Abstract
Based on the ecological risk assessment literature, we analyzed the clustering characteristics and factors influencing ecological risks in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. The results showed that the areas with high ecological risk were mainly distributed in the areas of cultivated land and construction land. The ecological risk in the Yangtze River Economic Belt exhibited a downward trend from 1995 to 2015, but the areas with high ecological risk were stable. The influence of natural environmental factors on the ecological risk was greater than that of social and economic factors. The effect of social and economic factors on the ecological risk was significant in the early stage of the study period and tended to stabilize in the middle and later stages. Natural environmental factors had a strong effect on the ecological risk throughout the economic belt, and the mechanism of action had a certain level of stability. Social disturbance should be reduced in the forest areas in the middle and western parts of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, and ecological support should be increased in the construction and arable areas to the east.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from Resources and Environmental Sciences and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (https://www.resdc.cn/).
References
Chen J, Yang Y, Feng Z, Huang R, Zhou G (2023) Ecological risk assessment and prediction based on scale optimization—a case study of Nanning, a landscape Garden City in China. Remote Sens 15(5):1304. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15051304
Das M, Das A, Mandal A (2023) Exploring the factors affecting urban ecological risk: a case from an Indian mega metropolitan region. Geosci Front 14(1):101488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2022.101488
Gong J, Xie Y, Zhao C, Gao Y (2014) Landscape ecological risk assessment and its spatiotemporal variation of the Bailongjiang watershed, Gansu. China Environ Sci 34:2153–2160.
Ji Y, Bai Z, Hui J (2021) Landscape ecological risk assessment based on LUCC—a case study of Chaoyang County, China. Forests 12:1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12091157
Kapustka LA, Galbraith H, Luxon M, Yocum J (2001) Using landscape ecology to focus ecological risk assessment and guide risk management decision-making. Toxicol Ind Health 17:236–246. https://doi.org/10.1191/0748233701th121oa
Karimian H, Zou W, Chen Y, Xia J, Wang Z (2022) Landscape ecological risk assessment and driving factor analysis in Dongjiang river watershed. Chemosphere 307:135835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135835
Kupfer JA (2012) Landscape ecology and biogeography: rethinking landscape metrics in a post-FRAGSTATS landscape. Prog Phys Geogr 36:400–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133312439594
Li X, Li S, Zhang Y, Connor PJ, Zhang L et al (2021) Landscape ecological risk assessment under multiple indicators. Land 10:739. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10070739
Li M, Zhang B, Zhang X, Zhang S, Yin L (2023) Exploring spatio-temporal variations of ecological risk in the Yellow River Ecological Economic Belt based on an improved landscape index method. Int J Environ Res Public Health 20(3):1837. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031837
Liang T, Yang F, Huang D, Luo Y, Wu Y et al (2022) Land-use transformation and landscape ecological risk assessment in the Three Gorges Reservoir region based on the “production–living–ecological space” Perspective. Land 11:1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081234
Lin X, Wang Z (2023) Landscape ecological risk assessment and its driving factors of multi-mountainous city. Ecol Indic 146:109823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109823
Liu Y, Zhao M (2023) Linking ecosystem service supply and demand to landscape ecological risk for adaptive management: the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau case. Ecol Indic 146:109796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109796
Liu H, Wang R, Sun H, Cao W, Song J et al (2023) Spatiotemporal evolution and driving forces of ecosystem service value and ecological risk in the Ulan Buh Desert. Front Environ Sci 10:2659. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1053797
Mo W, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Zhuang D (2017) Impacts of road network expansion on landscape ecological risk in a megacity, China: a case study of Beijing. Sci Total Environ 574:1000–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.048
Qian Y, Dong Z, Yan Y, Tang L (2022) Ecological risk assessment models for simulating impacts of land use and landscape pattern on ecosystem services. Sci Total Environ 833:155218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155218
Tan L, Luo W, Yang B, Huang M, Shuai S et al (2023) Evaluation of landscape ecological risk in key ecological functional zone of South–to–North Water Diversion Project, China. Ecol Indic 147:109934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109934
Wang B, Ding M, Li S, Liu L, Ai J (2020) Assessment of landscape ecological risk for a cross-border basin: a case study of the Koshi River Basin, central Himalayas. Ecol Indic 117:106621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106621
Wang H, Liu X, Zhao C, Chang Y, Liu Y et al (2021) Spatial-temporal pattern analysis of landscape ecological risk assessment based on land use/land cover change in Baishuijiang National nature reserve in Gansu Province, China. Ecol Indic 124:107454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107454
Wang S, Tan X, Fan F (2022) Landscape ecological risk assessment and impact factor analysis of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Remote Sens 14:4726. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14194726
Wang K, Zheng H, Zhao X, Sang Z, Yan W et al (2023) Landscape ecological risk assessment of the Hailar River basin based on ecosystem services in China. Ecol Indic 147:109795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109795
Wu J, Zhu Q, Qiao N, Wang Z, Sha W, et al. (2021) Ecological risk assessment of coal mine area based on “source-sink” landscape theory – a case study of Pingshuo mining area. J Clean Prod 295:126371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126371
Xu W, Wang J, Zhang M, Li S (2021) Construction of landscape ecological network based on landscape ecological risk assessment in a large-scale opencast coal mine area. J Clean Prod 286:125523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125523
Yan Y, Ju H, Zhang S, Chen G (2021) The construction of ecological security patterns in coastal areas based on landscape ecological risk assessment—a case study of Jiaodong Peninsula, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:12249. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182212249
Ying X, Min W, Haiping Y, Chunyan D, Haipeng W (2020) Landscape ecological risk assessment and its spatiotemporal evolution in Dongting lake area. Ecol Environ 29:1292. https://doi.org/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2020.07.002
Yang Y, Chen J, Lan Y, Zhou G, You H, et al. (2022) Landscape pattern and ecological risk assessment in Guangxi based on land use change. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19:1595. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031595
Yuan Y, Fang G, Yan M, Sui C, Ding Z, Lu C (2019) Flood-landscape ecological risk assessment under the background of urbanization. Water 11(7):1418. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071418
Zhang F, Yushanjiang A, Wang D (2018) Ecological risk assessment due to land use/cover changes (LUCC) in Jinghe County, Xinjiang, China from 1990 to 2014 based on landscape patterns and spatial statistics. Environ Earth Sci 77:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7676-z
Zhang W, Chang WJ, Zhu ZC, Hui Z (2020) Landscape ecological risk assessment of Chinese coastal cities based on land use change. Appl Geogr 117:102174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102174
Zhang X, Du H, Wang Y, Chen Y, Ma L, et al. (2021) Watershed landscape ecological risk assessment and landscape pattern optimization: Take Fujiang River Basin as an example. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 27:2254–2276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2021.1970511
Zhu Z, Mei Z, Xu X, Feng Y, Ren G (2022) Landscape ecological risk assessment based on land use change in the Yellow River basin of Shaanxi, China. Int J Environ Res Pub Health 19(15):9547. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159547
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Woonsup Choi
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, W., Wang, H. & Zhou, X. Ecological risk assessment of watershed economic zones on the landscape scale: a case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China. Reg Environ Change 23, 105 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-023-02108-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-023-02108-0