Abstract
The Indian Sundarban is one of the most vulnerable eco-regions of the world and its vulnerability has increased manifold in the last two decades. Despite the insecurities and risks, people do not always migrate and often prefer to stay back by adjusting their lives and livelihood. This article explores the practice of immobility and the process of decision-making that results in immobility. Based on empirical research carried out at Gobardhanpur village in South 24 Parganas district of West Bengal, India, this article examines how people readjust themselves and remain voluntarily immobile instead of facing high vulnerability caused by different shocks or stresses. The empirical research was carried out with the help of both quantitative and qualitative research methods including household-level questionnaire survey, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. The findings show that whilst the region supports multiple occupations, fishing is the prime occupation of the people. During the monsoon period, diversification in terms of livelihood is low, as fishing supports maximum respondents. In contrast, low fish catch during the off-monsoon season is responsible for high livelihood diversification. Circular migration is a very common adaptive strategy to overcome the livelihood crisis during the off-monsoon season, especially amongst the younger members of the households. The remittances earned through circular migration supplement the household income and secure their livelihood. Moreover, institutional help, robust social networks and attachment to the place also play a role in controlling the decision of immobility.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Twelve-digit individual identification number which serves as proof of address for residents of India.
References
Adams H (2016) Why populations persist: mobility, place attachment and climate change. Popul Environ 37:429–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-015-0246-3
Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16:268–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
Allison EH, Ellis F (2001) The livelihood approach and management of small-scale fisheries. Mar Policy 25:377–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-597X(01)00023-9
Ayeb-Karlsson S, Tanner T, Geest der van K, Warner K (2015) Livelihood resilience in a changing world-6 global policy recommendation for a more sustainable future; UNU-EHS Working paper, UNU-EHS; Bonn, Germany
Bennet K, Bilak A, Bullock N, Cakaj L, Clarley M et al (2017) Global report on internal displacement. Geneva: Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC) Retrieved from http://www.internal-displacemnt.Org/global-report/grid2017/pdfs/2017-GRID.pdf. Accessed June 2020
Biswas B, Mallick B (2020) Livelihood diversification as key to long-term non-migration: evidence from coastal Bangladesh. Environ Dev Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01005-4
Black R, Collyer M (2014) “Trapped” populations: limits on mobility at times of crisis. In: Martin SF, Weerasinghe S, Taylor A (eds) Humanitarian Crises and Migration, 1st edn. Routledge, London, pp 287–305
Carling J (2002) Migration in the age of involuntary immobility: theoretical reflections and Cape Verdean experiences. J Ethn Migr Stud 28(1):5–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830120103912
Carling J, Schewel K (2018) Revisiting aspiration and ability in international migration. J Ethn Migr Stud 44(6):945–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1384146
Census of India Report (2011) District census handbook. Series- 20 Part XII-B p 528 published by Government of India
Chambers R, Conway G (1991) Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS Discussion Paper 296. Brington:7–8
Chand BK, Trivedi RK, Biswas A, Dubey SK, Beg MM (2012) Study on impact of saline water inundation on freshwater aquaculture in Sundarban using risk analysis tools. Explor Anim Med Res 2(2):170–178. https://www.academia.edu/download/37984397/EAMR_Paper-B_K_Chand.pdf
Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol 94:S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
Conway GR (1985) Agroecosystem analysis. Agric Adm 24(4):31–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-586X(85)90064-0
de Hass H (2010) Migration and development: a theoretical perspective. Int Migr Rev 44:227–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j1747-7379.2009.00804.x
Ellis F (1998) Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. J Dev Stud 35(1):1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389808422553
Fresque- Baxter JA, Amritage D (2012) Place identity and climatic change adaptation: a synthesis and framework for understanding. Wiley Interdisciplinary Rev Clim Change 3(3):251–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.164
Hazra S, Ghosh T, DasGupta R, Sen G (2002) Sea level and associated changes in Sundarbans. Sci Cult 68:309–321. https://www.academia.edu/download/27633202/Sc___Culture-Paper.pdf
Hidalgo MC, Hernandez B (2001) Place attachment: conceptual and empirical question. J Environ Psychol 21:273–281. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0221
Hunter LM, Luna JK, Norton RM (2015) Environmental dimensions of migration. Annu Rev of Sociol 4:377–397. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112223
International Organization for Migration (2018) World migration report 2018; International Organization for Migration: Geneva, Switzerland
Joshi PK, Gulati A, Birthal PS, Tewari L (2003) Agriculture diversification in South Asia: patterns, determinants, and policy implications. Econ Pol Wkly 39:2457–2467. https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/mssddp/57.html
Keck M, Sakdapolrak P (2013) What is social resilience? Lessons Learned Ways Forward Erdkunde 67(1):5–19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23595352
Lewicka M (2013) In search of roots: restoring continuity in a mobile world. In: Manzo LC, Devine-Wright P (eds) Place attachment; Advances in theory, methods and applications, 2nd edn. Routledge, London, pp 49–60
Malkki L (1992) National geographic: the rooting of peoples and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees. Cul Anthropol 7(1):24–44. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1992.7.1.02a00030
Mallick B, Witte SB, Sarkar R, Mahaboob AS, Vogt J (2009) Local adaptation strategies of a coastal community during cyclone Sidr and their vulnerability analysis for sustainable disaster mitigation planning in Bangladesh. J Bangladesh Inst Planners 2:158–168. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbip.v2i0.9576
Mallick B (2019) The nexus between socio-ecological systems, livelihood resilience, and migration decisions: empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123332
Mallick B, Schanze J (2020) Trapped or voluntary? Non-migration despite climatic risks. Sustainability 12:1–6. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114718
Mallick B, Kimberly RG, Sultana Z (2021) In harm’s way: Non-migration decisions of people at risk of slow-onset coastal hazards in Bangladesh. Ambio. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01552-8
Malmberg G (1997) Time and space in international migration. In: Hammaar T, Brochmann G, Tamas K, Faist T (ed) International Migration, Immobility and Development, 1st edn Oxford, pp 21–48
Massey DS, Arango J, Hugo G, Kouaouci A, Pellegrino A et al (1998) Worlds in motion: understanding international migration at the end of the millennium. Oxford University Press, London
McLeman R (2018) Thresholds in climatic migration. Popul Environ 39:319–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-017-0290-2
Mistri A (2013) Migration and sustainable livelihoods: a study from Sundarban Biosphere Reserve. Asia-Pac J Soc Sci 5(2):76 102. https://www.academia.edu/download/33769829/10.5._Avijit_Mistri_(1).pdf
Mistri A, Das B (2020) Environmental change and migration: a growing concern, environmental change, livelihood issues and migration. pp 1–19
Obrist B, Pfeiffer C, Henley R (2010) Multi-layered social resilience: a new approach in mitigation research. Prog Dev Stud 10(4):283–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/146499340901000402
Sanyal S, Routray JK (2016) Social capital for disaster risk reduction and management with empirical evidences from Sundarbans of India. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 19:101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.010
Schewel K (2019) Understanding immobility: moving beyond the mobility bias in migration studies. Migrant Mobility Aspirations Life Chances: 328–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918319831952
Serrat O (2008) The sustainable livelihood approach, knowledge solutions. Asian Development Bank
Stark O, Bloom DE (1985) The new economics of labor migration author (s): Oded Stark and David E. Bloom Source: The American Economic Review. 75(2): Papers and proceedings of the ninety-seventh annual meeting of the American Economic Association 173–178. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1805591. Accessed June 2020
Swift J (1989) Why are rural people vulnerable to famine? IDS Bull 20(2):8–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.1989.mp20002002.x
Twigger-Ross CL, Uzzell DL (1996) Place and identity processes. J Environ Psychol 16:205–220. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0017
Van Hear N, Bakewell O, Long K (2018) Push-pull plus: reconsidering the drivers of migration. J Ethn Migr Stud 44:927–944. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2017.1384135
Zickgraf C (2018) Immobility. In: Routledge handbook of environmental displacement and migration, 1st edn. F. Gemenne and R. McLeman, London, Routledge pp 71–84
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Bishawjit Mallick and accepted by Topical Collection Chief Editor Christopher Reyer
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Environmental Non-Migration: Frameworks, Methods, and Cases
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sengupta, A., Samanta, G. Understanding immobility of a highly vulnerable coastal village in the Indian Sundarban. Reg Environ Change 22, 90 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-022-01931-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-022-01931-1