Regionalized Shared Socioeconomic Pathways: narratives and spatial population projections for the Mediterranean coastal zone

Abstract

Existing narratives and population projections of the global-scale Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) do not capture regional differences in socioeconomic development in the Mediterranean region. In this study, we regionalize the global SSPs to account for differences in coastal population development between northern, eastern, and southern countries of the region. First, we develop coastal SSP narratives that include region-specific elements and differentiate between geographical regions. Based on these narratives, we derive coastal population growth rates that vary for each SSP as well as between coastal, inland, rural, and urban areas. We apply these growth assumptions to observed population growth patterns in a spatially explicit manner. The Mediterranean coastal SSPs thereby reflect socioeconomic development patterns across countries as well as coastal versus inland development within countries. Our results show that coastal population in the Mediterranean increases across SSPs 2–5 by 3% to 130% until 2100 except for SSP1, where population declines by almost 20% compared to 2010. We observe considerable differences between geographical regions and countries. In the Mediterranean north, coastal population declines in SSP1, SSP3, and SSP4 and experiences the highest increase of more than 100% in SSP5. In southern and eastern Mediterranean countries, the highest increase in coastal population takes place in SSP3 and amounts to almost 180% by 2100. The regionalized SSP narratives and population projections are intended for assessing future exposure, vulnerability, and impacts of population to coastal hazards and sea-level rise but can also be of use for a wider range of Impact, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (IAV) studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. 1.

    See SM7 for the LECZ population per country.

References

  1. Absar SM, Preston BL (2015) Extending the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways for sub-national impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability studies. Glob Environ Chang 33:83–96. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balk D, Montgomery MR, McGranahan G, Kim D, Mara V, Todd M, Buettner T, Dorélien AD (2009) Mapping urban settlements and the risks of climate change in Africa, Asia and South America. In: Guzmán JM (ed) Population dynamics and climate change. UNFPA; IIED, New York, pp 80–103

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benoit G, Comeau A (2005) A sustainable future for the Mediterranean. The Blue Plan’s environment and development outlook. Edited by Guillaume Benoit and Aline Comeau; preface by Lucien Chabason. Earthscan, London

  4. Birkmann J, Cutter SL, Rothman DS, Welle T, Garschagen M, van Ruijven B, O’Neill B, Preston BL, Kienberger S, Cardona OD, Siagian T, Hidayati D, Setiadi N, Binder CR, Hughes B, Pulwarty R (2015) Scenarios for vulnerability. Opportunities and constraints in the context of climate change and disaster risk. Clim Chang 133(1):53–68. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0913-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blue Plan (2008) The Blue Plan’s sustainable development outlook for the Mediterranean. http://www.euromedina.net/bibliotheque_fichiers/Doc_UpM_PlanBleu_EN.pdf. Accessed 07 Mar 2017

  6. Center for International Earth Science Information Network—Columbia University (CIESIN), International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), The World Bank, Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT) (2011) Global Rural-Urban Mapping Project, Version 1 (GRUMPv1): Urban Extents Grid. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), Palisades, NY. http://dx.doi.org/10.7927/H4GH9FVG

  7. Center for International Earth Science Information Network—Columbia University (CIESIN) (2016) Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4): Population Count Adjusted to Match 2015 Revision of UN WPP Country Totals. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), Palisades, NY. http://dx.doi.org/10.7927/H4SF2T42

  8. Crespo Cuaresma J (2017) Income projections for climate change research. A framework based on human capital dynamics. Glob Environ Chang 42:226–236. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.012

  9. Dellink R, Chateau J, Lanzi E, Magné B (2017) Long-term economic growth projections in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Glob Environ Chang 42:200–214. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ebi KL, Hallegatte S, Kram T, Arnell NW, Carter TR, Edmonds J, Kriegler E, Mathur R, O’Neill BC, Riahi K, Winkler H, van Vuuren DP, Zwickel T (2014) A new scenario framework for climate change research: background, process, and future directions. Clim Chang 122(3):363–372. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0912-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. European Environment Agency (EEA) (2006) The changing faces of Europe’s coastal areas. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eea_report_2006_6. Accessed 07 Mar 2017

  12. European Environment Agency (EEA) (2014) Horizon 2020 Mediterranean report. Toward shared environmental information systems—EEA-UNEP/MAP joint report. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/horizon-2020-mediterranean-report. Accessed 07 Mar 2017

  13. Farr TG, Rosen PA, Caro E, Crippen R, Duren R, Hensley S, Kobrick M, Paller M, Rodriguez E, Roth L, Seal D, Shaffer S, Shimada J, Umland J, Werner M, Oskin M, Burbank D, Alsdorf D (2007) The shuttle radar topography mission. Rev. Geophys. 45(2). doi:10.1029/2005RG000183

  14. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2014) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3720e.pdf. Accessed 07 Mar 2017

  15. Foresight (2011) Migration and global environmental change: future challenges and opportunities. Final project report. The Government Office for Science, London

  16. Garschagen M, Romero-Lankao P (2015) Exploring the relationships between urbanization trends and climate change vulnerability. Clim Chang 133(1):37–52. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0812-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Global administrative areas (GADM) (2015). Version 2.8. www.gadm.org. Accessed 07 Mar 2017

  18. Hallegatte S, Przyluski V, Vogt-Schilb A (2011) Building world narratives for climate change impact, adaptation and vulnerability analyses. Nat Clim Chang 1(3):151–155. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hallegatte S, Green C, Nicholls RJ, Corfee-Morlot J (2013) Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nat Clim Chang 3(9):802–806. doi:10.1038/nclimate1979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hanson S, Nicholls R, Ranger N, Hallegatte S, Corfee-Morlot J, Herweijer C, Chateau J (2011) A global ranking of port cities with high exposure to climate extremes. Clim Chang 104(1):89–111. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9977-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hunter LM, O’Neill BC (2014) Enhancing engagement between the population, environment, and climate research communities: the shared socio-economic pathway process. Popul Environ 35(3):231–242. doi:10.1007/s11111-014-0202-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) (2016) SSP database. Version 1.1. https://tntcat.iiasa.ac.at/SspDb. Accessed 07 Mar 2017

  23. Jarvis A, Reuter HI, Nelson A, Guevara E (2008) Hole-filled SRTM for the globe version 4. Available from the CGIAR-CSI SRTM 90m Database. http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org. Accessed 01 Jun 2017

  24. Jiang L (2014) Internal consistency of demographic assumptions in the shared socioeconomic pathways. Popul Environ 35:261–285. doi:10.1007/s11111-014-0206-3

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jiang L, O’Neill BC (2017) Global urbanization projections for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Glob Environ Chang 42:193–199. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jones B, O’Neill BC (2016) Spatially explicit global population scenarios consistent with the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Environ Res Lett 11(8):84003. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/8/084003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. KC S, Lutz W (2017) The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways. Population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100. Glob Environ Chang 42:181–192. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.004

  28. Kok K, Rothman DS, Patel M (2006) Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective. Part I. European and Mediterranean scenario development. Futures 38(3):261–284. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2005.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kok K, Christensen JH, Madsen MS, Pedde S, Gramberger M, Jäger J, Carter T (2015) Evaluation of existing climate and socio-economic scenarios including a detailed descriptions of the final selection. Deliverable D2.1. http://impressions-project.eu/documents/2020_9_0. Accessed 07 Mar 2017

  30. Koutroulis AG, Grillakis MG, Daliakopoulos IN, Tsanis IK, Jacob D (2016) Cross sectoral impacts on water availability at +2°C and +3°C for east Mediterranean island states. The case of Crete. J Hydrol 532:16–28. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kriegler E, O’Neill BC, Hallegatte S, Kram T, Lempert RJ, Moss RH, Wilbanks T (2012) The need for and use of socio-economic scenarios for climate change analysis. A new approach based on shared socio-economic pathways. Glob Environ Chang 22(4):807–822. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kriegler E, Edmonds J, Hallegatte S, Ebi KL, Kram T, Riahi K, Winkler H, van Vuuren DP (2014) A new scenario framework for climate change research. The concept of shared climate policy assumptions. Clim Chang 122(3):401–414. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0971-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kummu M, de Moel H, Salvucci G, Viviroli D, Ward PJ, Varis O (2016) Over the hills and further away from coast. Global geospatial patterns of human and environment over the 20th–21st centuries. Environ Res Lett 11(3):34010. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Leimbach M, Kriegler E, Roming N, Schwanitz J (2017) Future growth patterns of world regions—A GDP scenario approach. Glob Environ Chang 42:215–225. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.005

  35. McGranahan G, Balk D, Anderson B (2007) The rising tide. Assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environ Urban 19(1):17–37. doi:10.1177/0956247807076960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Merkens J-L, Reimann L, Hinkel J, Vafeidis A (2016) Gridded population projections for the coastal zone under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Glob Planet Chang 145:57–66. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbard KA, Manning MR, Rose SK, van Vuuren DP, Carter TR, Emori S, Kainuma M, Kram T, Meehl GA, Mitchell JFB, Nakicenovic N, Riahi K, Smith SJ, Stouffer RJ, Thomson AM, Weyant JP, Wilbanks TJ (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463(7282):747–756. doi:10.1038/nature08823

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Neumann B, Vafeidis AT, Zimmermann J, Nicholls RJ (2015) Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding—a global assessment. PLoS One 10(3):e0118571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Neverre N, Dumas P (2015) Projecting and valuing domestic water use at regional scale. A generic method applied to the Mediterranean at the 2060 horizon. Water Resour Econ 11:33–46. doi:10.1016/j.wre.2015.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nicholls RJ (2004) Coastal flooding and wetland loss in the 21st century. Changes under the SRES climate and socio-economic scenarios. Glob Environ Chang 14(1):69–86. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nicholls RJ, Wong PP, Burkett V, Woodroffe CD, Hay J (2008) Climate change and coastal vulnerability assessment. Scenarios for integrated assessment. Sustain Sci 3(1):89–102. doi:10.1007/s11625-008-0050-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. O’Neill BC, Kriegler E, Riahi K, Ebi KL, Hallegatte S, Carter TR, Mathur R, van Vuuren DP (2014) A new scenario framework for climate change research. The concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Clim Chang 122(3):387–400. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. O’Neill BC, Kriegler E, Ebi KL, Kemp-Benedict E, Riahi K, Rothman DS, van Ruijven BJ, van Vuuren DP, Birkmann J, Kok K, Levy M, Solecki W (2017) The roads ahead. Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. Glob Environ Chang 42:169–180. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Özkaynak B, Rodríguez-Labajos B (2010) Multi-scale interaction in local scenario-building. A methodological framework. Futures 42(9):995–1006. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2010.08.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Piante C, Ody D (2015) Blue growth in the Mediterranean Sea: the challenge of good environmental status. http://www.medtrends.org/reports/MEDTRENDS_REGIONAL.pdf. Accessed 07 Mar 2017

  46. Riahi K, van Vuuren DP, Kriegler E, Edmonds J, O’Neill BC, Fujimori S, Bauer N, Calvin K, Dellink R, Fricko O, Lutz W, Popp A, Crespo Cuaresma J, KC S, Leimbach M, Jiang L, Kram T, Rao S, Emmerling J, Ebi K, Hasegawa T, Havlik P, Humpenöder F, Da Silva LA, Smith S, Stehfest E, Bosetti V, Eom J, Gernaat D, Masui T, Rogelj J, Strefler J, Drouet L, Krey V, Luderer G, Harmsen M, Takahashi K, Baumstark L, Doelman JC, Kainuma M, Klimont Z, Marangoni G, Lotze-Campen H, Obersteiner M, Tabeau A, Tavoni M (2017) The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications. An overview. Glob Environ Chang 42:153–168. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009

  47. Satta A, Venturini S, Puddu M, Firth J, Lafitte A (2015) Strengthening the knowledge base on regional climate variability and change: application of a multi-scale coastal risk index at regional and local scale in the Mediterranean. http://planbleu.org/sites/default/files/publications/multi-scale_coastal_risk_index.pdf. Accessed 07 Mar 2017

  48. Schweizer VJ, Kurniawan JH (2016) Systematically linking qualitative elements of scenarios across levels, scales, and sectors. Environ Model Softw 79:322–333. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.12.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Small C, Nicholls RJ (2003) A global analysis of human settlement in coastal zones. J Coast Res 19(3):584–599

    Google Scholar 

  50. van Ruijven BJ, Levy MA, Agrawal A, Biermann F, Birkmann J, Carter TR, Ebi KL, Garschagen M, Jones B, Jones R, Kemp-Benedict E, Kok M, Kok K, Lemos MC, Lucas PL, Orlove B, Pachauri S, Parris TM, Patwardhan A, Petersen A, Preston BL, Ribot J, Rothman DS, Schweizer VJ (2014) Enhancing the relevance of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways for climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability research. Clim Chang 122(3):481–494. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0931-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. van Vuuren DP, Smith SJ, Riahi K (2010) Downscaling socioeconomic and emissions scenarios for global environmental change research. A review. WIREs Clim Change 1(3):393–404. doi:10.1002/wcc.50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, Riahi K, Thomson A, Hibbard K, Hurtt GC, Kram T, Krey V, Lamarque J-F, Masui T, Meinshausen M, Nakicenovic N, Smith SJ, Rose SK (2011) The representative concentration pathways. An overview. Clim Chang 109(1–2):5–31. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wessel P, Smith WHF (1996) A global, self-consistent, hierarchical, high-resolution shoreline database. J Geophys Res 101(B4):8741–8743. doi:10.1029/96JB00104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wong PP, Losada IJ, Gattuso J-P, Hinkel J, Khattabi A, McInnes KL, Saito Y, Sallenger A (2014) Coastal systems and low-lying areas. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp 361–409

  55. World Economic Forum (WEF) (2011) Scenarios for the Mediterranean region. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Scenario_MediterraneanRegion_Report_2011.pdf. Accessed 07 Mar 2017

Download references

Acknowledgments

JLM and ATV were supported by the European research project RISES-AM (grant agreement no. 603396). We would like to thank the reviewers and editors for their valuable comments.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lena Reimann.

Additional information

Editor: Christopher Reyer

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 582 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reimann, L., Merkens, JL. & Vafeidis, A.T. Regionalized Shared Socioeconomic Pathways: narratives and spatial population projections for the Mediterranean coastal zone. Reg Environ Change 18, 235–245 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1189-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs)
  • Coastal zone
  • Narratives
  • Spatial population projections
  • Mediterranean
  • Scenarios