Advertisement

Marine Biotechnology

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 512–519 | Cite as

Administration of Probiotics Improves the Brine Shrimp Production and Prevents Detrimental Effects of Pathogenic Vibrio Species

  • Eduardo Quiroz-Guzmán
  • Ricardo Vázquez-Juárez
  • Antonio Luna-González
  • José L. Balcázar
  • Diana R. Barajas-Sandoval
  • Sergio F. Martínez-Díaz
Original Article
  • 154 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated a consortium of probiotic bacteria as an environmentally-friendly strategy for controlling pathogenic Vibrio species during the brine shrimp incubation period. Probiotic strains were initially selected on basis of (i) their ability to colonize the cyst surfaces, (ii) their absence of cross-inhibitory effects, and (iii) no detrimental effect on cyst hatching. The cysts and nauplius surfaces were immediately colonized after the application of selected probiotic strains, without detrimental effects on survival. Ten probiotic strains were mixed at similar proportions (probiotic consortium) and evaluated at different concentrations into brine shrimp cultures during incubation and early stages of development. Subsequently, these cultures were challenged with Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio harveyi. The probiotic consortium was effective to reduce the abundance of pathogenic Vibrio species and to prevent the mortality during Vibrio challenges; however, its effect was concentration-dependent and was successful at a starting concentration of 1.8 × 106 CFU/ml. Our results suggest that this probiotic consortium offers an alternative to antimicrobial agents routinely used to reduce the incidence and prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio species in brine shrimp production.

Keywords

Brine shrimp Probiotic consortium Biological control Vibrio species 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by projects SIP 20100865 and CONACyT 085033. EQG thanks CONACyT for the support through grant number, 34984, and the Secretariat for Research and Graduate studies (SIP-IPN) for the support through PIFI grant.

References

  1. Apún-Molina JP, Santamaría-Miranda A, Luna-González A, Martínez-Díaz SF, Rojas-Contreras M (2009) Effect of potential probiotic bacteria on growth and survival of tilapia L., cultured in the laboratory under high density and suboptimum temperature. Aquacult Res 40(8):887–894Google Scholar
  2. Austin B, Allen DA (1982) The microbiology of laboratory hatched brine shrimp Artemia. Aquaculture 26:369–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avella MA, Gioacchini G, Decamp O, Makridis P, Bracciatelli C, Carnevali O (2010) Application of multi–species of Bacillus in sea bream larviculture. Aquaculture 305:12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balcázar JL, Rojas-Luna T (2007) Inhibitory activity of probiotic Bacillus subtilis UTM 126 against Vibrio species confers protection against vibriosis in juvenile shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Curr Microbiol 55:409–412CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Balcázar JL, Vendrell D, de Blas I, Ruiz-Zarzuela I, Gironés O, Múzquiz JL (2007) In vitro competitive adhesion and production of antagonistic compounds by lactic acid bacteria against fish pathogens. Vet Microbiol 122:373–380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Balcázar JL, de Blas I, Ruiz-Zarzuela I, Cunningham D, Vendrell D, Múzquiz JL (2006) The role of probiotics in aquaculture. Vet Microbiol 114:173–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dehasque M, Verdonck L, Sorgeloos P, Swings J, Léger Ph, Kersters K (1991) Determination of the bacterial contamination in live food production system and in marine fish hatcheries in Southern Europe. In: Lavens P, Sorgeloos P, Jaspers E, Ollevier F (eds) Larvi’91–Fish & Crustacean Larviculture Symposium. European Aquaculture Society, Special Publication No. 15, Ghent, Belgium, pp 399–402Google Scholar
  8. Dopazo C, Lemos M, Lodeiros C, Bolinches J, Barja J, Toranzo A (1988) Inhibitory activity of antibiotic-producing marine bacteria against fish pathogens. J Appl Bacteriol 65:97–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Douillet P (1995) Microbial management in marine fish larviculture. In: Lavens P, Jaspers E, Roelants I (eds) Larvi’95–Fish & Shellfish Symposium. European Aquaculture Society, Special Publication No. 24, Ghent, pp 477Google Scholar
  10. Douillet PA, Langdon CJ (1994) Use of a probiotic for the culture of larvae of the pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas Thunberg). Aquaculture 119:25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. García-Rodríguez R (2003) Relevancia de las bacterias ácido lácticas en los diferentes estadios del cultivo del camarón. Thesis Fishery Engineering Studies, UABCS, La Paz, B.C.S., MexicoGoogle Scholar
  12. Giarma E, Amanetidou E, Toufexi A, Touraki M (2017) Defense systems in developing Artemia franciscana nauplii and their modulation by probiotic bacteria offer protection against a Vibrio anguillarum challenge. Fish Shellfish Immunol 66:163–172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gorospe JN, Nakamura K, Abe M, Higashi S (1996) Nutritional contribution of Pseudomonas sp. in Artemia culture. Fish Sci 62:914–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gram L, Løvold T, Nielsen J, Melchiorsen J, Spanggaard B (2001) In vitro antagonism of the probiont Pseudomonas fluorescens strain AH2 against Aeromonas salmonicida does not confer protection of salmon against furunculosis. Aquaculture 199:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Griffith DRW (1995) Microbiology and the role of probiotics in Ecuadorian shrimp hatcheries. In: Lavens P, Jaspers E, Roelants I (eds) Larvi’95–Fish & Shellfish Symposium. European Aquaculture Society, Special Publication No. 24, Ghent, pp 478Google Scholar
  16. Hameed AS, Balasubramanian G (2000) Antibiotic resistance in bacteria isolated from Artemia nauplii and efficacy of formaldehyde to control bacterial load. Aquaculture 183:195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Høj L, Bourne D, Hall MR (2009) Localization, abundance and community structure of bacteria associated with Artemia: effects of nauplii enrichment and antimicrobial treatment. Aquaculture 293:278–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Igarashi MA, Segugita H, Deguchi Y (1989) Microflora associated with eggs and nauplii of Artemia salina. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 55:20–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Intriago P, Jones DA (1993) Bacteria as food for Artemia. Aquaculture 113:115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lauzon HL, Pérez-Sánchez T, Merrifield DL, Ringø E, Balcázar JL (2014) Probiotic applications in cold water fish species. In: Merrifield D, Ringø E (eds) Aquaculture nutrition: gut health, probiotics and prebiotics. Wiley, Chichester, pp 223–252Google Scholar
  21. López Torres MA, Lizárraga-Partida ML (2001) Bacterial isolated on TCBS media associated with hatched Artemia cysts of commercial brands. Aquaculture 194:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mahdhi A, Hmila Z, Chaieb K, Kamoun F, Bakhrouf A (2011) Probiotic properties of halophilic Bacillus strains enhance protection of Artemia culture against pathogenic Vibrio. Aquat Biol 13:225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moriarty DJW (1997) The role of microorganisms in aquaculture ponds. Aquaculture 151:333–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Newaj-Fyzul A, Al-Harbi AH, Austin B (2014) Review: developments in the use of probiotics for disease control in aquaculture. Aquaculture 431:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Patra SK, Mohamed KS (2003) Enrichment of Artemia nauplii with the probiotic yeast Saccharomyces boulardii and its resistance against a pathogenic Vibrio. Aquac Int 11:505–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pérez-Sánchez T, Ruiz-Zarzuela I, de Blas I, Balcázar JL (2014) Probiotics in aquaculture: a current assessment. Rev Aquac 6:133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Qi Z, Zhang XH, Boon N, Bossier P (2009) Probiotics in aquaculture of China – current state, problems and prospect. Aquaculture 290:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Quiroz-Guzmán E, Balcázar JL, Vázquez- Juarez R, Cruz-Villacorta AA, Martínez-Díaz SF (2013) Proliferation, colonization and detrimental effects of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio harveyi during brine shrimp hatching. Aquaculture 406–407:86–90Google Scholar
  29. Rico-Mora R, Voltolina D (1995) Effects of bacterial isolates from Skeletonema costatum cultures on the survival of Artemia franciscana nauplii. J Invertebr Pathol 66:203–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sorgeloos P, Persoone G (1972) Three simple devices for aquatic invertebrates and fish larvae with continuous recirculation of the medium. Mar Biol 15:251–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Touraki M, Karamanlidou G, Karavida P, Chrysi K (2012) Evaluation of the probiotics Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus plantarum bioencapsulated in Artemia nauplii against vibriosis in European sea bass larvae (Dicentrarchus labrax, L.). World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28:2425–2433CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Verschuere L, Rombaut G, Huys G, Dhont J, Sorgeloos P, Verstraete W (1999) Microbial control of the culture of Artemia juveniles through preemptive colonization by selected bacterial strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:2527–2533PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang J, Ji H, Zhang D, Liu H, Wang S, Shan D et al (2011) Assessment of probiotic properties of lactobacillus plantarum ZLP001 isolated from gastrointestinal tract of weaning pigs. Afr J Biotechnol 10(54):11303–11308CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cátedras-CIBNOR, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C. (CIBNOR)La PazMexico
  2. 2.Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C.(CIBNOR)La PazMexico
  3. 3.Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral RegionalGuasaveMexico
  4. 4.Catalan Institute for Water Research (ICRA)GironaSpain
  5. 5.Microbiology and Molecular Biology LabInstituto Politécnico Nacional-CICIMARLa PazMexico

Personalised recommendations