A landscape ecology assessment of land-use change on the Great Plains-Denver (CO, USA) metropolitan edge

Abstract

For better or worse, in those parts of the world with a widespread farming, livestock rising, and urban expansion, the maintenance of species richness and ecosystem services cannot depend only upon protected natural sites. Can they rely on a network of cultural landscapes endowed with their own associated biodiversity? We analyze the effects of land-cover change on landscape ecological patterns and processes that sustain bird species richness associated to cropland-grassland landscapes in the Great Plains-Denver metropolitan edge. Our purpose is to assess the potential contribution to bird biodiversity maintenance of Great Plain’s cropland-grassland mosaics kept as farmland green belts in the edge of metropolitan areas. We present a quantitative landscape ecology assessment of land-cover changes (1930–2010) experienced in five Great Plains counties in Colorado. Several landscape metrics assess the diversity of land-cover patterns and their impact on ecological connectivity indices. These metrics are applied to historical land-cover maps and datasets drawn from aerial photos and satellite imagery. The results show that the cropland-grassland mosaics that link the metropolitan edge with the surrounding habitats sheltered in less human-disturbed areas provide a heterogeneous land matrix were a high bird species richness exists. They also suggest that keeping multifunctional farmland-grassland green belts near the edge of metropolitan areas may provide important ecosystem services, supplementing traditional conservation policies. Our maps and indicators can be used for selecting certain types of landscape patterns and priority areas on which biodiversity conservation efforts and land-use planning can concentrate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Agnoletti M (2014) Rural landscape, nature conservation and culture: some notes on research trends and management approaches from a (southern) European perspective. Landsc Urban Plan 126:66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Altieri M (1999) The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74(1-3):19–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00028-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andersson E, Lindborg R (2014) Species richness and assemblages in landscapes of different farming intensity—time to revise conservation strategies? PLoS One 2(10):e109816. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Andrén H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71(3):355–366. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bender DJ, Contreras TA, Fahrig L (1998) Habitat loss and population decline: a meta-analysis of the patch size effect. Ecology 79(2):517–533. https://doi.org/10.2307/176950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bengtsson J, Angelstam P, Elmqvist T, Emanuelsson U, Folke C, Ihse M, Moberg F, Nyström M (2003) Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes. Ambio 32(6):389–396. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-32.6.389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bock CE, Bock JH, Bennett BC (1999) Songbird abundance in grasslands at a suburban interface on the Colorado high plains. Stud Avian Biol 19:131–136

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bommarco R, Kleijn D, Potts SG (2013) Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends Ecol Evol 28(4):230–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boulinier T, Nichols JD, Hines JE, Sauer JR, Flather CH, Pollock KH (1998) Higher temporal variability of forest breeding bird communities in fragmented landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95(13):7497–7501. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.13.7497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brennan LA, Kuvlesky WP (2005) North American grassland birds: an unfolding conservation crisis? J Wildl Manag 69(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069<0001:NAGBAU>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bridgewater P, Régnier M, Cruz García R (2015) Implementing SDG 15: can large-scale public programs help deliver biodiversity conservation, restoration and management, while assisting human development? Nat Res Forum 39:214–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B, van Strien A, Scharlemann JP, Almond RE, Baillie JE, Bomhard B, Brown C, Bruno J, Carpenter KE, Carr GM, Chanson J, Chenery AM, Csirke J, Davidson NC, Dentener F, Foster M, Galli A, Galloway JN, Genovesi P, Gregory RD, Hockings M, Kapos V, Lamarque JF, Leverington F, Loh J, McGeoch MA, McRae L, Minasyan A, Hernández Morcillo M, Oldfield TE, Pauly D, Quader S, Revenga C, Sauer JR, Skolnik B, Spear D, Stanwell-Smith D, Stuart SN, Symes A, Tierney M, Tyrrell TD, Vié JC, Watson R (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328(5982):1164–1168. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Christian JM, Wilson SD (1999) Long-term ecosystem impacts of an introduced grass in the northern Great Plains. Ecology 80(7):2397–2407. https://doi.org/10.2307/176919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cronon W (1992) A place for stories: nature, history, and narrative. J Am Hist 78(4):1347–1376. https://doi.org/10.2307/2079346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cronon W (1996) The trouble with wilderness: or, getting back to the wrong nature. Environ Hist 1(1):7–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/3985059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cunfer G (2005) On the Great Plains: agriculture and environment. Texas A & M University Press, College Station, 292 pp

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cunfer G, Krausmann F (2009) Sustaining soil fertility: agricultural practice in the old and new worlds. Glob Environ 2(4):8–47. https://doi.org/10.3197/ge.2009.020402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Danbom DB (1995) Born in the country: a history of rural America. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 306 pp

    Google Scholar 

  19. Derner JD, Lauenroth WK, Stapp P, Augustine DJ (2009) Livestock as ecosystem engineers for grassland bird habitat in the western Great Plains of North America. Rangel Ecol Manag 62(2):111–118. https://doi.org/10.2111/08-008.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dodds WK, Gido K, Whiles MR, Fritz KM, Matthews WJ (2004) Life on the edge: the ecology of Great Plains prairie streams. Bioscience 54(3):205–216. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Drummond MA, Auch RF, Karstensen KA, Sayler KL, Taylor JL, Loveland TR (2012) Land change variability and human–environment dynamics in the United States Great Plains. Land Use Policy 29(3):710–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dupras J, Marull J, Parcerisas L, Coll F, Gonzalez A, Tello E (2016) The impacts of urban sprawl on ecological connectivity in the Montreal Metropolitan Region. Environ Sci Policy 58:61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Euliss NH, Smith LM, Liu S, Feng M, Mushet DM, Auch RF, Loveland TR (2010) The need for simultaneous evaluation of ecosystem services and land use change. Environ Sci Technol 44(20):7761–7763. https://doi.org/10.1021/es102761c

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fenn EA (2014) Encounters at the heart of the world: a history of the Mandan people. Hill & Wang, New York 456 pp

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 216(3):265–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00287.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fischer J, Brosi B, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Goldman R, Goldstein J, Lindenmayer DB, Manning AD, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ranganathan J, Tallis H (2008) Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming? Front Ecol Environ 6(7):380–385. https://doi.org/10.1890/070019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fischer-Kowalski M (1998) Society’s metabolism. The intellectual history of materials flow analysis, part I, 1860-1970. J Ind Ecol 2(1):61–136. https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.1998.2.1.61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fleischner TL (1994) Ecological costs of livestock grazing in western North America. Conserv Biol 8(3):629–644. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08030629.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics. The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  30. Freemark KE, Boutin C, Keedy CJ (2003) Importance of farmland habitats for conservation of plant species. Conserv Biol 16(2):399–412. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00387.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Freese CH, Fuhlendorf SD, Kunkel K (2014) A management framework for the transition from livestock production toward biodiversity conservation on Great Plains Rangelands. Ecol Restor 32(4):358–368. https://doi.org/10.3368/er.32.4.358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fuhlendorf SD, Harrell WC, Engle DM, Hamilton RG, Davis CA, Leslie DM (2006) Should heterogeneity be the basis for conservation? Grassland and bird response to fire and grazing. Ecol Appl 16(5):1706–1716. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1706:SHBTBF]2.0.CO;2

  33. Gilbert-Norton L, Wilson R, Stevens JR, Beard KH (2010) A meta-analytic review of corridor effectiveness. Conserv Biol 24(3):660–668. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01450.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gliessman SR (ed) (1990) Agroecology: researching the ecological basis for sustainable agriculture. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3252-0

    Google Scholar 

  35. Green TL, Kronenberg J, Andersson E, Elmqvist T, Gómez-Baggethun E (2016) Insurance value of green infrastructure in and around cities. Ecosystems 19(6):1051–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-9986-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gutmann MP (2005) Great Plains population and environment data. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hamer TL, Flather CH, Noon BR (2006) Factors associated with grassland bird species richness: the relative roles of grassland area, landscape structure, and prey. Landsc Ecol 21(4):569–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-2167-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hartman MD, Merchant ER, Parton WJ, Gutmann MP, Lutz SM, Williams SA (2011) Impact of historical land use changes in the U.S. Great Plains, 1883 to 2003. Ecol Appl 21(4):1105–1119. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-0036.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Herzog F, Franklin J (2016) State-of-the-art practices in farmland biodiversity monitoring for North America and Europe. Ambio 45(8):857–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0799-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hurt RD (1987) Indian Agriculture in America. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence 290 pp

    Google Scholar 

  41. Isenberg AC (2000) The destruction of the bison: an environmental history, 1750-1920. Cambridge University Press, New York. 206 pp. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511549861

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jackson LE, Pascual U, Hodgkin T (2007) Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 121(3):196–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Jaeger JAG (2000) Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation. Landsc Ecol 15(2):115–130. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008129329289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Jones KB, Slonecker ET, Nash MS, Neale AC, Wade TG, Hamann S (2010) Riparian habitat changes across the continental United States (1972–2003) and potential implications for sustaining ecosystem services. Landsc Ecol 25(8):1261–1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9510-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Joshi O, Becerra TA, Engle DM, Fuhlendorf SD, Elmore RD (2017) Factors affecting public preferences for grassland landscape heterogeneity in the Great Plains. Environ Manag 60(5):922–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0921-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kaule G (1997) Principles for mitigation of habitat fragmentation. In: Proceedings of the international conference on habitat fragmentation, infrastructures and the roles of ecological engineering. Maastricht and The Hague, The Netherlands, September 1995, pp 17–21

  47. Kleijn D, Kohler F, Báldi A, Batáry P, Concepción ED, Clough Y, Díaz M, Gabriel D, Holzschuh A, Knop E, Kovács A, Marshall EJP, Tscharntke T, Verhulst J (2009) On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land-use intensity in Europe. Proc R Soc B 276(1658):903–909. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Knopf FL, Samson FB (1997) Conservation of grassland vertebrates. In: Knopf FL, Samson FB (eds) Ecology and conservation of great plains vertebrates. Ecological studies (analysis and synthesis), vol 125. Springer, New York

  49. Li B-L (2000) Why is the holistic approach becoming so important in landscape ecology? Landsc Urban Plan 50(1-3):27–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00078-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J (2007) Tackling the habitat fragmentation panchreston. TREE 22(3):127–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lindsay KE, Kirk DA, Bergin TM, Best LB, Sifneos JC, Smith J (2013) Farmland heterogeneity benefits birds in American Mid-west watersheds. Am Midl Nat 170(1):121–143. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-170.1.121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Loreau M, Mouquet N, Gonzalez A (2010) Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(22):12765–12770. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2235465100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Lovell ST, Taylor JR (2013) Supplying urban ecosystem services through multifunctional green infrastructure in the United States. Landsc Ecol 28(8):1447–1463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9912-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Marull J, Mallarach JM (2005) A new GIS methodology for assessing and predicting landscape and ecological connectivity: applications to the metropolitan area of Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain). Landsc Urban Plan 71(2-4):243–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Marull J, Pino J, Mallarach JM, Cordobilla MJ (2007) A land suitability index for strategic environmental assessment in metropolitan areas. Landsc Urban Plan 81(3):200–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Marull J, Font C, Tello E, Fullana N, Domene E, Pons M, Galán E (2016) Towards an energy–landscape integrated analysis? Exploring the links between socio-metabolic disturbance and landscape ecology performance (Mallorca, Spain, 1956–2011). Landsc Ecol 31:317–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0245-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Matson PA, Parton WJ, Power AG, Swift MJ (1997) Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277(5325):504–509. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Maxwell SK, Sylvester KM (2012) Identification of ever and never cropped land (1984-2010) using Landsat and Maximum NDVI image composites: Southwestern Kansas case study. Remote Sens Environ 121:186–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. McGinnies WJ, Shantz HL, McGinnies WG (1991) Changes in vegetation and land use in eastern Colorado: a photographic study, 1904 to 1986. Agricultural Research Service, ARS-85. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  60. Millennial Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  61. Miller B, Reading R, Hoogland J, Clark T, Ceballos G, List R, Forrest S, Hanbury L, Manzano P, Pacheco J, Uresk D (2000) The role of prairie dogs as a keystone species: response to Stapp. Conserv Biol 14(1):318–321. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99201.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Opdam P, Steingröver E, van Rooij S (2006) Ecological networks. A spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 75:322–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Opie J (1993) Ogallala: water for a dry land. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, 412 pp

    Google Scholar 

  64. Parton WJ, Gutmann MP, Merchant ER, Hartman MD, Adler PR, McNeal FM, Lutz SM (2015) Measuring and mitigating agricultural greenhouse gas production in the US Great Plains, 1870-2000. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(34):E4681–E4E88. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416499112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Phalan B, Onial M, Balmford A, Green RE (2011) Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared. Science 333(6047):1289–1291. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1208742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Pino J, Marull J (2012) Ecological networks: are they enough for connectivity conservation? A case study in the Barcelona Metropolitan Region (NE Spain). Land Use Policy 29(3):684–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Pyne SJ (2001) Fire: a brief history. University of Washington Press, Seattle 204 pp

    Google Scholar 

  68. Rosenberg NJ, Smith SJ (2009) A sustainable biomass industry for the North American Great Plains. Environ Sustain 1(2):121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2009.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Rouse DC, Bunster-Ossa IF (2013) Green infrastructure: a landscape approach. American Planning Association, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  70. Samson FB, Knopf FL, Ostlie WR (2004) Great Plains ecosystems: past, present, and future. Wildl Soc Bull 32(1):6–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/3784538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Sanderson MA, Archer D, Hendrickson J, Kronberg S, Liebig M, Nichols K, Schmer M, Tanaka D, Aguilar J (2013) Diversification and ecosystem services for conservation agriculture: outcomes from pastures and integrated crop–livestock systems. Renewable Agric Food Syst 28(2):129–144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170512000312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Sauer JR, Hines JE, Fallon J (2008) The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966–2007. Version 5.15. 2008. USGS Patuxent wildlife research center, Laurel

    Google Scholar 

  73. Schneider M, McMichael P (2010) Deepening, and repairing, the metabolic rift. J Peasant Stud 37(3):461–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2010.494371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Schröter D, Cramer W, Leemans R, Prentice IC, Araújo MB, Arnell NW, Bondeau A, Bugmann H, Carter TR, Gracia CA, de la Vega-Leinert AC, Erhard M, Ewert F, Glendining M, House JI, Kankaanpää S, Klein RJ, Lavorel S, Lindner M, Metzger MJ, Meyer J, Mitchell TD, Reginster I, Rounsevell M, Sabaté S, Sitch S, Smith B, Smith J, Smith P, Sykes MT, Thonicke K, Thuiller W, Tuck G, Zaehle S, Zierl B (2005) Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science 310(5752):1333–1337. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1115233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423–623–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Swift MJ, Izac AMN, van Noordwijk M (2004) Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes—are we asking the right questions? Agric Ecosyst Environ 104(1):113–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Sylvester KM, Rupley ESA (2012) Revising the dust bowl: high above the Kansas grasslands. Environ Hist 17(3):603–633. https://doi.org/10.1093/envhis/ems047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Sylvester KM, Brown DG, Deane GD, Kornak RN (2013) Land transitions in the American plains: multilevel modeling of drivers of grassland conversion (1956-2006). Agric Ecosyst Environ 168:7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Sylvester KM, Gutmann MP, Brown DG (2016) At the margins: agriculture, subsidies and the shifting fate of North America’s native grassland. Popul Environ 37(3):362–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-015-0242-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Tilman D (2002) The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity. A search for general principles. Ecology 80(5):1455–1474. https://doi.org/10.2307/176540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Toombs TP, Derner JD, Augustine DJ, Krueger B, Gallagher (2010) Managing for biodiversity and livestock. A scale-dependent approach for promoting vegetation heterogeneity in western Great Plains grasslands. Rangelands 32(3):10–15. https://doi.org/10.2111/RANGELANDS-D-10-00006.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Tress B, Tress G, Décamps H, d’Hauteserre AM (2001) Bridging human and natural sciences in landscape research. Landsc Urban Plan 57(3-4):137–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00199-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Carsten Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8(8):857–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Wanger TC, Jackson L, Motzke I, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Whitbread A (2012) Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biol Conserv 151(1):53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Turner BL, Lambin EF, Reenberg A (2007) The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(52):20666–20671. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704119104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. van Zanten BT, Verburg PH, Espinosa M, Gomez-y-Paloma S, Galimberti G, Kantelhardt J, Kapfer M, Lefebvre M, Manrique R, Annette P, Raggi M, Schaller L, Targetti S, Zasada I, Viaggi D (2014) European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 34(2):309–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0183-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Verburg PH, van de Steeg J, Veldkamp A, Willemen L (2009) From land cover change to land function dynamics: a major challenge to improve land characterization. J Environ Manag 90(3):1327–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Wrbka T, Erb K-H, Schulz NB, Peterseil J, Hahn C, Haberl H (2004) Linking pattern and process in cultural landscapes. An empirical study based on spatially explicit indicators. Land Use Policy 21(3):289–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Wright CK, Wimberly MC (2013) Recent land use change in the Western Corn Belt threatens grasslands and wetlands. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(10):4134–4139. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1215404110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Wu J (2000) Slippage Effects of the Conservation Reserve Program. Am J Agric Econ 82:979–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0002-9092.2005.00716.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thanks the contributions of Myron Gutmann, Susan Leonard, Dan Brown, Melinda Smith, Mike Antolin, Dennis Ojima and Michael Brydge, and the technical support of Francesc Coll, Manel Pons and Marta Bayona. This work has been supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Partnership Grant 895-2011-1020, entitled “Sustainable Farm Systems: Long-Term Socio-Ecological Metabolism in Western Agriculture”.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan Marull.

Additional information

Editor: Kathleen Hermans

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 83.6 kb)

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 8
figure8

Land-cover sample cells distributed in five Colorado counties (Weld, Logan, Morgan, Adams and Arapahoe), and bird sample coincident routes (1967–2007) from the North American Breeding Bird Survey

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marull, J., Cunfer, G., Sylvester, K. et al. A landscape ecology assessment of land-use change on the Great Plains-Denver (CO, USA) metropolitan edge. Reg Environ Change 18, 1765–1782 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1284-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Agro-ecosystems
  • Land-cover/land-use change
  • Ecological connectivity
  • Landscape heterogeneity
  • Bird species richness
  • Great Plains