In urban-influenced areas, farmers face new opportunities and constraints that shape their farming styles. In this article, we investigate the impact of two planning strategies, Ontario’s Greenbelt, Canada, and Toulouse InterSCoT, France, on farmers’ investment and discuss the consistency of farmers’ strategies and territorial projects. A theoretical approach centered on J.R. Commons’ concept of Futurity is operationalized with mental modeling during 41 in-depth interviews with farmers. The results show that farming styles, which reflect farmers’ adaptation to their urban-influenced environment, stem in both jurisdictions from farmers’ values, attitudes, skills, and norms. The differences in investment decisions revealed in the respective planning strategies highlight that Ontario’s Greenbelt zoning is not sufficient to preserve urban-influenced farming, while in Toulouse InterSCoT, the viability of farmers’ projects depends on the alignment of farmers and other agricultural stakeholders’ representations of agriculture. The shared territorial vision of the agricultural landscape stemming from such an alignment may help mitigate potential conflicts while supporting farmers’ projects that contribute to this vision. The importance of a shared vision of the future supporting multifunctional agriculture emerged in both jurisdictions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Despite conceptual proximities, the concepts of amenities and ecosystem services are different; the overlapping of these concepts has not yet been investigated in depth (Schaeffer and Dissart 2018).
Jongeneel et al. (2008) define time inconsistency as the possibility that regulations and public support unexpectedly shift.
In this article, we adopt the psychological perspective wherein psyche is understood as a landscape (Kaplan et al. 2017).
Although factors identified by farmers are connected by causality arrows, we preferred to not to use the term causal models given that the collected models resulted from the elicitation of farmers’ own perception of their farming projects. Hence, causal relationships on one map could conflict with causal relationships on other maps. In our opinion, this subjectivity is better captured through the term mental maps.
At the exception of a specialized and intensive tomato production unit with a land base of 10 ha.
Following the definition of the Ontario CSA farm directory, Community Supported Agriculture is a partnership between farmers looking for stable markets and consumers seeking good quality safe food. Food boxes are delivered every week and both parties share the risks of production.
Eco-grazing is where the maintenance of public or private green space is done by grazing animals instead of mechanical equipment.
SMI is a threshold that aimed to determine the minimum size necessary for a farmer to make a living using conventional agricultural practices and taking into account farm type and the geographical characteristics of farm location.
The commodification of agricultural knowledge is a fragmentation of knowledge and a decrease in information sharing resulting from a withdrawal of the State and an increased role of private commercial service providers.
Akimowicz M, Magrini MB, Ridier A, Bergez JE, Requier-Desjardins D (2013) What influences farm size growth? An illustration in southwestern France. Appl Econ Perspect Pol 35(2):242–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppt008
Akimowicz M, Cummings H, Landman K (2016) Green lights in the Greenbelt? A qualitative analysis of farm investment decision-making in peri-urban Southern Ontario. Land Use Policy 55:24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.024
Akimowicz M, Képhaliacos C (2018) Coordonner la construction territoriale par une vision du futur. Les dynamiques d’investissement agricole dans l’InterSCoT toulousain. Econ Rurale 365:27–47. https://doi.org/10.4000/economierurale.5851
Allaire G, Boyer R (1995) La grande transformation de l’agriculture, lectures conventionnalistes et régulationnistes. INRA Economica, Paris
Atkinson G (2009) Going concerns, futurity and reasonable value. J Econ Issues 43(2):433–440. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624430216
Barnaud C, Corbera E, Muradian R, Salliou N, Sirami C, Vialatte A, Choisis J-P, Dendoncker N, Mathevet R, Moreau C, Reyes-García V, Boada M, Deconchat M, Cibien C, Garnier S, Maneja R, Antona M (2018) Ecosystem services, social interdependencies, and collective action: A conceptual framework. Ecol Soc 23(1):15. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09848-230115
Barry PJ, Ellinger PN, Hopkin JA, Baker CB (1995) Financial management in agriculture. Interstate Publishers, Danville, Illinois
Benis K, Ferrão P (2018) Commercial farming within the urban built environment–taking stock of an evolving field in northern countries. Glob Food Secur 17:30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2018.03.005
Benjamin C, Phimister E (2002) Does capital market structure affect farm investment? A comparison using French and British farm-level panel data. Amer J Agr Econ 84(4):1115–1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00372
Bierlen R, Dixon BL, Ahrendsen BL, Barry PJ (1998) Credit constraints, farm characteristics, and the farm economy: differential impacts on feeder cattle and beef cow inventories. Amer J Agr Econ 80(4):708–723. https://doi.org/10.2307/1244058
Billaudot B (2009) Les institutions dans la théorie de la régulation: Une actualisation. Rev Reg 6 [on-line]. http://journals.openedition.org/regulation/7632. doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/regulation.7632:
Bissonnette JF, Dupras J, Messier C, Lechowicz M, Dagenais D, Paquette A, Jaeger JA, Gonzalez A (2018) Moving forward in implementing green infrastructures: stakeholder perceptions of opportunities and obstacles in a major North American metropolitan area. Cities 81:61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.03.014
Blancard S, Boussemart JP, Chavas JP, Leleu H (2016) Potential gains from specialization and diversification further to the reorganization of activities. Omega 63:60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.10.002
Boncinelli F, Bartolini F, Casini L (2018) Structural factors of labour allocation for farm diversification activities. Land Use Policy 71:204–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.058
Bryant CR (2013). Rural land-use planning in Canada. In: Cloke P (ed) Rural land-use planning in developed nations. Routledge, New York, pp 190–218
Bryant CR, Marois C (2010). The management and planning of communities in the rural-urban fringe. In: Bryant CR (2013). Rural land-use planning in Canada. In: Cloke P (ed) Rural land-use planning in developed nations. Routledge, New York, pp 190–218
Buchan R, Cloutier DS, Friedman A (2018) Transformative incrementalism: planning for transformative change in local food systems. Prog Plan Corrected Proof. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2018.07.002
Butt A, Taylor E (2018) Smells like politics: planning and the inconvenient politics of intensive peri-urban agriculture. Geogr Res 56(2):206–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12266
Carley K, Palmquist M (1992) Extracting, representing, and analyzing mental models. Soc Forces 70(3):601–636. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/70.3.601
Carey JM, Zilberman D (2002) A model of investment under uncertainty: modern irrigation technology and emerging markets in water. Amer J Agr Econ 84(1):171–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00251
Chanel O, Delattre L, Napoléone C (2014) Determinants of local public policies for farmland preservation and urban expansion: a French illustration. Land Econ 90(3):411–433. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.90.3.411
Chavas JP (1994) Production and investment decisions under sunk cost and temporal uncertainty. Amer J Agr Econ 76(1):114–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243926
Commons JR (1934) Institutional economics: its place in political economy. Macmillan, New York
Compagnone C, Simon B (2018) Cooperation and competition among agricultural advisory service providers. The case of pesticides use. J Rural Stud 59:10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.01.006
Conell DJ, Bryant CR, Caldwell WJ, Churchyard A, Cameron G, Johnston T, Margulis ME, Ramsey D, Marois C (2013) Food sovereignty and agricultural land use planning: the need to integrate public priorities across jurisdictions. J Agr Food Syst Community Dev 3(4):117–124. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2013.034.011
Crespo J, Requier-Desjardins D, Vicente J (2014) Why can collective action fail in local agri-food systems? A social network analysis of cheese producers in Aculco, Mexico. Food Policy 46:165–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.03.011
Deininger K, Jin S (2006) Tenure security and land related investment evidence from Ethiopia. Eur Econ Rev 50:1245–1277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.02.001
Del Corso JP, Kephaliacos C, Plumecocq G (2015) Legitimizing farmers’ new knowledge, learning and practices through communicative action: application of an agro-environmental policy. Ecol Econ 117:86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.05.017
Delgado JA, Groffman PM, Nearing MA, Goddard T, Reicosky D, Lal R, Kitchen NR, Rice CW, Towery D, Salon P (2011) Conservation practices to mitigate and adapt to climate change. J Soil Water Conserv 66(4):118A–129A. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.66.4.118A
Dixit AK, Pindyck RS (1994) Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Dong F, Hennessy DA, Jensen HH (2010) Contract and exit decisions in finisher hog production. Amer J Agr Econ 92(3):667–684. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aap041
Duvernoy I (2016) Partenariats inter-institutionnels et construction de représentations d'une activité agricole territorialisée dans l'aire urbaine toulousaine. Rev Econ Reg Urb 4:799–816. https://doi.org/10.3917/reru.164.0799
Duvernoy I, Lima S, Barthe L (2012) Des projets agricoles dans la planification territoriale ? L’exemple de quatre Pays en Midi-Pyrénées. Agr Dev Territ 34:79–92. https://doi.org/10.4000/soe.138
Duvernoy I, Zambon I, Sateriano A, Salvati L (2018) Pictures from the other side of the fringe: urban growth and peri-urban agriculture in a post-industrial city (Toulouse, France). J Rural Stud 57:25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.10.007
Epp S, Caldwell W, Bryant CR (2019) Farmland preservation and rural development in Canada. In: Gottero E (ed) Agrourbanism: tools for governance and planning of agrarian landscape. Springer, Cham, pp 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95576-6
Foltz JD (2004) Entry, exit, and farm size: assessing an experiment in dairy price policy. Amer J Agr Econ 86(3):594–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00603.x
Gilchrist S, Himmelberg CP (1995) Evidence on the role of cash flow for investment. J Monet Econ 36(3):541–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(95)01223-0
Glauben T, Tietje H, Weiss C (2006) Agriculture on the move: exploring regional differences in farm exit rates in Western Germany. Jahrb Reg 26(1):103–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-004-0062-1
Gould JP (1968) Adjustment costs in the theory of investment of the firm. Rev Econ Stud 35:47–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/2974406
Groumpos PP (2010) Fuzzy cognitive maps: basic theories and their application to complex systems. In: Glykas M (ed) Fuzzy cognitive maps: advances in theory, methodologies, tools and applications. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 1–22
Hansson H, Ferguson R, Olofsson C, Rantamäki-Lahtinen L (2013) Farmers’ motives for diversifying their farm business – the influence of family. J Rural Stud 32:240–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.07.002
Hansson H, Kokko S (2018) Farmers' mental models of change and implications for farm renewal–a case of restoration of a wetland in Sweden. J Rural Stud 60:141–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.04.006
Hennessy T, O'Brien M (2008) Is off-farm income driving on-farm investment? J Farm Manag 13(4):235–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2011.00542.x
Howley P, Buckley C, Donoghue CO, Ryan M (2015) Explaining the economic ‘irrationality’ of farmers' land use behaviour: the role of productivist attitudes and non-pecuniary benefits. Ecol Econ 109:186–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.015
Huang D, Drescher M (2015) Urban crops and livestock: the experiences, challenges, and opportunities of planning for urban agriculture in two Canadian provinces. Land Use Policy 43:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.011
Hubbard RG, Kashyap AK (1992) Internal net worth and the investment process: an application to US agriculture. J Polit Econ 100(3):506–534. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3339
Ilbery BW (1991) Farm diversification as an adjustment strategy on the urban fringe of the West Midlands. J Rural Stud 7(3):201–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(91)90085-7
Inwood SM, Sharp JS (2012) Farm persistence and adaptation at the rural–urban interface: succession and farm adjustment. J Rural Stud 28(1):107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.07.005
Isaac ME, Dawoe E, Sieciechowicz K (2009) Assessing local knowledge use in agroforestry management with cognitive maps. Environ Manag 43(6):1321–1329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9201-8
Jones NA, Ross H, Lynam T, Perez P, Leitch A (2011) Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecol Soc 16(1):46. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03802-160146
Jongeneel RA, Polman NB, Slangen LH (2008) Why are Dutch farmers going multifunctional? Land Use Policy 25(1):81–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.03.001
Jordan NR, Mulla DJ, Slotterback C, Runck B, Hays C (2018) Multifunctional agricultural watersheds for climate adaptation in Midwest USA: commentary. Renew Agric Food Syst 33(3):292–296. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170517000655
Jorgenson D (1967) The theory of investment behavior. In: Ferber R (ed) Determinants of investment behavior. NBER, Cambridge, MA, pp 129–175
Kaplan R, Schuck NW, Doeller CF (2017) The role of mental maps in decision-making. Trends Neurosci 40(5):256–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2017.03.002
Kille GS, Lyne MC (1993) Investment on freehold and trust farms: theory with some evidence from KwaZulu. Agrekon J 32:101–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.1993.9524730
Labarthe P (2010) Services immatériels et verrouillage technologique. Le cas du conseil technique aux agriculteurs. Econ Soc 44(2):173–196. https://prodinra.inra.fr/record/41862
Lange A, Piorr A, Siebert R, Zasada I (2013) Spatial differentiation of farm diversification: how rural attractiveness and vicinity to cities determine farm households’ response to the CAP. Land Use Policy 31:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.02.010
Lobley M, Potter C (2004) Agricultural change and restructuring: recent evidence from a survey of agricultural households in England. J Rural Stud 20(4):499–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2004.07.001
Lopez RA, Adelaja AO, Andrews MS (1988) The effects of suburbanization on agriculture. Amer J Agr Econ 70(2):346–358. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242075
Lovell ST (2010) Multifunctional urban agriculture for sustainable land use planning in the United States. Sustain 2(8):2499–2522. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2082499
Lucas RE (1967) Adjustment costs and the theory of supply. J Polit Econ 75:321–334. https://doi.org/10.1086/259289
McDonald R, Siegel D (1986) The value of waiting to invest. Q J Econ 101(4):707–727. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884175
Manson SM, Jordan NR, Nelson KC, Brummel RF (2016) Modeling the effect of social networks on adoption of multifunctional agriculture. Environ Model Softw 75:388–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.015
Marsden T, Sonnino R (2008) Rural development and the regional state: denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK. J Rural Stud 24:422–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.04.001
Ollsson E, Kerselaers E, Søderkvist Kristensen L, Primdahl J, Rogge E, Wästfelt A (2016) Peri-urban food production and its relation to urban resilience. Sustain 8(12):1340. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8121340
Ostrom E (1999) Social capital: A fad or a fundamental concept? In: Dasgupta P, Serageldin I (eds) Social capital: A multiperspective approach. World Bank, Washington DC, pp 195–198
Oude Lansik AGJM, Verstegen JAAM, Van Den Hengel JJ (2001) Investment decisions making in Dutch greenhouse horticulture. Neth J Agric Sci 49:357–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-5214(01)80023-3
Paül V, McKenzie FH (2013) Peri-urban farmland conservation and development of alternative food networks: insights from a case-study area in metropolitan Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain). Land Use Policy 30(1):94–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.02.009
Perrin C, Nougarèdes B, Sini L, Branduini P, Salvati L (2018) Governance changes in peri-urban farmland protection following decentralisation: a comparison between Montpellier (France) and Rome (Italy). Land Use Policy 70:535–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.027
Purvis A, Boggess WO, Moss CB, Holt J (1995) Technology adoption decisions under irreversibility and uncertainty: an ex ante approach. Amer J Agr Econ 77:541–551. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243223
Rastoin JL, Ghersi G (2010) Le système alimentaire mondial Concepts et méthodes, analyses et dynamiques. Quae, Paris, France
Ricart S, Kirk N, Ribas A (2019) Ecosystem services and multifunctional agriculture: Unravelling informal stakeholders' perceptions and water governance in three European irrigation systems. Environ Policy Gov 29(1):23–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1831
Rojo MS, Moratalla AZ, Alonso NM, Jimenez VH (2014) Pathways towards the integration of periurban agrarian ecosystems into the spatial planning system. Ecol Process 3(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-014-0013-x
Sanz Sanz E, Martinetti D, Napoléone C (2018) Operational modelling of peri-urban farmland for public action in Mediterranean context. Land Use Policy 75:757–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.003
Schaeffer Y, Dissart JC (2018) Natural and environmental amenities: a review of definitions, measures and issues. Ecol Econ 146:475–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.001
Serra T, Zilberman D, Goodwin BK, Featherstone A (2006) Effects of decoupling on the mean and variability of output. Eur Rev Agric Econ 33(3):269–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbl014
Singh I, Squire L, Strauss J (1986) Agricultural household models: extensions, applications, and policy. The World Bank
Singh C, Dorward P, Osbahr H (2016) Developing a holistic approach to the analysis of farmer decision-making: implications for adaptation policy and practice in developing countries. Land Use Policy 59:329–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.041
Steinhäußer R, Siebert R, Steinführer A, Hellmich M (2015) National and regional land-use conflicts in Germany from the perspective of stakeholders. Land Use Policy 49:183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.009
Stenholm P, Hytti U (2014) In search of legitimacy under institutional pressures: a case study of producer and entrepreneur farmer identities. J Rural Stud 35:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.05.001
Stiglitz JE, Weiss A (1981) Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. The American Economic Review, vol 71, no. 3, pp 393–410
Summers LH (1987) Investment incentives and the discounting of depreciation allowances. In: Feldstein M (ed) The effects of taxation on capital accumulation. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 295–304
Szpiro GG (1997) The emergence of risk aversion. Complex 2(4):31–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0526(199703/04)2:4<31::AID-CPLX8>3.0.CO;2-3
Taylor BM, Van Grieken M (2015) Local institutions and farmer participation in Agri-environmental schemes. J Rural Stud 37:10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.11.011
Taylor E, Butt A, Amati M (2017) Making the blood broil: Conflicts over imagined rurality in peri-urban Australia. Plan Prac Res 32(1):85–102
Trigeorgis L (1996) Real options: Managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. MIT Press, Cambridge
United Nations (2018) 2018 revision of world urbanization prospects. Multimedia Library https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html
van der Ploeg JD, Laurent C, Blondeau F, Bonnafous P (2009) Farm diversity, classification schemes and multifunctionality. J Environ Manag 90:S124–S131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.022
van Dijk WFA, Lokhorst AM, Berendse F, de Snoo GR (2016) Factors underlying farmers’ intentions to perform unsubsidised agri-environmental measures. Land Use Policy 59:207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.003
Van Huylenbroeck G, Durand G (2003) Multifunctional agriculture: a new paradigm for European agriculture and rural development. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot
Vandermeulen V, Verspecht A, Van Huylenbroeck G, Meert H, Boulanger A, Van Hecke E (2006) The importance of the institutional environment on multifunctional farming systems in the peri-urban area of Brussels. Land Use Policy 23(4):486–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.06.002
Viaggi D, Raggi M, Paloma SG (2011) Farm-household investment behaviour and the CAP decoupling: methodological issues in assessing policy impacts. J Policy Model 33(1):127–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2010.10.004
Wästfelt A, Zhang Q (2018) Keeping agriculture alive next to the city–the functions of the land tenure regime nearby Gothenburg, Sweden. Land Use Policy 78:447–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.053
Westerink J, Jongeneel R, Polman N, Prager K, Franks J, Dupraz P, Mettepenningen E (2017) Collaborative governance arrangements to deliver spatially coordinated agri-environmental management. Land Use Policy 69:176–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.002
Wilber CK, Harrison RS (1978) The methodological basis of institutional economics: pattern model, storytelling, and holism. J Econ Issues 12(1):61–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1978.11503505
Williamson OE (1981) The modern corporation: origins, evolution, attributes. Journal of Economic Literature, vol 19, no. 4, pp 1537–1568
Zagata L, Sutherland LA (2015) Deconstructing the ‘young farmer problem in Europe’: towards a research agenda. J Rural Stud 38:39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.01.003
Zasada I (2011) Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture—a review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy 28(4):639–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.01.008
Zepeda L (1995) Asymmetry and nonstationarity in the farm size distribution of Wisconsin milk producers: an aggregate analysis. Amer J Agr Econ 77(4):837–852. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243807
The authors would like to thank all the participants for their time and commitment. The MARSUPIA project was funded by the European’ Commission Research Executive Agency (Grant Marie Curie – IOF 622830).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Farmland Management
Appendix. Factors used for mental modeling
Appendix. Factors used for mental modeling
About this article
Cite this article
Akimowicz, M., Képhaliacos, C., Landman, K. et al. Planning for the future? The emergence of shared visions for agriculture in the urban-influenced Ontario’s Greenbelt, Canada, and Toulouse InterSCoT, France. Reg Environ Change 20, 57 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01635-4
- Farm investment
- Commons’ futurity
- Mental modeling
- Ontario’s Greenbelt
- Toulouse InterSCoT
- Farmland preservation
- Urban-influenced agriculture