Advertisement

Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 1645–1654 | Cite as

Transboundary politics of cooperation: Telugu ganga project, India

  • Srinivas Chokkakula
Original Article

Abstract

The Telugu Ganga project in India supplies the Krishna river waters to meet drinking water needs of the Chennai city in the state of Tamil Nadu, a nonriparian state. This has happened through an unusual historic accord between the riparian states of Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh. The instance is often celebrated as the finest example of interstate river water cooperation in the history of independent India. This paper presents an alternative and a more complete and critical appraisal of interstate cooperation in the Telugu Ganga project focusing on transboundary political interactions to offer the following findings. One, the case of Telugu Ganga project showcases how and why cooperation and conflict coexist in transboundary water sharing. The celebrated interstate cooperation has turned into a source of conflicts eventually and is connected to the current shape and the state of the Krishna river water dispute. Two, it reveals a nexus of water provisioning politics and mainstream party politics in its making, and its subsequent contentious history. This nexus is a challenge to inter-basin transfer across territorial boundaries—an important drought coping mechanism. This challenge defines the character of politics of cooperation and conflict resolution in federal democracies, such as India. Three, India’s interstate river water governance suffers from dormant policy space and absence of institutional models for interstate river cooperation. This makes it ill-equipped to address the adverse implications of politics or to channelize for progressive outcomes of cooperation. At a broader policy level, India has to reconsider its excessive reliance on dispute resolution, and shift its focus to enabling cooperation for a better governance of its interstate rivers.

Keywords

Interstate river water cooperation in India Krishna river dispute Telugu Ganga project Transboundary river water conflicts Federal river water governance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Dr. Lucia De Stefano for her detailed comments on earlier drafts. I also express my gratitude to two other anonymous reviewers. I thank Dhruv Arora and Ajay Kumar Katuri for their help with preparing the figure.

Funding information

The research presented in the paper has been carried out for my doctoral dissertation, funded partially by a CRE (Committee for Research and Exploration) research grant no. 8831-10 of the National Geographic Society.

References

  1. Agnew J (2011) Waterpower: politics and the geography of water provision. Ann Am Assoc Geogr 101:463–476.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2011.560053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alam UZ (2002) Questioning the water wars rationale: a case study of the Indus waters treaty. Geogr J 168:341–353.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0016-7398.2002.00060.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basemap (no date) Basemap Under Telugu Ganga Project. Water Resources Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh. http://basemaps.in. Accessed 17 January 2017
  4. Bednar J (2009) The robust federation: principles of design. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Chokkakula S (2017) Why do interstate water disputes emerge and recur? An anatomy of ambiguities, antagonisms and asymmetries. CESS Monograph 45. CESS, HyderabadGoogle Scholar
  6. Chokkakula S (2015) The political geographies of interstate water disputes in India. University of Washington, DissertationGoogle Scholar
  7. Chokkakula S (2014) Interstate water disputes: perils and prospects of democratisation. Econ Polit Wkly 49:75–81Google Scholar
  8. CWC (Central Water Commission) (1995) Legal instruments on rivers in India. Agreements on interstate rivers. CWC, New Delhi, Volume IIIGoogle Scholar
  9. CWDT (Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal) (2007) The report of the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal with the decision. Government of India, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  10. Doabia, T S (2012) Report of the committee to study the activities that are required for optimal development of a river basin and changes required in existing River Boards Act, 1956 for achievement of the same. Ministry of Water Resources, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  11. DeStefano L, Duncan J, Dinar S, Stahl K, Strezepek K, Wolf AT (2012) Climate change and the institutional resilience of international river basins. J Peace Res 49:193–209.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343311427416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeStefano L, Edwards P, DeSilva L, Wolf AT (2010) Tracking cooperation and conflict in international basins: historic and recent trends. Water Policy 12:871–884.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2010.137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. D’Souza R (2009) Nation vs peoples: interstate water disputes in India’s Supreme Court. In: Iyer RR (ed) Water and the laws in India. Sage, New Delhi, pp 58–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garrick D, DeStefano L, Fung F, Pittock J, Schlager E, New M, Connell D (2013) Managing hydroclimatic risks in federal rivers: a diagnostic assessment. Phil Trans R Soc A 371:20120415.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0415 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giordano M, Wolf A (2003) Sharing waters: post-Rio international water management. Nat Resour Forum 27:163–171.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.00051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giordano M, Giordano M, Wolf AT (2002) The geography of water conflict and cooperation: internal pressures and international manifestations. Geogr J 168:293–312.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0016-7398.2002.00057.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gleditsch NP, Furlong K, Hegre H, Lacina B, Owen T (2006) Conflicts over shared rivers: resource scarcity or fuzzy boundaries? Polit Geogr 25:361–382.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gleick PH (1993) Water and conflict: fresh water resources and international security. Int Secur 18:79–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gopal B (1989) Dynamics of centre-state relations: experience of Andhra Pradesh since 1983. The Indian Journal of Political Science 50:357–375Google Scholar
  20. Gupta SK, Deshpande RD (2004) Water for India in 2050: first-order assessment of available options. Curr Sci 86:1216–1224Google Scholar
  21. India-WRIS (2012) River basin atlas of India. RRSC-West, NRSC, JodhpurGoogle Scholar
  22. Iyer RR (1994) Indian federalism and water resources. Int J Water Resour Dev 10:191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Iyer RR (2004) Punjab water imbroglio: background, implications and the way out. Econ Polit Wkly 39:3435–3438Google Scholar
  24. Iyer RR (2007) Towards water wisdom: Limits, justice, harmony. Sage, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  25. KWDT-I (Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal - I) (1973) The report of the Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal with the decision. Government of India, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  26. KWDT-II (Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal-II) (2010) The report of the Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal with the decision. Government of India, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  27. Mirumachi N (2015) Transboundary water politics in the developing world. Routledge, OxonGoogle Scholar
  28. Mostert E (2003) Conflict and co-operation in international freshwater management: a global review. Int J River Basin Manag 1:267–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nariman FS (2009) Interstate water disputes: a nightmare! In: Iyer RR (ed) Water and the laws in India. Sage, New Delhi, pp 32–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. NCRWC (2002) Report of the National Commission to review the working of the constitution. Ministry of Law, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  31. Nikku BR (2004) Water rights, conflicts and collective action: case of the Telugu Ganga project, India. In The Tenth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property Proceedings, The Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, Universitad Nacional Autonoma de MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  32. Padhiari HK, Ballabh V (2008) Inter-state water disputes and the governance challenge. In: Ballabh V (ed) Governance of water: institutional alternatives and political economy. Sage, New Delhi, pp 174–192Google Scholar
  33. Prasad GK (1987) Politics in a non-congress (I) state: the case of Andhra Pradesh. The Indian J Political Sci 48:607–617Google Scholar
  34. Richards A, Singh N (2002) Inter-state water disputes in India: institutions and policies. Int J Water Resour Dev 18:611–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rudolph LI, Rudolph SH (1987) In pursuit of Lakshmi: the political economy of the Indian state. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  36. Salman SMA, Uprety K (2002) Conflict and cooperation on South Asia’s international rivers: a legal perspective. World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  37. Salve H (2016) Inter-state river water disputes. In: Choudhry S, Khosla M, Mehta PB (eds) The Oxford handbook of the Indian constitution. Oxford University Press, New Delhi, pp 502–520Google Scholar
  38. Sampathkumar TJ (2005) Telugu Ganga project: an act of inter-state co-operation. The Indian J Polit Sci 66:851–872Google Scholar
  39. Starr JR (1991) Water wars. Foreign Policy 82:17–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stinnett DM, Tir J (2009) The institutionalization of river treaties. Int Negot 14:229–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Swain A (2001) Water wars: fact or fiction? Futures 33:769–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thatte CD (2007) Inter-basin water transfer for the augmentation of water resources in India: a review of needs, plans, status and prospects. Water Resour Dev 23:709–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tir J, Ackerman JT (2009) Politics of formalized river cooperation. J Peace Res 46:623–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Toset HPW, Gleditsch NP, Hegre H (2000) Shared rivers and interstate conflict. Polit Geogr 19:971–996.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(00)00038-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Trottier J (2003) Water wars: the rise of a hegemonic concept. UNESCO-Green Cross InternationalGoogle Scholar
  46. Tummala KK (1986) Democracy triumphant in India: The case of Andhra Pradesh. Asian Surv 26:378–395Google Scholar
  47. UN Convention (1997) United Nations Convention on the Law of the Non-navigational Uses of International Watercourses. International Water Law Project. https://www.internationalwaterlaw.org/documents/intldocs/watercourse_conv.html. Accessed 20 March 2018
  48. Wolf AT (1998) Conflict and cooperation along international waterways. Water Policy 1251-1265Google Scholar
  49. Wolf AT (1999a) Criteria for equitable allocations: the heart of international water conflict. Nat Resour Forum 23:3–30.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.1999.tb00235.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wolf AT (1999b) The transboundary freshwater dispute database project. Water Int 24:160–163.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02508069908692153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wolf AT (2007) Shared waters: conflict and cooperation. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32:241–269.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.041006.101434 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wolf AT, Yofee SB, Giordano M (2003) International waters: identifying basins at risk. Water Policy 5:29–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zeitoun M, Mirumachi N (2008) Transboundary water interaction I: reconsidering conflict and cooperation. Int Environ Agreements: Polit Law Econ 8:297–316.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-008-9083-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Policy ResearchNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations