Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Innovative tools for detection of plant pathogenic viruses and bacteria

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Detection of harmful viruses and bacteria in plant material, vectors or natural reservoirs is essential to ensure safe and sustainable agriculture. The techniques available have evolved significantly in the last few years to achieve rapid and reliable detection of pathogens, extraction of the target from the sample being important for optimising detection. For viruses, sample preparation has been simplified by imprinting or squashing plant material or insect vectors onto membranes. To improve the sensitivity of techniques for bacterial detection, a prior enrichment step in liquid or solid medium is advised. Serological and molecular techniques are currently the most appropriate when high numbers of samples need to be analysed. Specific monoclonal and/or recombinant antibodies are available for many plant pathogens and have contributed to the specificity of serological detection. Molecular detection can be optimised through the automatic purification of nucleic acids from pathogens by columns or robotics. New variants of PCR, such as simple or multiplex nested PCR in a single closed tube, co-operative-PCR and real-time monitoring of amplicons or quantitative PCR, allow high sensitivity in the detection of one or several pathogens in a single assay. The latest development in the analysis of nucleic acids is micro-array technology, but it requires generic DNA/RNA extraction and pre-amplification methods to increase detection sensitivity. The advances in research that will result from the sequencing of many plant pathogen genomes, especially now in the era of proteomics, represent a new source of information for the future development of sensitive and specific detection techniques for these microorganisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2A, B.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Álvarez AM (2001) Differentiation of bacterial populations in seed extracts by flow cytometry. In: de Boer SH (ed) Plant pathogenic bacteria. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 393–396

  2. Anonymous (1993) Council Directive 93/85/EEC on the control of potato ring rot. Official Journal of the European Communities. No. L259/1, 18.10.93. Annex 1–IV

  3. Anonymous (1998) Council Directive 98/57/EEC on the control of Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith). Yabuuchi et al. Official Journal of the European Communities. No. L235/1, 21.08.98. Annex 1–VI

  4. Bariana HS, Shannon AL, Chu PWG, Waterhouse PM (1994) Detection of five seedborne legume viruses in one sensitive multiplex polymerase chain reaction test. Phytopathology 84:1201–1205

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Becker H, Manz A (1999) Microsystem technology in chemistry and life science. Springer Desktop Editions in Chemistry, vol 194. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  6. Bertolini E, Olmos A, Martínez MC, Gorris MT, Cambra M (2001) Single-step multiplex RT-PCR for simultaneous and colourimetric detection of six RNA viruses in olive trees. J Virol Methods 96:33–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bertolini E, Olmos A, López MM, Cambra M (2003) Multiplex nested reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction in a single tube for sensitive and simultaneous detection of four RNA viruses and Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi in olive trees. Phytopathology 93:286–292

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bertolini E, Penyalver R, García A, Olmos A, Quesada JM, Cambra M, López MM (2003) Highly sensitive detection of Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi in asymptomatic olive plants by nested-PCR in a single closed tube. J Microbiol Methods 52:261–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Biosca EG, Caruso P, Bertolini E, Álvarez B, Palomo JL, Gorris MT, López MM (2003) Improved detection of Ralstonia solanacearum in culturable and VBNC state from water samples at low temperatures. Proceedings of the 3rd International Bacterial Wilt Symposium (in press)

  10. Bird RE, Hardman KD, Jacobson JW, Johnson S, Kaufman BM, Lee S, Lee T, Pope SH, Riordan GS, Whitlow M (1988) Single-chain antigen-binding proteins. Science 242:423–426

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cambra M, Gorris MT, Román MP, Terrada E, Garnsey SM, Camarasa E, Olmos A, Colomer M (2000) Routine detection of Citrus tristeza virus by direct immunoprinting-ELISA method using specific monoclonal and recombinant antibodies. In: da Graça JV, Lee RF, Yokomi RK (eds) Proceedings of the 14th IOVC Conference. IOCV, Riverside, Calif., pp 34–41

  12. Caruso P, Gorris MT, Cambra M, Palomo JL, Collar J, López MM (2002) Enrichment double-antibody sandwich indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay that uses a specific monoclonal antibody for sensitive detection of Ralstonia solanacearum in asymptomatic potato tubers. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:3634–3638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Caruso P, Bertolini E, Cambra M, López MM (2003) A new and co-operational polymerase chain reaction (Co-PCR) for rapid detection of Ralstonia solanacearum in water. J Microbiol Methods (in press)

  14. Chandelier A, Dubois N, Baelen F, De Leener F, Warnon S, Remacle J, Lepoivre P (2001) RT-PCR-ELOSA tests on pooled sample units for the detection of virus Y in potato tubers. J Virol Methods 91:99–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Clark MF, Adams AN (1977) Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. J Gen Virol 34:475–483

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cubero J, van der Wolf J, van Beckhoven J, López MM (2002) An internal control for the diagnosis of crown gall by PCR. J Microbiol Methods 51:387–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Davey HM, Kell DB (1996) Flow cytometry and cell sorting of heterogeneous microbial populations: the importance of single-cell analyses. Microbiol Rev 60:641–696

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. De Jaeger G, De Wilde C, Eeckhout D, Fiers E, Depicker A (2000) The plantibody approach: expression of antibody genes in plants to modulate plant metabolism or to obtained pathogen resistance. Plant Mol Biol 43:419–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gloffke W (2003) Quantitative PCR update. Scientist 21:41–43

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gorris MT, Alarcón B, López MM, Cambra M (1994) Characterization of monoclonal antibodies specific for Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica and comparison of serological methods for its sensitive detection on potato tubers. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:2076–2085

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gorris MT, Cambra M, Llop P, López MM, Lecomte P, Chartier R, Paulin JP, Bonn WG (1996) A sensitive and specific detection of Erwinia amylovora based on the ELISA-DASI enrichment method with monoclonal antibodies. Acta Hortic 411:41–46

    Google Scholar 

  22. Grieco F, Gallitelli D (1999) Multiplex reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction applied to virus detection in globe artichoke. J Phytopathol 147:183–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Henson JM, French R (1993) The polymerase chain reaction and plant disease diagnosis. Annu Rev Phytopathol 31:81–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jacobi V, Bachand GD, Hamelin RC, Castello JD (1998) Development of a multiplex immunocapture RT-PCR assay for detection and differentiation of tomato and tobacco mosaic tobamoviruses. J Virol Methods 74:167–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. James D (1999) A simple and reliable protocol for the detection of apple stem grooving virus by RT-PCR and in a multiplex PCR assay. J Virol Methods 83:1–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Janse JD, Wenneker M (2002) Possibilities of avoidance and control of bacterial plant diseases when using pathogen-tested (certified) or -treated planting material. Plant Pathol 51:523–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Johnson JR (2000) Development of polymerase chain reaction-based assays for bacterial gene detection. J Microbiol Methods 41:201–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kerschbaumer RJ, Hirschl S, Schwager C, Ibl M, Himmler G (1996) pDAP2: a vector for construction of alkaline phosphatase fusion-proteins. Immunotechnology 2:145–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kerschbaumer RJ, Hirschl S, Kaufmann A, Ibl M, Koenig R, Himmler G (1997) Single-chain Fv fusion proteins suitable as coating and detecting reagents in a double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Anal Biochem 249:219–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Landgraf A, Reckmann B, Pingoud A (1991) Direct analysis of polymerase chain reaction products using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay techniques. Anal Biochem 198:86–91

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Llop P, Caruso P, Cubero J, Morente C, López MM (1999) A simple extraction procedure for efficient routine detection of pathogenic bacteria in plant material by polymerase chain reaction. J Microbiol Methods 37:23–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Llop P, Bonaterra A, Peñalver J, López MM (2000) Development of a highly sensitive nested-PCR procedure using a single closed tube for detection of Erwinia amylovora in asymptomatic plant material. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2071–2078

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. López MM, Gorris MT, Llop P, Cubero J, Vicedo B, Cambra M (1997) Selective enrichment improves the isolation, serological and molecular detection of plant pathogenic bacteria. In: Dehne HW, Adam G, Diekmann M, Frahn J, Mauler A (eds) Diagnosis and identification of plant pathogens. Kluwer, Dordrecht

  34. López MM, Llop P, Cubero J, Peñalver R, Caruso P, Bertolini E, Gorris MT, Cambra M (2001) Strategies for improving serological and molecular detection of plant pathogenic bacteria. In: de Boer SH (ed) Plant pathogenic bacteria. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 83–85

  35. Louws FJ, Rademaker JLW, de Bruijn FJ (1999) The three Ds of PCR-based genomic analysis of phytobacteria: diversity, detection, and disease diagnosis. Annu Rev Phytopathol 37:81–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Martin RR, James D, Lévesque CA (2000) Impacts of molecular diagnostic technologies on plant disease management. Annu Rev Phytopathol 38:207–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. McManus PS, Jones AL (1995) Detection of Erwinia amylovora by nested PCR and PCR-dot-blot and reverse blot hybridizations. Phytopathology 85:618–623

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Minafra A, Hadidi A (1994) Sensitive detection of grapevine virus A, B or leafroll-associated virus III from viruliferous mealybugs and infected tissue. J Virol Methods 47:175–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nassuth A, Pollari E, Helmeczy K, Stewart S, Kofalvi SA (2000) Improved RNA extraction and one-tube RT-PCR assay for simultaneous detection of control plant RNA plus several viruses in plant extracts. J Virol Methods 90:37–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nemchinov L, Hadidi A, Foster JJ, Candresse T, Verderevskaya T (1995) Sensitive detection of apple chlorotic leaf spot virus from infected apple or peach tissue using RT-PCR, IC-RT-PCR, or multiplex IC-RT-PCR. Acta Hortic 386:51–62

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Nie X, Singh RP (2000) Detection of multiple potato viruses using an oligo(dT) as a common cDNA primer in multiplex RT-PCR. J Virol Methods 86:179–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Nie X, Singh RP (2001) A novel usage of random primers for multiplex RT-PCR detection of virus and viroid in aphids, leaves, and tubers. J Virol Methods 91:37–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nolasco G, de Blas C, Torres V, Ponz F (1993) A method combining immunocapture and PCR amplification in a microtiter plate for the detection of plant viruses and subviral pathogens. J Virol Methods 45:201–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Okuda M, Hanada K (2001) RT-PCR for detecting five distinct Tospovirus species using degenerate primers and dsRNA template. J Virol Methods 96:149–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Olmos A, Dasi MA, Candresse T, Cambra M (1996) Print-capture PCR: a simple and highly sensitive method for the detection of plum pox virus (PPV) in plant tissues. Nucleic Acids Res 24:2192–2193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Olmos A, Cambra M, Dasi MA, Candresse T, Esteban O, Gorris MT, Asensio M (1997) Simultaneous detection and typing of plum pox potyvirus (PPV) isolates by heminested-PCR and PCR-ELISA. J Virol Methods 68:127–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Olmos A, Cambra M, Esteban O, Gorris MT, Terrada E (1999) New device and method for capture, reverse transcription and nested PCR in a single closed-tube. Nucleic Acids Res 27:1564–1565

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Olmos A, Bertolini E, Cambra M (2002) Simultaneous and co-operational amplification (Co-PCR): a new concept for detection of plant viruses. J Virol Methods 106:51–59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Olmos A, Esteban O, Bertolini E, Cambra M (2003) Nested RT-PCR in a single closed tube. In: Bartlett JMS, Stirling D (eds) Methods in molecular biology, 2nd edn, vol 226. PCR Protocols. Humana Press, Ottowa, pp 156–161

  50. Orou A, Fechner B, Menzel HJ, Utermann G (1995) Automatic separation of two PCRs in one tube by annealing temperature. Trends Genet 11:127–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Osiowy C (1998) Direct detection of respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, and adenovirus in clinical respiratory specimens by a multiplex reverse transcription-PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol 36:3149–3154

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Penyalver R, García A, Ferrer A, Bertolini E, López MM (2000) Detection of Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi in olive plants by enrichment and PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2673–2677

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Plückthun A (1991) Antibody engineering: advances from the use of Escherichia coli expression systems. Biotechnol Adv 9:545–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Roberts PD (1996) Survival of Xanthomonas fragariae on strawberry in summer nurseries in Florida detected by specific primers and nested polymerase chain reaction. Plant Dis 80:1283–1288

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Rosenfield SI, Jaykus LAA (1999) Multiplex reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction method for the detection of foodborne viruses. J Food Prot 62:1210–1214

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Russo P, Miller L, Singh RP, Slack SA (1999) Comparison of PLRV and PVY detection in potato seed samples tested by Florida winter field inspection and RT-PCR. Am J Potato Res 76:313–316

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Saade M, Aparicio F, Sanchez-Navarro JA, Herranz MC, Di-Terlizzi AMB, Pallas V (2000) Simultaneous detection of the three ilarviruses affecting stone fruit trees by nonisotopic molecular hybridization and multiplex reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. Phytopathology 90:1330–1336

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Schaad NW, Cheong SS, Tamaki S, Hatziloukas E, Panopoulos NJ (1995) A combined biological and enzymatic amplification (BIO-PCR) technique to detect Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola in bean seed extracts. Phytopathology 85:243–248

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Schaad NW, Jones JB, Chun W (2001) Laboratory guide for identification of plant pathogenic bacteria, 3rd edn. APS, St. Paul, Minn.

  60. Sharman M, Thomas J, Dietzgen RG (2000) Development of a multiplex immunocapture PCR with colourimetric detection for viruses of banana. J Virol Methods 89:75–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Singh RP, Kurz J, Boiteau G (1996) Detection of stylet-borne and circulative potato viruses in aphids by duplex reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. J Virol Methods 59:189–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Terrada E, Kerschbaumer RJ, Giunta G, Galeffi P, Himmler G, Cambra M (2000) Fully "recombinant enzyme linked immunosorbent assays" using genetically engineered single-chain antibody fusion proteins for detection of Citrus tristeza virus. Phytopathology 90:1337–1344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Van der Wolf JM, van Beckhoven JRCM, Bonanats PJM, Schoen CD (2001) New technologies for sensitive and specific routine detection of plant pathogenic bacteria. In: de Boer SH (ed) Plant pathogenic bacteria. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 75–77

  64. Van Elsas JD, Kastelein P, de Vries PM, van Overbeek LS (2001) Effects of ecological factors on the survival and physiology of Ralstonia solanacearum bv. 2 in irrigation water. Can J Microbiol 47:842–854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Van Sluys MA, Monteiro-Vitorello CB, Camargo LEA, Menck CFM, da Silva ACR, Ferro JA, Oliveira MC, Setubal JC, Kitajima JP, Sympson AJ (2002) Comparative genomic analysis of plant-associated bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 40:169–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Volkhard A, Kempf J, Trebesius K, Autenrieth IB (2000) Fluorescent in situ hybridization allows rapid identification of microorganisms in blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 38:830–838

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Weller SA, Elphinstone JG, Smith NC, Boonham N, Stead DE (2000) Detection of Ralstonia solanacearum strains with a quantitative multiplex, real-time, fluorogenic PCR (Taqman) assay. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2853–2858

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Wetzel T, Candresse T, Macquaire G, Ravelonandro M, Dunez J (1992) A highly sensitive immunocapture polymerase chain reaction method for plum pox potyvirus detection. J Virol Methods 39:27–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Williams K, Blake S, Sweeney A, Singer JT, Nicholson BL (1999) Multiplex reverse transcriptase PCR assay for simultaneous detection of three fish viruses. J Clin Microbiol 37:4139–4141

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Winter G, Griffiths AD, Hawkins RE, Hoogenboom HR (1994) Making antibodies by phage display technology. Annu Rev Immunol 12:433–455

    Google Scholar 

  71. Wullings BA, Beuningen AR van, Janse JD, Akkermans ADL, Van Beuningen AR (1998) Detection of Ralstonia solanacearum, which causes brown rot of potato, by fluorescent in situ hybridization with 23S rRNA-targeted probes. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:4546–4554

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Yourno J (1992) A method for nested PCR with single closed reaction tubes. PCR Methods Appl 2:60–65

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all their colleagues at IVIA who contributed to the development of different techniques. We wish to thank the project QLK5-CT 2001-02270 granted by EU and the projects AGL 2000-0394-P4-04 and CAO 00-007 financed by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología and the Spanish Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentacion, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María M. López.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

López, M.M., Bertolini, E., Olmos, A. et al. Innovative tools for detection of plant pathogenic viruses and bacteria. Int Microbiol 6, 233–243 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-003-0143-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-003-0143-y

Keywords

Navigation