Identifying pathways to visions of future land use in Europe
- 558 Downloads
Plausible scenarios of future land use derived from model projections may differ substantially from what is actually desired by society, and identifying such mismatches is important for identifying policies to resolve them. This paper presents an approach to link explorative projections of future land use for the European Union to normative visions of desired land-use futures. We used the results of 24 scenario projections obtained from seven linked simulation models to explore uncertainty in future land-use developments. Land-use projections were linked to statements made by stakeholders for three normative visions of desired, future land use. The visions differed in the scale of multifunctionality of land use: at European (Best Land in Europe), regional (Regional Connected) or local (Local Multifunctional) level. To identify pathways to these visions, we analysed in which cases projected land-use changes matched with the land-use changes desired in the visions. We identified five pathways to the vision Regional Connected, two pathways to the vision Best Land in Europe, but no pathway to the vision Local Multifunctional. Our results suggest that policies have the ability to change the development of land use such that it is more in line with land-use futures desired by society. We believe our approach represents an interesting avenue for foresight studies on land use, as it combines the credibility from explorative scenarios with legitimacy and saliency of normative visions.
KeywordsExplorative scenarios Land use Normative visions Pathways
The authors thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on the manuscript. The authors also thank Sergey Zudin, Elena Zudina and Simo Varis from the European Forest Institute for their help with data processing, Bep Schrammeijer from VU University for scenario simulations, as well as all partners of the VOLANTE Project for their comments on the approach. This work has been funded through the EU 7th framework project VOLANTE (Project Number 265104) and is part of the strategic research program KBIV “Sustainable spatial development of ecosystems, landscapes, seas and regions”, funded by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs (in the part of work carried out by Wageningen University & Research). Opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors only.
- Castella J-C, Pheng Kam S, Dinh Quang D, Verburg PH, Thai Hoanh C (2007) Combining top-down and bottom-up modelling approaches of land use/cover change to support public policies: application to sustainable management of natural resources in northern Vietnam. Land Use Policy 24(3):531–545. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- EUROSTAT (2014) Population on 1 January by broad age group, sex and NUTS 3 region. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do. Accessed 2 June 2015
- Lotze-Campen K, Popp A, Verburg P, Lindner M, Verkerk H et al (2013) Description of the translation of sector specific land cover and land management information. VOLANTE deliverable report 7.3Google Scholar
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends assessment, vol 1. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Palacios-Agundez I, Onaindia M, Potschin M, Tratalos JA, Madariaga I, Haines-Young R (2015) Relevance for decision making of spatially explicit, participatory scenarios for ecosystem services in an area of a high current demand. Environ Sci Policy 54:199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pérez-Soba M, Paterson J, Metzger M (2015) Visions of future land use in Europe. Stakeholder visions for 2040. Alterra Wageningen UR, Wageningen. http://www.volante-project.eu/docs/visions.pdf
- Smith P, Bustamante M, Ahammad H, Clark H, Dong H et al (2014) Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S et al. (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
- United Nations (2015). World population prospects: the 2015 revision, key findings and advance tables. Working paper No. ESA/P/WP.241Google Scholar
- van der Heijden K (2005) Scenarios: the art of strategic conversation, 2nd edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- van der Pluijm F, Miller K, Cuginotti A (2010) Backcasting using principles for implementing cradle-to-cradle. In: Sarkis J, Cordeiro JJ, Vazquez Brust D (eds) Facilitating sustainable innovation through collaboration. Springer, Berlin, pp 203–216. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-3159-4_11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Verburg P, Lotze-Campen K, Popp A, Lindner M, Verkerk H et al (2013) Report documenting the assessment results for the scenarios stored in the database. VOLANTE deliverable report 11.1Google Scholar