Advertisement

Fisher score and Matthews correlation coefficient-based feature subset selection for heart disease diagnosis using support vector machines

  • Syed Muhammad Saqlain
  • Muhammad Sher
  • Faiz Ali Shah
  • Imran Khan
  • Muhammad Usman Ashraf
  • Muhammad Awais
  • Anwar Ghani
Regular Paper
  • 65 Downloads

Abstract

Heart is one of the essential operating organs of the human body and its failure is a major contributing factor toward the human deaths. Coronary heart disease may be asymptotic but can be anticipated through the medical tests and daily life routine of the subject. Diagnosis of the coronary heart disease needs a specialized medical resource with the plenty of experience. All over the world and particularly in the developing countries, there is a lack of such experts which make the diagnosis more difficult. In this paper, we present a clinical heart disease diagnostic system by proposing feature subset selection methodology with an object of achieving improved performance. The proposed methodology presents three algorithms for selecting candidate feature subsets: (1) mean Fisher score-based feature selection algorithm, (2) forward feature selection algorithm and (3) reverse feature selection algorithm. Feature subset selection algorithm is presented to select the most decisive subset from the candidate feature subsets. The features are added to the feature subsets on the basis of their individual Fisher scores, while the selection of a feature subset depends on its Matthews correlation coefficient score and dimension. The selected feature subset with the reduced dimension is fed to the RBF kernel-based SVM which results in binary classification: (1) heart disease patient and (2) normal control subject. The proposed methodology is validated through accuracy, specificity and sensitivity using four UCI datasets, i.e., Cleveland, Switzerland, Hungarian and SPECTF. The statistical results achieved using the proposed technique are shown in comparison with the existing techniques reflecting its better performance. It has an accuracy of 81.19, 84.52, 92.68 and 82.7% for Cleveland, Hungarian, Switzerland and SPECTF, respectively.

Keywords

Heart disease Feature selection Fisher score SVM RBF 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

There have been no involvements that might raise the question of bias in the work reported or in the conclusions, implications or opinions stated. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    WHO (2016) Who—cardiovascular diseases (cvds). http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs317/en/. Accessed 10 Jan 2016
  2. 2.
    Naicker S, Plange-Rhule J, Tutt RC, Eastwood JB (2009) Shortage of healthcare workers in developing countries-Africa. Ethn Dis 19(1):60Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, Morton SC, Shekelle PG (2006) Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 144(10):742–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rajkumar A, Reena GS (2010) Diagnosis of heart disease using datamining algorithm. Glob J Comput Sci Technol 10(10):38–43Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Long CN, Meesad P, Unger H (2015) A highly accurate firefly based algorithm for heart disease prediction. Expert Syst Appl 42(21):8221–8231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ismaeel S, Miri A, Chourishi D (2015) Using the extreme learning machine (elm) technique for heart disease diagnosis. In: 2015 IEEE Canada international on humanitarian technology conference (IHTC2015), pp 1–3Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krishnaiah V, Narsimha G, Chandra N (2015) Heart disease prediction system using data mining technique by fuzzy k-nn approach. In: Satapathy SC, Govardhan A, Raju KS, Mandal JK (eds) Emerging ICT for bridging the future—proceedings of the 49th annual convention of the computer society of India (CSI) volume 1, ser. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 337. Springer International Publishing, pp 371–384Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chitra R, Seenivasagam V (2015) Heart disease prediction system using intelligent network. In: Power electronics and renewable energy systems. Springer, New York, pp 1377–1384Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Srinivas K, Rao G, Govardhan A (2014) Rough-fuzzy classifier: a system to predict the heart disease by blending two different set theories. Arab J Sci Eng 39(4):2857–2868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang GJ, Kim J-K, Kang U-G, Lee Y-H (2014) Coronary heart disease optimization system on adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system and linear discriminant analysis (anfislda). Pers Ubiquitous Comput 18(6):1351–1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yuehjen ES, Hou C-D, Chiu C-C (2014) Hybrid intelligent modeling schemes for heart disease classification. Appl Soft Comput 14(Part A):47–52, special issue on hybrid intelligent methods for health technologiesGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Muthukaruppan S, Er M (2012) A hybrid particle swarm optimization based fuzzy expert system for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Expert Syst Appl 39(14):11 657–11 665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anooj PK (2012) Clinical decision support system: risk level prediction of heart disease using decision tree fuzzy rules. Int J Res Rev Comput Sci 3(3):1659–1667Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anooj PK (2012) Clinical decision support system: risk level prediction of heart disease using weighted fuzzy rules. J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci 24(1):27–40Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shilaskar S, Ghatol A (2013) Feature selection for medical diagnosis: evaluation for cardiovascular diseases. Expert Syst Appl 40(10):4146–4153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nahar J, Imam T, Tickle KS, Chen Y-PP (2013) Computational intelligence for heart disease diagnosis: a medical knowledge driven approach. Expert Syst Appl 40(1):96–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Giri D, Acharya UR, Martis RJ, Sree SV, Lim T-C, Ahamed T, Suri JS (2013) Automated diagnosis of coronary artery disease affected patients using lda, pca, ica and discrete wavelet transform. Knowl-Based Syst 37:274–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhao Z, Wang L, Liu H, Ye J (2013) On similarity preserving feature selection. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 25(3):619–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hancer E, Xue B, Karaboga D, Zhang M (2015) A binary abc algorithm based on advanced similarity scheme for feature selection. Appl Soft Comput 36:334–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang J, Yu J, Wan J, Zeng Z (2015) l2, 1 norm regularized fisher criterion for optimal feature selection. Neurocomputing 166:455–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li C, Shi C, Zhang H, Hui C, Lam K-M, Zhang S (2014) Cost-sensitive feature selection in medical data analysis with trace ratio criterion. In: 2014 12th international conference on signal processing (ICSP). IEEE, pp 1077–1082Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Markos GT, Exarchos TP, Fotiadis D, Kotsia AP, Vakalis KV, Naka KK, Michalis LK et al (2008) Automated diagnosis of coronary artery disease based on data mining and fuzzy modeling. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 12(4):447–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gu Q, Li Z, Han J (2012) Generalized fisher score for feature selection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1202.3725
  24. 24.
    Lee C, Lee GG (2006) Information gain and divergence-based feature selection for machine learning-based text categorization. Inf Process Manag 42(1):155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shah SMS, Batool S, Khan I, Ashraf MU, Abbas SH, Hussain SA (2017) Feature extraction through parallel probabilistic principal component analysis for heart disease diagnosis. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 482:796–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Akay MF (2009) Support vector machines combined with feature selection for breast cancer diagnosis. Expert Syst Appl 36(2):3240–3247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Çomak E, Arslan A, Türkoğlu İ (2007) A decision support system based on support vector machines for diagnosis of the heart valve diseases. Comput Biol Med 37(1):21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yahiaoui A, Er O, Yumusak N (2017) A new method of automatic recognition for tuberculosis disease diagnosis using support vector machines. Biomed Res 28(9):4208–4212Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Huang M-W, Chen C-W, Lin W-C, Ke S-W, Tsai C-F (2017) SVM and SVM ensembles in breast cancer prediction. PloS one 12(1):e0161501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Asuncion A, Newman D (2007) UCI machine learning repository. http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html. Accessed 15 June 2015
  31. 31.
    Chapelle O (2007) Training a support vector machine in the primal. Neural comput 19(5):1155–1178MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science & Software EngineeringInternational Islamic University IslamabadIslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.University of TartuTartuEstonia
  3. 3.IBMSUniversity of Agriculture FaisalabadFaisalabadPakistan
  4. 4.Government College University FaisalabadFaisalabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations