Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Sand dunes management: a comparative analysis of ecological versus economic valuations applied to the Coastal region in Israel

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mobile coastal dunes are of significant ecological importance both globally and locally. Yet a large portion of these dunes are disappearing due to encroachment of local shrubs and exotic plants, resulting in changes of floristic and faunal composition, and an overall decrease in biodiversity of coastal systems. Active management is therefore required to maintain mobile dune presence. This study focuses on economic valuation of coastal dunes in Israel, based on public and professional ecological perspectives. This comparison allows reflection on the suitability of a contingent valuation method (CVM) to assess ecological restoration and conservation projects. The CVM was applied in Nizzanim LTER nature reserve in Israel, and concurrently, data of plant species composition on stabilized and mobile dunes were used to calculate the ecological value index (EVI) of the different dune states. The EVI was then transformed into monetary terms by combining the public valuation and the relative proportion of the various species to the total coverage. The monetary values derived from the general public and the ecological assessment were then compared and used to estimate the expected change in economic value resulting from a state shift from mobile to stabilized dunes. According to the CVM, the total value of the Nizzanim coastal dunes would drop from 344 to 197 million Israeli Shekels (NIS) (1 Shekel = $0.39) if active management does not take place, a reduction of 42 % in value. However, results from the EVI indicate only a 33 % decrease in ecological value (in monetary terms) in the absence of active management. We suggest that in this case, general public perception is strong enough to justify conservation decisions, even though they are not professional ecologists. However, we still recommend the use of both measures for land use decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow KJ, Solow RS, Learner E, Portney P, Rodner R, Schuman H (1993) Report of the NOAA-panel on contingent valuation. Fed Regist 58(10):4601–4614

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar (Kutiel) P (2013) Restoration of coastal sand dunes for conservation of biodiversity—the Israeli experience. In: Gallego-Fernández JB, Hesp PA, Martínez ML (eds) Restoration of coastal dunes. Springer Series on Environmental Management, Berlin, pp 173–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman IJ, Carson RT, Day B, Hanemann M, Hanley N, Hett T, Jones-Lee M, Loomes G, Mourato S, Ozdemiroglu E, Pearce DW, Sugden R, Swanson J (2002) Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: a manual. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop R, Heberlein A (1979) Measuring values of extra market goods: Are indirect measures biased? Am J Agric Econ 61:926–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore L, Doole G, Scilizzi S (2014) Practitioner versus participant perspectives on conservation tenders. Biodivers Conserv 23:2033–2052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs DJ, France J (1980) Landscape evaluation: a comparative study. Environ Manage 10:263–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen O, Bar (Kutiel) P (2005) Effect of invasive alien plant—Acacia saligna—on natural vegetation of coastal sand ecosystems. J Woodl Environ 7:11–17 (Hebrew, with an English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Folke C (1997) Valuing ecosystem services with efficiency, fairness and sustainability as goals. In: Daily G (ed) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 49–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Dachary-Bernard J, Rambonilaza T (2012) Choice experiment, multiple programs contingent valuation and landscape preferences: How can we support the land use decision making process? Land Use Policy 29:846–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delbaere BCW (1998) Facts and figures on European biodiversity; state and trends 1998–1999. European Centre for Nature Conservation, Tilburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Drees JM (ed.) (1997) Coastal dunes, recreation and planning. In: Proceedings of European Seminar, Castricum, November 1995 Publication EUUC Service, the Netherland

  • European Environmental Agency (1999) Coastal and marine zones: environment at the turn of the century, Chapter 3/14. European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP et al (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734):570–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Font AR (2000) Mass tourism and the demand for protected natural areas: a travel cost approach. J Environ Econ Manag 39(1):97–116

  • García-Llorente M, Martín-López B, Nunes PA, González JA, Alcorlo P, Montes C (2011) Analyzing the social factors that influence willingness to pay for invasive alien species management under two different strategies: eradication and prevention. Environ Manage 48(3):418–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gren IM, Svensson L, Carlsson M, Bishop K (2010) Policy design for a multifunctional landscape. Reg Environ Change 10:339–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann WM (1984) Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. Am J Agric Econ 66:332–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann WM (1994) Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. J Econ Perspect 8:19–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley N, Barbier E (2010) Pricing nature, cost-benefit analysis and environmental policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, p 360

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdgate MW (1993) The sustainable use of tourism—a key conservation issue. Ambio 22:481–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin EG, Geoghegan J (2001) Theory, data, methods: developing spatially explicit economic models of land use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 85(1):7–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones N, Koukoulas S, Clark JRA, Evangelinos KI, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Eftihidou MO, Koliou A, Mpalaska M, Papanikolaou S, Stathi G, Tsaliki P (2013) Social capital and citizen perceptions of coastal management for tackling climate change impacts in Greece. Reg Environ Change 14:1083–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke CQ, Zhang D, Wang FQ, Chen SX, Schmullius C, Boerner WM, Wang H (2011) Analyzing coastal wetland change in the Yancheng national nature reserve, China. Reg Environ Change 11(1):161–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koniak G, Noy-Meir E, Perevolotsky A (2009) Estimating multiple benefits from vegetation in Mediterranean ecosystems. Biodivers Conserv 18:3483–3501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutiel P (1998) Annual vegetation of the coastal sand dunes. Isr J Plant Sci 46:287–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutiel P (2001) Conservation and management of the Mediterranean coastal sand dunes in Israel. J Coast Conserv 7:183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutiel P, Danin A (1987) Annual species diversity and above-ground phytomass in relation to some soil properties in a sandy area in the northern Sharon plains. Plant Ecol 70:45–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutiel P, Peled Y, Geffen E (2000) The effect of removing shrub cover on annual plants and small mammals in a coastal sand dune ecosystem. Biol Conserv 94:235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutiel P, Cohen O, Shoshany M, Shub M (2004) Vegetation establishment on the southern Israeli coastal sand dunes between the years 1965–1999. Landsc Ecol Urban Plan 67:141–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin N, Ben-Dor E (2004) Monitoring sand dune stabilization along the coastal dunes of Ashdod-Nizanim, Israel, 1945–1999. J Arid Environ 58:335–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Opdam P (2014) Valuing ecosystem services in community-based landscape planning: introducing a wellbeing-based approach. Landsc Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10980-014-0045-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Marre JB, Brander L, Thebaud O, Boncoeur J, Pascoe S, Coglan L, Pascal N (2015) Non-market use and non-use values for preserving ecosystem services over time: a choice experiment application to coral reef ecosystems in New Caledonia. Ocean Coast Manage 105:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Lopez B, Montes C, Benayas J (2007) Influence of user characteristics on valuation of ecosystem services in Doñana Natural Protected Area (south-west Spain). Environ Conserv 34(03):215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pocewicz A, Nielsen-Pincus M, Goldberg C, Johnson MH, Morgan P, Force JE, Waits LP, Vierling L (2008) Predicting land use change: comparison of models based on landowner surveys and historical land cover trends. Landsc Ecol 23:195–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rambonilaza M, Dachary-Bernard J (2007) Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiment method? Landsc Urban Plan 83(4):318–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein Y, Groner E, Yizhaq H, Svoray T, Bar P (2013) An eco-spatial index for evaluating stabilization state of sand dunes. Aeolian Res 9:75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silberman J, Gerlowski DA, Williams NA (1992) Estimating existence value for users and nonusers of New Jersey beaches. Land Econ 68:225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spash C, Stagl S, Getzner M (2005) Exploring alternatives for environmental valuation. Routledge, Oxon

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurgeoon J (1998) The socio-economic costs and benefits of coastal habitat rehabilitation and creation. Mar Pollut Bull 37:373–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoar H, Blumberg DAN (2002) Formation of parabolic dunes from barchan and transverse dunes along Israel’s Mediterranean coast. Earth Surf Proc Landf 27(11):1147–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meulen F, Salman AHPM (1996) Management of Mediterranean coastal dunes. Ocean Coast Manage 30:177–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg PH, Schot PP, Dijst MJ, Veldkamp A (2004) Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities. GeoJournal 61(4):309–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography and Environmental Development, University of Ben-Gurion, Beer-Sheva, 84115, Israel

    Pua Bar & Meira Segev

  2. Department of Economics and Management, Tel-Hai College, Upper Galilee, 12210, Israel

    Nir Becker

Authors
  1. Pua Bar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nir Becker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Meira Segev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nir Becker.

Additional information

Editor: Wolfgang Cramer.

Authors are listed alphabetically. Senior authorship is equally shared.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 20 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 22 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bar, P., Becker, N. & Segev, M. Sand dunes management: a comparative analysis of ecological versus economic valuations applied to the Coastal region in Israel. Reg Environ Change 16, 941–950 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0808-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0808-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation