Gastric Cancer

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 4–12 | Cite as

Why is the coexistence of gastric cancer and duodenal ulcer rare? Examination of factors related to both gastric cancer and duodenal ulcer

  • Hideyuki UbukataEmail author
  • Hiroyuki Nagata
  • Takanobu Tabuchi
  • Satoru Konishi
  • Teruhiko Kasuga
  • Takafumi Tabuchi
Review Article


The coexistence of gastric cancer with duodenal ulcer has been found empirically to be rare, but why it is rare is difficult to explain satisfactorily. To elucidate this question, we carried out a literature review of the subject. The frequency with which the two diseases coexist is 0.1–1.7%, and the main factor associated with both gastric cancer and duodenal ulcer is Helicobacter pylori infection. However, there are marked differences between the disorders of hyperchlorhydria in duodenal ulcer, and hypochlorhydria in gastric cancer. The most acceptable view of the reason for the difference may be that the acquisition of H. pylori infection occurs mainly in childhood, so that the time of acquisition of atrophic gastritis may be the most important, and if atrophic gastritis is not acquired early, high levels of gastric acid may occur, and consequently acute antral gastritis and duodenal ulcer may occur in youth, whereas, in elderly individuals, persistent H. pylori infections and the early appearance of atrophic gastritis may be the causes of low gastric acid, and consequently gastric cancer may occur. In patients with duodenal ulcer, factors such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and dupA-H. pylori strains may contribute to preventing the early acquisition of atrophic gastritis, while acid-suppressive therapy and vascular endothelial growth factor and other entities may inhibit atrophic gastritis. In contrast, in gastric cancer, factors such as excessive salt intake, acid-suppressive therapy, polymorphisms of inflammatory cytokines, and the homB-H. pylori strain may contribute to the early acquisition of atrophic gastritis, while factors such as NSAIDs; fruits and vegetables; vitamins A, C, and E; and good nutrition may inhibit it.


Gastric cancer Duodenal ulcer Helicobacter pylori Polymorphism Gastric acid 


Recently, we encountered a patient with gastric cancer that was histologically of the diffuse type and in whom the active bleeding of a duodenal ulcer had been successfully treated by an endoscopic procedure 4 months before the diagnosis of the gastric cancer.

However, it has been shown empirically that the coexistence of gastric cancer with duodenal ulcer is a rare phenomenon [1]—indeed, the frequencies of gastric cancer and gastric and duodenal ulcers are about 0.15, 2, and 1%, respectively, in Japanese mass surveys. But the coexistence of gastric cancer and duodenal ulcers is very rare. Several studies have demonstrated the low frequency of this combination, and the question about this coexistence has been variously discussed for a long time, leading to a small flood of opinions at each report of a new finding regarding causation, such as Helicobacter pylori, H2-blockers, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and so on, but still no satisfactory answer has been found.

H. pylori infection, in particular, is an etiological factor common to both diseases and may be one of the major causative factors in both, and so it is reasonable to expect a strong, direct relationship between the two diseases, and a frequency of coexistence that is more than fortuitous. That is to say, a strong association between them would be unsurprising. And yet, the diseases have different phenotypes and they rarely coexist. Why?

To shed some light on this question, we investigated the relationship between gastroduodenal peptic ulcers and gastric cancer by reviewing the literature on the subject.

Frequencies of duodenal ulcer and gastric cancer

H. pylori infects approximately half of the world’s population [1], and in 1994, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organization (WHO) concluded that H. pylori is a definite carcinogen in humans [2].

Labigne and de Reuse [3], Graham [4], and Stemmermann and Fenoglio-Preiser [5] have reported that H. pylori infection is a causative agent of superficial gastritis, peptic ulcer, atrophic gastritis, and gastric cancer. Graham [4] and Uemura et al. [6] reported that approximately 20% of H. pylori-infected individuals develop clinically significant diseases, and the frequency of duodenal ulcers in individuals with H. pylori infection is thought to be approximately 16% [4]. Although Fischer et al. [7] found 48 cases of concomitant gastric cancer while reviewing 45000 patients with duodenal ulcer (0.1%), Miwa et al. [8] stated that six patients with gastric cancer among their 356 patients (1.7%) also showed duodenal ulcers, and Take et al. [9] and Kamada et al. [10] reported that gastric cancer did not develop in patients with duodenal ulcer. Uemura et al. [6] conducted a 5-year follow-up of many Japanese subjects with H. pylori infections and found that all those with duodenal ulcers were also infected with H. pylori; however, none of the patients with duodenal ulcer developed gastric cancer, although 3.4% of the patients with gastric ulcer did, and gastric cancer subsequently appeared in 5% of the patients with H. pylori infections. Fuccio et al. [11] indicated that the risk of gastric cancer was higher in patients with gastric ulcer than in those with duodenal ulcer. Therefore, gastric cancer concomitant with duodenal ulcer appears to be very rare.

We examined the factors related to both gastric cancer and duodenal ulcer.

Exogenous factors (Fig. 1)

Various H. pylori strains (Figs. 1, 4)

It is gradually becoming clear that there is a wide variety of H. pylori infections, and that there are some bacterial strains that may well be more likely to cause duodenal ulcer disease, and others that may promote the development of gastric cancer [12].
Fig. 1

Risk factors of gastric cancer and duodenal ulcer. Hp, Helicobacter pylori; IL, interleukin; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; HSP, heat shock protein

Atherton [13], Atherton et al. [14], Censini et al. [15], Prinz et al. [16], and Li et al. [17] have reported that H. pylori strains containing various bacterial virulence factors—such as the cytotoxicity-associated gene pathogenicity island (cagPAI), the vacuolating cytotoxin (vacA) gene, and the blood group antigen binding adhesion (babA) gene—are associated with more severe inflammation and an increased risk of developing cancer. Marrelli et al. [18] have reported that the vacA gene encodes the vacuolating cytokine VacA, which induces epithelial cell injury, and the degree of heterogeneity in vacA may be useful as a marker for peptic ulcer diseases.

Odenbreit et al. [19] have reported that the cagA gene is located in the right half of the PAI, and encodes the CagA protein, which is translocated into the gastric epithelial cells that deleteriously affect host cell physiology. Huang et al. [20], Kuipers et al. [21], and Hatakeyama [22] have indicated that the cagA gene increases the risk of atrophic gastritis and gastric cancer, and Yamaoka et al. [23] reported that subgroup analysis suggested that Japanese H. pylori strains with the type C pattern of repeats (1 FR region and 2 JSR regions) in CagA + H. pylori strains were associated with atrophy and gastric cancer. Moreover, Graham [4] reported that, in the presence of low acid secretion, highly virulent H. pylori (due to the presence of cagA) might lead to atrophic gastritis and a concomitant increase in the risk of developing cancer. However, Nomura et al. [24] and Atherton et al. [14] stated that individuals infected with CagA + H. pylori were at higher risk of developing duodenal ulcers than those infected with other H. pylori strains.

Meanwhile, Lu et al. [25] and Argent et al. [26] reported that the expression of the duodenal ulcer-promoting gene A (dupA) may be associated with an increased risk of duodenal ulcer and a reduced risk of gastric cancer, because the pathogenic mechanism of dupA appears to involve the induction of high interleukin (IL)-8 production in the antrum, leading to antrum-predominant gastritis, a well-recognized characteristic of duodenal ulcer. However, Hussein [1] reported that dupA promotes duodenal ulceration in some populations and gastric ulcer and gastric cancer in others, and Argent et al. [26], Nguyen et al. [27], and Arachchi et al. [28] indicated that about 40% of H. pylori-infected patients with duodenal ulcer do not have the dupA gene, so that they required further investigation into the effects of the dupA gene.

However, recently, Jung et al. [29] have reported that, although cagA status was associated with inflammation and atrophy both in the antrum and in the corpus, homB (one of the hom family of H. pylori outer-membrane proteins) status was associated with inflammation and atrophy only in the corpus, so that homB gene status may be used as a factor for discriminating between the risk of gastric cancer and that of duodenal ulcer.

In this way, various H. pylori strains have been reported and various opinions concerning them are prevalent, but no consensus has existed, and at present, it is impossible to answer the questions that prompted this study merely on the basis of differences of virulence between H. pylori strains. However, if unknown types of H. pylori strains that induce gastric cancer and duodenal ulcer independently are discovered in the future, it is possible that current views will undergo great changes. Therefore, major developments of research in this field can be expected.

Effects of acid-suppressive therapy (Fig. 2)

Camels et al. [30] reported that atrophic gastritis in which there is a loss of gastric acidity contributes to the promotion of the endogenous formation of N-nitroso compounds by the gastric bacterial flora, and Sanduleanu et al. [31] indicated that profound acid-suppressive therapy can be associated with bacterial overgrowth with non-H. pylori species within the stomach, so that these factors may be some of the causative factors of gastric cancer.
Fig. 2

Effects of acid-suppressive therapy. PPI proton pump inhibitor, VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor

Moreover, Lamberts et al. [32] and Klinkenberg-Knol et al. [33] indicated that the profound reduction in gastric acid secretion induced by PPIs leads to increased secretion of gastrin, and most PPI users have moderate hypergastrinemia; Havu [34], Gillen and McColl [35], and Kuipers [36] indicated that hypergastrinemia has been associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer.

Kuipers [36] and Kuipers and Sipponen [37] stated that PPI therapy in H. pylori-positive patients changes the gastritis pattern from antral-predominant to corpus-predominant pangastritis, and in antral-predominant gastritis, inflammation of the antral mucosa stimulates gastrin secretion, which maintains acid production at a normal to high level and thus keeps the acid production pattern intact, in contrast with corpus-predominant gastritis, in which inflammation of the gastric corpus mucosa further impairs acid secretion, despite the increase in gastrin. These authors [36, 37] concluded that, in patients with H. pylori infection, long-term PPI use is associated with an increased incidence of atrophic gastritis, which is a precursor of gastric cancer. Similarly, vagotomy, a procedure used mainly for duodenal ulcers, may increase the risk of gastric cancer [38], as may treatment with cimetidine [39] (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Effects of cimetidine and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). COX-2 cyclooxygenase-2

Elder et al. [40] proposed that cimetidine is converted to its nitroso analog which structurally resembles other known gastric carcinogens, but Muscroft et al. [41] contended that cimetidine is unlikely to cause gastric cancer, as a result of their finding low concentrations of gastric juice nitrite in patients taking the drug.

Lin et al. [42] reported on the anticancer activity of cimetidine (Fig. 3), and noted that the perioperative use of cimetidine in gastric cancer patients could help restore diminished cellular immunity. Milito and Fais [43], Dillman et al. [44], and Jiang et al. [45] were in agreement with this opinion, but Langman et al. [46] reported that cimetidine did not show significantly more influence on the survival of patients with gastric cancer than placebo. Therefore, further investigation is required into the effects of cimetidine.

Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (Fig. 3)

Gridley et al. [47] and Thun et al. [48] indicated that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may protect patients against gastric cancer as well as colorectal cancer. Wang et al. [49] reported that NSAID use has been associated with a reduced risk of gastric cancer and speculated that it is possible that NSAIDs may inhibit the replication and proliferation of H. pylori [49, 50], while Takahashi et al. [51] and Hudson et al. [52] reported that NSAIDs may neutralize the increased cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression and prostaglandin synthesis associated with H. pylori infection, thereby reducing the risk of gastric cancer. However, these drugs may also cause peptic ulcers [53], so that long-term NSAID use may be associated with an increased risk of gastroduodenal ulcer and a reduced risk of gastric cancer, but there are some negative opinions about this association [54, 55], and so there is no consensus regarding the anticancer effects of NSAIDs.

Effects of diet (Fig. 1)

Graham [4] indicated that fresh fruits and vegetables may prove to have been a critical factor in delaying or preventing the progression of superficial gastritis to atrophic gastritis; Correa et al. [56] named this phenomenon “the banana hypothesis” and concluded that environment is more important than genetics in determining the outcome of an H. pylori infection.

Parsonnet et al. [57], Correa et al. [58], and Kobayashi et al. [59] indicated that dietary factors that have been suspected to increase risk, such as nitrates, carbohydrates, and salt, could potentially amplify the risk of mutation beyond that due to inflammation alone, whereas fresh fruits and vegetables, and vitamins A, C, and E are dietary antioxidants that may limit inflammation-related oxidative damage.

Consumption of fresh fruit and vegetables may diminish the risk of acute antral gastritis, but it has no effect on more advanced cases of atrophy such as atrophic body gastritis, and therefore, it is considered that the consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables may also be of little value in the improvement of severely advanced mucosal atrophy.

Of interest, Correa et al. [58] reported that salty foods may be another risk factor for gastric cancer, excessive salt perhaps amplifying the virulent carcinogenetic factors of H. pylori.

Other exogenous risk factors (Fig. 1)

Chen et al. [60] and Sierra et al. [61] indicated that male gender and smoking were associated with an increased risk of duodenal ulcer in H. pylori-infected patients. Graham [4] speculated that poor nutrition in childhood and low parietal cell function may leave H. pylori-infected patients open to gastric cancer, whereas good nutrition in childhood and high parietal cell function may precede the development of duodenal ulcer. Moreover, childhood infections such as diphtheria, tonsillitis, and so on are associated with a marked decrease in acid secretion, and this is also considered to be a causative factor in gastric cancer [62, 63, 64].

Endogenous factors

Polymorphisms of inflammatory cytokines (Figs. 1, 4)

Suzuki et al. [65] and Murakami et al. [66] have reported that H. pylori increases the production of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and that toxic metabolites and lysosomal enzymes released from neutrophils are also responsible for gastric mucosal injury, while Takashima et al. [67] reported that decreased acid secretion was accompanied by an elevation of IL-1β messenger RNA levels in the H. pylori-infected gastric mucosa. Esplugues et al. [68] and Kondo et al. [69] reported that the acid-inhibitory effect of IL-1β appears to involve nitric oxide synthesis and may be mediated by the inhibition of gastric histamine mobilization.
Fig. 4

Possible causative factors of gastric cancer and duodenal ulcer

The examination of gastric acid secretion is very important because a significant difference in gastric acid secretion exists between duodenal ulcer and gastric cancer; namely, hyperchlorhydria in duodenal ulcer and hypochlorhydria in gastric cancer.

Furthermore, El-Omar et al. [70], Furuta et al. [71], Figueiredo et al. [72], and Camargo et al. [73] indicated that IL-1 genetic polymorphism may induce a reduction in acid secretion, may cause gastric inflammation and atrophy, and may contribute to H. pylori-related gastric carcinogenesis. Moreover, Camargo et al. [73], Zambon et al. [74], and El-Omar et al. [75] stated that polymorphisms in genes associated with the inflammatory response in the gastric mucosa, such as IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-10, have been shown to be associated with higher risks for duodenal ulcer and gastric cancer. However, Kato et al. [76], Lee et al. [77], Gatti et al. [78], and Kamangar et al. [79] did not agree with these opinions, and Chang et al. [80], in particular, indicated that mucosal inflammatory cytokines were related to gastroduodenal phenotypes, not to IL-1β genotypes, and they noted that H. pylori infection was a more important factor in the development of gastroduodenal phenotypes than IL-1β polymorphisms. Partida-Rodríguez et al. [81], however, reported that genotype TNF-β G/G showed a significant gene-dose effect with gastric cancer, and heat shock protein (HSP) 70-1 C/G showed significant association with both gastric cancer and duodenal ulcer.

Thus, opinions vary considerably, but it is not possible to explain the causes of gastric cancer and duodenal ulcer by the notion of polymorphism alone. Nevertheless, examination of the polymorphisms of inflammatory cytokines is very important because hitherto unknown polymorphisms of some cytokines which have significant roles in gastric acid secretion may be found in the future.

Effect of vascular endothelial growth factor (Figs. 2, 4)

Jones et al. [82] and Suzuki et al. [83] stated that enhanced vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene expression was identified to contribute to the healing of peptic ulcer, whereas Takahashi et al. [84] and Maeda et al. [85] reported that gastric cancer frequently displayed high levels of VEGF expression associated with intramucosal microvessel density, and Feng et al. [86] indicated that high levels of VEGF expression have also been observed in gastric premalignant lesions such as chronic atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia. Moreover, Tahara et al. [87] indicated that the VEGF 1612A polymorphism was associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer.

Failure to notice lesions

In addition to the above factors, failure to detect gastric cancer during the follow-up periods for gastroduodenal ulcers may also play a part in the reported lack of gastric cancer coexistent with duodenal ulcer. Especially in cases of duodenal ulcers that are, for instance, large, deep, bleeding, or concomitant with severe acute antral gastritis, gastric cancer of the antrum may easily be missed. Indeed, Takatsu et al. [88] reported that 0.98% (9/920) of gastric cancers were missed in panendoscopy; moreover, Hosokawa et al. [89] reported that in 41/250 (16.4%) cases, gastric cancer may have been overlooked. Therefore, the problem of failure to notice a lesion should also be included in our title question, because in patients with multiple lesions, minor lesions tend to be easily overlooked in various examinations.

Etiology of duodenal ulcer and gastric cancer (Fig. 5)

Although gastric cancer and duodenal ulcer have the same major causative factor (H. pylori infection), the phenotypes of the diseases are greatly different. Why and how do H. pylori infections lead to different diseases?
Fig. 5

Mechanisms of gastric cancer and duodenal ulcer

To help answer this question, we examined the etiology of these two disorders involving the various factors related to these disorders mentioned above.

Mabe et al. [90] reported that cases of duodenal ulcer are more prevalent in younger individuals than gastric cancer cases and that gastritis in duodenal ulcer was primarily antral and spared the gastric corpus, allowing continued high levels of acid secretion. Corpus inflammation, however, has long been known to suppress acid, and low acid allows H. pylori to interact with the mucosa to cause more inflammation and to establish a vicious cycle leading to the loss of glands and to atrophy. Correa [91] speculated that atrophic gastritis starts in the antrum and may extend upwards towards the gastric body, often resulting in more severe atrophic gastritis with increased age. Uemura et al. [6], Khulusi et al. [92], Sipponen et al. [93], and Wu et al. [94] have indicated that antral-predominant gastritis is associated with hyperchlorhydria and duodenal ulcer, whereas corpus gastritis leads to hypochlorhydria and atrophy and an increased risk of distal gastric cancer. Miwa et al. [8] stated that the low incidence of gastric cancer coexistent with duodenal ulcer was assumed to depend on the fact that intestinal metaplasia is slight in stomachs carrying duodenal ulcers, and that gastric cancers occur less frequently and grow more slowly in stomachs with high acid secretion activity than in stomachs with low acid secretion.

Hwang et al. [95] reported that peptic ulcer patients had lower atrophy scores than patients with simple gastritis, whereas Brooks [96] reported that patients with gastric ulcer generally have more severe atrophy than do duodenal ulcer patients, and furthermore, Fuccio et al. [11] reported that many patients with gastric ulcer also have atrophic gastritis or intestinal metaplasia. Hussein [1] has shown that gastric ulcer is associated with a high risk, but duodenal ulcer with a low risk, of gastric cancer, and patients with gastric ulcers typically have atrophic gastritis and corpus-predominant gastritis, whereas patients with duodenal ulcers have antral-predominant gastritis, but few atrophic changes.

Parsonnet et al. [57] and Hussein [1] indicated that the rapid turnover of cells resulting from H. pylori infection-related injury increased the risks of DNA damage, predisposing the mucosa to transformation by ingested or endogenous mutagens, and they also noted that endogenous byproducts (especially free radicals) of inflammation, such as superoxide and hydroxyl ions, and nitric oxide, nitrates, and nitrosamines produced by macrophages caused oxidative damage, mutation, and malignant transformation [97]. They noted that these mechanisms are not mutually exclusive, and a combination of mechanisms is likely.

Hussein [1] also indicated that, in patients with gastric cancer, the infiltration of leukocytes into the gastric mucosa, combined with an alkaline pH in gastric juice, results in low levels of ascorbic acid and a diminished ability to block the N-nitrosation process; however, the gastric juice of patients with duodenal ulcers shows high levels of ascorbic acid.

Fuccio et al. [11] appropriately summarized the mechanisms of gastric cancer and duodenal ulcer after H. pylori infection as follows: H. pylori infection is usually established during childhood, so that antral gastritis and duodenal ulcers are common among young patients with a relatively short history of H. pylori infection; they speculated that continuous infection with H. pylori may result in the development of corpus gastritis in patients with antral gastritis associated with duodenal ulcer, so that middle-aged and elderly patients with duodenal ulcer often have gastritis in the corpus, and these conditions may place a patient at high risk of the development of gastric cancer. This explanation is considered to be widely accepted at the present time.

These contrasting etiologies may be the main reasons for the rare frequency of the coexistence of gastric cancer and duodenal ulcer. Another important factor in this phenomenon is the age at which the H. pylori infection is acquired. Graham [4] hypothesized that the acquisition of H. pylori infection in early childhood would lead to an increased prevalence of gastric atrophy in young adults and that duodenal ulcer disease would be rare in that population. However, it is now recognized that H. pylori is typically a childhood-acquired infection; Kubo and Imai [98] indicated that the best association with gastric cancer is not the age of acquisition of H. pylori infection but the age of acquisition of atrophic gastritis, because cases of early acquisition of atrophic gastritis may lead to gastric but not duodenal ulcer; this opinion is now widely accepted.

Factors in the early acquisition of atrophic gastritis may include salty foods; acid-suppressive therapy; polymorphisms of inflammatory cytokines and VEGF; and the presence of the homB H. pylori strain, whereas the factors that inhibit atrophic gastritis may include NSAIDs; fresh fruits and vegetables; vitamins A, C, and E; good nutrition; and the presence of the dupA-H. pylori strain.

Figure 5 shows a summary of the processes described in this section; we note that because of the contrasting etiologies of gastric cancer and duodenal ulcer, their coexistence may be unusual.

In addition, for gastric cancer to coexist with duodenal ulcer, an unrelated cause of mucosal atrophy must play some part, and the diffuse type of gastric cancer may be predominant in such cases [6, 93, 99].


Individuals with infections caused by the same H. pylori strain do not all show the same phenotypes of diseases, so that some amplifying factors are necessary. At present, then, we consider that the time of acquisition of atrophic gastritis is the most important factor in the final clinical outcome, and the characteristics of the infecting H. pylori strains and genetic characteristics of the host, as well as environmental factors, may all be involved in this outcome. Therefore, environmental factors such as diet, nutrition, and smoking are still important.

In the future, if bacteria other than H. pylori, or atypical H. pylori strains, or unfamiliar mutations of H. pylori, or unknown endogenous factors of the host, for example, are discovered, then the current outlook may be amended, and an accurate understanding may arise. We therefore look forward to further developments in molecular biology in this field.

In addition, the frequency of H. pylori infections is expected to decrease in the future, and whatever kinds of alterations may occur should be carefully observed.


Gastric cancer rarely coexists with duodenal ulcer, and one of the most acceptable views at present as to why this is so is the following: in many cases of childhood infections by H. pylori, the time of acquisition of atrophic gastritis is the most important factor as regards the phenotypes of diseases, and if there is no early acquisition of atrophic gastritis, high levels of gastric acid can occur, and consequently, acute antral gastritis and duodenal ulcer may be seen when the subjects are in their teens or twenties. NSAIDs, smoking, and the dupA H. pylori strain may be among the factors promoting duodenal ulcer. In contrast, in elderly individuals, persistent H. pylori infections and early acquisition of atrophic gastritis may be the cause of low gastric acid, and consequently gastric cancer can occur. Factors such as salty foods; acid-suppressive therapy; polymorphisms of inflammatory cytokines and VEGF; and the homB H. pylori strain appear to promote gastric cancer, whereas factors such as NSAIDs and fresh fruits and vegetables are thought to inhibit this disease. In these ways, gastric cancer and duodenal ulcer may have contrasting etiologies, and their risk factors may also be contrasting. Therefore, the coexistence of these two disorders is unusual, and such cases may occur only as a result of a factor unrelated to mucosal atrophy; thus, the diffuse type of gastric cancer is probably predominant in such cases. However, these speculations are open to the possibility of marked amendments, if striking new factors should be discovered.



The authors are indebted to Mr. C.W.P. Reynolds of the Department of International Medical Communications of Tokyo Medical University for his careful linguistic assistance with this manuscript. The authors report no conflicts of interest.


  1. 1.
    Hussein NR. The association of dupA and Helicobacter pylori-related gastroduodenal diseases. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;29:817–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Infection with Helicobacter pylori. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Vol. 61. Schistosomes, liver flukes and Helicobacter pylori. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1994. p. 177–241.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Labigne A, de Reuse H. Determinants of Helicobacter pylori pathogenicity. Infect Agents Dis. 1996;5:191–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Graham DY. Helicobacter pylori infection in the pathogenesis of duodenal ulcer and gastric cancer: a model. Gastroenterology. 1997;113:1983–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stemmermann GN, Fenoglio-Preiser C. Gastric carcinoma distal to the cardia: a review of the epidemiological pathology of the precursors to a preventable cancer. Pathology. 2002;34:494–503.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Uemura N, Okamoto S, Yamamoto S, Matsumura N, Yamaguchi S, Yamakido M, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:784–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fischer A, Clagett OT, McDonald JR. Coexistent duodenal ulcer and gastric malignancy. Surgery. 1947;21:168–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miwa M, Senoue I, Kikuchi K, Watanabe H, Nomiyama T, Suzuki S, et al. The coexistence of gastric cancer and duodenal ulcers. Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 1981;6:203–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Take S, Mizuno M, Ishiki K, Nagahara Y, Yoshida T, Yokota K, et al. The effect of eradicating Helicobacter pylori on the development of gastric cancer in patients with peptic ulcer disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1037–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kamada T, Hata J, Sugiu K, Kusunoki H, Ito M, Tanaka S, et al. Clinical features of gastric cancer discovered after successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori: results from a 9-year prospective follow-up study in Japan. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;21:1121–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fuccio L, Zagari RM, Minardi ME, Bazzoli F. Systematic review: Helicobacter pylori for the prevention of gastric cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25:133–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Go MF, Graham DY. How does Helicobacter pylori cause duodenal ulcer disease: the bug, the host, or both? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1994;9(Suppl 1):S8–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Atherton JC. The clinical relevance of strain types of Helicobacter pylori. Gut. 1997;40:701–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Atherton JC, Peek RM Jr, Tham KT, Cover TL, Blaser MJ. Clinical and pathological importance of heterogeneity in vacA, the vacuolating cytotoxin gene of Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:92–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Censini S, Lange C, Xiang Z, Crabtree JE, Ghiara P, Borodovsky M, et al. cag, a pathogenicity island of Helicobacter pylori, encodes type I-specific and disease-associated virulence factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:14648–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prinz C, Schoniger M, Rad R, Becker I, Keiditsch E, Wagenpfeil S, et al. Key importance of the Helicobacter pylori adherence factor blood group antigen binding adhesion during chronic gastric inflammation. Cancer Res. 2001;61:1903–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li SD, Kersulyte D, Lindley IJ, Neelam B, Berg DE, Crabtree JE. Multiple genes in the left half of the cag pathogenicity island of Helicobacter pylori are required for tyrosine kinase-dependent transcription of interleukin-8 in gastric epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 1999;67:3893–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marrelli D, Pedrazzani C, Berardi A, Corso G, Neri A, Garosi L, et al. Negative Helicobacter pylori status is associated with poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. Cancer. 2009;115:2071–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Odenbreit S, Puls J, Sedlmaier B, Gerland E, Fischer W, Haas R. Translocation of Helicobacter pylori CagA into gastric epithelial cells by type IV secretion. Science. 2000;287:1497–1500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huang JQ, Zheng GF, Sumanac K, Irvine EJ, Hunt RH. Meta-analysis of the relationship between cagA seropositivity and gastric cancer. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:1636–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kuipers EJ, Perez-Perez GI, Meuwissen SG, Blaser MJ. Helicobacter pylori and atrophic gastritis: importance of the cagA status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:1777–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hatakeyama M. Oncogenic mechanisms of the Helicobacter pylori CagA protein. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:688–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yamaoka Y, Kodama T, Kashima K, Graham DY, Sepulveda AR. Variants of the 3′ region of the cagA gene in Helicobacter pylori isolates from different H. pylori associated diseases. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:2258–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nomura AM, Perez-Perez GI, Lee J, Stemmermann G, Blaser MJ. Relation between Helicobacter pylori cagA status and risk of peptic ulcer disease. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:1054–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lu H, Hsu PY, Graham DY, Yamaoka Y. Duodenal ulcer promoting gene of Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:833–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Argent RH, Burette A, Miendje Deyi VY, Atherton JC. The presence of dupA in Helicobacter pylori is not significantly associated with duodenal ulceration in Belgium, South Africa, China, or North America. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:1204–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nguyen LT, Uchida T, Tsukamoto Y, Kuroda A, Okimoto T, Kodama M, et al. Helicobacter pylori dupA gene is not associated with clinical outcomes in the Japanese population. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16(8):1264–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Arachchi HS, Kalra V, Lal B, Bhatia V, Baba CS, Chakravarthy S, et al. Prevalence of duodenal ulcer-promoting gene (dupA) of Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer in North Indian population. Helicobacter. 2007;12:591–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jung SW, Sugimoto M, Graham DY, Yamaoka Y. homB status of Helicobacter pylori as a novel marker to distinguish gastric cancer from duodenal ulcer. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:3241–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Camels S, Bereziat JC, Oshima H, Bartsch H. Bacterial formation of N-nitroso compounds in rats after omeprazole-induced achlorhydria. In: O’Neill IK, Chen J, Bartsch H, editors. Relevance to human cancer of N-nitroso compounds, tobacco smoke and mycotoxins (IARC scientific publication no. 105). Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1991. p. 187–91.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sanduleanu S, Jonkers D, De Bruïne A, Hameeteman W, Stockbrügger RW. Double gastric infection with Helicobacter pylori and non-Helicobacter pylori bacteria during acid-suppressive therapy: increase of pro-inflammatory cytokines and development of atrophic gastritis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001;15:1163–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lamberts R, Creutzfeldt W, Strüber HG, Brunner G, Solcia E. Long-term omeprazole therapy in peptic ulcer disease: gastrin, endocrine cell growth, and gastritis. Gastroenterology. 1993;104:1356–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Nelis F, Dent J, Snel P, Mitchell B, Prichard P, et al. Long-term omeprazole treatment in resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease: efficacy, safety, and influence on gastric mucosa. Gastroenterology. 2000;118:661–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Havu N. Enterochromaffin-like cell carcinoids of gastric mucosa in rats after life-long inhibition of gastric secretion. Digestion. 1986;35(Suppl 1):42–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gillen D, McColl KE. Problem associated with the clinical use of proton pump inhibitors. Pharmacol Toxicol. 2001;89:281–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kuipers EJ. Proton pump inhibitors and gastric neoplasia. Gut. 2006;55:1217–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kuipers EJ, Sipponen P. Helicobacter pylori eradication for the prevention of gastric cancer. Helicobacter. 2006;11(Suppl 1):52–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lundegårdh G, Ekbom A, McLaughlin JK, Nyrén O. Gastric cancer risk after vagotomy. Gut. 1994;35:946–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Møller H, Nissen A, Mosbech J. Use of cimetidine and other peptic ulcer drugs in Denmark 1977–1990 with analysis of the risk of gastric cancer among cimetidine users. Gut. 1992;33:1166–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Elder JB, Ganguli PC, Gillespie IE. Cimetidine and gastric cancer. Lancet. 1979;1:1005–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Muscroft TJ, Youngs DJ, Burdon DW, Keighley. Cimetidine is unlikely to increase formation of intragastric N-nitroso-compounds in patients taking a normal diet. Lancet. 1981;I:408–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lin CY, Bai DJ, Yuan HY, Wang K, Yang GL, Hu MB, et al. Perioperative cimetidine administration promotes peripheral blood lymphocytes and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10:136–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Milito AD, Fais S. Proton pump inhibitor may reduce tumour resistance. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;6:1049–54.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dillman RO, Soori G, DePriest C, Nayak SK, Beutel LD, de Leon C, et al. Treatment of human solid malignancies with autologous activated lymphocytes and cimetidine: a phase II trial of the Cancer Biotherapy Research Group. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2003;18:727–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jiang CG, Liu FR, Li JB, Xu HM. Cimetidine induces apoptosis in gastric cancer cells in vitro and inhibits tumor growth in vivo. Oncol Rep. 2010;23:693–700.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Langman MJS, Dunn JA, Whiting JL, Burton A, Hallissey MT, Fielding JWL, et al. Prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of cimetidine in gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 1999;81:1356–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gridley G, McLaughlin JK, Ekbom A, Klareskog L, Adami HO, Hacker DG, et al. Incidence of cancer among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:307–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Thun MJ, Namboodiri MM, Calle EE, Flanders WD, Health CW Jr. Aspirin use and risk of fatal cancer. Cancer Res. 1993;53:1322–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wang WH, Huang JQ, Zheng GF, Lam SK, Karlberg J, Wong BC. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and the risk of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1784–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Shirin H, Moss SF, Stark B, Weinstein IB, Holt PR, Sordillo EM. Inhibition of Helicobacter pylori growth by sulindac. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:A4931 (abstract).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Takahashi M, Katayama Y, Takada H, Kuwayama H, Terano A. The effect of NSAIDs and a COX-2 specific inhibitor on Helicobacter pylori-induced PGE2 and HGF in human gastric fibroblasts. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14(Suppl 1):44–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hudson N, Balsitis M, Filipowicz F, Hawkey CJ. Effect of Helicobacter pylori colonization on gastric mucosal eicosanoid synthesis in patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Gut. 1993;34:748–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wolfe MM, Lichtenstein DR, Singh G. Gastrointestinal toxicity of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1888–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Garcia Rodriguez LA, Lagergren J, Lindblad M. Gastric acid suppression and risk of oesophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma: a nested case control study in the UK. Gut. 2006;55:1538–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    McColl KE. Acid inhibitory medication and risk of gastric and oesophageal cancer. Gut. 2006;55:1532–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Correa P, Cuello C, Fajardo LF, Haenszel W, Bolaños O, de Ramirez B. Diet and gastric cancer: nutrition survey in a high-risk area. Natl Cancer Inst. 1983;70:673–8.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Parsonnet J, Friedman GD, Vandersteen DP, Chang Y, Vogelman JH, Orentreich N, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and the risk of gastric carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1127–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Correa P, Piazuelo MB, Camargo MC. The future of gastric cancer prevention. Gastric Cancer. 2004;7:9–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kobayashi M, Tsubono Y, Sasazuki S, Sasaki S, Tsugane S. Vegetables, fruit and risk of gastric cancer in Japan: a 10-year follow-up of the JPHC Study Cohort I. Int J Cancer. 2002;102:39–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Chen TS, Lee YC, Li FY, Chang FY. Smoking and hyperpepsinogenemia are associated with increased risk for duodenal ulcer in Helicobacter pylori-infected patients. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;39:699–703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Sierra R, Une C, Ramirez V, Gonzalez MI, Ramirez JA, de Mascarel A, et al. Association of serum pepsinogen with atrophic body gastritis in Costa Rica. Clin Exp Med. 2006;6:72–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Faber K. Gastritis and its consequences. London: Oxford University Press; 1935.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Nyfeldt A, Vimtrup B. Gastritis acuta bei diphtheria faucium. Acta Med Scand. 1932;78:447–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Schoen AM. Acute gastritis. In: Bockus HL, editor. Gastroenterology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1963. p. 351–67.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Suzuki M, Miura S, Suematsu M, Fukumura D, Kurose I, Suzuki H, et al. Helicobacter pylori-associated ammonia production enhances neutrophil-dependent gastric mucosal cell injury. Am J Physiol. 1992;263:G719–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Murakami M, Asagoe K, Dekigai H, Kusaka S, Saita H, Kita T. Products of neutrophil metabolism increase ammonia-induced gastric mucosal damage. Dig Dis Sci. 1995;40:268–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Takashima M, Furuta T, Hanai H, Sugimura H, Kaneko E. Effects of Helicobacter pylori infection on gastric acid secretion and serum gastrin levels in Mongolian gerbils. Gut. 2001;48:765–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Esplugues JV, Martinez-Cuesta MA, Barrachina MD, Calatayud S, Whittle BJ. Involvement of endogenous nitric oxide in the inhibition by endotoxin and interleukin-1 beta of gastric acid secretion. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1994;9(Suppl 1):S45–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kondo S, Shinomura Y, Kanayama S, Kawabata S, Miyazaki Y, Imamura I, et al. Interleukin-1 beta of pentagastrin-stimulated rat gastric acid secretion. Br J Pharmacol. 1993;108:9–10.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    El-Omar EM, Rabkin CS, Gammon MD, Vaughan TL, Risch HA, Schoenberg JB, et al. Increased risk of noncardia gastric cancer associated with proinflammatory cytokine gene polymorphisms. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:1193–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Furuta T, El-Omar EM, Xiao F, Shirai N, Takashima M, Sugimura H. Interleukin 1 beta polymorphisms increase risk of hypochlorhydria and atrophic gastritis and reduce risk of duodenal ulcer recurrence in Japan. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:92–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Figueiredo C, Machado JC, Pharoah P, Seruca R, Sousa S, Carvalho R, et al. Helicobacter pylori and interleukin 1 genotyping: an opportunity to identify high risk individuals for gastric carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1680–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Camargo MC, Mera R, Correa P, Peek RM Jr, Fontham ET, Goodman KJ, et al. Interleukin-1 beta and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist gene polymorphisms and gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1674–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Zambon CF, Basso D, Navaglia F, Belluco C, Falda A, Fogar P, et al. Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines gene polymorphisms and Helicobacter pylori infection: interactions influence outcome. Cytokine. 2005;29:141–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    El-Omar EM, Carrington M, Chow WH, McColl KE, Bream JH, Young HA, et al. Interleukin-1 polymorphisms associated with increased risk of gastric cancer. Nature. 2000;404:398–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Kato S, Onda M, Yamada S, Matsuda N, Tokunaga A, Matsukura N. Association of the interleukin-1 beta genetic polymorphism and gastric cancer risk in Japanese. J Gastroenterol. 2001;36:696–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Lee SG, Kim B, Choi W, Lee I, Choi J, Song K, et al. Lack of association between pro-inflammatory genotypes of the interleukin-1 (IL-1B-31 C/+ and IL-1RN*2/*2) and gastric cancer/duodenal ulcer in Korean population. Cytokine. 2003;21:167–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Gatti LI, Burbano RR, de Assumpção PP, Smith M de A, Payão SL. Interleukin-1 beta polymorphisms, Helicobacter pylori infection in individuals from Northern Brazil with gastric adenocarcinoma. Clin Exp Med. 2004;4:93–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Kamangar F, Abnet CC, Hutchinson AA, Newschaffer CJ, Helzlsouer K, Shugart YY, et al. Polymorphisms in inflammation-related genes and risk of gastric cancer (Finland). Cancer Causes Control. 2006;17:117–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Chang YW, Oh HC, Jang JY, Hwangbo Y, Lee JW, Lee J, et al. IL-1B and IL-8, matrix metalloproteinases 3, and pepsinogen secretion before and after H. pylori eradication in gastroduodenal phenotypes. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43:1184–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Partida-Rodríguez O, Torres J, Flores-Luna L, Camorlonga M, Nieves-Ramírez M, Lazcano E, et al. Polymorphisms in TNF and HSP-70 show a significant association with gastric cancer and duodenal ulcer. Int J Cancer. 2010;126:1861–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Jones MK, Kawanaka H, Baatar D, Szabó IL, Tsugawa K, Pai R, et al. Gene therapy for gastric ulcers with single local injection of naked DNA encoding VEGF and angioprotein-1. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:1040–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Suzuki N, Takahashi S, Okabe S. Relationship between vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenesis in spontaneous and indomethacin-delayed healing of acetic acid-induced gastric ulcer in rats. J Physiol Pharmacol. 1998;49:515–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Takahashi Y, Clearly KR, Mai M, Kitadai Y, Bucana CD, Ellis LM. Significance of vessel count and vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor (KDR) in intestinal-type gastric cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 1996;2:1679–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Maeda K, Kang SM, Onoda N, Ogawa M, Kato Y, Sawada T, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression in preoperative biopsy specimens correlates with disease recurrence in patients with early gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 1999;86:566–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Feng CW, Wang LD, Jiao LH, Liu B, Zheng S, Xie XJ. Expression of p53, inducible nitric oxide synthase and vascular endothelial growth factor in gastric precancerous and cancerous lesions: correlation with clinical features. BMC Cancer. 2000;29:2–8.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Tahara T, Shibata T, Nakamura M, Yamashita H, Yoshioka D, Hirata I, et al. Effect of polymorphisms in the 3′ untranslated region (3′-UTR) of vascular endothelial growth factor gene on gastric cancer and peptic ulcer diseases in Japan. Mol Carcinog. 2009;48:1030–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Takatsu S, Tsuchiya H, Kitamura A, Yoshida S, Ito M, Sakurai Y, et al. Detection of early gastric cancer by panendoscopy. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1984;14:243–52.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Hosokawa O, Kaizaki Y, Nakaya T, Hinoshita T, Watanabe K, Douden K, et al. Retrospective study of endoscopic findings: 250 cases of gastric cancer. Dig Endosc. 2000;12:136–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Mabe K, Takahashi M, Oizumi H, Tsukuma H, Shibata A, Fukase K, et al. Does Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy for peptic ulcer prevent gastric cancer? World J Gastroenterol. 2009;14:4290–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Correa P. Human gastric carcinogenesis: a multistep and multifactorial process. First American Cancer Society Award Lecture on Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. Cancer Res. 1992;52:6735–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Khulusi S, Badve S, Patel P, Lloyd R, Marrero JM, Finlayson C, et al. Pathogenesis of gastric metaplasia of the human duodenum: role of Helicobacter pylori, gastric acid, and ulceration. Gastroenterology. 1996;110:452–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Sipponen P, Ranta P, Helske T, Kaariainen I, Maki T, Linnala A, et al. Serum levels of amidated gastrin-17 and pepsinogen I in atrophic gastritis: an observational case–control study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37:785–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Wu MS, Chen CJ, Lin JT. Host-environmental interactions: their impact on progression from gastric inflammation to carcinogenesis and on development of new approaches to prevent and treat gastric cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:1878–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Hwang IR, Kodama T, Kikuchi S, Sakai K, Peterson LE, Graham DY, et al. Effect of interleukin 1 polymorphisms on gastric mucosal interleukin 1β production in Helicobacter pylori infection. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:1793–803.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Brooks FP. The pathophysiology of peptic ulcer disease. Dig Dis Sci. 1985;30(Suppl 11):15S–29S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Ames BN, Gold LS. Too many rodent carcinogens: mitogenesis increases mutagenesis. Science. 1990;249:970–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Kubo T, Imai T. Intestinal metaplasia of gastric mucosa in autopsy materials in Hiroshima and Yamaguchi districts. Gann. 1971;62:49–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Solcia E, Fiocca R, Luinetti O, Villani L, Padovan L, Calistri D, et al. Intestinal and diffuse gastric cancers arise in a different background of Helicobacter pylori gastritis through different gene involvement. Am J Surg Pathol. 1996;20(Suppl 1):S8–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Gastric Cancer Association and The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hideyuki Ubukata
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hiroyuki Nagata
    • 1
  • Takanobu Tabuchi
    • 1
  • Satoru Konishi
    • 1
  • Teruhiko Kasuga
    • 1
  • Takafumi Tabuchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Fourth Department of SurgeryTokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical CenterInashikiJapan

Personalised recommendations