This work aims at correcting flaws existing in multi-objective evolutionary schemes to discover quantitative association rules, specifically those based on the well-known non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II). In particular, a methodology is proposed to find the most suitable configurations based on the set of objectives to optimize and distance measures to rank the non-dominated solutions. First, several quality measures are analyzed to select the best set of them to be optimized. Furthermore, different strategies are applied to replace the crowding distance used by NSGA-II to sort the solutions for each Pareto-front since such distance is not suitable for handling many-objective problems. The proposed enhancements have been integrated into the multi-objective algorithm called MOQAR. Several experiments have been carried out to assess the algorithm’s performance by using different configuration settings, and the best ones have been compared to other existing algorithms. The results obtained show a remarkable performance of MOQAR in terms of quality measures.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Agrawal R, Imielinski T, Swami A (1993) Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data, pp 207–216
Agrawal R, Srikant R (1994) Fast algorithms for mining association rules in large databases. In: Proceedings of the international conference on very large databases, pp 478–499
Aguirre H, Tanaka K (2009) Space partitioning with adaptive ranking and substitute distance assignments: a comparative study on many-objective mnk-landscapes. In: Proceedings of the annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation, pp 547–554
Alatas B, Akin E (2006) An efficient genetic algorithm for automated mining of both positive and negative quantitative association rules. Soft Comput 10(3):230–237
Alatas B, Akin E, Karci A (2008) MODENAR: multi-objective differential evolution algorithm for mining numeric association rules. Appl Soft Comput 8(1):646–656
Alcalá-Fdez J, Sánchez L, García S, del Jesús MJ, Ventura S, Garrell JM, Otero J, Romero C, Bacardit J, Rivas VM, Fernández JC, Herrera F (2009) Keel: a software tool to assess evolutionary algorithms for data mining problems. Soft Comput 13(3):307–318
Anand R, Vaid A, Singh PK (2009) Association rule mining using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: strengths and challenges. In: Proceedings of the IEEE world congress on nature biologically inspired computing, pp 385–390
Brin S, Motwani R, Silverstein C (1997) Beyond market baskets, generalizing association rules to correlations. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD, pp 265–276
Brin S, Motwani R, Ullman JD, Tsur S (1997) Dynamic itemset counting and implication rules for market basket data. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD, pp 265–276
Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 6(2):182–197
Dehuri S, Jagadev AK, Ghosh A, Mall R (2006) Multi-objective genetic algorithm for association rule mining using a homogeneous dedicated cluster of workstations. Am J Appl Sci 3(11):2086–2095
del Jesús MJ, Gámez JA, González P, Puerta JM (2011) On the discovery of association rules by means of evolutionary algorithms. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov 1(5):397–415
García S, Fernández A, Luengo J, Herrera F (2009) A study of statistical techniques and performance measures for genetics-based machine learning: accuracy and interpretability. Soft Comput 13(10):959–977
Geng L, Hamilton HJ (2006) Interestingness measures for data mining: a survey. ACM Comput Surv 38(3):1–42
Ghosh A, Nath B (2004) Multi-objective rule mining using genetic algorithms. Inf Sci 163:123–133
Guvenir HA, Uysal I (2000) Bilkent university function approximation repository. http://funapp.cs.bilkent.edu.tr
Köppen M, Yoshida K (2007) Substitute distance assignments in NSGA-II for handling many-objective optimization problems. In: Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization, volume 4403 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, pp 727–741
Li D, Deogun J, Spaulding W, Shuart B (2004) Towards missing data imputation: a study of fuzzy k-means clustering method. In: Rough sets and current trends in computing, volume 3066 of Lecture Notes on Computer Science, pp 573–579
Luna JM, Romero JR, Ventura S (2012) Design and behavior study of a grammar-guided genetic programming algorithm for mining association rules. Knowl Inf Syst 32(1):53–76
Luna JM, Romero JR, Ventura S (2013) Grammar-based multi-objective algorithms for mining association rules. Data Knowl Eng 86:19–37
Martín D, Rosete A, Alcalá-Fdez J, Herrera F (2014) QAR-CIP-NSGA-II: a new multi-objective evolutionary algorithm to mine quantitative association rules. Inf Sci 258:1–28
Martínez-Ballesteros M, Martínez-Álvarez F, Troncoso A, Riquelme JC (2009) Quantitative association rules applied to climatological time series forecasting. In: Proceedings of the international conference on intelligent data engineering and automated learning, volume 5788 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp 284–291
Martínez-Ballesteros M, Martínez-Álvarez F, Troncoso A, Riquelme JC (2011) An evolutionary algorithm to discover quantitative association rules in multidimensional time series. Soft Comput 15(10):2065–2084
Martínez-Ballesteros M, Martínez-Álvarez F, Troncoso A, Riquelme JC (2014) Selecting the best measures to discover quantitative association rules. Neurocomputing 126:3–14
Martínez-Ballesteros M, Salcedo-Sanz S, Riquelme JC, Casanova-Mateo C, Camacho JL (2011) Evolutionary association rules for total ozone content modeling from satellite observations. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 109(2):217–227
Mata J, Álvarez J, Riquelme JC (2001) Mining numeric association rules with genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the international conference on adaptive and natural computing algorithms, pp 264–267
Miller BL, Goldberg DE (1995) Genetic algorithms, tournament selection, and the effects of noise. Complex Syst 9(3):193–212
Pachón Álvarez V, Vázquez JM (2012) An evolutionary algorithm to discover quantitative association rules from huge databases without the need for an a priori discretization. Expert Syst Appl 39(1):585–593
Pears R, Koh YS, Dobbie G, Yeap W (2013) Weighted association rule mining via a graph based connectivity model. Inf Sci 218:61–84
Piatetsky-Shapiro G (1991) Discovery, analysis and presentation of strong rules. In: Proceedings of knowledge discovery in databases. AAAI Press, pp 229–248
Qodmanan HR, Nasiri M, Minaei-Bidgoli B (2011) Multi objective association rule mining with genetic algorithm without specifying minimum support and minimum confidence. Expert Syst Appl 38(1):288–298
Shortliffe E, Buchanan B (1975) A model of inexact reasoning in medicine. Math Biosci 23:351–379
Venturini G (1993) SIA: a supervised inductive algorithm with genetic search for learning attribute based concepts. In: Proceedings of the European conference on machine learning, pp 280–296
Wakabi-Waiswa PP, Baryamureeba V (2008) Extraction of interesting association rules using genetic algorithms. Int J Comput ICT Res 2(1):26–33
Yan X, Zhang C, Zhang S (2009) Genetic algorithm-based strategy for identifying association rules without specifying actual minimum support. Expert Syst Appl 36(2):3066–3076
Zhou A, Qu B-Y, Li H, Zhao S-Z, Suganthan PN, Zhang Q (2011) Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a survey of the state of the art. Swarm Evol Comput 1(1):32–49
Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L (2001) SPEA2: improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm. EUROGEN 3242(103):95–100
Zitzler E, Thiele L (1999) Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength pareto approach. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 3(4):257–271
The authors would like to thank Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology, Junta de Andalucia and University Pablo de Olavide for the support under Projects TIN2011-28956-C02, TIN2014-55894-C2-R, P12-TIC-1728 and APPB813097, respectively.
About this article
Cite this article
Martínez-Ballesteros, M., Troncoso, A., Martínez-Álvarez, F. et al. Improving a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm to discover quantitative association rules. Knowl Inf Syst 49, 481–509 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-015-0911-y
- Association rules
- Data mining
- Evolutionary computation