Advertisement

Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 529–538 | Cite as

Sustainability principles put into practice: case studies of network analysis in Swiss climate change adaptation

  • Karin IngoldEmail author
  • Jörg Balsiger
Original Article

Abstract

Climate adaptation policies increasingly incorporate sustainability principles into their design and implementation. Since successful adaptation by means of adaptive capacity is recognized as being dependent upon progress toward sustainable development, policy design is increasingly characterized by the inclusion of state and non-state actors (horizontal actor integration), cross-sectoral collaboration, and inter-generational planning perspectives. Comparing four case studies in Swiss mountain regions, three located in the Upper Rhone region and one case from western Switzerland, we investigate how sustainability is put into practice. We argue that collaboration networks and sustainability perceptions matter when assessing the implementation of sustainability in local climate change adaptation. In other words, we suggest that adaptation is successful where sustainability perceptions translate into cross-sectoral integration and collaboration on the ground. Data about perceptions and network relations are assessed through surveys and treated via cluster and social network analysis.

Keywords

Climate change adaptation Sustainability Local communities Social network analysis 

Supplementary material

10113_2013_575_MOESM1_ESM.docx (33 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 33 kb)

References

  1. Adger WN (2003) Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Econ Geogr 79(4):387–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler PS, Kwon SW (2002) Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Acad Manag Rev 27(1):17–40Google Scholar
  3. Beniston M (2004) Climatic change and its impacts - an overview focusing on Switzerland. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordecht/Boston/LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolleyer N, Börzel T (2010) Non-hierarchical policy coordination in multilevel systems. Eur Polit Sci Rev 2(2):157–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coleman JS (1990) Foundation of social theory. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Crona BI, Bodin Ö (2006) What you know is who you know? Patterns of communication as prerequisites for co-management. Ecol Soc 11(2):7. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art7/. Accessed 6 May 2013Google Scholar
  7. Davies AR (2005) Local action for climate change: transnational networks and the Irish experience. Local Environ 10(1):21–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eakin H, Lemos MC (2010) Institutions and change: the challenge of building adaptive capacity in Latin America. Glob Environ Chang 20:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. FOEN (2009) Pärke von nationaler Bedeutung: Produktelabel. Richtlinie zur Verleihung und Verwendung des Produktelabels. Federal Office for the Environment, Bern, CHGoogle Scholar
  10. Gavazov KS, Peringer A, Buttler A, Gillet F, Spiegelberger T (2013) Dynamics of forage production in pasture-woodlands of the Swiss Jura Mountains under projected climate change scenarios. Ecol Soc 18:38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gehrlein U (2004) Nachhaltigkeitsindikatoren zur Steuerung kommunaler Entwicklung. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, WiesbadenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamdouch A, Zuindeau B (2010) Sustainable development, 20 years on: methodological innovations, practices and open issues. J Environ Plan Manag 53:427–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanneman RA, Riddle M (2005) Introduction to social network methods. University of California, Riverside, RiversideGoogle Scholar
  14. Hartmuth G, Huber K, Rink D (2008) Operationalization and contextualization of sustainability at the local level. Sustain Dev 16:261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ingold K, Balsiger J, Hirschi C (2010) Climate change in mountain regions: how local communities adapt to extreme events. Local Environ 15(7):651–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC (2001) IPCC third assessment report—Climate change 2001: Working Group II: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://www.grida.no/publications/other/ipcc_tar/. Accessed 22 Apr 2013
  17. IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers, contribution of Working Group I. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York. http://www.ipcc.ch. Accessed 22 Apr 2013
  18. Jänicke M, Jörgens H (2006) New approaches to environmental governance. In: Jänicke M, Jacob K (eds) Environmental governance in global perspective. New approaches to ecological modernisation. Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Political and Social Sciences, Berlin, pp 167–209Google Scholar
  19. Kenis P, Schneider V (1991) Policy networks and policy analysis: scrutinizing a new analytical toolbox. In: Marin B, Mayntz R (eds) Policy networks: empirical evidence and theoretical considerations. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 25–59Google Scholar
  20. Khailani D, Perera R (2013) Mainstreaming disaster resilience attributes in local development plans for the adaptation to climate change induced flooding: a study based on the local plan of Shah Alam City, Malaysia. Land Use Policy 30(1):615–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Knoepfel P, Nahrath S, Savary J, Varone F (2009) Analyse des politiques publiques de l’environnement. Editions Rüegger, Zürich/ChurGoogle Scholar
  22. Knoke D, Pappi FU, Broadbent J, Tsujinaka Y (1996) Comparing policy networks: labour politics in the US, Germany and Japan. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koontz T (1999) Citizen participation: conflicting interests in state and national agency policy making. Soc Sci J 36(3):441–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Laumann EO, Knoke D (1987) The organizational state: social choice in national policy domains. University of Wisconsin Press, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  25. Layard A (2001) Introduction: sustainable development—principles and practice. In: Layard A, Davoudi S, Batty S (eds) Planning for a sustainable future. Spon Press, London, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  26. Lubell M, Fulton A (2007) Local policy networks and agricultural watershed management. J Publ Adm Res Theor 18(4):673–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Newig J, Fritsch O (2009) Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level—and effective? Env Pol Gov 19:197–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Newman L, Dale A (2007) Homophily and agency: creating effective sustainable development networks. Environ Dev Sustain 9(1):79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nohrstedt D, Ingold K (2011) Venue access and policy conflict: belief system alignment in Swiss and Swedish energy policy subsystems. In: Presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Conference, section 50: public policy, March 30–April 3 2011, Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
  30. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parris TM, Kates RW (2003) Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annu Rev Environ Resour 28:559–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pelling M, High C (2005) Understanding adaptation: what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? Glob Environ Chang 15(4):308–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pelling M, High C, Dearing J, Smith D (2008) Shadow spaces for social learning: a relational understanding of adaptive capacity to climate change within organisations. Environ Plan A 40(4):867–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Prell C, Hubacek K, Reed M (2009) Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 22(6):501–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scott J (2000) Social network analysis. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Smit B, Pilifosova O (2001) Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity. In: McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, contribution of Working Group II to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 877–912Google Scholar
  37. Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16:282–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Torenvlied R, Thomson R (2003) Is implementation distinct from political bargaining? Ration Soc 15:64–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wall E, Marzall K (2006) Adaptive capacity for climate change in Canadian rural communities. Local Environ 11(4):373–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weible CM, Sabatier PA (2005) Comparing policy networks: marine protected areas in California. Policy Stud J 33(2):181–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wenger E (2000) Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization 7(2):225–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilson E (2006) Adapting to climate change at the local level: the spatial planning response. Local Environ 11(6):609–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Political Science and Oeschger Center for Climate Change ResearchUniversity of BerneBernSwitzerland
  2. 2.EAWAGDübendorfSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Geography and EnvironmentUniversity of GenevaGenèveSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations