International Microbiology

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 155–167 | Cite as

Isolation and characterization of a lindane degrading bacteria Paracoccus sp. NITDBR1 and evaluation of its plant growth promoting traits

  • Banishree Sahoo
  • Ritu Ningthoujam
  • Surabhi ChaudhuriEmail author
Original Article


Lindane contamination in different environmental compartments is still posing a serious threat to our environment and effective measures need to be taken for the detoxification of lindane. Soil bacteria isolated from agricultural fields are known to possess certain plant growth promoting traits like the production of phytohormones, production of ammonia, nitrogen fixation and solubilization of phosphorus, etc. In the present study, an indigenous bacterial strain Paracoccus sp. NITDBR1 have been isolated from an agricultural field in Manipur, India which could grow on 100 mg L−1 lindane as the sole source of carbon and could degrade up to 90% of lindane in mineral salt media under liquid culture conditions in 8 days. The strain NITDBR1 was able to form biofilm in lindane media and the addition of substrate like glucose and sucrose enhanced the biofilm formation by 1.3 and 1.17-fold respectively in 3 days. The strain NITDBR1 could produce glycolipid and glycoprotein based biosurfactants. It was also found to possess plant growth promoting traits like nitrogen fixation and indole-3-acetic acid production to assist crop production. The phytotoxicity studies carried out on mustard seeds revealed that the degradation products formed after treatment with NITDBR1 could lower the toxicity of lindane for root elongation by 1.3-fold. Therefore, strain NITDBR1 could be useful for the bioremediation of soil contaminated with lindane with lesser damage to the environment, biofilm forming ability may help the bacteria survive under stressed environmental conditions, and biosurfactant production will help in increasing the bioavailability of contaminants. The plant growth promoting traits can be beneficial for agriculture. With such soil friendly activities coupled with pesticide degradation, this strain can be used for environmental as well as agricultural applications.


Biodegradation Biofilm Biosurfactant Ecotoxicity Paracoccus Plant growth promotion 



We thank Centre of Excellence, National Institute of Technology Durgapur, West Bengal for FESEM analysis, Bose Institute, Kolkata for FTIR analysis, Royal Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Secunderabad for GC-FAME and PathCare Labs Pvt Ltd, Hyderabad for microbial identification.

Supplementary material

10123_2018_37_MOESM1_ESM.docx (6.8 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 6914 kb)


  1. Abdul Salam J, Lakshmi V, Das D, Das N (2013) Biodegradation of lindane using a novel yeast strain, Rhodotorula sp. VITJzN03 isolated from agricultural soil. World J Microbiol Biotechnol Abdul Sala.
  2. Abhilash PC, Srivastava S, Singh N (2011) Comparative bioremediation potential of four rhizospheric microbial species against lindane. Chemosphere 82:56–63. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Akbar S, Sultan S (2016) Soil bacteria showing a potential of chlorpyrifos degradation and plant growth enhancement. Braz J Microbiol 47:563–570. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. An X, Cheng Y, Huang M et al (2018) Treating organic cyanide-containing groundwater by immobilization of a nitrile-degrading bacterium with a biofilm-forming bacterium using fluidized bed reactors. Environ Pollut 237:908–916. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Anupama KS, Paul S (2010) Ex situ and in situ biodegradation of lindane by Azotobacter chroococcum. J Environ Sci Heal - Part B Pestic Food Contam Agric Wastes.
  6. ATSDR, Agency for toxic substances and disease registry, US Department of Health and Human Services (1999) Toxicological profile for alpha-, beta-, gamma-, and delta-hexachlorocyclohexane. Clement and Associates, TaurangaGoogle Scholar
  7. Bajaj S, Sagar S, Khare S, Singh DK (2017) Biodegradation of γ-hexachlorocyclohexane (lindane) by halophilic bacterium Chromohalobacter sp. LD2 isolated from HCH dumpsite. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 122:23–28. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bakkiyaraj D, Pandian STK (2010) In vitro and in vivo antibiofilm activity of a coral associated actinomycete against drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Biofouling 26:711–717. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Benimeli CS, Castro GR, Chaile AP, Amoroso MJ (2007) Lindane uptake and degradation by aquatic Streptomyces sp. strain M7. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad.
  10. Beyer A, Matthies M (2001) Long-range transport potential of semivolatile organic chemicals in coupled air-water systems. Environ Sci Pollut Res 8:173–179. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bric JM, Bostock RM, Silverstone SE (1991) Rapid in situ assay for indoleacetic acid production by bacteria immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:535–538PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Cappuccino JC, Sherman N (1992) In: Microbiology: A Laboratory Manual, New York, pp 125–179Google Scholar
  13. Carrillo PG, Mardaraz C, Pitta-Alvarez SI, Giulietti AM (1996) Isolation and selection of biosurfactant-producing bacteria. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 12:82–84. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Bisno AL, Beachey EH (1982) Adherence of slime-producing strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis to smooth surfaces. Infect Immun 37:318–326PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooper DG, Goldenberg BG (1987) Surface-active agents from two Bacillus species. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:224–229 0099-2240/87/020224PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Deo PG, Karanth NG, Gopalakrishna N, Karanth K (1994) Biodegradation of hexachlorocyclohexane isomers in soil and food environment. Crit Rev Microbiol 20:57–78. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dubey RC, Maheshwari DK (2002) Practical microbiology. S.Chand & company Ltd., New Delhi, pp 172–174Google Scholar
  18. Etesami H, Alikhani HA (2016) Rhizosphere and endorhiza of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) plant harbor bacteria with multifaceted beneficial effects. Biol Control 94:11–24. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garcia MT, Campos E, Dalmau M et al (2006) Inhibition of biogas production by alkyl benzene sulfonates (LAS) in a screening test for anaerobic biodegradability. Biodegradation 17:39–46. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gordon SA, Weber RP (1951) Colorimetric Estimation of Inodoleacetic Acid. Plant Physiol 26:192–195.
  21. Guillén-Jiménez FDM, Cristiani-Urbina E, Cancino-Díaz JC et al (2012) Lindane biodegradation by the Fusarium verticillioides AT-100 strain, isolated from Agave tequilana leaves: Kinetic study and identification of metabolites. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 74:36–47.
  22. Johnsen AR, Wick LY, Harms H (2005) Principles of microbial PAH-degradation in soil. Environ Pollut 133:71–84.
  23. Kumar D, Kumar A, Sharma J (2016) Degradation study of lindane by novel strains Kocuria sp. DAB-1Y and Staphylococcus sp. DAB-1W. Bioresour Bioprocess 3:53. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Lal R, Pandey G, Sharma P et al (2010) Biochemistry of Microbial Degradation of Hexachlorocyclohexane and Prospects for Bioremediation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 74:58–80.
  25. Lima TMS, Procópio LC, Brandão FD et al (2011) Biodegradability of bacterial surfactants. Biodegradation 22:585–592. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Manickam N, Mau M, Schlömann M (2006) Characterization of the novel HCH-degrading strain, Microbacterium sp. ITRC1. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 69:580–588. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Manickam N, Bajaj A, Saini HS, Shanker R (2012) Surfactant mediated enhanced biodegradation of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) isomers by Sphingomonas sp. NM05. Biodegradation 23:673–682. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mathurasa L, Tongcumpou C, Sabatini DA, Luepromchai E (2012) Anionic surfactant enhanced bacterial degradation of tributyltin in soil. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 75:7–14. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mohan PK, Nakhla G, Yanful EK (2006) Biokinetics of biodegradation of surfactants under aerobic, anoxic and anaerobic conditions. Water Res 40:533–540. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mulvaney RL, Khan SA, Ellsworth TR (2009) Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizers Deplete Soil Nitrogen: A Global Dilemma for Sustainable Cereal Production. J Environ Qual. 38(6):2295–2314.
  31. Nagasawa S, Kikuchi R, Nagata Y et al (1993) Aerobic mineralization of γ-HCH by Pseudomonas paucimobilis UT26. Chemosphere 26:1719–1728. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nisha KN, Devi V, Varalakshmi P, Ashokkumar B (2015) Biodegradation and utilization of dimethylformamide by biofilm forming Paracoccus sp. strains MKU1 and MKU2. Bioresour Technol 188:9–13. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ohisa N, Yamaguchi M, Kurihara N (1980) Lindane degradation by cell-free extracts of Clostridium rectum. Arch Microbiol 125:221–225. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Okeke BC, Siddique T, Arbestain MC, Frankenberger WT (2002) Biodegradation of gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane (lindane) and alpha-hexachlorocyclohexane in water and a soil slurry by a Pandoraea species. J Agric Food Chem 50:2548–2555. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pacwa-Płociniczak M, Płociniczak T et al (2016) Isolation of hydrocarbon-degrading and biosurfactant-producing bacteria and assessment their plant growth-promoting traits. J Environ Manage 168:175–184.
  36. Pannu R, Kumar D (2017) Process optimization of γ- Hexachlorocyclohexane degradation using three novel Bacillus sp. strains. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 11:97–107Google Scholar
  37. Passari AK, Mishra VK et al (2016) Phytohormone production endowed with antagonistic potential and plant growth promoting abilities of culturable endophytic bacteria isolated from Clerodendrum colebrookianum Walp. Microbiol Res 193:57–73. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Pokhrel LR, Dubey B (2013) Evaluation of developmental responses of two crop plants exposed to silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles. Sci Total Environ 452–453:321–332. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Qu J, Xu Y, Ai GM et al (2015) Novel Chryseobacterium sp. PYR2 degrades various organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and achieves enhancing removal and complete degradation of DDT in highly contaminated soil. J Environ Manage 161:350–357.
  40. Salam JA, Das N (2014) Lindane degradation by Candida VITJzN04, a newly isolated yeast strain from contaminated soil: Kinetic study, enzyme analysis and biodegradation pathway. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 30:1301–1313.
  41. Sangwan N, Lata P, Dwivedi V et al (2012) Comparative Metagenomic Analysis of Soil Microbial Communities Across Three Hexachlorocyclohexane Contamination Levels. PLoS One 7:1–12.
  42. Sasser M (2001) Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids. Tech Note 101:1–6Google Scholar
  43. Sharma AD, Singh J (2005) A nonenzymatic method to isolate genomic DNA from bacteria and actinomycete. Anal Biochem 337:354–356. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Siegmund I, Wagner F (1991) New method for detecting rhamnolipids excreted by Pseudomonas species during growth on mineral agar. Biotechnol Tech 5:265–268. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F et al (1997) The CLUSTAL X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882.
  46. Vaux D, Cottingham M (2001) Method and apparatus for measuring surface configuration. patent number WO 2007/039729 A1Google Scholar
  47. Vega FA, Covelo EF, Andrade ML (2007) Accidental Organochlorine Pesticide Contamination of Soil in Porriño, Spain. J Environ Qual 36:272.
  48. Wagner SC (2011) Biological Nitrogen Fixation. Nature Education Knowledge 3(10):15.
  49. Welp G, Brümmer GW (1999) Effects of organic pollutants on soil microbial activity: influence of sorption, solubility, and speciation. Ecotoxicol Env Saf 43:83–90. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weselowski B, Nathoo N, Eastman AW et al (2016) Isolation, identification and characterization of Paenibacillus polymyxa CR1 with potentials for biopesticide, biofertilization, biomass degradation and biofuel production. BMC Microbiol 16:1–10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yang L, Watts DJ (2005) Particle surface characteristics may play an important role in phytotoxicity of alumina nanoparticles. Toxicol Lett 158:122–132. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang Y, Wang F, Zhu X et al (2015) Extracellular polymeric substances govern the development of biofilm and mass transfer of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons for improved biodegradation. Bioresour Technol 193:274–280. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Banishree Sahoo
    • 1
  • Ritu Ningthoujam
    • 2
  • Surabhi Chaudhuri
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologyNational Institute of TechnologyDurgapurIndia
  2. 2.Department of Earth and Environmental StudiesNational Institute of TechnologyDurgapurIndia

Personalised recommendations