Increasing demands, climate change and variability, and over-allocation pose tremendous challenges for the sustainable management of water resources. Federal river systems such as the Colorado River Basin provide an opportunity to understand multi-level governance challenges to sustainability as well as opportunities to improve decision-making processes. This paper seeks to understand what components of the decision-making process are important for meeting sustainability criteria. This research uses the Colorado River Basin in a multi-method study designed to understand how those specific components not only highlight challenges to sustainability, but also how they may be utilized to further sustainability objectives. Results suggest that process components such as stakeholder participation, decision-making transparency, and fairness are important considerations in the sustainability of a river basin system. Further, a nuanced analysis of the process suggests that these components provide guidance for how decision-making might be improved. This includes emphasizing problematic hydrological or institutional events, reconciling transparency and decision-making efficiency, and acknowledging that all users in the system will need to undertake shortages. Results also suggest how the state and federal governments have specific roles in implementing and facilitating these processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
The Basin faces some of the prominent challenges that many river basins around the world must confront in the coming decades, most notably over-allocation and reduced flows due to increasing temperatures in the region (Udall and Overpeck 2017).
Wyoming, State of v. Colorado 259 U.S. 419, 42 S.Ct. 552, 66 L.Ed. 999 (1922)
Arizona v. California, 376 U.S. 340, 84 S.Ct. 755, 11 L.Ed.2d 757 (1964)
The complete protocol, including instructions for the coding process, can be found in Online Resource 1 or be made available by contacting the author.
Ananda J, Proctor W (2013) Collaborative approaches to water management and planning: an institutional perspective. Ecol Econ 86:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.018
Bethlehem J (2014) Web surveys in official statistics. In: Engel U, Jann B, Lynn P, Scherpenzeel A, Sturgis P (eds) Improving survey methods. Routledge, New York, pp 156–169
Bureau of Reclamation (2012) Colorado River Basin water supply and demand study: executive summary. Department of the Interior. http://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/programs/crbstudy/finalreport/Executive%20Summary/CRBS_Executive_Summary_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 23 September 2016
Crow D (2010) Local media and experts: sources of environmental policy initiation? Policy Stud J 38:143–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00348.x
Dillman D, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2009) Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method, 3rd edition. Wiley, Hoboken
Falkenmark M, Molden D (2008) Wake up to realities of river basin closure. Int J Water Resour D 24:201–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620701723570
Garrick DE, Stefano LD (2016) Adaptive capacity in federal rivers: coordinate challenges and institutional responses. Curr Opin Env Sust 21:78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.003
Gerlak A (2014) Federalism and US water policy. In: Garrick D, Anderson G, Connel D, Pittock J (eds) Federal rivers: managing water in multi-layered political systems. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 41–56
Gibson RB, Hassan S, Holtz S, Tansey J, Whitelaw G (2005) Sustainability assessment: criteria, processes and applications. Earthscan, London
Glennon RJ, Culp PW (2002) The last green lagoon: how and why the Bush Administration should save the Colorado River Delta. Ecol Law Quart 28:903–992
Gold RL (2008) Dividing the pie—dealing with surplus and drought: examining the Colorado River compact of 1922. J Land Resour Environ Law 28:71
Hedelin B (2007) Criteria for the assessment of sustainable water management. Environ Manag 39:151–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0387-0
Kenney D (2005) In search of sustainable water management: international lessons for the American West and beyond. Edward Elgar, Massachusetts
King JS, Culp PW, De La Parra C (2014) Getting to the right side of the river: lessons for binational cooperation on the road to Minute 319. 18 U. Denv Water Law Rev 1:36
McCaffrey S (2003) The need for flexibility in freshwater treaty regimes. Nat Resour Forum 27:156–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.00050
McClurg S (2013) Colorado River project symposium proceedings. Water Education Foundation, Sacramento
Meko DM, Woodhouse CA, Baisan CA, Knight T, Lukas JJ, Hughes MK, Salzer MW (2007) Medieval drought in the upper Colorado River Basin. Geophys Res Lett 34:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029988
Miles MB, Huberman AM (1984) Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: toward a shared craft. Educ Res 13:20–30 https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013005020
Millar MM, Dillman DA (2011) Improving response to web and mixed-mode surveys. Public Opin Q 75:251–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr003
Mostert E (2006) Participation for sustainable water management. In: Giupponi C, Jakeman AJ, Karssenberg D, Hare MP (eds) Sustainable management of water resources. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Overpeck J, Udall B (2010) Dry times ahead. Science 328:1642–1643. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186591
Pahl-Wostl C (2007) Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resour Manag 21:49–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9040-4
Reed PM, Kasprzyk J (2009) Water resources management: the myth, the wicked, and the future. J Water Res Pl-ASCE 135:411–413. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000047
Renner R, Schneider F, Hohenwallner D, Kopeinig C, Kruse S, Lienert J, Link S, Muhar S (2013) Meeting the challenges of transdisciplinary knowledge production for sustainable water governance. Mt Res Dev 33:234–247. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-13-00002.1
Rogers P, Hall A (2003) Effective water governance. Global Water Partnership Technical Committee, Stockholm
Sabatier P, Focht W, Lubell M, Trachtenberg Z, Vedlitz A, Matlock M (2005) Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
Schlager E, Blomquist W (2008) Embracing watershed politics. University of Colorado Press, Boulder
Schlager E, Heikkila T (2009) Resolving water conflicts: a comparative analysis of interstate river compacts. Policy Stud J 37:367–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00319.x/abstract
Schlager E, Heikkila T (2011) Left high and dry? Climate change, common-pool resource theory, and the adaptability of western water compacts. Public Admin Rev 71:461–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02367.x
Schlager E, Heikkila T (2014) Water scarcity, conflict resolution, and adaptive governance in federal transboundary river basins. In: Garrick D, Anderson G, Connel D, Pittock J (eds) Federal rivers: managing water in multi-layered political systems. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 57–75
Schlager E, Heikkila T, Case C (2012) The costs of compliance with interstate agreements: lessons from water compacts in the Western United States. Publius J Federalism 42:494–515. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjs017
Stakhiv EZ (2011) Pragmatic approaches for water management under climate change uncertainty. J Am Water Resour As 47:1183–1196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00589.x
Tortajada C (2010) Water governance: some critical issues. Int J Water Resour D 26:297–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900621003683298
Udall B, Overpeck J (2017) The twenty-first century Colorado River hot drought and implications for the future. Water Resour Res 53:2404–2418. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019638
Whiteley JM, Ingram H, Perry RW (2008) Water, place, and equity. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
Wiek A, Larson KL (2012) Water, people, and sustainability—a systems framework for analyzing and assessing water governance regimes. Water Resour Manag 26:3153–3171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0065-6
Wilder M, Ingram H (2016) Knowing equity when we see it: water equity in contemporary global contexts. In: Conca K, Weinthal E (eds) The Oxford handbook of water politics and policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199335084.013.11
The author gratefully acknowledges the reviews and feedback from the special issue editors Drs. Dustin Garrick and Lucia De Stefano, two anonymous reviewers, and the journal editors. Additional thanks to Drs. Lisa Dilling and Deserai Crow for their comments and support.
About this article
Cite this article
Berggren, J. Utilizing sustainability criteria to evaluate river basin decision-making: the case of the Colorado River Basin. Reg Environ Change 18, 1621–1632 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1354-2
- Water governance
- Colorado River Basin