Abstract
Contemporary water management practices worldwide are informed by two leading paradigms: integrated water resources management and adaptive management. While previous scholarship has already studied the two paradigms, as well as their central principles, in isolation, there are few attempts only to theorise their interaction and to explore empirically their parallel implementation and coexistence. This article contributes to this emerging literature. Its ambition is to review and complement current frameworks conceptualising the impact of integrated water resources management on adaptive capacity. To this end, the article analyses the involvement of non-state actors in UK water and flood risk management, specifically in England and Wales. This is an exciting case to study: for many decades, environmental management in England and Wales had a reputation for being a technocratic exercise. In the past 15 years, however, environmental authorities undertook major efforts to lay the foundations for enhanced collaboration and stakeholder participation, amongst others encouraged by two European Union initiatives reflecting integrated and adaptive management principles: the Water Framework Directive and the Floods Directive. The empirical evidence suggests a spurious link only between the two paradigms. This contradicts conventional wisdom which, so I argue, tends to oversimplify a complex relationship. I introduce three theory-informed arguments—relating to conceptual diversity, path dependency, and the nature of the dependent variable—to address these shortcomings and to contribute to theory building.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plan 35:216–224
Benson D, Jordan A (2011) What have we learned from policy transfer research? Dolowitz and Marsh revisited. Political Studies Review 9:366–378. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00240.x
Benson D, Fritsch O, Cook H, Schmid M (2014) Evaluating participation in WFD river basin management in England and Wales: processes, communities, outputs and outcomes. Land Use Policy 38:213–222. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.11.004
Bevir M, O’Brien D (2001) New Labour and the public sector in Britain. Public Adm Rev 61:535–547. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00126
Blackstock KL, Dunglinson J, Dilley R, Matthews K, Futter M, Marshall K (2009) Climate proofing Scottish river basin planning—a future challenge. Environmental Policy and Governance 19:374–387. doi:10.1002/eet.522
Cabinet Office (2008) Learning lessons from the 2007 floods. London
Cook H, Benson D, Inman A, Jordan A, Smith L (2012) Catchment management groups in England and Wales: extent, roles and influences. Water and Environment Journal 26:47–55. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.2011.00262.x
Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (2006) River basin planning guidance. London
Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (2013) Catchment based approach: improving the quality of our water environment. London
Earle JR, Blacklocke S, Bruen M, Almeida G, Keating D (2011) Integrating the implementation of the European Union Water Framework Directive and Floods Directive in Ireland. Water Sci Technol 64:2044–2051. doi:10.2166/wst.2011.669
Engle NL (2011) Adaptive capacity and its assessment. Glob Environ Change 21:647–656. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.019
Engle NL, Johns OR, Lemos MC, Nelson DR (2011) Integrated and adaptive management of water resources: tensions, legacies, and the next best thing. Ecol Soc 16(1):19
European Commission (2003) Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance document no. 8. Public participation in relation to the Water Framework Directive. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
European Commission (2009) Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance document no. 24. River basin management in a changing climate. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
Fischhendler I (2008) Institutional conditions for IWRM: the Israeli case. Ground Water 46:91–102. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00383.x
Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
Fritsch O, Benson D (2013) Integrating the principles of integrated water resources management? River basin planning in England and Wales. Int J Water Gov 1:265–284. doi:10.7564/13-IJWG7
Gain AK, Rouillard JJ, Benson D (2013) Can integrated water resources management increase adaptive capacity to climate change adaptation? A critical review. J Water Resourc Prot 5:11–20. doi:10.4236/jwarp.2013.54A003
Gerring J (2007) Case study research: principles and practices. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Giordano M, Shah T (2014) From IWRM back to integrated water resources management. Int J Water Resour Dev 30:364–376. doi:10.1080/07900627.2013.851521
Global Water Partnership (2011) What is IWRM? Stockholm
Grigg NS (2014) Integrated water resources management: unified process or debate forum? Int J Water Resour Dev 30:409–422. doi:10.1080/07900627.2013.877338
House of Commons (2000) Select committee on environment, transport and regional affairs, 6th report. London
House of Commons (2003) Select committee on environment, food and rural affairs, 4th report. The Water Framework Directive
Howarth W (2009) Aspirations and realities under the Water Framework Directive: proceduralisation, participation and practicalities. J Environ Law 21:391–417. doi:10.1093/jel/eqp019
Johnson CL, Priest SJ (2008) Flood risk management in England: a changing landscape of risk responsibility? Int J Water Resour Dev 24:513–525. doi:10.1080/07900620801923146
Jordan G, Richardson J (1982) The British policy style or the logic of negotiation? In: Richardson J (ed) Policy styles in Western Europe. George Allen & Unwin, London, pp 121–138
Kay A (2005) A critique of the use of path dependency in policy studies. Public Adm 83:553–571. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00462.x
Kidd S, Shaw D (2007) Integrated water resource management and institutional integration: realising the potential of spatial planning in England. Geogr J 173:312–329. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4959.2007.00260.x
Larsen SV (2011) Risk as a challenge in practice: investigating climate change in water management. Reg Environ Change 11:111–122. doi:10.1007/s10113-010-0123-7
Ludwig F, van Slobbe E, Cofino W (2014) Climate change adaptation and integrated water resource management in the water sector. J Hydrol 518 Part B:235–242. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.010
Mahoney J (2000) Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory Soc 29:507–548. doi:10.1023/A:1007113830879
Maloney WA, Richardson J (1994) Water policy-making in England and Wales: policy communities under pressure? Environ Polit 4:110–138. doi:10.1080/09644019408414169
McMahon R (2006) The Environmental Protection Agency: structuring motivation in a green bureaucracy: the conflict between regulatory style and cultural identity. Sussex Academic Press, Brighton
Medema W, McIntosh BS, Jeffrey PJ (2008) From premise to practice: a critical assessment of integrated water resources management and adaptive management approaches in the water sector. Ecol Soc 13(2):29
Moran M (2003) The British regulatory state: high modernism and hyper-innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Newig J, Fritsch O (2009) Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level—and effective? Environ Policy Gov 19:197–214. doi:10.1002/eet.509
Newig J, Koontz TM (2013) Multi-level governance, policy implementation and participation: the EU’s mandated participatory planning approach to implementing environmental policy. J Eur Public Policy 21:248–267. doi:10.1080/13501763.2013.834070
Newig J, Adzersen A, Challies E, Fritsch O, Jager N (2012) ECOPAG/EDGE code book. Working paper, 18 Jan 2012
Newig J, Challies E, Jager N, Kochskämper E (2014) What role for public participation in implementing the EU Floods Directive? A comparison with the Water Framework Directive, early evidence from Germany and a research agenda. Environ Policy Gov 24:275–288. doi:10.1002/eet.1650
Nye M, Tapsell S, Twigger-Ross C (2011) New social directions in UK flood risk management: moving towards flood risk citizenship? J Flood Risk Manag 4:288–297. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01114.x
Page B (2003) Has widening participation in decision-making influenced water policy in the UK? Water Policy 5:313–329
Pahl-Wostl C (2007) Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resour Manage 21:49–62. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9040-4
Parker DJ, Sewell WRD (1988) Evolving water institutions in England and Wales: an assessment of two decades of experience. Nat Resourc J 28:751–785
Pierson P (2000) Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Am Polit Sci Rev 94:251–267. doi:10.2307/2586011
Pitkethly AS (1990) Integrated water management in England. In: Mitchell B (ed) Integrated water policy. Belhaven, London, pp 119–147
Porter J, Demeritt D (2012) Flood-risk management, mapping, and planning: the institutional politics of decision support in England. Environ Plan A 44:2359–2378. doi:10.1068/a44660
Rhodes G (1981) Inspectorates in British government: law enforcement and standards of efficiency. Allen & Unwin, London
Rouillard JJ, Heal KV, Ball T, Reeves AD (2013) Policy integration for adaptive water governance: learning from Scotland’s experience. Environ Sci Policy 33:378–387. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.07.003
Rouillard JJ, Benson D, Gain AK (2014) Evaluating IWRM implementation success: are water policies in Bangladesh enhancing adaptive capacity to climate change impacts? Int J Water Resour Dev 30:515–527. doi:10.1080/07900627.2014.910756
Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2005) A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Sci Technol Human Values 30:251–290. doi:10.1177/0162243904271724
Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (1998) Twenty-first report: setting environmental standards. Cm 4053. The Stationery Office, London
Schmidt VA, Radaelli CM (2004) Policy change and discourse in Europe: conceptual and methodological issues. West Eur Polit 27:183–210. doi:10.1080/0140238042000214874
Short C (2015) Micro-level crafting of institutions within integrated catchment management: early lessons of adaptive governance from a catchment-based approach case study in England. Environ Sci Policy 53 Part B:130–138. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.009
Theesfeld I, Schleyer C (2013) Germany’s light version of integrated water resources management. Environ Policy Gov 23:130–144. doi:10.1002/eet.1602
Thelen K (1999) Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annu Rev Polit Sci 2:369–404. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369
Tunstall S, Green C (2003) From listener to talker: the changing social role of the citizen in England and Wales. HarmoniCOP report. Middlesex University
Vogel D (1986) National styles of regulation: environmental policy in Great Britain and the United States. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Weale A (2001) Can we democratize decisions on risk and the environment? Gov Oppos 36:355–378. doi:10.1111/1477-7053.00070
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fritsch, O. Integrated and adaptive water resources management: exploring public participation in the UK. Reg Environ Change 17, 1933–1944 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-0973-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-0973-8