Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Gastric Cancer
  3. Article

Safety and efficacy of S-1 monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published: 03 December 2010
  • Volume 13, pages 245–250, (2010)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Gastric Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Safety and efficacy of S-1 monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer
Download PDF
  • Takahiro Tsushima1,
  • Shuichi Hironaka1,2,
  • Narikazu Boku1,
  • Nozomu Machida1,
  • Kentaro Yamazaki1,
  • Hirofumi Yasui1,
  • Keisei Taku1,
  • Akira Fukutomi1 &
  • …
  • Yusuke Onozawa1 
  • 927 Accesses

  • 18 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Background

Although S-1 is effective against advanced gastric cancer (AGC), its efficacy in elderly patients has not yet been investigated sufficiently. We assessed the efficacy and safety of S-1 monotherapy in elderly patients with AGC.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of the data of 153 patients with unresectable/recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma who received S-1 monotherapy as first-line chemotherapy at our institution. S-1 was administered orally twice daily at the dose of 40 mg/m2, on days 1–28, every 6 weeks. We categorized the patients into three groups, the young (≤65 years old), the middle-aged (66–75 years old), and the elderly (≥76 years old); and the drug toxicity, objective responses, progression-free survivals, and overall survivals were compared among the three groups.

Results

The incidence of leukopenia of grade 3 or greater in the three groups was 7%, 5%, and 13%, and that of anemia was 9%, 18%, and 27%, respectively. In regard to nonhematological toxicities, the incidence of nausea of grade 3 or greater was 3%, 5%, and 13%; that of fatigue was 5%, 11%, and 20%; and that of anorexia was 5%, 6%, and 27%, respectively. As for the treatment efficacy, the objective response rates, median progressionfree survivals, and overall survivals in the young, middle-aged, and elderly groups were 53%, 46%, and 33%; 7.8, 5.6, and 3.9 months; and 16.9, 17.1; and 7.7 months, respectively.

Conclusion

Although S-1 monotherapy showed moderate efficacy in elderly (≥76 years) patients with AGC, patients in this age group showed higher incidences of severe toxicities than the younger patients.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Phase II study of S-1 plus docetaxel as first-line treatment for older patients with advanced gastric cancer (OGSG 0902)

Article 16 January 2024

A phase II study of combination therapy with oral S-1 and cisplatin in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer

Article 01 August 2017

Facilitated completion of 1-year adjuvant S-1 monotherapy for pathological stage II or III gastric cancer by medical oncologists

Article 02 April 2020

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Chemotherapy
  • Drug Therapy
  • Gastric cancer
  • Gastrointestinal cancer
  • Geriatric Care
  • Geriatrics
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. Munoz N, Franceschi S. Epidemiology of gastric cancer and perspectives for prevention. Salud Publica Mex 1997;39:318–330.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF. Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2137–2150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Inoue M, Tsugane S. Epidemiology of gastric cancer in Japan. Postgrad Med J 2005;81:419–424.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Murad AM, Santiago FF, Petroianu A, Rocha PR, Rodrigues MA, Rausch M. Modified therapy with 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced gastric cancer. Cancer 1993;72:37–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Glimelius B, Hoffman K, Haglund U, Nyren O, Sjoden PO. Initial or delayed chemotherapy with best supportive care in advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol 1994;5:189–190.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pyrhonen S, Kuitunen T, Nyandoto P, Kouri M. Randomised comparison of fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and methotrexate (FEMTX) plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 1995;71:587–591.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cullinan SA, Moertel CG, Fleming TR, Rubin JR, Krook JE, Everson LK, et al. A comparison of three chemotherapeutic regimens in the treatment of advanced pancreatic and gastric carcinoma. Fluorouracil versus fluorouracil and doxorubicin versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin. JAMA 1985;253:2061–2067.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wils JA, Klein HO, Wagener DJ, Bleiberg H, Reis H, Korsten F, et al. Sequential high-dose methotrexate and fluorouracil combined with doxorubicin-a step ahead in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 1991;9:827–831.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kelsen D, Atiq OT, Saltz L, Niedzwiecki D, Ginn D, Chapman D, et al. FAMTX versus etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin: a random assignment trial in gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:541–548.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cocconi G, Bella M, Zironi S, Algeri R, Di Costanzo F, De Lisi V, et al. Fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin combination versus PELF chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a prospective randomized trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:2687–2693.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Webb A, Cunningham D, Scarffe JH, Harper P, Norman A, Joffe JK, et al. Randomized trial comparing epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced esophagogastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:261–267.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vanhoefer U, Rougier P, Wilke H, Ducreux MP, Lacave AJ, Van Cutsem E, et al. Final results of a randomized phase III trial of sequential high-dose methotrexate, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin versus etoposide, leucovorin, and fluorouracil versus infusional fluorouracil and cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer: a trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:2648–2657.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim NK, Park YS, Heo DS, Suh C, Kim SY, Park KC, et al. A phase III randomized study of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin C versus 5-fluorouracil alone in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Cancer 1993;71:3813–3818.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cullinan SA, Moertel CG, Wieand HS, O’Connel MJ, Poon MA, Krook JE, et al. Controlled evaluation of three drug combination regimen versus fluorouracil alone in the therapy of advanced gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:412–416.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ohtsu A, Shimada Y, Shirao K, Boku N, Hyodo I, Saito H, et al. Randomized phase III trial of fluorouracil alone versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus uracil and tegafur plus mitomycin in patients with unresectable, advanced gastric cancer: The Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9205). J Clin Oncol 2003;21:54–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shirasaka T, Shimamoto Y, Ohshimo H, Yamaguchi M, Kato T, Yonekura K, et al. Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators. Anticancer Drugs 1996;7:548–557.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H, Shirao K, Doi T, Sawaki A, et al. Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:1063–1069.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, Takagane A, Akiya T, Takagi M, et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 2007;9:215–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Imamura H, Ishii H, Tsuburaya A, Hatake K, Imamoto H, Esaki T, et al. Randomized phase III study of irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) versus S-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (GC 0301/TOP-002). ASCO-GI 2008;Abstract no. 5.

  20. Lichtman SM, Wildiers H, Chatelut E, Steer C, Budman D, Morrison VA, et al. International Society Of Geriatric Oncology Chemotherapy Taskforce: evaluation of chemotherapy in older patients — an analysis of the medical literature. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:1832–1843.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Repetto L, Balducci L. A case of geriatric oncology. Lancet Oncol 2002;3:289–297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lichtman SM, Boparai MK. Anticancer drug therapy in the older cancer patient: pharmacology and polypharmacy. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2008;9:191–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hurria A, Lichtman SM. Clinical pharmacology of cancer therapies in older adults. Br J Cancer 2008;98:517–522.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee JL, Kang YK, Kang HJ, Lee KH, Zang DY, Ryoo BY, et al. A randomised multicentre phase II trial of capecitabine vs S-1 as first-line treatment in elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent unresectable gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 2008;99:584–590.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Koizumi W, Akiya T, Sato A, Sakuyama T, Sasaki E, Tomidokoro T, et al. Phase II study of S-1 as first-line treatment for elderly patients over 75 years of age with advanced gastric cancer: the Tokyo Cooperative Oncology Group Study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2010;65:1093–1099.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lindeman RD, Tobin J, Shock NW. Longitudinal studies of decline in renal function with age. J Am Geriatr Soc 1985;33:278–285.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tatsumi K, Fukushima M, Shirasaka T, Fujii S. Inhibitory effects of pyrimidine, barbituric acid and pyridine derivatives on 5-fluorouracil degradation in rat liver extracts. Jpn J Cancer Res 1987;78:748–755.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hirata K, Horikoshi N, Aiba K, Okazaki M, Denno R, Sasaki K, et al. Pharmacokinetic study of S-1, a novel oral fluorouracil antitumor drug. Clin Cancer Res 1999;5:2000–2005.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nagashima F, Ohtsu A, Yoshida S, Ito K. Japanese nationwide post-marketing survey of S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2005;8:6–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan

    Takahiro Tsushima, Shuichi Hironaka, Narikazu Boku, Nozomu Machida, Kentaro Yamazaki, Hirofumi Yasui, Keisei Taku, Akira Fukutomi & Yusuke Onozawa

  2. Clinical Research Promotion Department, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan

    Shuichi Hironaka

Authors
  1. Takahiro Tsushima
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuichi Hironaka
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Narikazu Boku
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nozomu Machida
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kentaro Yamazaki
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hirofumi Yasui
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Keisei Taku
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Akira Fukutomi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yusuke Onozawa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsushima, T., Hironaka, S., Boku, N. et al. Safety and efficacy of S-1 monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 13, 245–250 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-010-0566-z

Download citation

  • Received: 08 April 2010

  • Accepted: 06 July 2010

  • Published: 03 December 2010

  • Issue Date: November 2010

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-010-0566-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Key words

  • S-1
  • Elderly
  • Gastric Cancer
  • Safety
  • Efficacy
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

152.53.39.118

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature