Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enriching behavior patterns with learning styles using peripheral devices

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Knowledge and Information Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The human being is currently under an increased demand for attention, a result of a society that is moving faster. In most of the so-called developed countries, workers have nowadays increasingly busier activities. This makes them stretch their limits to find time for children, sports activities and other. This necessary extra time is frequently obtained at the expense of shorter periods of sleep or rest and with a cost in terms of pressure and stress. In this paper, we present a non-intrusive distributed system for enriching behavior patterns applying learning styles in a class of students which was considered as a team. It is especially suited for teams working at the computer. The presented system is able to provide real-time information about each individual as well as information about the team. It can be very useful for teachers or managers to identify potentially distracting events or individuals, and to detect the onset of mental fatigue or boredom, which significantly influence attention. In summary, this tool can be very useful for the implementation of better human resource management strategies, namely in the classification of learning style and the monitoring of the level of attention of each user.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liao M-H, Drury C (2000) Posture, discomfort and performance in a VDT task. Ergonomics 43(3):345–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pimenta A, Carneiro D, Neves J, Novais P (2016) A neural network to classify fatigue from human–computer interaction. J Neurocomput 172:413–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.03.105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Folkard S, Tucker P (2003) Shift work, safety and productivity. J Carrees Netw Occup Med 53(2):95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carneiro D, Novais P, Andrade F, Zeleznikow J, Neves J (2013) Using case-based reasoning and principled negotiation to provide decision support for dispute resolution. Knowl Inf Syst 36(3):789–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Durães D, Jiménez A, Bajo J, Novais P (2016) Monitoring level attention approach in learning activities. Adv Intell Syst Comput 478:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40165-2_4

    Google Scholar 

  6. ATTENTION-DEFICIT SO et al (2011) ADHD: clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Pediatrics (peds). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-2654

    Google Scholar 

  7. Benevenuto F et al (2009) Characterizing user behavior in online social networks. In: IMC ‘09 Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCOMM conference on internet measurement, pp 49–62

  8. Yampolskiy RV, Govindaraju V (2008) Behavioural biometrics: a survey and classification. Int J Biom. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBM.2008.018665

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mancas M (2017) How to measure attention? News and insights from EAI community—cited: 7 December 2017. http://blog.eai.eu/how-to-measure-attention/

  10. Duc AH, Bays P, Husain M (2008) Eye movements as a probe of attention, Chapter 5.5. In: Kennard C, John Leigh R (eds) Progress in brain research, pp 403–411

  11. Carneiro D, Novais P, Pêgo JM, Sousa N, Neves J (2015) Using mouse dynamics to assess stress during online exams. In: International conference on hybrid artificial intelligence systems. Springer, Cham, pp 345–356

  12. Pimenta A et al (2013) Monitoring mental fatigue through the analysis of keyboard and mouse interaction patterns. In: Pan J-S et al (eds) Hybrid artificial intelligent systems, pp 222–231

  13. Pimenta A et al (2015) Detection of distraction and fatigue in groups through the analysis of international patterns with computers. In: Camacho D et al (eds) Intelligent distributed computing VII. Springer, Berlin, pp 29–39

    Google Scholar 

  14. Durães D, Cardoso C, Bajo J, Novais P (2017) Learning frequent behaviors patterns in intelligent environments for attentiveness level. In: International conference on practical applications of agents and multi-agent systems, PAAMS 2017: trends in cyber-physical multi-agent systems. The PAAMS Collection—15th International Conference, PAAMS 2017, pp 139–147

  15. Morgan R, Baker F, Alabama US (2013) A comparison of VARK analysis studies and recommendations for teacher educators. In: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Louisiana, US, pp 1381–1385

  16. Ford N, Chen Y (2000) Individual differences, hypermedia navigation and learning: an empirical study. J Educ Multimed Hypermedia 9(4):281–311

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chase WG, Simon HA (1973) Perception in chess. Cogn Psychol 4(1):55–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hansen JW (1995) Student cognitive styles in postsecondary technology programs. J Technol Educ 6(2):19–33

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rollock D (1992) Field dependence/independence and learning condition: an exploratory study of style vs ability. Percept Mot Skills 74(3):807–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pashler H, McDaniel M, Rohrer D, Bjork R (2008) Learning styles: concepts and evidence. Psychol Sci Public 9(3):105–119

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kolb D (1984) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall Inc, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smith PL, Ragan TJ (1999) Instructional design. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Keefe JW (1979) Learning style: an overview. In: NASSP’s student learning styles: diagnosing and prescribing programs, pp 1–17

  24. Weber W, Rabaey JM, Aarts E (1988) Ambient intelligence. In: Sp Felder RM, Silverman LK (eds) Learning and teaching styles in engineering education, vol 78, no 7, pp 674–681

  25. Zudilova-Seinstra E (2007) On the role of individual human abilities in the design of adaptive user interfaces for scientific problem solving environments. J Knowl Inf Syst 13(2):243–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Durães D, Carneiro D, Bajo J, Novais P (2016) Supervising and improving attentiveness in human computer interaction. In: Intelligent environment, pp 255–264

  27. Anil KJ (2010) Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means. Pattern Recognit Lett 31(8):651–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH (2009) The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor Newsl 11:10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by COMPETE: POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007043 and FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia within the Project Scope: UID/CEC/00319/2013.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dalila Durães.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Durães, D., de la Prieta, F. & Novais, P. Enriching behavior patterns with learning styles using peripheral devices. Knowl Inf Syst 60, 1645–1662 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-018-1287-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-018-1287-6

Keywords

Navigation