Advertisement

Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 16, Supplement 1, pp 31–41 | Cite as

Effect of human use, season and habitat on ungulate density in Kanha Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh, India

  • Neha Awasthi
  • Ujjwal Kumar
  • Q. Qureshi
  • Anup Pradhan
  • J. S. Chauhan
  • Y. V. Jhala
Original Article

Abstract

Conservation practitioners require strata specific, seasonal species densities for habitat management. Herein, we use stratified distance sampling in Kanha Tiger Reserve (KTR) with 200 spatial transects and an effort of 1200 km walk in the year 2013. Analysis was done to access (a) impact of human use and (b) effect of habitat and season on ungulate densities in KTR. While a single detection function for each species was used for estimating density within human-restricted core and multiple use buffer of KTR, species-specific seasonal detections were modelled for each habitat. Ungulate biomass was 4.8 times higher in the core area compared with the buffer zone. The core supported a herbivore density and biomass of 50 ± 4.80/km2 and 26,806 ± 2573 kg/km2, respectively. Chital were found to be most abundant, having a density of 30.1 ± 4.34/km2 and contributing 33 % of the biomass with a habitat preference for grasslands (106 ± 39/km2) in summer and winter. Sambar had highest density (15.4 ± 3.34/km2) in bamboo-mixed habitat, in both seasons. Gaur contributed 39 % of the ungulate biomass and showed a seasonal shift in density from sal forests (9.65 ± 3.55/km2) in summer to miscellaneous forests (8.13 ± 1.94/km2) in winter. Barasingha were restricted to grasslands with similar summer and winter densities of 1.56 ± 0.76/km2. Chousingha were rare (0.1 ± 0.04/km2), found mostly in miscellaneous forests and plateau grasslands. Grassland and bamboo-mixed forests supported 58 % of the total ungulate biomass. Management for an optimal habitat mosaic that maintains ungulate diversity, addresses the specific needs of endangered species and maximizes ungulate biomass is recommended.

Keywords

Distance sampling Habitat management Habitat mosaic Protected areas Tropical forest Ungulate biomass 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Chief Wildlife Warden of Madhya Pradesh and management of Kanha Tiger Reserve for permissions and logistics for the study. We thank our field assistants Nirottam and Kanhaiya and the team of forest guards for their help in field data collection. We thank former deputy director Kanha, H.S. Mohanta and Research Officer Rakesh Shukla for logistic support and Swati Saini and Ninad Shastri for GIS inputs. This study was funded by National Tiger Conservation Authority, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate change, Government of India. QQ & YVJ conceived the study, NA, UK & AP conducted the field work, JSC, QQ and YVJ provided logistic support and supervised the study, and NA, UK, QQ and YVJ did the data analysis and wrote the paper.

Supplementary material

10113_2016_953_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (6.7 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 6823 kb)

References

  1. Beever DE, Offer N, Gill M (2000) The feeding value of grass and grass products. In: Hopkins A (ed) Grass-its production and utilization, 3rd edn. Blackwell science, Oxford, pp 140–195Google Scholar
  2. Blakesley (1905) Working plan for Banjar valley, Mandla forest division. Central provinces for the period 1904–1932. Central provinces, Forest departmentGoogle Scholar
  3. Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L (2001) Introduction to distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L (2004) Advanced distance sampling. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Byers CR, Steinhorst RK, Krausman PR (1984) Clarification of a technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. J Wildl Manag 48:1050–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Champion HG, Seth SK (1968) A revised survey of forest types of India. Government of India Press, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20(1):37–46. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dinerstein E, Varma K, Wikramanayake E, Lumpkin S (2010) Wildlife Premium Market + REDD: creating a financial incentive for conservation and recovery of endangered species and habitats.www.hevnetwork.org/resources/folder.2006-09-29.6584228415/Wildlife Premium-REDD. pp 272–288 in Biology and Management of the Cervidea. Christen M. Wemmer, ed. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington, D.C. Accessed 24 Nov 2015
  9. Dyke FV (2008) Conservation biology: foundations, concepts, applications. Springer Publications, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Field CB, Behrenfeld MJ, Randerson JT, Falkowski P (1998) Primary production of the biosphere: integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science 281:237–240. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5374.237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gopal R, Sinha PR, Mathur VB, Jhala YV, Qureshi Q (2007) Guidelines for preparation of tiger conservation plan. The National Tiger Conservation Authority, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  12. Hansen AJ, DeFries R (2007) Ecological mechanisms linking protected areas to surrounding lands. Ecol Appl 17:974–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hayward MW, O’Brien J, Kerley GIH (2007) Carrying capacity of large African predators: predictions and tests. Biol Conserv 139:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hofmann RR (1989) Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia 78:443–457. doi: 10.1007/BF00378733 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Imam BARH (1985) Seasonal migrations of gaur (Bos gaurus) (A comparitive study between observations at Gaurimara Wildlife Sanctuary, West Bengal, and Megpal and Bamni in Rairkhol, Orissa). Cheetal 26(3/4):45–48Google Scholar
  16. Ivlev VS (1961) Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes. Yale University Press, New havenGoogle Scholar
  17. Jhala YV, Qureshi Q, Gopal R (2015) The status of tigers in India 2014. National Tiger Conservation Authority, New Delhi and the Wildlife Institute of India, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  18. Kanoje RS (1999) Draft management plan: wetlands of Kanha Tiger Reserve, international course on wetland management 1999. RIZA Wetland Advisory and Training Center, LelystadGoogle Scholar
  19. Kie JG (1999) Optimal foraging and risk of predation: effects on behavior and social structure in ungulates. J Mammal 80:1114–1129. doi: 10.2307/1383163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liese W, Kohl M (2015) Bamboo: the plant and its uses. Tropical forestry. Springer, Basel,  Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-14133-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lillesand T, Kiefer RW, Chipman JW (2004) Remote sensing and image interpretation, 5th edn. International Edition, Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Lopoukhine N, Crawhall N, Dudley N, Figgis P, Karibuhoye C, Laffoley D, Londoño JM, MacKinnon K, Sandwith T (2012) Protected areas: providing natural solutions to 21st Century challenges Vol.5/no 2—IUCN Commissions. S.A.P.I.E.N.S.Google Scholar
  24. Loveridge AJ, Wang S, Frank LG, Seidensticker J (2010) People and wild felids: conservation of cast and management of conflict. In: Macdonald DW, Loveridge AJ (eds) Biology and conservation of wild felids. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 161–195Google Scholar
  25. Melillo JM, McGuire AD, Kicklighter DW, Moore B, Vorosmarty CJ, Schloss AL (1993) Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production. Nature 363:234–240. doi: 10.1038/363234a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Negi HS, Shukla R (2011) Tiger Conservation plan for Kanha Tiger Reserve (2012–2022). Report for Kanha Tiger Reserve Forest Department, Mandla, 376 ppGoogle Scholar
  27. Ogutu JO, Bhola N, Reid R (2005) The effects of pastoralism and protection on the density and distribution of carnivores and their prey in the Mara ecosystem of Kenya. J Zool 265:281–293. doi: 10.1017/S0952836904006302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. OwenSmith N (1994) Foraging responses of kudus to seasonal changes in food resources: elasticity in constraints. Ecology 75:1050–1062. doi: 10.2307/1939429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prins HHT, Loth PE (1988) Rainfall patterns as background to plant phenology in northern Tanzania. J Biogeogr 15:451–463. doi: 10.2307/2845275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pulliam RH, Caraco T (1984) Living in groups: Is there an optimal group size? In: Krebs CJ, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 122–147Google Scholar
  31. Rosenfield GH, Fitzpatrick-Lins K (1986) A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 52:223–227Google Scholar
  32. Schaller GB (1967) The deer and the tiger: a study of wildlife in India. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  33. Schaller GB (1972) The Serengeti lion. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmitt CB, Belokurov A, Besancon C, Boisrobert L, Burgess ND, Campbell A, Coad L, Fish L, Gliddon D, Humphries K, Kapos V, Loucks C, Lysenko I, Miles L, Mills C, Minnemeyer S, Pistorius T, Ravilious C, Steininger M, Winkel G (2008) Global ecological forest classification and forest protected area gap analysis. Analyses and recommendations in view of the 10% target for forest protection under the convention on biological diversity (CBD). University of Freiburg, FreiburgGoogle Scholar
  35. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2008) Protected areas in today’s world: their values and benefits for the welfare of the planet. Montreal, Technical Series no. 36, i–vii, p 96Google Scholar
  36. Steinmetz R, Chutipong W, Seuaturien N, Chirngsaard E, Khaengkhetkarn M (2010) Population recovery patterns of Southeast Asian ungulates after poaching. Biol Conserv 143:42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sutherland WJ (2000) The conservation handbook: research, management and policy. Blackwell Scientific, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thomas L, Buckland ST, Rexstad EA, Laake JL, Strindberg S, Hedley SL, Bishop JRB, Marques TA, Burnham KP (2010) Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. J Appl Ecol 47:5–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01737.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wild life (Protection) Amendment Act (2006) Act number 39 of 2006, Ministry of Law, Justice and Company, New Delhi, India. www.moef.nic.in/sites/default/files/WildLifeAmedmentAct2006%20.pdf
  40. Yeo J, Peek J (1992) Habitat selection by female Sitka black tailed deer in logged forests of south eastern Alaska. J Wildl Manag 56:253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yumnam B, Jhala YV, Qureshi Q, Maldonado JE, Gopal R, Saini S, Srinivas Y, Fleischer RC (2014) Prioritizing tiger conservation through landscape genetics and habitat linkages. PLoS One 9(11):e111207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wildlife Institute of IndiaDehradunIndia
  2. 2.Madhya Pradesh Forest DepartmentKanha Tiger ReserveMandlaIndia

Personalised recommendations