Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 1601–1613 | Cite as

Policy diffusion in arid Basin water management: a Q method approach in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia

  • Amanda H. Lynch
  • Carolina E. Adler
  • Nicholas C. Howard
Original Article

Abstract

The Murray–Darling Basin is Australia’s national food bowl, home to almost half of the national income from food production, as well as internationally significant wetlands, iconic red gum forests, endangered flora and fauna, and approximately 40 autonomous indigenous nations. Persistent severe drought and extreme flooding episodes have presented new challenges in the region. Chief among these challenges is the establishment of a legitimate framework to sustainably manage water resources that finds common ground between environmental, indigenous and commercial interests. A powerful approach to examine these processes is through the theory of diffusion and adaptation of policy innovations. Here, we describe an approach to place this theory on empirical ground using Q methodology. We elucidate patterns of subjectivity, to explore the perceptions of expert advice, subsidiarity and local knowledge to better understand the interests in play. We find that respect is held for local practitioners (water managers and farmers) and indigenous knowledge, but while policy innovations are being generated, the diffusion of policy is contested. We identify the potential, though limited, for common ground through substantive and respectful consultation.

Keywords

Policy diffusion Water Governance Climate change Q methodology Murray–Darling Basin 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work could not have been possible without the contributions from Lee Joachim, Jackie Walker, Kate Auty and Gordana Marin. In addition, the importance of the participation, support and interest of the Yorta Yorta Elders Council cannot be overestimated. We appreciate the technical mastery of Stephan Adler. This work has been supported by Brown University. Finally, the views expressed are those of the authors and do not represent those of The World Bank Group or its Board of Directors.

References

  1. ABC (2007) Transcript from ABC AM National News Radio Program, 3rd Sept 2007, accessed online 17th Dec 2012 from http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2007/s2022053.htm
  2. ABC (2012) Transcript from ABC “The world today” news radio program, broadcast on 26th Oct 2012, accessed online 20th Dec 2012 from http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2012/s3619160.htm
  3. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl 10:1251–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernauer T, Böhmelt T, Buhaug H, Gleditsch NP, Tribaldos T (2012) Demand, supply, and restraint: determinants of domestic water conflict and cooperation, Berlin conference on the human dimensions of global environmental change: evidence for sustainable development. 5–6 Oct 2012, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown SR (1980) Political subjectivity: applications of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  6. Brunner RD, Lynch AH (2010) Adaptive governance and climate change. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CECA (2011) Genocidalists impose water restrictions on food producers during flood, Media release accessed online 17th Dec 2012 http://cecaust.com.au/main.asp?sub=releases&id=2011_01_07_Block_Farmers.html
  8. Clark TW (2002) The policy process: a practical guide for natural resource professionals. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark DA, Lee DS, Freeman MMR, Clark SG (2008) Polar bear conservation in Canada: denning the policy problems. Arctic 61:347–360Google Scholar
  10. Cui BS, Yang QC, Yang ZF, Zhang K (2009) Evaluating the ecological performance of wetland restoration in the Yellow River Delta, China. Ecol Eng 35:1090–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fredriksson PG, Wollshcied JR (2011) Environmental decentralization and political centralization, environmental federalism: the political economy of the design of local taxation and environmental protection. 9–10 December 2011. Universita Politecnica Delle Marche, AnconaGoogle Scholar
  12. Grafton RQ, Pittock J, Davis R, Williams J, Fu G, Warburton M, Udall B, McKenzie R, Yu X, Che N, Connell D, Jiang Q, Kompas T, Lynch A, Norris R, Possingham H, Quiggin J (2012) Global insights into water resources, climate change and governance. Nat Clim Change. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1746 Google Scholar
  13. Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hobson K, Niemeyer S (2011) Public responses to climate change: the role of deliberation in building capacity for adaptive action. Glob Environ Change 21:957–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hogan A (2010) A comparison of offline and online Q factors, International Society for the Scientific Study of Subjectivity (ISSSS) 26th Annual Q Conference, Akron, OH, USAGoogle Scholar
  16. Humphries P (2007) Historical indigenous use of aquatic resources in Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin, and its implications for river management. Ecol Manag Restor 8:106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jordan A, Jeppesen T (2000) EU Environmental policy: adapting to the principle of subsidiarity? European Environ 10:64–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Karl HA, Susskind LE, Wallace KH (2007) A dialogue, not a diatribe: effective integration of science and policy through joint fact finding. Environ Polit 49:20–34Google Scholar
  19. La Nauze J (2009a) Victoria’s new red gum national parks and the development of aboriginal co-management policy. Interaction 37:18–20Google Scholar
  20. La Nauze J (2009b) Victorian red gum forests: an historic victory. Chain React 105:19–21Google Scholar
  21. Lasswell HD (1971) A pre-view of policy sciences. Elsevier, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. Lasswell H, Kaplan A (1950) Power and society. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  23. LMDCMA (2006) Lower murray darling catchment action plan. Lower Murray Darling Catchment Management Authority, BurongaGoogle Scholar
  24. Lorenzoni I, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Glob Environ Change 17:445–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lynch AH, Brunner RD (2010) Learning from climate variability: adaptive governance and the Pacific ENSO applications center. Weather Clim Soc 2:311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lynch A, Griggs D, Joachim L, Walker J (2012) The role of the Yorta Yorta people in clarifying the common interest in sustainable management of the Murray–Darling Basin. Policy Sciences Online first, Australia. doi:10.1007/s11077-012-9164-8 Google Scholar
  27. McLaughlin C, Krantzberg G (2012) An appraisal of management pathologies in the Great Lakes. Sci Total Environ 416:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MCMA (2007) Catchment action plan. Murray Catchment Management Authority, DeniliquinGoogle Scholar
  29. MDBA (2012) Basin Plan 2012. Accessed online on 20 Dec 2012 at http://download.mdba.gov.au/Basin-Plan/Basin-Plan-Nov2012.pdf, in: Murray–Darling Basin Authority (Ed.). Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra
  30. National Research Council (2007) Colorado River Basin water management: evaluating and adjusting to hydroclimatic variability. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. Niemeyer S, Petts J, Hobson K (2005) Rapid climate change and society: assessing responses and thresholds. Risk Anal 25:1443–1456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. NSW Government (2003) Catchment management authorities Act 2003. NSW Government (Ed.), SydneyGoogle Scholar
  33. Ockwell D (2008) ‘Opening up’ policy to reflexive appraisal: a role for Q Methodology? A case study of fire management in Cape York, Australia. Policy Sci 41:263–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raadgever GT, Mostert E, van de Giesen NC (2008) Measuring perspectives on future flood management on the Rhine: application and discussion of Q methodology. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Dis 5:437–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reber BH, Kaufman SE, Cropp F (2000) Assessing Q-assessor: a validation study of computer-based Q sorts versus paper sorts. Operant Subj 23:192–209Google Scholar
  36. Rodriguez-Piñeros S, Focht W, Lewis D, Montgomery D (2012) Incorporating values into community-scale sustainable forest management plans: an application of Q methodology. Small-Scale Forestry 11:167–183. doi:10.1007/s11842-011-9182-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations, 4th edn. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Roy ED, Martin JF, Irwin EG, Conroy JD, Culver DA (2011) Living within dynamic social-ecological freshwater systems: system parameters and the role of ecological engineering. Ecol Eng 37:1661–1677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scheffran J, Brzoska M, Kominek J, Link PM, Schilling J (2012) Climate change and violent conflict. Science 336:869–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sigman H (2007) Decentralization and environmental quality: an international analysis of water pollution. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 13098Google Scholar
  41. Sinn H-W (1994) How much Europe? Subsidiarity, centralization and fiscal competition. Scott J Polit Econ 41:85–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stephenson W (1935a) Correlating persons instead of tests. J Pers 4:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stephenson W (1935b) Technique of factor analysis. Nature 136:297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Strebel F, Widmer T (2012) Visibility and facticity in policy diffusion: going beyond the prevailing binarity. Policy Sci 45:385–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tonn BE, Zambrano P, Moore S (2001) Community networks or networked communities? Soc Sci Comput Rev 19:201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van Exel J, de Graaf G (2005) Q methodology: a sneak preview. http://qmethod.org/articles/QmethodologyASneakPreviewReferenceUpdate.pdf
  47. Vidot A, (2012) Murray–Darling Basin Plan signed into law at last—22 November 2012, ABC Rural. Accessed online on 20th Dec 2012 at http://www.abc.net.au/rural/news/content/201211/s3638832.htm
  48. Watts S, Stenner P (2012) Doing Q methodological research: theory, method and interpretation. Sage Publications Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Wenger EC (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wenger EC, Snyder WM (2000) Communities of practice: the organizational frontier. Harvard Business School 78:139–145Google Scholar
  51. Whitworth KL, Baldwin DS, Kerr JL (2012) Drought, floods and water quality: drivers of a severe hypoxic blackwater event in a major river system (the southern Murray–Darling Basin, Australia). J Hydrol 450–451:190–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wolf J, Brown K, Conway D (2009) Ecological citizenship and climate change: perceptions and practice. Environ Polit 18:503–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amanda H. Lynch
    • 1
  • Carolina E. Adler
    • 2
  • Nicholas C. Howard
    • 3
  1. 1.Environmental Change InitiativeBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Environmental DecisionsETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  3. 3.World Bank InstituteWorld Bank GroupWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations