Abstract
Agroecology is gaining increasing attention as a solution to maintaining robust ecosystem services for rural communities and down-stream users in tropical regions. The incorporation of trees into working landscapes is one specific agroecology practice, which to be effective must be driven by regional values and preferences. Using an exploratory study from rural Costa Rica, we illustrate how a photo-based survey approach can assist in determining landowner preferences for tree configurations that could be incorporated into private-property landscape design. We also examined landowner motivations and community-identified barriers to maintaining tree cover on private property. Through the photo-based survey, which was deployed online in 2020, we found that landowners were more interested in the incorporation of large tree configurations (e.g. wide riparian buffer zones; large, forested patches) over smaller ones (e.g. small, forested patches; isolated trees). While preferred tree configurations supported landowner-identified values (e.g. habitat provisioning; watershed protection), barriers most likely inhibited the actual implementation of such configurations, including limited space and financial resources. To overcome such barriers, a diversified approach including involvement by government and local NGOs may increase accessibility of preferred tree configurations among small landholders interested in conservation. Photo-based surveys are effective tools for increasing dialogue with local communities, which can generate a deeper understanding of potential challenges and landowner interest in tree incorporation, thus informing regional agroecology recommendations and policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, S. L. Lehnert, upon reasonable request.
References
Altieri MA (1999) The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Invertebrate biodiversity as bioindicators of sustainable landscapes. Elsevier, p 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-50019-9.50005-4
Arriagada RA, Sills EO, Ferraro PJ, Pattanayak SK (2015) Do payments pay off? Evidence from participation in Costa Rica’s PES program. PLoS One 10(7):e0131544. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131544
Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Fahrig L, Tabarelli M, Watling JI, Tischendorf L et al (2020) Designing optimal human-modified landscapes for forest biodiversity conservation. Ecol Lett 23(9):1404–1420. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13535
Babin N (2015) The coffee crisis, fair trade, and agroecological transformation: impacts on land-use change in Costa Rica. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst 39(1):99–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2014.960549
Baltar F, Brunet I (2012) Social research 2.0: virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook. Internet Res. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241211199960
Baskent EZ (2020) A framework for characterizing and regulating ecosystem services in a management planning context. Forests 11(1):102. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010102
Barr BW, Kliskey AD (2014) “I know it when I see it”: identifying ocean wilderness using a photo-based survey approach. Glob Ecol Conserv 2:72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2014.08.002
Bernués A, Rodríguez-Ortega T, Ripoll-Bosch R, Alfnes F (2014) Socio-cultural and economic valuation of ecosystem services provided by Mediterranean mountain agroecosystems. PLoS One 9(7):e102479. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102479
Blundo-Canto G, Bax V, Quintero M, Cruz-Garcia GS, Groeneveld RA et al (2018) The different dimensions of livelihood impacts of payments for environmental services (PES) schemes: a systematic review. Ecol Econ 149:160–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.011
Bosselmann AS (2012) Mediating factors of land use change among coffee farmers in a biological corridor. Ecol Econ 80:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.05.007
Brinkhoff T (2017) Coto Brus: Canton in Costa Rica. Available from https://www.citypopulation.de/php/costarica-admin.php?adm1id=608. Accessed 10 June 2022
Bunch R (2000) Reasons for resiliency: toward a sustainable recovery after Hurricane Mitch. Oklahoma City, OK: World Neighbours
Cadavid-Florez L, Laborde J, Mclean DJ (2020) Isolated trees and small woody patches greatly contribute to connectivity in highly fragmented tropical landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 196:103745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103745
Chazdon RL, Harvey CA, Komar O, Griffith DM, Ferguson BG et al (2009) Beyond reserves: a research agenda for conserving biodiversity in human-modified tropical landscapes. Biotropica 41(2):142–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00471.x
Cole RJ (2010) Social and environmental impacts of payments for environmental services for agroforestry on small-scale farms in southern Costa Rica. Int J Sust Dev World 17(3):208–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504501003729085
Cortés-Capano G, Toivonen T, Soutullo A, Fernández A, Dimitriadis C et al (2020) Exploring landowners’ perceptions, motivations and needs for voluntary conservation in a cultural landscape. People Nat 2(3):840–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10122
Costa Rica INEC (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos) (2007) Censo Cafetalero: Turrialba y Coto Brus 2003, Valle Central y Valle Central Occidental 2004, y Peréz Zeledón, Terrazú y Zona Norte 2006: Principales Resultados. https://inec.cr/estadisticas-fuentes/censos. Accessed 14 May 2023
Costa Rica INEC (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos) (2011) Censos 2011. https://inec.cr/estadisticas-fuentes/censos. Accessed 14 May 2023
Costa Rica INEC (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos) (2015) VI Censo Nacional Agropecuario 2014/ Resultados Generales. https://inec.cr/estadisticas-fuentes/censos. Accessed 14 May 2023
Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Sanchez-Azofeifa GA (2001) Countryside biogeography: use of human-dominated habitats by the avifauna of southern Costa Rica. Ecol Appl 11(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0001:CBUOHD]2.0.CO;2
Daniel TC, Meitner MM (2001) Representational validity of landscape visualizations: the effects of graphical realism on perceived scenic beauty of forest vistas. J Environ Psychol 21(1):61–72. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0182
Daniels AE, Bagstad K, Esposito V, Moulaert A, Rodriguez CM (2010) Understanding the impacts of Costa Rica’s PES: are we asking the right questions? Ecol Econ 69(11):2116–2126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.011
Deaconu A, Berti PR, Cole DC, Mercille G, Batal M (2021) Agroecology and nutritional health: a comparison of agroecological farmers and their neighbors in the Ecuadorian highlands. Food Policy 101:102034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102034
DeClerck FA, Chazdon R, Holl KD, Milder JC, Finegan B et al (2010) Biodiversity conservation in human-modified landscapes of Mesoamerica: past, present and future. Biol Conserv 143(10):2301–2313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.026
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons
Estrada-Carmona N, Martínez-Salinas A, DeClerck FAJ, Vílchez-Mendoza S, Garbach K (2019) Managing the farmscape for connectivity increases conservation value for tropical bird species with different forest-dependencies. J Environ Manag 250:109504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109504
Evans S (2010) The green republic: a conservation history of Costa Rica. University of Texas Press
FAO (2005) Best practices for improving law compliance in the forestry sector. International Tropical Timber Organization. https://www.fao.org/3/a0146e/a0146e00.htm. Accessed 2 August 2022
FAO (2021) Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity (ESB). http://www.fao.org/ecosystem-services-biodiversity/en/. Accessed 1 Aug 2022
Fondo Nacional de Financiamiento Forestal (FONAFIFO) ( 2015) Informe Plan Annual 2015. https://www.fonafifo.go.cr. Accessed 10 June 2023
Fondo Nacional de Financiamiento Forestal (FONAFIFO) (2016) Informe 2016 Planes Annuales Operativos. https://www.fonafifo.go.cr. Accessed 10 June 2023
Fondo Nacional de Financiamiento Forestal (FONAFIFO) (2018) Sustainable biodiversity fund (SBF). https://www.fonafifo.go.cr/en/conozcanos/proyectos-actuales/. Accessed 10 June 2023
Fondo Nacional de Financiamiento Forestal (FONAFIFO) (2019) Plan Annual Operativo: Informe 2019. https://www.fonafifo.go.cr. Accessed 10 June 2023
Forman RT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press.
Global Forest Watch (2019) “Location of tree cover loss in Costa Rica”. Accessed 05/06/2023 from www.globalforestwatch.org
Griffin M, Martino RJ, LoSchiavo C, Comer-Carruthers C, Krause KD, et al (2021) Ensuring survey research data integrity in the era of internet bots. Qual Quant:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01252-1
Göritz AS (2006) Incentives in web studies: methodological issues and a review. Int J Internet Sci 1(1):58–70
Hagerhall CM (2001) Consensus in landscape preference judgements. J Environ Psychol 21(1):83–92. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0186
Haines-Young R, Potschin-Young M (2018) Revision of the common international classification for ecosystem services (CICES V5. 1): a policy brief. One Ecosyst 3:e27108. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e27108
Harvey CA, Haber WA (1999) Remnant trees and the conservation of biodiversity in Costa Rican pastures. Agrofor Syst 44(1):37–68. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006122211692
Harvey CA, Komar O, Chazdon R, Ferguson BG, Finegan B et al (2008) Integrating agricultural landscapes with biodiversity conservation in the Mesoamerican hotspot. Conserv Biol 22(1):8–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00863.x
Harvey CA, Medina A, Sanchez-Merlo D, Vilchez S, Hernandez B et al (2006) Patterns of animal diversity associated with different forms of tree cover retained in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Appl 16(5):19861999. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1986:POADID]2.0.CO;2. (Henriques)
Imbach P, Beardsley M, Bouroncle C, Medellin C, Läderach P et al (2017) Climate change, ecosystems and smallholder agriculture in Central America: an introduction to the special issue. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1920-5
Instituto de Desarollo Rural (INDER) (2014) Región Brunca: Territorio Buenos Aires- Coto Brus. http://inder.go.cr. Accessed 30 May 2023
Jantzi T, Schelhas J, Lassoie JP (1999) Environmental values and forest patch conservation in a rural Costa Rican community. Agric Hum Values 16(1):29–39. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007524321057
Kearney AR, Tilt JR, Bradley GR (2010) The effects of forest regeneration on preferences for forest treatments among foresters, environmentalists, and the general public. J Forest 108(5):215–229. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/108.5.215
Kosoy N, Martinez-Tuna M, Muradian R, Martinez-Alier J (2007) Payments for environmental services in watersheds: insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America. Ecol Econ 61(2–3):446–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.016
Lackman C, Lanasa JM (1993) Family decision-making theory: an overview and assessment. Psychol Mark 10(2):81–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220100203
Lansing DM (2014) Unequal access to payments for ecosystem services: the case of Costa Rica. Dev Chang 45(6):1310–1331. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12134
Lansing DM (2017) Understanding smallholder participation in payments for ecosystem services: the case of Costa Rica. Hum Ecol 45(1):77–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-016-9886-x
Leakey RR (2014) The role of trees in agroecology and sustainable agriculture in the tropics. Annu Rev Phytopathol 52:113–133. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-102313-045838
Leary J, Grimm K, Aslan C, Mark M, Frey S et al (2021) Landowners’ socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services provided by trees in Costa Rican agricultural landscapes. Environ Manag:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01442-5
Leon MC, Harvey CA (2006) Live fences and landscape connectivity in a neotropical agricultural landscape. Agroforestry systems 68:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-005-5831-5
Manger WF (1992) Colonization on the southern frontier of Costa Rica: a historical-cultural landscape (No. Thesis M277c). Memphis State University, Memphis (EUA). Faculty of the Graduate School
MEA (2005) Millenium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being synthesis. Island Press, Washington
Mendenhall CD, Shields-Estrada A, Krishnaswami AJ, Daily GC (2016) Quantifying and sustaining biodiversity in tropical agricultural landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(51):14544–14551. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604981113
Méndez VE, Caswell M, Gliessman SR, Cohen R (2017) Integrating agroecology and participatory action research (PAR): lessons from Central America. Sustainability 9(5):705. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050705
Michalski F, Metzger JP, Peres CA (2010) Rural property size drives patterns of upland and riparian forest retention in a tropical deforestation frontier. Glob Environ Chang 20(4):705–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.010
MINAE (2002) Estrategía para el control del la tala ilegal 2002–2007. San José, Costa Rica
Molnár Z, Berkes F (2018) Role of traditional ecological knowledge in linking cultural and natural capital in cultural landscapes. Reconnecting Natural and Cultural Capital: Contributions from Science and Policy; Paracchini, ML, Zingari, PC, Blasi, C., Eds, 183–193
Morrison EB, Lindell CA, Holl KD, Zahawi RA (2010) Patch size effects on avian foraging behaviour: implications for tropical forest restoration design. J Appl Ecol 47(1):130–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01743.x
Navarro JG (2021) Latin America and the Caribbean: social media reach (2021), by country. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/454805/latam-social-media-reach-country/. Accessed 12 Nov 2022
Needham MD, Rollins RB, Wood CJ (2004) Site-specific encounters, norms and crowding of summer visitors at alpine ski areas. Int J Tour Res 6(6):421–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.504
Palmer JF, Hoffman RE (2001) Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Landsc Urban Plan 54(1–4):149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00133-5
Panayides T (2016) Habitat connectivity in tropical agricultural landscapes: a case study of Southern Costa Rica. [Master’s thesis, Imperial College London]
Pagdee A, Homchuen S, Sang-arome P, Sasaki Y (2008) Community forest: a local attempt in natural resource management, economic value of ecosystem services, and contribution to local livelihoods. Asia-Pac J Sci Technol 13(10):1129–1134
Pascua PA, McMillen H, Ticktin T, Vaughan M, Winter KB (2017) Beyond services: a process and framework to incorporate cultural, genealogical, place-based, and indigenous relationships in ecosystem service assessments. Ecosyst Serv 26:465–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.012
Pinto-Correia T, Barroso F, Surová D, Menezes H (2011) The fuzziness of Montado landscapes: progress in assessing user preferences through photo-based surveys. Agrofor Syst 82(2):209–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9347-2
Prevedello JA, Almeida-Gomes M, Lindenmayer DB (2018) The importance of scattered trees for biodiversity conservation: a global meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 55(1):205–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12943
Quesada Román A (2013) Condición de uso de la tierra del distrito San Vito, Coto Brus, Puntarenas. Reflexiones 92(1):47–64
Recanati F, Guariso G (2018) An optimization model for the planning of agroecosystems: trading off socio-economic feasibility and biodiversity. Ecol Eng 117:194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.03.010
Reid JL, Fagan ME, Lucas J, Slaughter J, Zahawi RA (2018) The ephemerality of secondary forests in southern Costa Rica. Conserv Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12607
Rodricks S mainly based on Bennet & Henninger (2010) TEEBCase: Enabling the legal framework for PES, Costa Rica (2010), available at: www.TEEBweb.org
Schelhas J, Greenberg RS (Eds.) (1996) Forest patches in tropical landscapes. Island Press
Scherr SJ, McNeely JA (2008) Biodiversity conservation and agricultural sustainability: towards a new paradigm of ‘ecoagriculture’landscapes. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 363(1491):477–494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2165
Siegner AB, Acey C, Sowerwine J (2020) Producing urban agroecology in the East Bay: from soil health to community empowerment. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst 44(5):566–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2019.1690615
Sekercioglu CH, Loarie SR, Brenes FO, Ehrlich PR, Daily GC (2007) Persistence of forest birds in the Costa Rican agricultural countryside. Conserv Biol 21(2):482–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00655.x
Sibelet N, Chamayou L, Newing H, Montes IG (2017) Perceptions of trees outside forests in cattle pastures: land sharing within the Central Volcanic Talamanca Biological Corridor, Costa Rica. Human Ecol 45(4):499–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-017-9924-3
Sibelet N, Posada KE, Gutiérrez-Montes IA (2019) Agroforestry systems provide firewood for livelihood improvement in Guatemala. Bois For Trop 340. https://doi.org/10.19182/bft2019.340.a31692
Smith J (2016) Contested understandings of sustainability and climate issues in southern Costa Rica. In The economics of ecology, exchange, and adaptation: anthropological explorations. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol 36, p 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0190-128120160000036002
Teixeira HM, Vermue AJ, Cardoso IM, Claros MP, Bianchi FJ (2018) Farmers show complex and contrasting perceptions on ecosystem services and their management. Ecosyst Serv 33:44–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.08.006
Tilt JH (2010) Walking trips to parks: exploring demographic, environmental factors, and preferences for adults with children in the household. Prev Med 50:S69–S73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.026
Tveit MS (2009) Indicators of visual scale as predictors of landscape preference; a comparison between groups. J Environ Manag 90(9):2882–2888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.12.021
UNDP y Escuela de Estadística de la Universidad de Costa Rica (2021) Atlas de Desarollo Humano Cantonal de Costa Rica 2021. https://www.cr.undp.org/content/costarica/es/home/atlas-de-desarrollo-humano-cantonal.html. Accessed 5 May 2023
Vignola R, Gonzalez-Rodrigo B, Lane O, Marchamalo M, McDaniels T (2017) A scenario approach to assess stakeholder preferences for ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes of Costa Rica. Reg Environ Chang 17(2):605–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1051-y
Winthrop RH (2014) The strange case of cultural services: limits of the ecosystem service paradigm. Ecol Econ 108:208–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.005
Zahawi RA, Duran G, Kormann U (2015) Sixty-seven years of land-use change in southern Costa Rica. PLoS ONE 10(11):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143554
Zbinden S, Lee DR (2005) Paying for environmental services: an analysis of participation in Costa Rica’s PSA program. World Dev 33(2):255–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.012
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Mau Paniagua and Jeisson Figueroa for providing local knowledge and assistance with the project, as well as the Las Cruces Biological Station staff, the residents of Coto Brus who participated in the survey and the Organization for Tropical Studies. Finally, the authors would like to thank Ch’aska Huayuaca-Frye for a thoughtful review of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded by Earthwatch Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
The methods and aims described in this study were approved by the Northern Arizona University Institutional Review Board.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by Stacy-ann Robinson
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lehnert, S.L., Grimm, K.E., Aslan, C.E. et al. Landowner preferences for tree configurations in rural Costa Rica: a photo-based survey approach. Reg Environ Change 23, 104 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-023-02101-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-023-02101-7