Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 1667–1677 | Cite as

Canadian federalism and the governance of water scarcity in the South Saskatchewan River Basin

  • B. Timothy HeinmillerEmail author
Original Article


Water governance in the South Saskatchewan River Basin (SSRB), a transboundary river basin in western Canada, occurs in one of the world’s most decentralized federations. The provinces sharing the SSRB—Alberta and Saskatchewan—have primary responsibility for governing water scarcity in the basin and have done so with minimal intergovernmental coordination, oriented around an interprovincial apportionment of their shared waters, and with little involvement of the federal government. While most studies of transboundary river basin governance have focused on the importance of intergovernmental collective action, the SSRB case highlights the importance of governmental policy innovation. The decentralized nature of SSRB governance has allowed Alberta to pursue a ‘cap and trade’ policy innovation and Saskatchewan to pursue a centralized management policy innovation simultaneously, creating an unusual degree of policy divergence between two basin-sharing jurisdictions. In this way, the SSRB shows a different ‘face’ of federalism that is not as evident in most other cases, that is, the capacity for federalism to spur sub-national policy innovation in addition to intergovernmental cooperation.


Canada Federalism Intergovernmental relations Water governance Water scarcity Policy innovation 



The author would like to thank the interviewees in this study for their valuable input and feedback. He would also like to thank Dustin Garrick and Lucia De Stefano for organizing this special issue and providing important guidance in the article’s development and the journal’s anonymous reviewers for providing critical and constructive suggestions that improved the article greatly.


  1. Alberta Economic Development Authority (2008) Sustainable water management and economic development in Alberta. Government of Alberta, Edmonton. Accessed 18 Mar 2018
  2. Armstrong C, Evenden M, Nelles, HV (2009) The river returns—an environmental history of the bow. McGill-Queens University Press, Montreal.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett TP, Adam JC, Lettenmaier DP (2005) Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions. Nature 438:303–309. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beach D, Pederson RB (2013) Process-tracing methods: foundations and guidelines. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry FS, Berry WD (2014) Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In: Sabatier PA, Weible C (eds) Theories of the policy process, 3rd edn. Westview, Boulder, pp 307–359Google Scholar
  6. Bjornlund H, Nicol L, Klein K (2007) Challenges in implementing economic instruments to manage irrigation water on farms in southern Alberta. Ag Wat Man 92:131–141. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bjornlund H, Nicol L, Klein K (2009) The adoption of improved irrigation technology and management practices—a study of two irrigation districts in Alberta, Canada. Ag Wat Man 96:121–131. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandes OM, Curran D (2017) Changing currents: a case study in the evolution of water law in western Canada. In: Renzetti SR, Dupont DD (eds) Water policy and governance in Canada. Springer, Switzerland, pp 45–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Byrne J, Kienzle S, Sauchyn D (2010) Prairie water and climate change. In: Sauchyn D, Diaz H, Kulshreshtha S (eds) The new normal—Canadian prairies in a changing climate. Canadian Plains Research Centre, Regina, pp 61–79Google Scholar
  10. Cairns RD (1992) Natural resources and Canadian federalism: decentralization, recurring conflict, and resolution. Publius 22(1):55–70. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Environment Canada (2008) Section 2: annual statistics: Canada's physical environment. In: Human activity and the environment: annual statistics 2007 and 2008. Accessed 16 Nov 2016
  12. Figliuzzi S (2002) South Saskatchewan River sub-basin contributions to international and interprovincial water-sharing agreements. Government of Alberta, Edmonton. Accessed 18 Mar 2018
  13. Garrick DE, De Stefano L (2016) Adaptive capacity in federal rivers: coordination challenges and institutional responses. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 21:78–85. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glenn J (1999) Once upon an Oldman: special interest politics and the Oldman River Dam. UBC Press, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  15. Halliday R, Faveri G (2007) The St. Mary and Milk rivers: the 1921 order revisited. Can Wat Res J 32:75–92. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamilton A, Madison J, Jay J (2009) The federalist papers. Genovese MA (ed). Palgrave MacMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Heinmiller BT (2013) Advocacy coalitions and the Alberta Water Act. Can J Pol Sci 46(3):525–547. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heinmiller BT (2016) Water policy reform in southern Alberta: an advocacy coalition approach. University of Toronto Press, TorontoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hood GN (1994) Against the flow—Rafferty-Alameda and the politics of the environment. Fifth House, SaskatoonGoogle Scholar
  20. Horbulyk T (2017) Water policy in Canada. In: Renzetti SR, Dupont DD (eds) Water policy and governance in Canada. Springer, Switzerland, pp 29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hurlbert M (2016) Water governance in the prairie provinces. In: Diaz H, Hurlbert M, Warren J (eds) Vulnerability and adaptation: the Canadian prairies and South America. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, pp 217–247Google Scholar
  22. Hurlbert M, Pittman J (2014) Exploring adaptive management in environmental farm programs in Saskatchewan, Canada. J of Nat Res Pol Res 6(2–3):195–212. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kennett S (1991) Managing interjurisdictional waters in Canada: a constitutional analysis. Canadian Institute of Resources Law, CalgaryGoogle Scholar
  24. Macdonald M (1999) The dam the drought built: a history of the South Saskatchewan river project. Canadian Plains Research Centre, ReginaGoogle Scholar
  25. Mitchner EA (1973) The development of western waters 1885–1930. Department of History, University of Alberta, EdmontonGoogle Scholar
  26. Monahan P (2002) Constitutional law, 2nd edn. Irwin Law, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  27. Osborne D (1990) Laboratories of democracy. Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  28. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons—the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Percy DR (2005) Responding to water scarcity in western Canada. Tex Law Rev 83(7):2091–2107Google Scholar
  30. Poirier B, de Loë R (2011) Protecting aquatic ecosystems in heavily allocated river systems: the case of the Oldman River Basin, Alberta. Can Geo 55(2):243–261. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Administration PFR (1982) History of irrigation in western Canada. Government of Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  32. Prairie Provinces Water Board (2010) Master agreement on apportionment. Accessed 19 Jan 2017
  33. Prairie Provinces Water Board (2004) Prairie provinces water board—overview. Accessed 13 Sept 2004
  34. Rood SB, Vandersteen JW (2010) Relaxing the principle of prior appropriation: stored water and sharing the shortage in Alberta, Canada. Wat Res Mgmt 24:1605–1620. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saskatchewan Water Security Agency (2017) Developing an operating plan for Lake Diefenbaker. Accessed 25 Aug 2017
  36. Saskatchewan Watershed Authority (2012) Lake Diefenbaker reservoir operations: context and objectives. Accessed 25 Aug 2017
  37. Schmidt J (2010) The ethics of instream flows: science and policy in southern Alberta, Canada. Intl J of Env, Chem, Ecologic, Geologic and Geophysic Eng 4: 442–448.
  38. Vogel D (1995) Trading up: consumer and environmental regulations in the global economy. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  39. Warren J (2016) The troubled state of irrigation in southwestern Saskatchewan: the effects of climate variability and government off-loading on a vulnerable community. In: Diaz H, Hurlbert M, Warren J (eds) Vulnerability and adaptation: the Canadian prairies and South America. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, pp 133–158Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada

Personalised recommendations