Frontiers of solution-oriented adaptation research
- 410 Downloads
Adaptation is heterogeneous and relevant for a range of sectors and levels of decision-making. As adaptation moves up the policy agenda, solution-oriented adaptation research requires addressing questions that are salient to stakeholders and decision-makers at various scales and involves applying a wide range of different methods. Yet while solution-oriented adaptation research is being increasingly undertaken, there is to date a lack of synthesis of these experiences in the literature. In this paper, we aim to address this gap by synthesising findings in nine cases from the MEDIATION project (Methodology for Effective Decision-making on Impacts and AdaptaTION), an EC-funded solution-oriented adaptation research project. We do so by, first, describing methods applied for solution-oriented research in Europe and sequences of methods carried out in individual cases. Second, we assess strengths and weaknesses of individual methods in given empirical situations. Third, we analyse patterns observed in the sequences of methods and reflect on their implications for adaptation research. A strength of our approach is that detailed data on choices of research questions and methods were collected through in-depth and iterative interaction with the case study teams. We find that there is no standard recipe for adaptation; that even though social science methods are often indicated, they are often not applied; and that robust decision-making methods, while available, are often constrained because of their resource intensity. Reflecting on the implications of these findings, we argue that greater flexibility and transdisciplinarity are needed in adaptation research and that social science methods should be further supported. Finally, we find that stakeholder engagement is not a panacea and that engagement requires a more differentiated understanding of stakeholders and careful design in order to be effective.
KeywordsAdaptation Climate change Robust decision-making Institutions Impact assessment Social science Europe
This research has received funding from the European Commission’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant agreement No. 244012. We thank two anonymous reviews for comments on previous versions of this paper. The work would not have been possible without the constructive inputs of all members of the MEDIATION project team.
- ADB (2013) Climate change and rural communities in the greater Mekong subregion: a framework for assessing vulnerability and adaptation options. Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong CityGoogle Scholar
- Ahmed M, Suphachalasai S (2014) Assessing the costs of climate change and adaptation in South Asia. Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong CityGoogle Scholar
- Bisaro A, van Ierland E, Zhu X, Khovanskaia M, Hinkel J (2013) Identifying public adaptation challenges in Serbian agriculture: comparing insights from institutional and decision analysis. MEDIATION Deliverable 4.5: Integrated methodology for vulnerability, impacts and adaptation. http://mediationproject.eu/output/downloads/d4.5_final-with-appendix.pdf
- Bours D, McGinn C, Pringle P (2014) Monitoring & evaluation for climate change adaptation and resilience: A synthesis of tools, frameworks and approaches, 2nd edn. SEA Change CoP and UKCIP, Phnom Penh and OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Hartmann DL, Klein AMG, Rusticucci TM, Alexander LV, Brönnimann S, Charabi Y, Dentener FJ, Dlugokencky EJ, Easterling DR, Kaplan A, Soden BJ, Thorne PW, Wild M, Zhai PM (2013) Observations: Atmosphere and Surface. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, New York, NY, USA. doi: 10.1017/cbo9781107415324.009
- Hofmann M, Hinkel J, Wrobel M (2011) Classifying knowledge on climate change impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability in Europe for informing adaptation research and decision-making: a conceptual meta-analysis. Glob Environ Change 21:1106–1116. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- IPCC (2014) Summary for policymakers. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea MD, White LL (eds) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp 1–32. doi: 10.1017/cbo9781107415379.003
- Trombi G, Moriondo M, Bindi M (2013) Turning points in wine production in Tuscany, Italy. MEDIATION Deliverable 3.2: Adaptation turning points: Identification of impact thresholds, key risk factors and potential adaptive responses. Available at: http://mediation-project.eu/output/downloads/D2.3-turningpoints.pdf
- UKCIP (2010) A changing climate for business. UK Climate Impacts Programme, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Watkiss P, Hunt A, Blyth W (2013) Real options analysis: decision support methods for adaptation. MEDIATION Project Policy Brief. Available online http://www.mediation-project.eu/platform/pbs/home.html
- Werners S, van Loon J, Oost A (2014) Application of the diagnostic framework to adaptation decision-making in the Delta Programme for the Dutch Wadden Sea region. Regional Environmental Change Special Issue: Approaches for problem-oriented adaptation research: in reviewGoogle Scholar