Abstract
All over the world, there is a pressing need to better understand how climate change has been incorporated into governmental agendas, and evaluate the status of adaptation planning and interventions at the local level. In this paper, we seek to contribute towards bridging this gap by identifying local practices connected to climate adaptation in six large Brazilian cities, and presenting a framework, based on the existing literature, for assessing constraints to adaptation across the municipal level. Although local governments are not the only actors who can take the lead through their actions, the employed framework considers that effective adaptation planning in urban areas is highly dependent on municipal efforts. Our findings indicate that six aspects have the highest levels of impact on adaptation in the Brazilian cities studied: administrative practices, political will, level of commitment, mismatch between the scale of urban issues and the extent of local government authority, pressures from private sectors, and inspection. Although these barriers are not specific only to climate issues and can be identified in other environmental arenas, when combined, they cause and worsen constraints to advancing urban adaptation at the local level. Specifically concerning the local dynamics of urban planning, the combination of pressures from private sectors and insufficient inspection negatively affects the ability of these cities to consolidate adaptation interventions. Our results are helpful in the context of large cities, particularly in Global South, where, as in Brazil, competitive urbanism and specific interest groups confront municipal efforts, and make achieving adaptation more difficult.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


Change history
25 November 2019
The article which was recently published contained error in figure captions. The correct caption is given in this article.
References
Anguelovski I, Carmin J (2011). Something borrowed, everything new: innovation and institutionalization in urban climate governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 3:169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.017
Anguelovski I et al (2016) Equity impacts of urban land use planning for climate adaptation: critical perspectives from the Global North and South. J Plan Educ Res 36(3):333–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16645166
Araos M et al (2016) Climate change adaptation planning in large cities: a systematic global assessment. Environ Sci Pol 66(2016):375–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.009
Araos M et al (2017) Climate change adaptation planning for Global South megacities: the case of Dhaka. J Environ Policy Plan. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1264873
Aylett A (2014) Progress and challenges in the urban governance of climate change: results of a global survey. MIT, Cambridge
Aylett A (2015) Institutionalizing the urban governance of climate change adaptation: results of an international survey. Urban Clim 14:4–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2015.06.005
Biesbroek G et al (2013) On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation. Reg Environ Chang 13:1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0421-y
Biesbroek R, Lesnikowski A (2018) The Neglected Dimension of Polycentric Climate Governance. In: Jordan A et al. (eds) (2018). Governing Climate Change - Polycentricity in Action? Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108284646
Broto VC (2017) Urban governance and the politics of climate change. World Dev 93(1–15):2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.031
Brown K, Westaway E (2011) Agency, capacity, and resilience to environmental change: lessons from human development, well-being, and disasters. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36:321–342. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-052610-092905
Bulkeley H (2010) Cities and the governing of climate change. Annu Rev Environ Resour 35:229–253. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-072809-101747
Bulkeley H, Broto V (2013) Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Trans Inst Br Geogr 38:361–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x
Burch S (2009) In pursuit of resilient, low carbon communities: an examination of barriers to action in three Canadian cities. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.070
Burch S (2010) Transforming barriers into enablers of action on climate change: insights from three municipal case studies in British Columbia, Canada. Glob Environ Chang 20:287–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.009
Carmin J et al (2012) Urban climate adaptation in the Global South: planning in an emerging policy domain. J Plan Educ Res 32(1):18–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X11430951
Carmin J, Dodman D, Chu E (2013) Urban climate adaptation and leadership: from conceptual understanding to practical action. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 2013/26. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k3ttg88w8hh-en
Chu E et al (2017) Climate adaptation as strategic urbanism: assessing opportunities and uncertainties for equity and inclusive development in cities. Cities 60:378–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.016
Darela-Filho J et al (2016) Socio-climatic hotspots in Brazil: how do changes driven by the new set of IPCC climatic projections affect their relevance for policy? Clim Chang 136:413–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1635-z
Donat MG et al. (2013). Updated analyses of temperature and precipitation extreme indices since the beginning of the twentieth century: The HadEX2 dataset. JGR Atmospheres. 118:2098–2118. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50150
Eakin HC, Patt A (2011) Are adaptation studies effective, and what can enhance their practical impact? WIREs Clim Chang 2:141–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.100
Eakin H et al (2014) Differentiating capacities as a means to sustainable climate change adaptation. Glob Environ Chang 27:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.013
Ford JD et al (2011) A systematic review of observed climate change adaptation in developed nations. Clim Chang 106:327–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0045-5
Geneletti D, Zardo L (2016) Ecosystem-based adaptation in cities: an analysis of European urban climate adaptation plans. Land Use Policy 50:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.003
Gomes MDL et al. (2017) Capacidade estatal e formulação de políticas sociais por municípios sob a ótica da gestão pública democrática. Soc. e Cult. 20:83–104. https://doi.org/10.5216/sec.v20i1.51065
IBGE Censo 2010. https://censo2010.ibge.gov.br/
IPCC (2013) In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1535 pp
IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1132 pp
Klostermann J et al (2018) Towards a framework to assess, compare and develop monitoring and evaluation of climate change adaptation in Europe. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 23:187–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9678-4
Leck H, Roberts D (2015) What lies beneath: understanding the invisible aspects of municipal climate change governance. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 13:61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.02.004
Lemos MC, Kirchhoff CJ (2016) Climate information and water management: building adaptive capacity or business as usual? In: Conca K, Weinthal E (eds) The Oxford handbook of water politics and policy. Oxford University Press
Marques E (2013) Government, political actors and governance in urban policies in Brazil and São Paulo: concepts for a future research agenda. Braz Polit Sci Rev 7(3):8–35. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1981-38212013000300001
McClure L, Baker D (2018) How do planners deal with barriers to climate change adaptation? A case study in Queensland, Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning. 173:81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.01.012
Morgan E, Di Giulio G (2018) Science and evidence-based climate change policy: collaborative approaches to improve the science–policy interface. In: Serrao-Neumann et al. (Org.) Communicating climate change information for decision-making. Springer International Publishing, p. 13-28
Moser S, Boykoff MT (2013) Successful adaptation to climate change: linking science and practice in a rapidly changing world. Routledge, London
Moser SC et al (2010) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(51):22026–22031. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas1.007887107
Oliveira JAP (2017) Brazilian public administration: shaping and being shaped by governance and development. Chin Polit Sci Rev 2:7–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-017-0052-4
PMMA 2017. Plano Municipal de Conservação e Recuperação da Mata Atlântica do Município de São Paulo, Prefeitura Municipal de São Paulo, Secretaria do Verde e Meio Ambiente, apoio SOS Mata Atlântica, novembro de 2017, 533 pgs
Rochedo P et al (2018) The threat of political bargaining to climate mitigation in Brazil. Nat Clim Chang 8:695–698. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0213-y
Romero-Lankao P et al (2018) Urban transformative potential in a changing climate. Nat Clim Chang 8(9):7154–7756. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0264-0
Rosenzweig C et al (2015) ARC3.2 Summary for city leaders. Urban Climate Change Research Network. Columbia University, New York
Runhaar H et al (2018) Mainstreaming climate adaptation: taking stock about “what works” from empirical research worldwide. Reg Environ Chang 18:1201–1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1259-5
Ryan D (2015) From commitment to action: a literature review on climate policy implementation at city level. Clim Chang 131:519–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1402-6
Serrao-Neumann S et al (2018) Communicating climate change information for decision-making. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74669-2
Sherman M et al (2016) Drawing the line between adaptation and development: a systematic literature review of planned adaptation in developing countries. WIREs Clim Chang 7:707–726. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.416
Sillmann J et al (2013) Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: part 2 Future climate projections. J Geophys Res 118:2473–2493
Simões E et al (2017) Barriers and opportunities for adapting to climate change on the North Coast of São Paulo, Brazil. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1133-5
Torres RR, Marengo JA (2013) Uncertainty assessments of climate change projections over South America. Theor Appl Climatol 112:253–272
Torres RR, Marengo JA (2014) Climate change hotspots over South America: from CMIP3 to CMIP5 multi-model datasets. Theor Appl Climatol 117:579–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-013-1030-x
Uittenbroek CJ et al (2014) Political commitment in organising municipal responses to climate adaptation: the dedicated approach versus the mainstreaming approach. Environ Polit 26:1043–1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.92056
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the all practitioners of the six studied cities that participated in this project.
Funding
This study is part of the CiAdapta project funded by Brazil’s National Council for Scientific and Technological Development – CNPq (Proc. 446032/2015-8).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Robbert Biesbroek
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Di Giulio, G.M., Torres, R.R., Lapola, D.M. et al. Bridging the gap between will and action on climate change adaptation in large cities in Brazil. Reg Environ Change 19, 2491–2502 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01570-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01570-z