Skip to main content
Log in

“Two-Row” cross-cultural learning for collaborative governance of forestland in northwestern Ontario, Canada

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates learning occurring through cross-cultural collaboration and how learning processes and outcomes of such learning affect the governance of regional lands and resources in the context of a First Nation-industry partnership in northwestern Ontario, Canada. We use transformative learning theory as a basis for critically analyzing individual, social, and structural changes. Transformative theory has been found to be suitable for working with natural resource problems and has evolved over time to include ways for accounting for different cultural frames of reference. We attempted a decolonizing approach in our research methodology hoping to understand learning events and outcomes as expressed by the research participants according to their own worldviews. Thirty-six participants involved in the First Nation-industry partnership were engaged in semi-structured interviews. Our results reveal different events that catalyzed both transformative and culturally framed learning outcomes for participants, such as much deeper appreciation for cultural practices and shared understanding of provincial forest policies. Four types of events were identified as catalysts for such learning outcomes: (i) time spent on the land; (ii) social meetings; (iii) ceremony, and (iv) formal meetings. Each type of learning event corresponded with different learning outcomes that arose from being involved in the partnership. Drawing from the literature on transformative and Indigenous learning, our study resulted in a synthetic “two-row” frame for cross-cultural learning and demonstrates that this learning was important for building cross-cultural collaborations for resource use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We use “decolonizing” rather than “decolonized” to acknowledge that decolonization is a process without a definitive ending (Bartlett et al. 2007).

  2. Wincrief ceased operation in April 2014 after several challenges faced by the partnership resulted in bankruptcy (Zurba 2019).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our deepest gratitude to the study participants. We would like to give special thanks to DanielWemigwans who was extremely helpful in introducing us to those involved in the Miitigoog partnership and the Grand Council of Treaty #3. We would also like to thank the reviewers for their constructive feedback on our manuscript. The research was supported by a SSHRC Doctoral Fellowship and was supported by a Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC 833-2008-1007) Community-University Research Alliance grant to establish the Common Ground Research Forum.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melanie Zurba.

Additional information

Communicated by Shannon Hagerman

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zurba, M., Sinclair, A.J. & Diduck, A.P. “Two-Row” cross-cultural learning for collaborative governance of forestland in northwestern Ontario, Canada. Reg Environ Change 21, 57 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01784-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01784-0

Keywords

Navigation