Water governance in the South Saskatchewan River Basin (SSRB), a transboundary river basin in western Canada, occurs in one of the world’s most decentralized federations. The provinces sharing the SSRB—Alberta and Saskatchewan—have primary responsibility for governing water scarcity in the basin and have done so with minimal intergovernmental coordination, oriented around an interprovincial apportionment of their shared waters, and with little involvement of the federal government. While most studies of transboundary river basin governance have focused on the importance of intergovernmental collective action, the SSRB case highlights the importance of governmental policy innovation. The decentralized nature of SSRB governance has allowed Alberta to pursue a ‘cap and trade’ policy innovation and Saskatchewan to pursue a centralized management policy innovation simultaneously, creating an unusual degree of policy divergence between two basin-sharing jurisdictions. In this way, the SSRB shows a different ‘face’ of federalism that is not as evident in most other cases, that is, the capacity for federalism to spur sub-national policy innovation in addition to intergovernmental cooperation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Further details about the interviewees are not provided in order to protect their confidentiality.
It is important to note that the interprovincial apportionment of the SSRB is nested within an international apportionment of the St. Mary and Milk rivers, in the headwaters of the SSRB, outlined in Article VI of the Boundary Waters Treaty (1909) between the USA and the UK (who signed the treaty on Canada’s behalf). The implementation of Article VI is one of the few water governance areas in the SSRB where the Canadian government has a significant presence.
Alberta’s ‘Water for Life’ initiative, introduced in 2003, might be considered a fourth policy strategy but it has not substantively changed the institutional rules governing water use in the SSRB, so it is not considered here.
Alberta Economic Development Authority (2008) Sustainable water management and economic development in Alberta. Government of Alberta, Edmonton. http://economic.alberta.ca/documents/sustainable_water_management_economic_development.pdf. Accessed 18 Mar 2018
Armstrong C, Evenden M, Nelles, HV (2009) The river returns—an environmental history of the bow. McGill-Queens University Press, Montreal.
Barnett TP, Adam JC, Lettenmaier DP (2005) Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions. Nature 438:303–309. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04141
Beach D, Pederson RB (2013) Process-tracing methods: foundations and guidelines. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Berry FS, Berry WD (2014) Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In: Sabatier PA, Weible C (eds) Theories of the policy process, 3rd edn. Westview, Boulder, pp 307–359
Bjornlund H, Nicol L, Klein K (2007) Challenges in implementing economic instruments to manage irrigation water on farms in southern Alberta. Ag Wat Man 92:131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2007.05.018
Bjornlund H, Nicol L, Klein K (2009) The adoption of improved irrigation technology and management practices—a study of two irrigation districts in Alberta, Canada. Ag Wat Man 96:121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.07.009
Brandes OM, Curran D (2017) Changing currents: a case study in the evolution of water law in western Canada. In: Renzetti SR, Dupont DD (eds) Water policy and governance in Canada. Springer, Switzerland, pp 45–67
Byrne J, Kienzle S, Sauchyn D (2010) Prairie water and climate change. In: Sauchyn D, Diaz H, Kulshreshtha S (eds) The new normal—Canadian prairies in a changing climate. Canadian Plains Research Centre, Regina, pp 61–79
Cairns RD (1992) Natural resources and Canadian federalism: decentralization, recurring conflict, and resolution. Publius 22(1):55–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a037996
Environment Canada (2008) Section 2: annual statistics: Canada's physical environment. In: Human activity and the environment: annual statistics 2007 and 2008. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/16-201-x/2007000/5212638-eng.htm. Accessed 16 Nov 2016
Figliuzzi S (2002) South Saskatchewan River sub-basin contributions to international and interprovincial water-sharing agreements. Government of Alberta, Edmonton. https://www.aep.alberta.ca/water/programs.../Water-SharingAgreements-SSRB-Oct2002.pdf. Accessed 18 Mar 2018
Garrick DE, De Stefano L (2016) Adaptive capacity in federal rivers: coordination challenges and institutional responses. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 21:78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.003
Glenn J (1999) Once upon an Oldman: special interest politics and the Oldman River Dam. UBC Press, Vancouver
Halliday R, Faveri G (2007) The St. Mary and Milk rivers: the 1921 order revisited. Can Wat Res J 32:75–92. https://doi.org/10.4296/cwrj3201075
Hamilton A, Madison J, Jay J (2009) The federalist papers. Genovese MA (ed). Palgrave MacMillan, New York
Heinmiller BT (2013) Advocacy coalitions and the Alberta Water Act. Can J Pol Sci 46(3):525–547. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423913000541
Heinmiller BT (2016) Water policy reform in southern Alberta: an advocacy coalition approach. University of Toronto Press, Toronto
Hood GN (1994) Against the flow—Rafferty-Alameda and the politics of the environment. Fifth House, Saskatoon
Horbulyk T (2017) Water policy in Canada. In: Renzetti SR, Dupont DD (eds) Water policy and governance in Canada. Springer, Switzerland, pp 29–44
Hurlbert M (2016) Water governance in the prairie provinces. In: Diaz H, Hurlbert M, Warren J (eds) Vulnerability and adaptation: the Canadian prairies and South America. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, pp 217–247
Hurlbert M, Pittman J (2014) Exploring adaptive management in environmental farm programs in Saskatchewan, Canada. J of Nat Res Pol Res 6(2–3):195–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/19390459.2014.915131
Kennett S (1991) Managing interjurisdictional waters in Canada: a constitutional analysis. Canadian Institute of Resources Law, Calgary
Macdonald M (1999) The dam the drought built: a history of the South Saskatchewan river project. Canadian Plains Research Centre, Regina
Mitchner EA (1973) The development of western waters 1885–1930. Department of History, University of Alberta, Edmonton
Monahan P (2002) Constitutional law, 2nd edn. Irwin Law, Toronto
Osborne D (1990) Laboratories of democracy. Harvard Business School, Boston
Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons—the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Percy DR (2005) Responding to water scarcity in western Canada. Tex Law Rev 83(7):2091–2107
Poirier B, de Loë R (2011) Protecting aquatic ecosystems in heavily allocated river systems: the case of the Oldman River Basin, Alberta. Can Geo 55(2):243–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.2010.00322.x
Administration PFR (1982) History of irrigation in western Canada. Government of Canada, Ottawa
Prairie Provinces Water Board (2010) Master agreement on apportionment. http://www.ppwb.ca/information/109/index.html. Accessed 19 Jan 2017
Prairie Provinces Water Board (2004) Prairie provinces water board—overview. http://www.pnr-rpn.ec.gc.ca/water/fa01/fa01s01.en.html. Accessed 13 Sept 2004
Rood SB, Vandersteen JW (2010) Relaxing the principle of prior appropriation: stored water and sharing the shortage in Alberta, Canada. Wat Res Mgmt 24:1605–1620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9516-0
Saskatchewan Water Security Agency (2017) Developing an operating plan for Lake Diefenbaker. https://www.wsask.ca/Lakes-and-Rivers/Dams-and-Reservoirs/Developing-and-Operating-Plan-for-Lake-Diefenbaker. Accessed 25 Aug 2017
Saskatchewan Watershed Authority (2012) Lake Diefenbaker reservoir operations: context and objectives. https://www.wsask.ca/Lakes-and-Rivers/Dams-and-Reservoirs/Developing-and-Operating-Plan-for-Lake-Diefenbaker. Accessed 25 Aug 2017
Schmidt J (2010) The ethics of instream flows: science and policy in southern Alberta, Canada. Intl J of Env, Chem, Ecologic, Geologic and Geophysic Eng 4: 442–448. scholar.waset.org/1999.6/13718
Vogel D (1995) Trading up: consumer and environmental regulations in the global economy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Warren J (2016) The troubled state of irrigation in southwestern Saskatchewan: the effects of climate variability and government off-loading on a vulnerable community. In: Diaz H, Hurlbert M, Warren J (eds) Vulnerability and adaptation: the Canadian prairies and South America. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, pp 133–158
The author would like to thank the interviewees in this study for their valuable input and feedback. He would also like to thank Dustin Garrick and Lucia De Stefano for organizing this special issue and providing important guidance in the article’s development and the journal’s anonymous reviewers for providing critical and constructive suggestions that improved the article greatly.
About this article
Cite this article
Heinmiller, B.T. Canadian federalism and the governance of water scarcity in the South Saskatchewan River Basin. Reg Environ Change 18, 1667–1677 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1314-x
- Intergovernmental relations
- Water governance
- Water scarcity
- Policy innovation