant ML, Flick P, Menke P, Gold RE (1996) CT aortography of thoracic aortic rupture. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:955–961

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fishman JE (2000) Imaging of blunt aortic and great vessel trauma. J Thorac Imaging 15:97–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Roos JE, Willmann JK, Weishaupt D, Lachat M, Marincek B, Hilfiker PR (2002) Thoracic aorta: motion artifact reduction with retrospective and prospective electrocardiography-assisted multi-detector row CT. Radiology 222:271–277

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Becker C et al (2000) Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience. Radiology 217:564–571

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kachelriess M, Ulzheimer S, Kalender WA (2000) ECG-correlated image reconstruction from subsecond multi-slice spiral CT scans of the heart. Med Phys 27:1881–1902

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vogl TJ, Abolmaali ND, Diebold T et al (2002) Techniques for the detection of coronary atherosclerosis: multi-detector row CT coronary angiography. Radiology 223:212–220

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kalender WA, Schmidt B, Zankl M, Schmidt M (1999) A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography. Eur Radiol 9:555–562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McLaughlin JS, Shama Z, Hirsch E, Khazei AH, Attar S, Cowley A (1969) Cardiovascular dynamics in human shock. Am Surg 35:166–176

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roos JE, Hilfiker P, Platz A et al (2004) MDCT in emergency radiology: is a standardized chest or abdominal protocol sufficient for evaluation of thoracic and lumbar spine trauma? AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:959–968

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nieman K, Rensing BJ, van Geuns RJ et al (2002) Non-invasive coronary angiography with multislice spiral computed tomography: impact of heart rate. Heart 88:470–474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ben-Menachem Y (1993) Rupture of the thoracic aorta by broadside impacts in road traffic and other collisions: further angiographic observations and preliminary autopsy findings. J Trauma 35:363–367

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Creasy JD, Chiles C, Routh WD, Dyer RB (1997) Overview of traumatic injury of the thoracic aorta. Radiographics 17:27–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng I, McLellan BA, Joyner C, Christakis G (2000) Aortic root trauma: serious injuries requiring early recognition and management. J Trauma 48:525–529

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bashar AH, Kazui T, Washiyama N et al (2002) Stanford type a aortic dissection after blunt chest trauma: case report with a reflection on the mechanism of injury. J Trauma 52:380–381

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ono M, Yagyu K, Furuse A, Kotsuka Y, Kubota H (1998) A case of Stanford type A acute aortic dissection caused by blunt chest trauma. J Trauma 44:543–544

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Perchinsky M, Gin K, Mayo JR (1998) Trauma-associated dissection of the thoracic aorta. J Trauma 45:626–629

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gammie JS, Katz WE, Swanson ER, Peitzman AB (1996) Acute aortic dissection after blunt chest trauma. J Trauma 40:126–127

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by the NCCR CO-ME of the Swiss National Science Foundation. We thank Ulrich Helfenstein, MD, and Burkhardt Seifert, PhD, for their contributions to the statistical analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Boehm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schertler, T., Glücker, T., Wildermuth, S. et al. Comparison of retrospectively ECG-gated and nongated MDCT of the chest in an emergency setting regarding workflow, image quality, and diagnostic certainty. Emerg Radiol 12, 19–29 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-005-0435-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-005-0435-y

Keywords

  • ECG gating
  • Chest trauma
  • Aortic dissection
  • Blunt aortic injury